Disclosing the sacred in technological practices for sustainability

References

• Agar, Jon. 2020. “What is Technology?” Annals of Science 77 (3): 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2019.1672788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, Gregory. 1975. “Ecology of Mind: The Sacred.” In Loka: A Journal of Naropa Institute, edited by Rick Fields, 24–27. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, Gregory, and Mary C. Bateson. 1987. Angels Fear: Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. Toronto: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, Fikret. 2018. Sacred Ecology. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bisht, Ishwari Singh, and Jai Chand Rana. 2020. “Reviving the Spiritual Roots of Agriculture for Sustainability in Farming and Food Systems: Lessons Learned from Peasant Farming of Uttarakhand Hills in North-Western India.” American Journal of Food and Nutrition 8 (1): 12–15. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajfn-8-1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Kirk W., and Tim Kasser. 2005. “Are Psychological and Ecological Well-Being Compatible? The Role of Values, Mindfulness, and Lifestyle.” Social Indicators Research 74: 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daggett, Cara. 2018. “Petro-masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 47 (1): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829818775817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, Marisol. 2015. Earth Beings. Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demerath III, N. J. 2000. “The Varieties of Sacred Experience: Finding the Sacred in a Secular Grove.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 39: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/0021-8294.00001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drengson, Alan R. 1984. “The Sacred and the Limits of the Technological Fix.” Zygon® 19 (3): 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1984.tb00929.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drengson, Alan R. 1995. The Practice of Technology: Exploring Technology, Ecophilosophy, and Spiritual Disciplines for Vital Links. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, Émile. (1912) 1995. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Reprint. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Paul N. 2017. “Knowledge Infrastructures for the Anthropocene.” The Anthropocene Review 4 (1): 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616679854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Borsot, Gabriel. 2023. “Spirituality and Technology: A Threefold Philosophical Reflection.” Zygon® 58: 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giammarchi, Marco G. 2021. “Toward the Unity of Everything.” In Why Does What Exists Exist? Some Hypotheses on the Ultimate “Why” Question, edited by Mariano L. Bianca, and Paolo Piccari, 79–83. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grothe, Amberly. 2017. “From Beginning to the End: Humans as Caretakers and Co-Creators of Nature.” Dialogue & Nexus 4: 1–6. https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/dialogue/vol4/iss1/7.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, Félix. (1989) 2000. The Three Ecologies. London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. (1952-1962) 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translation by W. Lovitt. New York: Garland Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkurinen, Pasi. 2018. “Degrowth by Means of Technology? A Treatise for an Ethos of Releasement.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197 (2): 1654–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.070.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkurinen, Pasi. 2021. “Atechnological Experience Unfolding: Meaning for the Post-Anthropocene.” In Sustainability Beyond Technology: Philosophy, Critique, and Implications for Human Organization, edited by Pasi Heikkurinen, and Toni Ruuska, 96–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkurinen, Pasi. 2023. “Throughput.” In Dictionary of Ecological Economics: Terms for the New Millennium, edited by Brent M. Haddad, and Barry D. Solomon, 545–546. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkurinen, Pasi, and Toni Ruuska. 2021. Sustainability Beyond Technology: Philosophy, Critique, and Implications for Human Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Himberg, Nina. 2011. “Traditionally Protected Forests’ Role Within Transforming Natural Resource Management Regimes in Taita Hills, Kenya.” PhD Diss, University of Helsinki. https://helda.helsinki.fi/items/fea55fd1-8474-47b3-ad97-0a72da52accd.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenthal, Johanna, Marinka Räsänen, and Paola Minoia. 2018. “Political Ecology of Asymmetric Ecological Knowledges: Diverging Views on the Eucalyptus-Water Nexus in the Taita Hills, Kenya.” Journal of Political Ecology 25 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2458/v25i1.22005.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, Max. [1947] 2013. Eclipse of Reason. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Stephen. 2007. “Sacred.” The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (Online). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10029781405165518.wbeoss002.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim, and Terhi Kurttila. 2000. “Perceiving the Environment in Finnish Lapland.” Body & Society 6 (3-4): 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006003010.
   Google Scholar
• Karikari, Eric., José Castro-Sotomayor, and Godfried Asante. 2020. “Illegal Mining, Identity, and the Politics of Ecocultural Voice in Ghana.” In Routledge Handbook of Ecocultural Identity, edited by Tema Milstein, and José Castro-Sotomayor, 240–259. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kasser, Tim. 2017. “Living Both Well and Sustainably: A Review of the Literature, with Some Reflections on Future Research, Interventions and Policy.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences A375: 20160369. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0369.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2001. “Objectual Practice.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 175–188. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, Maria, and Vandana Shiva. (1993) 2021. Ecofeminism. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter. 2018. “The Invention of the Human and the Three Pillars of the Colonial Matrix of Power.” In On Decoloniality: Concepts, Analytics, Praxis, edited by Walter Mignolo, and Katherine Walsh, 153–176. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, Paul. 2014. “What is Technology? Six Definitions and Two Pathologies.” SWPS 2014-19. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2743113.
   Google Scholar
• Rautaniemi, Matti. 2020. Joogan Historia – Erakkomajoista Kuntosaleille [History of Yoga. from Hermitages to Gyms]. 3rd ed. Keuruu: Basam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, Bryan S. 2017. “The Sacred and Sacrality: From Eliade to Evolutionary Ethology.” Religion 47 (4): 663–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2017.1362833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruuska, Toni. 2021. “Conditions for Alienation: Technological Development and Capital Accumulation.” In Sustainability Beyond Technology: Philosophy, Critique, and Implications for Human Organization, edited by Pasi Heikkurinen, and Toni Ruuska, 138–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruuska, Toni, and Pasi Heikkurinen. 2021. “Technology and Sustainability: An Introduction.” In Sustainability Beyond Technology: Philosophy, Critique, and Implications for Human Organization, edited by Pasi Heikkurinen, and Toni Ruuska, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruuska, Toni, Pasi Heikkurinen, and Kristoffer Wilén. 2020. “Domination, Power, Supremacy: Confronting Anthropolitics with Ecological Realism.” Sustainability 12 (7): 2617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaarsberg, Suzanne Klein. 2021. “To Stop and See: Contemplative Fieldwork as Thoughtful Observation.” Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences 2 (2): 261–296. https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-bja10027.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, Madison, and Sean Connelly. 2023. “Regenerative Agriculture and a More-Than-Human Ethic of Care: A Relational Approach to Understanding Transformation.” Agriculture and Human Values 40: 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10350-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smetschka, Barbara, Dominik Widerhofer, Claudine Egger, Edeltraud Haselsteiner, Daniel Moran, and Veronika Gaube. 2019. “Time Matters: The Carbon Footprint of Everyday Activities in Austria.” Ecological Economics 164: 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suomalainen, Milla, Johanna Hohenthal, Jarkko Pyysiäinen, Toni Ruuska, Jenny Rinkinen, and Pasi Heikkurinen. 2023. “Food Self-Provisioning: A Review of Health and Climate Implications.” Global Sustainability 6 (e7): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swatos Jr., William H. 2007. “Sacred/Profane.” The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (Online). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10029781405165518.wbeoss004.
   Google Scholar
• Szerszynski, Bronislaw. 2005. Nature, Technology and the Sacred. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 2018. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vávra, Jan, Petr Danék, and Petr Jehlicka. 2018. “What is the Contribution of Food Self-Provisioning Towards Environmental Sustainability? A Case Study of Active Gardeners.” Journal of Cleaner Production 185: 1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, Lynn. 1967. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis.” Science 155: 1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Shinzen. n.d. The Science of Enlightenment: How Meditation Works. https://writemac.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/The-Science-of-Enlightenment-by-Shinzen-Young.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zalasiewicz, Jan, Mark Williams, Colin N. Waters, Anthony D. Barnosky, John Palmesino, Ann-Sofi Rönnskog, Matt Edgeworth, et al. 2017. “Scale and Diversity of the Physical Technosphere: A Geological Perspective.” The Anthropocene Review 4 (1): 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616677743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Guannan, Xingsui Cao, Bin Wang, Kai Zhang, and Qingwen Min. 2022. “The Importance of Spiritual Ecology in the Qingyuan Forest Mushroom Co-Cultivation System.” Sustainability 14: 865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar