Technological Change and Productivity Growth in Livestock Systems: Denmark, New Zealand and Uruguay (1870–1970)

References

• Álvarez, J. (2008). Instituciones, cambio tecnológico y distribución del ingreso: una comparación del desempeño económico de Nueva Zelanda y Uruguay (1870-1940). FCS.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J. (2014). Instituciones, cambio tecnológico y productividad en los sistemas agrarios de Nueva Zelanda y Uruguay. Patrones y trayectorias de largo plazo (1870-2010). PhD thesis. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of the Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J. (2018). Technological change and productivity growth in the Agrarian systems of New Zealand and Uruguay (1870–2010), pages 467–492. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J. (2020). Desempeño relativo de la productividad física de la ganadería de Nueva Zelanda y Uruguay, 1870-2010. Historia Agraria. Revista de Agricultura e Historia Rural, 80(Abril), 107–144. https://doi.org/10.26882/histagrar.080e06a
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J. (2021). Economía del conocimiento o especialización primario-exportadora: el dilema de Uruguay y Nueva Zelanda. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3993977
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J., & Bértola, L. (2013). So similar, so different: New Zealand and Uruguay in the world economy. In C. Lloyd, J. Metzer, & R. Sutch (Eds.), Settler Economies in World History, chapter 17 (pp. 493–520). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J., Bértola, L., & Bohlin, J.. (2022). Foreign trade and economic growth in the nordic countries, Australasia and the Rio de la Plata Region, 1870–1970. In J. Álvarez & S. Prado (Eds.), Scandinavia and South America. A tale of two capitalism: Comparative developments in trade, industrialisation and inequality since 1850 (pp. 91–125). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09198-8_4
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J., Bilancini, E., D’Alessandro, S., & Porcile, G. (2011). Agricultural institutions, industrialization and growth: The case of New Zealand and Uruguay in 1870–1940. Explorations in Economic History, 48(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J., & Bortagaray, I. (2007). El marco institucional de la innovación agropecuario en Nueva Zelanda y Uruguay en el largo plazo. In J. Álvarez, L. Bértola, & G. Porcile (Eds.), Primos Ricos y Empobrecidos. Crecimiento, distribución del ingreso e instituciones en Australia-Nueva Zelanda vs Argentina-Uruguay (pp. 233–272). Fin de Siglo.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J., & Menéndez, M. (2022). Land-ownership systems and agrarian income distribution in Denmark, New Zealand and Uruguay during the first globalization era and beyond. In J. Álvarez & S. Prado (Eds.), Scandinavia and South America—A tale of two capitalisms (pp. 211–244). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09198-8_7
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, J., & Prado, S. (2022). Scandinavia and South America. A tale of two capitalisms: Comparative developments in trade, industrialisation and inequality since 1850. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Averbuch, B., Thorsøe, M. H., & Kjeldsen, C. (2021). Longue durée study of agricultural transitions in Denmark using Multi-Level Perspective. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 121(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S021261092200012X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrán, J. P., & Nahum, B. (1967). Historia Rural del Uruguay Moderno: Vols. I–VII. Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.
   Google Scholar
• Barrán, J. P., & Nahum, B. B. (1978). Historia rural del Uruguay Moderno. Agricultura, crédito y transporte bajo Batlle (1905–1914) (Vol. VII). Ediciones de la Banda Oriental.
   Google Scholar
• Bértola, L. (2016). El PBI per capita de Uruguay 1870–2015: una reconstrucción. In Progama de Historia Económica y Social. Documentos de Trabajo (Vol. 48, pp. 3–32).
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, R., & Willebald, H. (2016). Do natural energy endowments matter? New Zealand and Uruguay in a comparative perspective, 1870–1940. Australian Economic History Review, 56(1), 70–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/aehr.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoni, R., & Willebald, H. (2022). Electricity and the role of the state: New Zealand and Uruguay before state-led development (1870-1930). Revista de Historia Industrial-Industrial History Review, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomström, M., & Meller, P. (1991). Diverging paths: Comparing a century of Scandinavian and Latin American Economic Development. Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, G. (1984). A handbook of New Zealand statistics. Hall & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, P. (2007). Looking at the numbers. A view of New Zealand economic history. NZIER.
   Google Scholar
• Caetano, G. (1991). Partidos, Estado y Cámaras Empresariales en el Uruguay contemporáneo (1900-1991). In Organizaciones empresariales y políticas públicas. CIESU-FESUR-Instituto de Ciencia Política.
   Google Scholar
• Carbajal, F., & de Melo, G. (2007). Volatilidad cíclica y arquitectura financiera doméstica, un estudio histórico comparado. El caso de Uruguay y Nueva Zelanda. In J. Álvarez, L. Bértola, & G. Porcile (Eds.), Primos ricos y empobrecidos. Crecimiento, distribución del ingreso e instituciones en Australia-Nueva Zelanda vs Argentina-Uruguay (pp. 305–341). Fin de Siglo.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, P., & Willebald, H. (2019). La mecanización agraria en las economías templadas de nuevo asentamiento europeo. La difusión del tractor en Uruguay y Nueva Zelanda durante el siglo XX. In XXXIV Jornadas de Economía del Banco Central de Uruguay (pp. 1–30).
   Google Scholar
• Danmarks Statistik. (1968). Landbrugsstatistik 1900–1965. Technical Report. Danmarks Statistik. Statistiske undersøgelser No 22.
   Google Scholar
• Danmarks Statistik. (1969). Landbrugsstatistik 1900-1965. Technical Report. Danmarks Statistik. Statistiske undersøgelser No 25.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, P., Pinilla, V., & Aparicio, G. (2023). A different product? The formation and expansion of the international live cattle market (1850–1939). Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, 41(1), 147–182.
   Google Scholar
• Denoon, D. (1983). Settler capitalism: The dynamics of dependent development in the Southern Hemisphere. Clarendon University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducoing, C., & Peres-Caj´ıas, J. (2021). Natural resources and divergence. A comparison of Andean and Nordic Trajectories. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations. Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B.-A. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, 265–298.
   Google Scholar
• Esposti, R. (2002). Public agricultural r&d design and technological spill-ins: a dynamic model. Research Policy, 31(5), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00133-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairburn, M. (1991). The farmers take over (1912–1930). In The Oxford illustrated history of New Zealand (pp. 185–210). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, H. (1992). Economía y Sociedad en el Uruguay del siglo XX. Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, Departamento de Publicaciones.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, H. (2005). La economía política del Uruguay contemporáneo, 1970–2000. Ed. EBO. Montevideo.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath, R. (1998). DSIR: making science work for New Zealand: Themes from the history of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, 1926–1992. Victoria University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greasley, D., & Oxley, L. (2009). The pastoral boom, the rural land market, and long swings in new zealand economic growth, 1873–1939 1. The Economic History Review, 62(2), 324–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2008.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison, A. (1982). National components of scientific knowledge a contribution to the social theory of science (PhD thesis). Göteborgs universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. (1937). Danish agriculture, its economic development: A description and economic analysis centering on the free trade epoch, 1870-1930. J.H. Schultz.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, K. J. (2019). A history of Denmark (3rd ed.). Macmillan International Higher Education. Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, H. C. (1985). Dansk historisk statistik, 1814–1980: Danish historical statistics, 1814–1980. Gyldendal Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, H. C. (1987). The Danish economy in the twentieth century. Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Jörberg, L. (1973). The Industrial Revolution in the Nordic Countries. In C. Cipolla (Ed.), The Fontana Economic History of Europe. Vol. 4, 1700–1914 (pp. 375–479). Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Just, F. (1993). Agriculture and controls in Denmark 1930–1950. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 41(3), 269–285.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. (2003). The Penguin History of New Zealand. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, J. (1975). On the viability of small countries: Uruguay and New Zealand compared. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 17(3), https://doi.org/10.2307/174724
   Google Scholar
• Kragh, H. (2015). From ørsted to bohr: The sciences and the Danish university system, 1800– 1920. Sciences in the Universities of Europe, Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: Academic Landscapes, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9636-1_3
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, T., Aaes, O., & Weisbjerg, M. R. (2015). Production and environmental impact of dairy cattle production in Denmark 1900–2010. Livestock Science, 178, 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, M., & Sharp, P. (2015). Just add milk: a productivity analysis of the revolutionary changes in nineteenth-century Danish dairying. The Economic History Review, 68(4), 1132–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampe, M., & Sharp, P. (2019). A Land of Milk and Butter. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, C., Metzer, J., & Sutch, R. (2013). Settler economies in world history. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National innovation system: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B-Å, & Andersen, E. S. (1988). Small national systems of innovation facing technological revolutions: An analytical framework. In B-Å. Lundvall & E. S. Andersen (Eds.), Small countries facing the technological revolution. Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B-˚A, Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of produc- tion, innovation and competence building. Research Policy, 31(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00137-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddison Project. (2020). Maddison Project Database. https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-project-database-2020?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of innovation and New Technology, 14(1–2), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/1043859042000228688
   Google Scholar
• Menéndez, M. (2021). Transformaciones productivas, institucionales y tecnológicas en el sector agrario de Dinamarca, Nueva Zelanda y Uruguay (1870-1930). Master’s thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of the Republic, Uruguay.
   Google Scholar
• Millot, J., & Bertino, M. (1996). Historia Económica del Uruguay. Tomo II: 1860–1910. Ediciones de Cultura Universitaria.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, M. I. (2008). La pradera perdida: historia y economía del agro uruguayo: una visión de largo plazo, 1760–1970. Linardi y Risso.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1995). Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(March), 48–90.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, T. (1992). White collars and gumboots. Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, K. (2006). Late 19th century Denmark in an Irish mirror: land tenure, homogeneity and the roots of Danish success. The state of Denmark: small states, corporatism and the varieties of capitalism. McGill-Queen’s University Press. 159–196.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H., & Møllenberg, S. (2017). Agriculture and Danish farm returns through 100 years 1916–2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pigurina, G., & Methol, M. (1990). Tabla de contenido nutricional de pasturas y forrajes del Uruguay. INIA La Estanzuela.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative methods. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlüter, A. (2014). Institutions and small settler economies. A comparative study of New Zealand and Uruguay, 1870–2008. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Senghaas, D. (1985). The European experience: A historical critique of development theory. Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., & Somers, M. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative studies in society and history, 22(2), 174–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500009282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trampusch, C., & Spies, D. C. (2014). Agricultural Interests and the origins of capitalism: A parallel comparative history of Germany, Denmark, New Zealand, and the USA. New Political Economy, 19(6), 918–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.861414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travieso, E. (2020). United by grass, separated by coal: Uruguay and New Zealand during the First Globalization. Journal of Global History, 15(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1740022820000042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanloqueren, G., & Baret, P. V. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38(6), 971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar