Insights into low-cost pm sensors using size-resolved scattering intensity of cooking aerosols in a test house

References

• Boedicker, E. K., E. W. Emerson, G. R. McMeeking, S. Patel, M. E. Vance, and D. K. Farmer. 2021. Fates and spatial variations of accumulation mode particles in a multi-zone indoor environment during the HOMEChem campaign. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 23 (7):1029–39. doi: 10.1039/D1EM00087J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren, C. F., and D. R. Huffman. 1983. Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bulot, F. M. J., S. J. Johnston, P. J. Basford, N. H. C. Easton, M. Apetroaie-Cristea, G. L. Foster, A. K. R. Morris, S. J. Cox, and M. Loxham. 2019. Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment. Sci. Rep. 9 (1):7497. 2019 9:1 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonanno, G., F. C. Fuoco, L. Morawska, and L. Stabile. 2013. Airborne particle concentrations at schools measured at different spatial scales. Atmos Environ 67:38–45. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, D., S. M. Alam El Din, J. Pulczinski, J. N. Mihalic, R. Chen, J. Bressler, A. M. Rule, and G. Ramachandran. 2022. Assessing variability of aerosols generated from e-cigarettes. Inhal. Toxicol. 34 (3–4):90–8. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2022.2044414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, P. F., J. G. Slowik, D. R. Worsnop, P. Davidovits, and J. L. Jimenez. 2004. Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: theory. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38 (12):1185–205. doi: 10.1080/027868290903907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sharkawy, M., and M. Noweir. 2014. Indoor air quality levels in a University Hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. J. Family Community Med. 21 (1):39–47. doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.128778.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farmer, D. K., M. E. Vance, J. P. D. Abbatt, A. Abeleira, M. R. Alves, C. Arata, E. Boedicker, S. Bourne, F. Cardoso-Saldaña, R. Corsi, et al. 2019. Overview of HOMEChem: house observations of microbial and environmental chemistry. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 21 (8):1280–300. doi: 10.1039/C9EM00228F.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, M. R., C. Malings, S. N. Pandis, A. A. Presto, V. F. McNeill, D. M. Westervelt, M. Beekmann, and R. Subramanian. 2021. From low-cost sensors to high-quality data: a summary of challenges and best practices for effectively calibrating low-cost particulate matter mass sensors. J Aerosol Sci 158:105833. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, D. H., and J. H. Kroll. 2020. Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13 (11):6343–55. doi: 10.5194/AMT-13-6343-2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, M., N. Kuerbanjiang, and S. Dhaniyala. 2019. Performance characteristics of the low-cost Plantower PMS optical sensor. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 54 (2):232–41. (2):232–241. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2019.169601554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W. C. 1999. Aerosol technology : properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Karagulian, F., M. Barbiere, A. Kotsev, L. Spinelle, M. Gerboles, F. Lagler, N. Redon, S. Crunaire, and A. Borowiak. 2019. Review of the performance of low-cost sensors for air quality monitoring. Atmosphere 10 (9):506. doi: 10.3390/atmos10090506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E. F., H. Guo, P. Campuzano-Jost, D. A. Day, W. L. Brown, E. Boedicker, M. Pothier, D. M. Lunderberg, S. Patel, K. Patel, et al. 2021. Quantification of cooking organic aerosol in the indoor environment using aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometers. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55 (10):1099–114. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1931013/SUPPL_FILE/UAST_A_1931013_SM0233.PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlystov, A., C. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis. 2004. An algorithm for combining electrical mobility and aerodynamic size distributions data when measuring ambient aerosol. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 38 (sup1):229–38. doi: 10.1080/02786820390229543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. Y., Y. S. Kim, Y. M. Roh, C. M. Lee, and C. N. Kim. 2008. Spatial distribution of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) in Seoul Metropolitan Subway stations. J. Hazard. Mater. 154 (1-3):440–3. doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2007.10.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepeis, N. E., W. C. Nelson, W. R. Ott, J. P. Robinson, A. M. Tsang, P. Switzer, J. V. Behar, S. C. Hern, and W. H. Engelmann. 2001. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001 11:3 11 (3):231–52. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuula, J., T. Mäkelä, M. Aurela, K. Teinilä, S. Varjonen, Ó. González, and H. Timonen. 2020. Laboratory evaluation of particle-size selectivity of optical low-cost particulate matter sensors. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13 (5):2413–23. doi: 10.5194/amt-13-2413-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, A. C. K., and Y. W. Ho. 2008. Spatial concentration variation of cooking-emitted particles in a residential kitchen. Build Environ 43 (5):871–6. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskin, A., J. Laskin, and S. A. Nizkorodov. 2015. Chemistry of atmospheric brown carbon. Chem. Rev. 115 (10):4335–82. doi: 10.1021/CR5006167/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/CR-2014-006167_0004.JPEG.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laven, P. 2011. A computer program for scattering of light from a sphere using Mie theory & the Debye series. Accessed December 16, 2023. https://www.philiplaven.com/mieplot.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., J. Kang, S. Kim, Y. Im, S. Yoo, and D. Lee. 2020. Long-term evaluation and calibration of low-cost particulate matter (PM) sensor. Sensors 20 (13):3617. doi: 10.3390/S20133617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy Zamora, M., F. Xiong, D. Gentner, B. Kerkez, J. Kohrman-Glaser, and K. Koehler. 2019. Field and laboratory evaluations of the low-cost plantower particulate matter sensor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (2):838–49. doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.8B05174/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/ES-2018-05174V_0007.JPEG.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and P. Biswas. 2017. Optical characterization studies of a low-cost particle sensor. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 17 (7):1691–704. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.02.0085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., H. Li, Y. Ma, Y. Wang, A. A. Abokifa, C. Lu, and P. Biswas. 2018. Spatiotemporal distribution of indoor particulate matter concentration with a low-cost sensor network. Build Environ 127:138–47. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., S. K. Mattewal, S. Patel, and P. Biswas. 2020a. Evaluation of nine low-cost-sensor-based particulate matter monitors. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20 (2):254–70. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0485.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., S. K. Mattewal, S. Patel, and P. Biswas. 2020b. Evaluation of nine low-cost-sensor-based particulate matter monitors. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20 (2):254–70. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, D., Q. Zhang, J. Jiang, and D. R. Chen. 2017. Performance calibration of low-cost and portable particular matter (PM) sensors. J Aerosol Sci 112:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masic, A., D. Bibic, B. Pikula, A. Blazevic, J. Huremovic, and S. Zero. 2020. Evaluation of optical particulate matter sensors under realistic conditions of strong and mild urban pollution. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13 (12):6427–43. doi: 10.5194/amt-13-6427-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, H., P. Han, Y. Wang, N. Zeng, D. Liu, Q. Cai, Z. Deng, Y. Wang, Y. Pan, and X. Tang. 2020. Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in Beijing. Sensors 20 (16):4381. doi: 10.3390/S20164381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, W. E. K. 1963. Vision through the Atmosphere, 206. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• molina Rueda, E., E. Carter, C. L'Orange, C. Quinn, and J. Volckens. 2023. Size-resolved field performance of low-cost sensors for particulate matter air pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 10 (3):247–53. doi: 10.1021/ACS.ESTLETT.3C00030/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/EZ3C00030_0002.JPEG.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimette, J., W. P. Arnott, P. Laven, R. Whitwell, N. Radhakrishnan, S. Dhaniyala, M. Sandink, J. Tryner, J. Volckens, W. Patrick Arnott, et al. 2023. Fundamentals of low-cost aerosol sensor design and operation. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 58 (1):1–15. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2023.2285935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouimette, J. R., W. C. Malm, B. A. Schichtel, P. J. Sheridan, E. Andrews, J. A. Ogren, and W. P. Arnott. 2022. Evaluating the PurpleAir monitor as an aerosol light scattering instrument. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15 (3):655–76. doi: 10.5194/amt-15-655-2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyola, P., S. Carbone, H. Timonen, M. Torkmahalleh, and J. Lindén. 2022. Editorial: rise of low-cost sensors and citizen science in air quality studies. Front. Environ. Sci. 10:868543. doi: 10.3389/FENVS.2022.868543/BIBTEX.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., J. Li, A. Pandey, S. Pervez, R. K. Chakrabarty, and P. Biswas. 2017. Spatio-temporal measurement of indoor particulate matter concentrations using a wireless network of low-cost sensors in households using solid fuels. Environ. Res. 152:59–65. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVRES.2016.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., S. Sankhyan, E. K. Boedicker, P. F. Decarlo, D. K. Farmer, A. H. Goldstein, E. F. Katz, W. W. Nazaroff, Y. Tian, J. Vanhanen, et al. 2020. Indoor particulate matter during HOMEChem: concentrations, size distributions, and exposures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (12):7107–16. doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.0C00740/SUPPL_FILE/ES0C00740_LIVESLIDES.MP4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavel, M. R. S., S. U. Zaman, S. Paul, P. Zaman, and A. Salam. 2023. Light absorption properties of black carbon and brown carbon emitted from biomass combustion at the typical rural cooking stoves in Bangladesh. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 16 (4):719–32. 2023 16:4 doi: 10.1007/s11869-023-01302-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rada, E. C., J. Saffell, and S. Nehr. 2023. Improving indoor air quality through standardization. Standards 3 (3):240–67. doi: 10.3390/standards3030019.
   Google Scholar
• S. Ensor, D., and A. P. Waggoner. 1970. Angular truncation error in the integrating nephelometer. Atmospheric Environment (1967) 4 (5):481–7. doi: 10.1016/0004-6981(70)90018-1.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu, V., and B. R. Gurjar. 2019. Spatio-temporal variations of indoor air quality in a university library. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 31 (5):475–490. 490. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1668916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankhyan, S., S. Patel, E. F. Katz, P. F. Decarlo, D. K. Farmer, W. W. Nazaroff, and M. E. Vance. 2021. Indoor black carbon and brown carbon concentrations from cooking and outdoor penetration: insights from the HOMEChem study. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 23 (10):1476–87. doi: 10.1039/D1EM00283J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankhyan, S., J. K. Witteman, S. Coyan, S. Patel, and M. E. Vance. 2022. Assessment of PM 2.5 concentrations, transport, and mitigation in indoor environments using low-cost air quality monitors and a portable air cleaner. Environ. Sci: Atmos. 2 (4):647–58. doi: 10.1039/D2EA00025C.
   Google Scholar
• Sayahi, T., D. Kaufman, T. Becnel, K. Kaur, A. E. Butterfield, S. Collingwood, Y. Zhang, P. E. Gaillardon, and K. E. Kelly. 2019. Development of a calibration chamber to evaluate the performance of low-cost particulate matter sensors. Environ. Pollut. 255 (Pt 1):113131. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2019.113131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sousan, S., K. Koehler, G. Thomas, J. H. Park, M. Hillman, A. Halterman, and T. M. Peters. 2016. Inter-comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50 (5):462–73. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2016.1162901/SUPPL_FILE/UAST_A_1162901_SM9028.DOCX.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanaway, J. D., A. Afshin, E. Gakidou, S. S. Lim, D. Abate, K. H. Abate, C. Abbafati, N. Abbasi, H. Abbastabar, F. Abd-Allah, et al. 2018. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries andterritories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet 392 (10159):1923–94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, A. K., and S. Patel. 2023. Indoor air quality in Urban India: current status, research gap, and the way forward. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 10 (12):1146–58. doi: 10.1021/ACS.ESTLETT.3C00636/SUPPL_FILE/EZ3C00636_SI_001.PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling, Ruiter, Blokhuis, Drukker, Weijers, Volten, Vonk, Gast, Voogt, Zandveld, van Ratingen. 2019. Development and implementation of a platform for public information on air quality, sensor measurements, and citizen science. Atmosphere 10 (8):445. doi: 10.3390/atmos10080445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, T., M. H. Bergin, K. K. Johnson, S. N. Tripathi, S. Shirodkar, M. S. Landis, R. Sutaria, and D. E. Carlson. 2018. Field evaluation of low-cost particulate matter sensors in high-and low-concentration environments. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11 (8):4823–46. doi: 10.5194/amt-11-4823-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., J. D. Clark, and A. A. May. 2021. Laboratory evaluation of the effects of particle size and composition on the performance of integrated devices containing Plantower particle sensors. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55 (7):848–58. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1905148/SUPPL_FILE/UAST_A_1905148_SM7876.PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar