98
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Problem With Perspective: Students’ and Teachers’ Reasoning About Credibility During Discussions of Online Sources

References

  • Addy, J. M. (2019). The art of the real: Fact checking as information literacy instruction. Reference Services Review, 48(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-09-2019-0067
  • Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.636495
  • Berlo, D. K., & Lemert, J. B. (1961). A factor analytic study of the dimensions of source credibility. Paper presented at the convention of the Speech Associate of America. New York.
  • Boudana, S. (2016). Impartiality is not fair: Toward an alternative approach to the evaluation of content bias in news sources. Journalism, 17(5), 600–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915571295
  • Brand-Gruwel, S., Kammerer, Y., van Meeuwen, L., & van Gog, T. (2017). Source evaluation of domain experts and novices during Web search. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12162
  • Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M., Ortega, T., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(6), 27–32. http://www.kappanonline.org/breakstone-need-new-approach-teaching-digital-literacy/ https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718762419
  • Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Connors, P., Ortega, T., Kerr, D., & Wineburg, S. (2021). Lateral reading: College students learn to critically evaluate internet sources in an online course. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr2020-56
  • Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Wineburg, S., Rapaport, A., Carle, J., Garland, M., & Saavedra, A. (2021). Students’ civic online reasoning: A national portrait. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211017495
  • Brodsky, J. E., Brooks, P. J., Pavlounis, D., & Johnston, J. L. (2023). Instruction increases Canadian students’ preference for and use of lateral reading strategies to fact-check online information. AERA Open, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231192106
  • Brodsky, J., Brooks, P. J., Scimeca, D., Galati, P., Todorova, R., & Caulfield, M. (2021). Associations between online instruction in lateral reading strategies and fact checking COVID-19 news among college students. AERA Open, 7(1), 233285842110389. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211038937
  • Castellví, J., Díez-Bedmar, M., & Santisteban, A. (2020). Preservice teachers’ critical digital literacy skills and attitudes to address social problems. Social Sciences, 9(8), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9080134
  • Clark, C. H., Schmeichel, M., & Garrett, H. J. (2020). Social studies teacher perceptions of news source credibility. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20909823
  • Coiro, J., Coscarelli, C., Maykel, C., & Forzani, E. (2015). Investigating criteria that seventh graders use to evaluate the quality of online information. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.448
  • Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–493). Erlbaum.
  • Dunn, A. D., Sondel, B., & Baggett, H. C. (2019). I don’t want to come off as pushing an agenda”: How contexts shaped teachers’ pedagogy in the days after the 2016 U.S. presidential election. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 444–476. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218794892
  • Educating for American Democracy (2021). Educating for American Democracy: Excellence in History and Civics for All Learners. iCivics. www.educatingforamericandemocracy.org.
  • Gibson, M. (2020). From deliberation to counter-narration: Toward a critical pedagogy for democratic citizenship. Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(3), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1747034
  • Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
  • Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176
  • Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 468–494. https://doi<?sch-permit JATS-0034-007?>.org/1932–8036/20100468
  • Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Routledge.
  • Hilligoss, B., & Rieh, S. Y. (2008). Developing a unifying framework of credibility assessment: Construct, heuristics, and interaction in context. Information Processing & Management, 44(4), 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.10.001
  • Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press.
  • Jones, J. M., Ritter, Z. (2018). Americans see more news bias; most can’t name neutral source. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/225755/americans-news-bias-name-neutral source.aspx.
  • Kelly, D. (2019). Evaluating the news: (Mis)perceptions of objectivity and credibility. Political Behavior, 41(2), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9458-4
  • Kiili, C., Leu, D. J., Marttunen, M., Hautala, J., & Leppänen, P. H. T. (2018). Exploring early adolescents’ evaluation of academic and commercial online resources related to health. Reading and Writing, 31(3), 533–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9797-2
  • Kohnen, A. M., Mertens, G. E., Dawson, K., Hampton, J., & Fu, D. (2021). A study of middle school students’ online credibility assessments: Challenges and possibilities. Research in the Teaching of English, 56(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte202131342
  • Kohnen, A. M., Mertens, G. E., & Boehm, S. M. (2020). Can middle schoolers learn to read the web like experts? Possibilities and limits of a strategy-based intervention. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 12(2), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-2-6
  • Kovach, B., & Rosentiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Three Rivers Press.
  • Kozyreva, A., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2020). Citizens versus the Internet: Confronting digital challenges with cognitive tools. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(3), 103–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620946707
  • Kozyreva, A., Wineburg, S., Lewandowsky, S., & Hertwig, R. (2023). Critical ignoring as a core competence for digital citizens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221121570
  • Kuo, R., & Marwick, A. (2021). Critical disinformation studies: History, power, and politics. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(4), 76. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr2020-76
  • Lipton, E. (2014, February 9). Fight over minimum wage illustrates web of industry ties. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/10/us/politics/fightoverminimum-wage illustrates-web-of-industry-ties.html.
  • List, A., Grossnickle, E. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Undergraduate students’ justifications for source selection in a digital academic context. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 22–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115606659
  • Macedo-Rouet, M., Potocki, A., Scharrer, L., Ros, C., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2019). How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on adolescents’ evaluation of web information quality. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.241
  • McCroskey, J C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637756609375482
  • McCroskey, J C., & Young, T J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510978109368075
  • McGrew, S. (2020). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in online reasoning. Computers & Education, 145, 103711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103711
  • McGrew, S. (2021a). Challenging approaches: Sharing and responding to weak digital heuristics in class discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 108, 103512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103512
  • McGrew, S. (2021b). Skipping the source and checking the contents: An in-depth look at students’ approaches to web evaluation. Computers in the Schools, 38(2), 75–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2021.1912541
  • McGrew, S., & Breakstone, J. (2023). Civic online reasoning across the curriculum: Developing and testing the efficacy of digital literacy lessons. AERA Open, 9, 233285842311764. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231176451
  • McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320
  • McGrew, S., & Byrne, V B. (2022). Conversations after lateral reading: Supporting teachers to focus on process, not content. Computers & Education, 185, 104519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104519
  • Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20672
  • Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey Bass.
  • Mitchell, A., Simmons, K., Matsa, K. A., Silver, L. (2018). Publics globally want unbiased news coverage, are divided on whether their news media deliver. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2018/01/11/publics-globally-want-unbiased-news coverage-but-are-divided-on-whether-their-news-media-deliver/.
  • National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. NCSS.
  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., Nielson, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report% 02017%20web_0.pdf.
  • Parker, W. C. (2021). Structured academic controversy: What it can be. In J. C. Lo (Ed.), Making classroom discussions work (pp. 73–89). Teachers College Press.
  • Perloff, R M. (2015). A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234
  • Pieschl, S., & Sivyer, D. (2021). Secondary students’ epistemic thinking and year as predictors of critical source evaluation of Internet blogs. Computers & Education, 160, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104038
  • Potocki, A., de Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Macedo-Rouet, M., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J.-F. (2020). The development of source evaluation skills during adolescence: Exploring different levels of source processing and their relationships. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(1), 19–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1690848
  • Tsfati, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2003). Do people watch what they do not trust? Communication Research, 30(5), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203253371
  • Tully, M., Vraga, E. K., & Smithson, A. (2020). News media literacy, perceptions of bias, and interpretation of news. Journalism, 21(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918805262
  • Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut Massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
  • Vasquez, V. M. (2017). Critical literacy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press.
  • Walsh-Moorman, E., Hovick, K. (2021). This is crazy…She’s real”: How fourth-grade readers establish source authority. The Reading Teacher, 74(5), 559–568. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1989
  • Walsh-Moorman, E., & Pytash, K. (2022). Guiding their thinking: A formative study of digital source evaluation. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(6), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1225
  • Weisberg, L., Kohnen, A., & Dawson, K. (2022). Impacts of a digital literacy intervention on preservice teachers’ civic online reasoning abilities, strategies, and perceptions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(1), 73–98.
  • Whitehead, J. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54(1), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636809382870
  • Wineburg, S., Breakstone, J., McGrew, S., Smith, M., & Ortega, T. (2022). Lateral reading on the open Internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000740
  • Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record, 121(11), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.