Monstrous Alphabet in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe

Works cited

• Attridge, Derek. “Oppressive Silence: J.M Coetzee’s Foe and the Politics of the Canon.” Decolonizing Tradition: New Views of Twentieth-Century “British” Literary Canons, edited by Karen Lawrence. U of Illinois P, 1992, pp. 212–38.
   Google Scholar
• Attwell, David. “Editor’s Introduction.” Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews, edited by David Attwell, Harvard U P, 1992, pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Attwell,David J. M. Coetzee and the Life of Writing: Face-to-Face with Time. Viking Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, Rita. Apartheid and Beyond: South African Writers and the Politics of Place. Oxford U P, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. Scott. “J. M. Coetzee’s Foe: A Culmination and a Solution to a Problem of White Identity.” World Literature Today, vol. 64, no. 1, 1990, pp. 54–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caracciolo, Marco. “J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and the Embodiment of Meaning.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 36, no. 1, 2012, pp. 90–103.
   Google Scholar
• Carusi, Annamaria. “Foe: The Narrative and Power.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 1989, pp. 134–44.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, J. M. Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews. Edited by David Attwell, Harvard U P, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, J. M. Foe. Penguin Books, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. “Monster Culture (Seven Theses).” Monster Theory: Reading Culture, edited by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen, U of Minnesota P, 1996, pp. 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Datli Beigi, Roohollah, et al. “Monstrosity in P. B. Shelley’s the Triumph of Life through Akkerman’s Citadel-to-Garden Trajectory.” Orbis Litterarum, vol. 77, 2022, pp. 299–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doležel, Lubomír. “Heterocosmica: Fiction and Possible Worlds. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1998. Print. England, Frank. Foes: Plato, Derrida, and Coetzee: Rereading J.M. Coetzee’s Foe.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, 2008, pp. 44–62. doi:10.1080/02564710802220887.
   Google Scholar
• Fanon, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks, Translated by Charles Lam Markmann. Pluto Press, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Head, Dominic. The Cambridge Introduction to J. M. Coetzee. Cambridge U P, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Loomba, Ania. “‘Local-Manufacture Made-In-India Othello fellows’: Issues of Race, Hybridity and Location in Post-Colonial Shakespeares.” Post-Colonial Shakespeares, edited by Ania Loomba and Martin Orkin, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Lewis. “‘Do We of Necessity Become Puppets in the Story?’ or Narrating the World: On Speech, Silence, and Discourse in Coetzee’s Foe.” Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 52, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, Mike. “The Novel As Ethical Command: J.M. Coetzee’s Foe.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, 2010, pp. 62–85.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, M. J. “The Deployment of Metafiction in an Aesthetic of Engagement in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe.” Journal of Literary Studies, vol. 5, no. 2, 1989, pp. 183–93.
   Google Scholar
• Mathuray, Mark. On the Sacred in African Literature: Old Gods and New Worlds. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, Benita. “Speech and Silence in the Fictions of J. M. Coetzee.” Critical Perspectives on J. M. Coetzee, edited by Graham Huggan and Stephen Watson, Macmillan, 1996, pp. 37–65.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, Dick. “J. M. Coetzee’s Foe: The Muse, the Absurd, and the Colonial Dilemma.” World Literature Written in English, vol. 27, no. 2, 1987, pp. 207–15.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Christopher. “The Home of Friday: Coetzee’s Foe.” Textual Practice, vol. 30, no. 5, 2015, pp. 1–21. doi:10.1080/0950236X.2015.1084365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, Robert M. “The Noise of Freedom: J. M. Coetzee’s Foe.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 30, no. 3, 1989, pp. 143–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, Chris. “Foe.” A Companion to the Works of J. M. Coetzee, edited by Timothy Mehigan, Camden House, 2011, pp. 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Saei Dibavar, Sara, et al. “Social Mind As Author(ity) in J. M. Coetzee’s Foe.” Research in African Literatures, vol. 51, 2021, pp. 190–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saei Dibavar, Sara, et al. “J. M. Coetzee’s Foe: A Narrative of Dislocation Through Assimilation.” Brno Studies in English, vol. 48, 2022, pp. 201–18.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. Yale U P, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, Christina. Monstrous Intimacies: Making Post-Slavery Subjects. Duke U P, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Theory in the Margin: Coetzee’s Foe Reading Defoe’s Crusoe/roxma.” Consequences of Theory, edited by Jonathan Arac and Barbara Johnson. Johns Hopkins UP, 1991, pp. 154–80.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, David. Deformed Discourse: The Function of the Monster in Mediaeval Thought and Literature. U of Exeter P, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Paul. “‘Foe’: The Story of Silence.” English Studies in Africa, vol. 31, no. 1, 1988, pp. 33–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbler, Jarad. “Under Local Eyes: The South African Publishing Context of J. M. Coetzee’s Foe.” English Studies in Africa, vol. 47, no. 1, 2004, pp. 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar