Urban regeneration and placemaking: a Digital Twin enhanced performance-based framework for Melbourne’s Greenline Project?

References

• Allan, M., A. Rajabifard, G. Foliente, and S. Sabri. 2021. “SDG 11 as a ‘Glocal’ Framework - The Challenges of Implementing Global and National Goals at a City Level.” GIM International 35 (6): 45–48.https://www.gim-international.com/content/article/sdg-11-as-a-glocal-framework.
   Google Scholar
• ANZLIC. 2019. “Principles for Spatially Enabled Digital Twins of the Built and Natural Environment in Australia.” (p. 25). https://www.anzlic.gov.au/sites/default/files/files/principles.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, Michael. 2018. “Digital Twins.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 45 (5): 817–820.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Australia, Beck, A., and G. Cotterill. 2023. Digital Twin White Paper. Standards Australia. https://www.standards.org.au/getmedia/c81ae488-b13d-4921-8961-2cf61cb8e94a/Digital_Twin-Report.pdf.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, R., C. M. Bidmon, and J. Pinkse. 2022. “Sustainability in the Digital Age: Intended and Unintended Consequences of Digital Technologies for Sustainable Development.” Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (2): 599–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burinskienė, A., and M. Seržantė. 2022. “Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union.” Sustainability 2022: 1–20.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8371.
   Google Scholar
• Calzati, Stefano. 2023. “No Longer Hype, Not yet Mainstream? Recalibrating City Digital Twins’ Expectations and Reality: A Case Study Perspective.” Frontiers in Big Data 6: 1–12https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1236397.
   Google Scholar
• Cappa, F., S. Franco, and F. Rosso. 2021. “Citizens and Cities: Leveraging Citizen Science and Big Data for Sustainable Urban Development.” Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (2): 648–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne). 2019. “Yarra River – Birrarung Strategy.” Participate Melbourne. Accessed November 9, 2023. https://participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/city-river-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne. 2021a. The Greenline Implementation Plan. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/greenline-implementation-plan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne). 2021b. “Economic Development Strategy 2031.” https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/economic-development-strategy-2031.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne). 2022a. The Greenline Project Self-Guided Tour Brochure.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne). 2022b. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals City of Melbourne Voluntary Local Review 2022. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne). 2023a. Melbourne as a Smart City. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/about-melbourne/melbourne-profile/smart-city/pages/smart-city.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne). 2023b. “Emerging Technology Testbed.” Participate Melbourne. Accessed November 8, 2023. https://participate.melbourne.vic.gov.au/emerging-tech-testbed.
   Google Scholar
• CoM (City of Melbourne), and EY. 2022. The Greenline Project Summary Business Case. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/news-and-media/Pages/Business-case-stacks-up-for-the-Greenline-Project–.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Cureton, P., and N. Dunn. 2021. “Digital Twins of Cities and Evasive Futures.” In Shaping Smart for Better Cities, 267–282. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818636-7.00017-2.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Jiaxin, Xinyue Ye, Piotr Jankowski, Thomas W. Sanchez, and Gengchen Mai. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence Enabled Participatory Planning: A Review.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 0 (0): 1–28. 10.1080/12265934.2023.2262427.
   Google Scholar
• Ellery, P. J., J. Ellery, and M. Borkowsky. 2021. “Toward a Theoretical Understanding of Placemaking.” International Journal of Community Well-Being 4 (1): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-020-00078-3.
   Google Scholar
• Farshid, Mana, Jeannette Paschen, Theresa Eriksson, and Jan Kietzmann. 2018. “Go Boldly!: Explore Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and Mixed Reality (MR) for Business.” Business Horizons 61 (5): 657–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foliente, G. C., P. Huovila, D. Spekkink, G. Ang, and W. Bakens. 2005. Performance Based Building R&D Roadmap. EUR 21988. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: CIBdf — International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction-Development Foundation. http://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3148.8643.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, L. T. 2022. “Effects of Digitalization on Financialization: Empirical Evidence from European Countries.” Technology in Society 68:101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, K., E. Miller, and M. Foth. 2014. “Integrating ICT Into the Planning Process: Impacts, Opportunities and Challenges.” Australian Planner 51 (1): 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2013.770771.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, S., and L. Harrie. 2020. “Visualizing a Possible Future: Map Guidelines for a 3D Detailed Development Plan.” Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis 4 (1): 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-020-00049-4.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtola, V. V., M. Koeva, S. O. Elberink, P. Raposo, J.-P. Virtanen, F. Vahdatikhaki, and S. Borsci. 2022. “Can Digital Twin Techniques Serve City Needs? – GIM International from Digital Twin of a City: Review of Technology Serving City Needs.” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 114:102915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2022.102915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Q., A. Kumar Parlikad, G. D. Ranasinghe, X. Xie, Z. Liang, E. Konstantinou, J. Heaton, and J. Schooling. 2020. “Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus.” Journal of Management in Engineering 36 (3): 1–19 https://ascelibrary.org/action/cookieAbsent.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbourne Water. 2022. Burndap Birrarunbg Burndap UMarkoo Yarra Strategic Plan A 10-Year Plan for the Yarra River Corridor 2022-2032 Yarra Strategic Plan. Burndap Birrarung burndap umarkoo. Melbourne Water, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi, P., M. Mohammadi, P. van Wesemael, and P. M. Le Blanc. 2023. “A User-Centred Virtual City Information Model for Inclusive Community Design: State-of-Art.” Cities 134:104203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narang Suri, S., M. Miraglia, and A. Ferrannini. 2021. “Voluntary Local Reviews as Drivers for SDG Localisation and Sustainable Human Development.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 22 (4): 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2021.1986689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietzsch, Holger. 2022. “Can Digital Construction Save the Planet?” Havard Data Science Review (HDSR) 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., H. Sykes, and R. Granger, eds. 2016. Urban Regeneration. 2nd ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sabri, S., and P. Witte. 2023. “Digital Technologies in Urban Planning and Urban Management.” Journal of Urban Management 12 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2023.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. W., H. Shumway, T. Gordner, and T. Lim. 2023. “The Prospects of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 27 (2): 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahat, E., C. T. Hyun, and C. Yeom. 2021. “City Digital Twin Potentials: A Review and Research Agenda.” Sustainability 13 (6): 3386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TCL (Taylor Cullity and Lethlean). 2022. The Greenline Project. https://www.tcl.net.au/news/the-greenline-project.
   Google Scholar
• Tomko, Martin, and Stephan Winter. 2019. “Beyond Digital Twins – A Commentary.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46 (2): 395–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318816992.
   Google Scholar
• Tzachor, A., S. Sabri, C. E. Richards, A. Rajabifard, and M. Acuto. 2022. “Potential and Limitations of Digital Twins to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.” Nature Sustainability 5 (10): 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00923-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | Department of Economic and Social Affairs (un.org).
   Google Scholar
• van der Aalst, W. M. P., O. Hinz, and C. Weinhardt. 2021. “Resilient Digital Twins.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 63 (6): 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00721-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHorn, E., and S. Mahadevan. 2021. “Digital Twin: Generalization, Characterization and Implementation.” Decision Support Sytems 145:113524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2021.113524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Valk, H., H. Haße, F. Möller, and B. Otto. 2021. “Archetypes of Digital Twins.” Business & Information Systems Engineering 64 (3): 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-021-00727-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEF (World Economic Forum). 2022. Digital Twin Cities: Framework and Global Practices. April 20. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/publications/digital-twin-cities-framework-and-global-practices/.
   Google Scholar
• Ye, X., J. Du, Y. Han, G. Newman, D. Retchless, L. Zou, Y. Ham, and Z. Cai. 2023. “Developing Human-Centered Urban Digital Twins for Community Infrastructure Resilience: A Research Agenda.” Journal of Planning Literature 38 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122221137861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar