Over-framing: interrogating sentence frames as pedagogical support vs. language restriction

References

• Arreguín, M. G., & Alanís, I. (2019). Paired learning: Strategies for enhancing social competence in dual language classrooms. Young Children, 72(2). https://www.naeyc.org/resources/pubs/yc/may2019/social-competence-dual-language-classrooms
   Google Scholar
• Ashton, K. (2021). Novice teacher agency in the multi-level language classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 34(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1818766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanases, S. Z., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2014). Scaffolding versus routine support for Latina/o youth in an urban school: Tensions in building toward disciplinary literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 263–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X14535328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. (2007). A culpable CALP: Rethinking the conversational/academic language proficiency distinction in early literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 60(7), 626–635. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.7.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. L. (2007). The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–599. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
   Google Scholar
• Block, N. C. (2020). Evaluating the efficacy of using sentence frames for learning new vocabulary in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(3), 454–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brisk, M. E. (2015). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy for K-5 classrooms. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, G. C. (2006). ‘Academic English’ in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(4), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Choi, W., Kim, W. H., Wright, W. E., & Morita-Mullaney, T. (2022). Improving English language arts instruction in Indiana dual language bilingual education classrooms. Language and Education, 37(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2032731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copland, F., & Creese, A. (2015). Linguistic ethnography. Sage Publications. https://www.doi.org/10.41359781473910607
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. M., Martin-Beltrán, M., Peercy, M. M., & Silverman, R. (2016). Moving beyond yes or no: Shifting from over-scaffolding to contingent scaffolding in literacy instruction with emergent bilingual students. TESOL Journal, 7(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, W. B., & Roe, C. J. (2010). Using sentence frames to develop academic vocabulary for English learners. The Reading Teacher, 64(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.2.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorner, L. (2016). The outstanding opportunities, but persistent challenges, of dual language education. University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Echevarría, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2008). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP model. Pearson & Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Education Commission of the States. (2014). English language learners – state profile – Florida. http://ecs.force.com/mbdata/mbstcprofexc?Rep=ELP14&st=Florida
   Google Scholar
• Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2011). Structuring the talk: Ensuring academic conversations matter. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 84(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2010.484440
   Google Scholar
• Fulton-Archer, L. (2013). Literacy at the core of the Delaware world language immersion programs. Learning Languages, 18(1), 10–15. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1016737.pdf
   Google Scholar
• García, O., & Kleifgen, J. A. (2018). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English learners. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Grapin, S. E., Llosa, L., Haas, A., & Lee, O. (2021). Rethinking instructional strategies with English learners in the content areas. TESOL Journal, 12(2), e557. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. M. (2015). Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macleroy, V. (2013). Cultural, linguistic and cognitive issues in teaching the language of literature for emergent bilingual pupils. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 26(3), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2013.852566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). ‘Scaffolding’ learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the national oracy project (pp. 186–195). Hodder & Stroughton.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, L., Hajdun, M., & Aguirre, A. A. (2021). Translanguaging together: Building bilingual identities con nuevos amigos. The Reading Teacher, 75(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, L. (2022). The ‘wrong love’ between the zone of proximal development and scaffolding: An interview with Prof. James P. Lantolf. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 45(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2022-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Young, D., & Hood, S. (2014). Balancing content & language in the English language development classroom. ORTESOL Journal, 31, 33–43. https://ortesol.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/Publications/Journals/2014/Balancing%20Content%20_%20Language%20in%20the%20English%20Language%20Development%20Classroom%20(33).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Mojica, C., & Briceño, A. (2018). Sentence stems that support reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 72(3), 398–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T., Ardasheva, Y., & Bookstrom, E. (2014). A brick-and-mortar approach: Scaffolding use of specific science language structures for first year English language learners. The Science Teacher, 81(4), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst14_081_04_39
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L., & Walqui, A. (2012). Language and the common core state standards [Paper presentation]. The Understanding Language Conference, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://ell.stanford.edu/papers
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar