Differentiated disintegration in the Economic Community of West African States, the Eurasian Economic Community and the European Union: a comparative regionalism approach

References

• Acharya, A. 2014. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A., and A. Johnston, Eds. 2007. Crafting Cooperation – Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axline, W. 1977. “Underdevelopment, Dependence and Integration: The Politics of Regionalism in the Third World.” International Organization 31 (1): 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300006494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azu, N. P. 2020. “Assessing the Costs of Alliance Withdrawal on Trade Determination: A Lesson from Mauritania.” Journal of African Business 23 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2020.1776908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. 1999. “Mauritania to Quit ECOWAS.” December 26. Accessed June 20, 2023. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/578966.stm.
   Google Scholar
• Blockmans, S., H. Kostanyan, and I. Vorobiov 2012. Towards a Eurasian Economic Union: The Challenge of Integration and Unity. CEPS Special Report No. 75. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse, Eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., and T. Risse. 2019. “Grand Theories of Integration and the Challenges of Comparative Regionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (8): 1231–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Carl, N., J. Dennison, and G. Evans. 2019. “European but Not European Enough: An Explanation for Brexit.” European Union Politics 20 (2): 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518802361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Closa, C., and L. Casini. (with a study by O. Sender on International Secretariats in Comparative Perspective). 2016. Comparative Regional Integration. Governance and Legal Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman. 2007. International Organisations and Peace Enforcement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K. W., S. A. Burrell, R. A. Kann, M. Lee, M. Lichterman, R. E. Lindgren, F. L. Loewenheim, and R. W. Van Wagenen 1957. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. 2020. “Death of International Organizations. The Organizational Ecology of Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815-2015.” The Review of International Organizations 15 (2): 339–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9340-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazendeiro, B. 2020. Uzbekistan’s Foreign Policy. The Struggle for Recognition and Self-Reliance Under Karimov. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, G. 2000. “A ‘Coming Age of Regionalism’?” In Contending Images of World Politics, edited by G. Fry and J. O’Hagan, 117–131. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S.2019. “Niemals geht man so ganz Historische Beispiele für regionale Desintegration [Never Is for Good. Historical Examaples for Regional Desintegration].” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 23-25: 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S., B. Leruth, and J. Trondal, Eds. 2020. Differentiated Integration and Disintegration in a Post-Brexit Era. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gänzle, S. and J.-U. Wunderlich 2022. “Differentiated (Dis)integration beyon Europe. A Comparative Regionalism Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union, edited by B. Leruth, S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal 50–65. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, S. 1990. An Awkward Partner. Britain and the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, G. 2008a. “Uzbekistan Charts a New “Uzbek Path”.” MC Series: Security Insights Number 3, November 2008. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://www.marshallcenter.org/en/publications/security-insights/uzbekistan-charts-new-uzbek-path-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, G. 2008b “‘Uzbekistan: Evaluating Tashkent’s Reason for Leaving the Eurasian Economic Community’.” Eurasianet. November 25, 2008. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://eurasianet.org/uzbekistan-evaluating-tashkents-reason-for-leaving-the-eurasian-economic-community.
   Google Scholar
• Glencross, A. 2021. “Managing Differentiated Disintegration: Insights from Comparative Federalism on Post-Brexit EU-UK Relations.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 23 (4): 593–680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120968516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, S., and E. Lannon. 2018. The Neighbours of the European Union’s Neighbours. Diplomatic and Geopolitical Dimensions Beyond the European Neighbourhood Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, C. 2021. Regionalism in Sub-Saharan Africa: Structural Constraints and African Agency. edited by Nolte, D. & Weiffen, B. London: Regionalism Under Stress Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimova, U. 2021. Uzbekistan Takes Further Steps Toward Eurasian Economic Union. Tashkent’s 2021 Strategy Directs Several Government Agencies to Align with a Number of EAEU Regulations. The Diplomat. Accessed June 22, 2023. https://thediplomat.com/2021/01/uzbekistan-takes-further-steps-toward-eurasian-economic-union/.
   Google Scholar
• Hettne, B., and F. Söderbaum. 2000. “Theorising the Rise of Regionness.” New Political Economy 5 (3): 457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687778.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. 2016. “The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (9): 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S., and C. de Vries. 2016. “Turning Against the Union? The Impact of the Crisis on the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Parliament Elections.” Electoral Studies 44:504–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. 1966. “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 95 (3): 862–915.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. 1982. “Reflections on the Nation-State in Western Europe Today.” Journal of Common Market Studies 21 (1): 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00637.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., T. Lenz, and G. Marks. 2019. A Theory of International Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G. J. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Online South Africa. 1999. “Mauritania to Quit ECOWAS Regional Group.” Accessed September 2, 2023. https://www.iol.co.za/news/africa/mauritania-to-quit-ecowas-regional-group-24206.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 1961. “Foreign Affairs.” Hansard. HC Deb 17 May 1961, vol 640 cc 1379-508. Accessed May 3, 2022. https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jeune Afrique. 2017. “La Mauritanie veut réintégrer la zone de libre-échange de la Cedeao. May 12.” Accessed December 28, 2022. https://www.jeuneafrique.com/437254/economie/mauritanie-prepare-retour-cedeao.
   Google Scholar
• Journal du Cameroun. 2020. “Mauritania to Apply Free Trade Deal with ECOWAS.” January 28. Accessed July 26, 2023. https://www.bilaterals.org/?mauritania-to-apply-free-trade.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C. 1986. “International Public Goods without Government.” The American Economic Review 76 (1): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapohl, S., and A. Vasileva-Dienes. 2020. “The Region That Isn’t: China, Russia and the Failure of Regional Integration in Central Asia.” Asia Europe Journal 18 (3): 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00548-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. 2012. “Factoring the Regional Impact of Uzbekistan’s Withdrawal from the CSTO. The German Marshall Fund of the United States.” Policy Brief. Accessed September 2, 2023. https://www.gmfus.org/publications/factoring-regional-impact-uzbekistan’s-withdrawal-csto.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2011. “Concentric Circles of Flexible ‘EUropean’ Integration: A Typology of EU External Governance Relations.” Comparative European Politics 9 (4–5): 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavergne, R., ed. 1997. Regional Integration and Cooperation in West Africa: A Multidimensional Perspective. Trenton: Africa World Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leruth, B., S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal. 2019. “Exploring Differentiated Disintegration in a Post-Brexit European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (5): 1013–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., B. Rittberger, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2013. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lobell, S. E., N. G. Jesse, and K. P. Williams. 2015. “Why Do Secondary States Choose to Support, Follow or Challenge?” International Politics 52 (2): 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokulo-Sodipe, J. O., and A. J. Osuntogun. 2013. “The Quest for a Supranational Entity in West Africa: Can the Economic Community of West African States Attain the Status?” Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 16 (3).https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v16i3.9. Accessed January 10, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Madiyev, O. 2021. Uzbekistan’s International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, S., and C. Peters-Berries. 2001. Regionale Integration und Kooperation in Afrika südlich der Sahara EAC, ECOWAS und SADC im Vergleich. Bonn: Weltforum.
   Google Scholar
• Martill, B., and M. Sus. 2022. “Growing Apart Together? Brexit and the Dynamics of Differentiated Disintegration in Security and Defence.” In The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union, edited by B. Leruth, S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal, 696–711. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, L. 2006. “Algeria, the Arab Maghreb Union and Regional Integration.” EuroMesco Paper 56.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, L. 2023. “State Aid Policy in the United Kingdom Post-Brexit: A Case of de-Europeanisation As Orbiting Europeanisation.” Journal of European Public Policy 30 (11): 2372–2396. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2208684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. 1990. “Back to the Future – Instability in Europe After the Cold War.” International Security 5 (1): 5–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538981.
   Google Scholar
• Melly, P. 2019. “Mauritania’s Unfolding Landscape: Elections, Hydrocarbons and Socio-Economic Change.” Research Paper Chatham House. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. 1998. The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, L. M. 2023. The ECOWAS Commission As a Policy-Making Nexus. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, P., A. Warleigh-Lack, and B. He. 2014. “Awkward States and Regional Organisations: The United Kingdom and Australia Compared.” Comparative European Politics 12 (3): 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N’Diaye, B. 2006). “Mauritania, August 2005: Justice and Democracy, or Just Another Coup?” African Affairs 105 (420): 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adi126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, D., and B. Weiffen. 2021. Regionalism Under Stress. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panke, D. and S. Stapel 2018. “Exploring Overlapping Regionalism.” Journal of International Relations and Development 21 (3): 635–662. 10.1057/s41268-016-0081-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panke, D., and A. Starkmann 2015. “Regional Organizations’ Competencies – ROCO Databases, Codebook.” Accessed September 24, 2023. ht tps://dataverse.harvard.edu/file.xhtml?persistentId=d oi:1 0.7910/DVN/UBXZHC/HORPVT&version=1.0.
   Google Scholar
• Phinnemore, D. 2022. “Brexit and Northern Ireland.” In The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union, edited by B. Leruth, S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal, 664–679. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2019. “Social Constructivism and European Integration.” In European Integration Theory, edited by A. Wiener, T. Börzel, and T. Risse, 128–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. P., and A. Moshes. 2016. “The Eurasian Economic Union: A Case of Reproductive Integration?” Post-Soviet Affairs 32 (6): 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1115198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy.” World Politics 51 (1): 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814.
   Google Scholar
• Sbragia, A. 2008. “Comparative Regionalism: What Might it Be?” Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.00809.x.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2018. “Brexit: Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (8): 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2019. “The Choice for Differentiated Europe: An Intergovernmentalist Theoretical Framework.” Comparative European Politics 17 (2): 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00166-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. 2022. “(Post-)Brexit: Negotiating Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union.” In The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union, edited by B. Leruth, S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal, 619–632. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. 1971. “A Revised Theory of Regional Integration.” In Regional Integration: Theory and Research, edited by L.N. Lindberg and S.A. Scheingold, 232–264. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, D. 1996. “The Political Economy of Mauritania: An Introduction.” Review of African Political Economy 23 (68): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056249608704195.
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F. 2009. “Comparative Regional Integration and Regionalism.” In The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by T. Landman and N. Robinson, 477–496. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum, F. 2016. Rethinking Regionalism. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tarr, D. G. 2016. “The Eurasian Economic Union of Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic: Can it Succeed Where Its Predecessor Failed?” Eastern European Economics 54 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2015.1105672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolipov, F. 2019, November 22. History Repeats Itself: Uzbekistan’s New Eurasian Gamble. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. Accessed September 23, 2023. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13596-history-repeats-itself-uzbekistans-new-eurasian-gamble.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vinokurov, E. 2018. Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H. 2014. “Explaining European Disintegration.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (5): 1142–1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H. 2018. European Disintegration: A Search for Explanations. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• von Borzyskowski, I., and F. Vabulas. 2019. “Hello, Goodbye: When Do States Withdraw from International Organizations?” The Review of International Organizations 14 (2): 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09352-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warleigh-Lack, A. 2015. “Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Towards a Comparative Regionalism Perspective.” Journal of European Public Policy 22 (6): 871–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warleigh-Lack, A. and N. R. Robinson 2011. “Introduction: Regions, Regionalism and Comparisons.” In New Regionalism and the European Union: Dialogues, Comparisons, and Research Directions, edited by Warleigh-Lack, A. Robinson, N.R. Rosamond, B. Warleigh-Lack, Nick Robinson Alex, and Ben Rosamond, 3–17. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Warleigh-Lack, A., and B. Rosamond. 2010. “Across the EU Studies–New Regionalism Frontier: Invitation to a Dialogue.” Journal of Common Market Studies 48 (4): 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02083.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, D. 2019. European Disintegration? The Politics of Crisis in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. 2016. “’we Have the Character of an Island nation’. A Discourse-Historical Analysis of David Cameron’s ‘Bloomberg Speech’ on the European Union.” EUI Working Papers RSCAS, Florence: EUI.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, J. U. 2012. “The EU an Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (4): 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M., and P. de Wilde. 2016. “Debating Globalization: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism As Political Ideologies.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21 (3): 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1207741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar