Between Redemption and Retribution: Justifying Commutations for Life-without-parole Sentences in California

Bibliography

• Abramowitz, Elkan, and David Paget. “Executive Clemency in Capital Cases.” New York University Law Review 39 (1964): 136–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, James R., Talia Harmon, and Craig Rivera. “Merciful Justice: Lessons from 50 Years of New York Death Penalty Commutations.” Criminal Justice Review 35, no. 2 (2010): 183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, James R., and Charles S. Lanier. “May God—or the Governor—Have Mercy: Executive Clemency and Executions in Modern Death-Penalty Systems.” Criminal Law Bulletin Boston 36, no. 3 (2000): 200–237.
   Google Scholar
• Acts of Executive Clemency. California Governor’s Office. Sacramento, CA: California State Archives, 1949–2009.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, Catherine, and Bent Grøver. “The Pros and Cons of Life Without Parole.” The British Journal of Criminology 47, no. 4 (2007): 597–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aviram, Hadar. Yesterday's Monsters: The Manson Family Cases and the Illusion of Parole. Oakland: University of California Press, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Barkow, Rachel E. “The Politics of Forgiveness: Reconceptualizing Clemency.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 21, no. 3 (2009): 153–159.
   Google Scholar
• Bedau, Hugo Adam. “A Retributive Theory of the Pardoning Power.” University of Richmond Law Review 27 (1992): 185–200.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, Lloyd. “Executive Clemency in California: A Case Study Interpretation of Criminal Responsibility.” Issues Criminology 1 (1965): 77–107.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Edmund Gerald Jr. Executive Report on Pardons, Commutations of Sentences, and Reprieves. Decisions for the Period January 1, 2017, Through December 31 2017. Official Website of the California Governor, Office of the Governor, 2018. https://www.ca.gov/archive/gov39/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2017-Executive-Report-on-Pardons-Commutations-of-Sentence-and-Reprieves.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Edmund Gerald Jr. Executive Report on Pardons, Commutations of Sentences, and Reprieves. Decisions for the Period January 1, 2018, Through December 31, 2018. Official Website of the California Governor, Office of the Governor, 2019. https://www.ca.gov/archive/gov39/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018-Executive-Report-on-Pardons-Commutations-of-Sentence-and-Reprieves.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Leah C., Francis T. Cullen, Alexander L. Burton, Angela J. Thielo, and Velmer S. Burton Jr. “Redemption at a Correctional Turning Point: Public Support for Rehabilitation Ceremonies.” Federal Probation 84 (2020): 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• California Board of Parole Hearings. Suitability Hearing Summary Calendar Year 1978 through Calendar Year 2022. Statistical Data Results, 2023. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/bph/2020/01/09/suitability-hearing-summary-cy-1978-through-cy-2018/.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Offender Data Points. Offender Demographics for the 24-month Period Ending December 2019. Office of Research, July 2020. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/research/wp-content/uploads/sites/174/2021/11/201912_DataPoints.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Recidivism Report for Offenders Released from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation in Fiscal Year 2017–18. Office of Research, January 2024. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/research/wp-content/uploads/sites/174/2023/04/Recidivism-Report-for-Offenders-Released-in-Fiscal-Year-2017-18.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• California Governor’s Office. 1949–2009. Acts of Executive Clemency. Sacramento, CA: California State Archives. Accessed February 21, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, Molly. “Forgiving the Unforgivable: Reinvigorating the Use of Executive Clemency in Capital Cases.” Boston College Law Review 54, no. 2 (2013): 751–788.
   Google Scholar
• Dagan, Netanel, and Julian V. Roberts. “Retributivism, Penal Censure, and Life Imprisonment Without Parole.” Criminal Justice Ethics 38, no. 1 (2019): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• England, J. R., and W. Ralph. “Pardon, Commutation, and their Improvement.” The Prison Journal 39, no. 1 (1959): 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, Molly M. “Clemency for Lifers: The Only Road Out is The Road Not Taken.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 23, no. 1 (2010): 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam Jr., Franklin D., and Shanto Iyengar. “The Superpredator Script.” Nieman Reports 52, no. 4 (1998): 1–3. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5mm8q8f7.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Philip. “Another Second Chance: Rethinking Rehabilitation Through the Lens of California’s Prison Fire Camps.” Social Problems 59, no. 4 (2012): 437–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, Michael. “Mercy by the Numbers: An Empirical Analysis of Clemency and its Structure.” Virginia Law Review 89, no. 2 (2003): 239–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, Jessica S. “Death-in-Prison Sentences: Overutilized and Underscrutinized.” In Life without Parole: America’s New Death Penalty? edited by Charles J. Ogletree Jr. and Austin Sarat, 66–95. New York and London: NYU Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Veronica, and Christopher Uggen. “Consistency and Compensation in Mercy: Commutation in the Era of Mass Incarceration.” Social Forces 97, no. 3 (2019): 1205–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husak, Douglas. “Retributivism and Over-Punishment.” Law and Philosophy 41, no. 2–⁠3 (2022): 169–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Carol, and Lora Bex Lempert. “Institutional Disparities: Considerations of Gender in the Commutation Process for Incarcerated Women.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 39, no. 1 (2013): 265–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin Jr, Paul J. “Revitalizing the Clemency Process.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 39 (2016): 833–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBel, Thomas P., Matt Richie, and Shadd Maruna. “Helping Others as a Response to Reconcile a Criminal Past: The Role of the Wounded Healer in Prisoner Reentry Programs.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 42, no. 1 (2015): 108–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, Margaret C. “Reinventing the President’s Pardon Power.” Federal Sentencing Reporter 20 (2007): 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Love, Margaret C. “The Twilight of the Pardon Power.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100, no. 3 (2010): 1169–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Susan E. “Commutation of Prison Sentences: Practice, Promise, and Limitation.” Crime & Delinquency 29, no. 4 (1983): 593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messinger, Sheldon L., John E. Berecochea, David Rauma, and Richard A. Berk. “The Foundations of Parole in California.” Law and Society Review 19, no. 1 (1985): 69–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Karen S., Gary W. Potter, and Victor E. Kappeler. “The Myth of the Juvenile Superpredator.” In Handbook of Juvenile Justice, edited by Barbara Sims and Pamela Preston, 207–⁠226. New York: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, Ed, Anthony G. Vito, and Gennaro F. Vito. “A Comparison of Executions and Death to Life Commutations in Kentucky, 1901–2019.” The Prison Journal 101, no. 5 (2021): 591–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moylan, Mary-Beth, and Linda E. Carter. “Clemency in California Capital Cases.” Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law 14 (2009): 37–104.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom, Gavin. Executive Report on Pardons, Commutations of Sentence, and Reprieves. Decisions for the Period January 7, 2019, Through December 31, 2019. Official Website of the California Governor, Office of the Governor, 2020. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Executive-Report-on-Clemency-2019-signed.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom, Gavin. Executive Report on Pardons, Commutations of Sentence, and Reprieves. Decisions for the Period January 1, 2020, Through December 31, 2020. Official Website of the California Governor, Office of the California Governor, 2021. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2020-Executive-Report-on-Pardons-Commutations-of-Sentence-and-Reprieves.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom, Gavin. Executive Report on Pardons, Commutations of Sentence, and Reprieves. Decisions for the Period January 1, 2021, Through December 31, 2021. Official Website of the California Governor, Office of the California Governor, 2022. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/2021-Executive-Clemency-Report.pdf?emrc=f169ab.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, Andrew. Comparative Executive Clemency: The Constitutional Pardon Power and the Prerogative of Mercy in Global Perspective. London: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the California Governor. Clemency–Commutations & Pardons. Official Website of the California Governor, Office of Governor Gavin Newsom, May 1, 2023. https://www.gov.ca.gov/clemency/.
   Google Scholar
• Pascoe, Daniel, and Marie Manikis. “Making Sense of the Victim’s Role in Clemency Decision Making.” International Review of Victimology 26, no. 1 (2020): 3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizarro, Jesenia M., Steven M. Chermak, and Jeffrey A. Gruenewald. “Juvenile ‘Super-predators’ in the News: A Comparison of Adult and Juvenile Homicides.” Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture 14, no. 1 (2007): 84–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport, Elizabeth. “Retribution and Redemption in the Operation of Executive Clemency.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 74, no. 4 (1998): 1501–1535.
   Google Scholar
• Rapaport, Elizabeth. “Staying Alive: Executive Clemency, Equal Protection, and the Politics of Gender in Women’s Capital Cases.” Buffalo Criminal Law Review 4 (2000): 967–1007.
   Google Scholar
• Raynor, Peter, and Gwen Robinson. Rehabilitation, crime and justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ridolfi, Kathleen, and Seth Gordon. “Gubernatorial Clemency Powers: Justice or Mercy.” Northern California Innocence Project Scholarship, Paper 3. Criminal Justice 24 (2009): 26–41. http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/ncipscholarship/3.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Paul. “Life Without Parole under Modern Theories of Punishment.” In Life Without Parole: America’s New Death Penalty, edited by Charles J. Ogletree and Austin Sarat, 138–⁠166. New York: New York University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ryberg, Jesper. “Retributivism and the Dynamic Desert Model: Three Challenges to Dagan and Roberts.” Criminal Justice Ethics 40, no. 1 (2021): 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Seeds, Christopher. Death by Prison: The Emergence of Life Without Parole and Perpetual Confinement. Oakland: University of California Press, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Jennifer. Discretionary Parole in California. Report for the Committee on Revision of the Penal Code. Board of Parole Hearings, 2020. https://www.cdcr.ca.gov/bph/wp-content/uploads/sites/161/2021/10/Discretionary-Parole-in-California-November-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Rita. The Meaning of Rehabilitation and its Impact on Parole: There and Back Again in California. New York: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Laurence. “Adolescent Brain Science and Juvenile Justice Policymaking.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 23, no. 4 (2017): 410–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockton, Rosie. Ensuring Access to Rehabilitative Programs and Ending Discrimination against People Serving Life Without Parole. University of California Los Angeles Center for the Study of Women, Policy Brief, 2020. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15(947m2.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, Michael, ed. Retributivism has a Past: Has it a Future? New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tonry, Michael, ed. Why Punish? How Much? A Reader on Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Vannier, Marion. Normalizing Extreme Imprisonment: The Case of Life Without Parole in California. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, Andrew. “Proportionate Sentences: A Desert Perspective.” In Why Punish? How Much? A Reader on Punishment, edited by Michael Tonry, 207–216. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hirsch, Andrew. “Punishment futures: The Desert-Model Debate and the Importance of the Criminal Law Context.” In Retributivism has a Past. Has it a Future? edited by Michael Tonry, 256–274. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Warr, Jason. “‘Always Gotta be Two Mans:’ Lifers, Risk, Rehabilitation, and Narrative Labour.” Punishment & Society 22, no. 1 (2020): 28–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar