Evaluation of asbestos exposure resulting from simulated application of spiked talcum powders

References

• ACGIH. 2010. TLV for talc. Cincinnati (OH): American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
   Google Scholar
• Addison J, Langer AM. 2000. Draft comments on the NTP draft report on carcinogens background document for talc asbestiform and non-asbestiform. Cottingham (UK): John Addison Consultancy.
   Google Scholar
• Addison J, McConnell EE. 2008. A review of carcinogenicity studies of asbestos and non-asbestos tremolite and other amphiboles. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 52(1 Suppl):S187–S99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMA Analytical Services. 2019. Certificate of analysis. Task 3-analysis of official samples: summary of analysis. Report date Oct. 3, 2019. Revision #2 Oct. 11, 2019. Prepared for the U.S. Food and Drug Administratin, Office of Cosmetics and Colors. Lanham (MD): AMA Analytical Services, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson EL, Sheehan PJ, Kalmes RM, Griffin JR. 2017. Assessment of health risk from historical use of cosmetic talcum powder. Risk Anal. 37(5):918–929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM. 2011. ASTM E741-11. Standard test method for determining air change in a single zone by means of a tracer gas dilution. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Aylott RI, Byrne GA, Middleton JD, Roberts ME. 1979. Normal use levels of respirable cosmetic talc: preliminary study. Int J Cosmet Sci. 1(3):177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown R. 1985. Memo from the Quantitative Risk Assessment Committee (QRAC) dated June 6, 1985 to W.G. Flamm, Director, Office of Toxicological Sciences, Re: Asbestos in Talc. Washington (DC): Dept. of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service.
   Google Scholar
• Burns AM, Barlow CA, Banducci AM, Unice KM, Sahmel J. 2019. Potential airborne asbestos exposure and risk associated with the historical use of cosmetic talcum powder products. Risk Anal. 39(10):2272–2294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciocan C, Pira E, Coggiola M, Franco N, Godono A, Vecchia CL, Negri E, Boffetta P. 2022. Mortality in the cohort of talc miners and millers from Val Chisone, Northern Italy: 74 years of follow-up. Environ Res. 203:111865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coggiola M, Bosio D, Pira E, Piolatto PG, Vecchia CL, Negri E, Michelazzi M, Bacaloni A. 2003. An update of a mortality study of talc miners and millers in Italy. Am J Ind Med. 44(1):63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cralley LJ, Key MM, Groth DH, Lainhart WS, Ligo RM. 1968. Fibrous and mineral content of cosmetic talcum products. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 29(4):350–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crankshaw O. 2014. Preparation of talc samples quantitatively mixed with 0.1% tremolite asbestos. produced for Julie Pier, Imerys. June 26, 2014. Research Triangle Park (NC): RTI International.
   Google Scholar
• CTFA. 1976. CTFA method J4-1: asbestiform amphibole minerals in cosmetic talc. Part I: x-ray diffraction method; Part II: optical microscopy and dispersion-staining method. Washington (DC): Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association (CTFA).
   Google Scholar
• Dement JM, Shuler PJ, Zumwalde RD. 1972. Preliminary report: fiber expsoure during use of baby powders. Cincinnati (OH): Environmental Investigations Branch, Division of Field Studies and Clinical Investigations, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
   Google Scholar
• Drechsel DA, Barlow CA, Bare JL, Jacobs NF, Henshaw JL. 2018. Historical evolution of regulatory standards for occupational and consumer exposures to industrial talc. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 92:251–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. 1993. Test method: method for the determination of asbestos in bulk building materials. EPA/600/R-93/116. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-Office of Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2011. Exposure factors handbook: 2011 Edition. EPA/600/R-090/052F. Sept., 2011. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 1971. Meeting minutes-asbestos in cosmetic talc. Washington (DC): FDA.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 1973. Notice of proposed rulemaking: asbestos particles in food and drugs. 21 CFR parts 121, 128, 133. Fed. Reg. 38(188):27076-27081. Sept. 28, 1973. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2010. Products and ingredients: talc. study conducted Sept. 28, 2009 - Sept. 27, 2010. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2019a. Company announcement: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. to voluntarily recall a single lot of Johnson’s Baby Powder in the United States. Oct. 18, 2019. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [accessed 2021 May 14]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/johnson-johnson-consumer-inc-voluntarily-recall-single-lot-johnsons-baby-powder-united-states.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2019b. FDA summary of results from testing of official samples of talc-containing cosmetics for asbestiform fibers by AMA laboratories during FY19. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [accessed 2021 May 14]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/135911/download.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2020a. Public meeting: testing methods for asbestos in talc and cosmetic products containing talc. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2020b. Cosmetic ingredients: talc. current as of Aug. 18, 2020. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [accessed 2020 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredients/talc.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2021. FDA releases data from the agency’s 2021 testing of talc-containing cosmetic products for asbestos. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [accessed 2022 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/fda-authority-over-cosmetics-how-cosmetics-are-not-fda-approved-are-fda-regulated.
   Google Scholar
• FDA. 2022. FDA authority over cosmetics: how cosmetics are not FDA-approved, but are FDA-regulated. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (FDA). [accessed 2022 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/fda-authority-over-cosmetics-how-cosmetics-are-not-fda-approved-are-fda-regulated.
   Google Scholar
• Finley BL, Benson SM, Marsh GM. 2017. Cosmetic talc as a risk factor for pleural mesothelioma: a weight of evidence evaluation of the epidemiology. Inhal Toxicol. 29(4):179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley BL, Pierce JS, Phelka AD, Adams RE, Paustenbach DJ, Thuett KA, Barlow CA. 2012. Evaluation of tremolite asbestos exposures associated with the use of commercial products. Crit Rev Toxicol. 42(2):119–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiume MM, Boyer I, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, Hill RA, Klaassen CD, Liebler DC, Marks JG, Jr., Shank RC, Slaga TJ, et al. 2015. Safety assessment of talc as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol. 34(1 Suppl):66S–129S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fordyce TA, Leonhard MJ, Mowat FS, Moolgavkar SH. 2019. A 37-year update on mortality patterns in an expanded cohort of Vermont talc miners and millers. J Occup Environ Med. 61(11):916–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble JF, Gibbs GW. 2008. An evaluation of the risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma from exposure to amphibole cleavage fragments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 52(1 Suppl):S154–S186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garabrant DH, Pastula ST. 2018. A comparison of asbestos fiber potency and elongate mineral particle (EMP) potency for mesothelioma in humans. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 361:127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn ME, Keeton KA, Gaffney SH, Sahmel J. 2018. Ambient asbestos fiber concentrations and long-term trends in pleural mesothelioma incidence between urban and rural areas in the United States (1973-2012): U.S. Urban vs. Rural Pleural Mesothelioma Incidence (1973-2012). Risk Anal. 38(3):454–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon RE, Fitzgerald S, Millette J. 2014. Asbestos in commercial cosmetic talcum powder as a cause of mesothelioma in women. Int J Occup Environ Health. 20(4):318–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene RC. 1995. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survery Talc Resources of the Conterminous United States Report OF 95–586.
   Google Scholar
• Hewett P, Ganser GH. 2007. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Ann Occup Hyg. 51(7):611–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildick-Smith GY. 1976. The biology of talc. Br J Ind Med. 33(4):217–229.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holton M, Ellis J, Anderson E, Poole J. 2022. Characterization of asbestos exposures associated with the use of facial makeups. Risk Anal.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC. 2010. Carbon black, titanium dioxide, and talc. Vol 93, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon (France): World Health Organization (WHO)-International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
   Google Scholar
• Ierardi AM, Best EA, Marsh GM. 2022. Updated Italian cohort data continues to confirm lack of mesothelioma risk in pooled cohort of international cosmetic talc miners and millers. Inhal Toxicol.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ierardi AM, Marsh GM. 2020. Absence of mesothelioma risk maintained in an expanded international cohort of cosmetic talc miners and millers. Inhal Toxicol. 32(6):257–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgren EB. 2004. The biology of cleavage fragments: a brief synthesis and analysis of current knowledge. Indoor Built Env. 13(5):343–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagatic J, Rubnitz ME, Godwin MC, Weiskopf RW. 1967. Tissue response to intraperitoneal asbestos with preliminary report of acute toxicity of heat-treated asbestos in mice. Environ Res. 1(3):217–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J. 2019. Press release: company investigation confirms no asbestos in Johnson’s Baby Powder. New Brunswick (NJ): Johnson & Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Kelse JW, Thompson CS. 1989. The regulatory and mineralogical definitions of asbestos and their impact on amphibole dust analysis. Am Ind Hygiene Assoc J. 50(11):613–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer AM, Nolan RP. 1989. Distinguishing asbestiform tremolite from non-asbestiform tremolite. Brooklyn (NY): Environmental Sciences Laboratory, Institute of Applied Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lee R, Van Orden D. 2015. Asbestos in commercial cosmetic talcum powder as a cause of mesothelioma in women [Letter to the editor]. Int J Occup Environ Health. 21(4):337–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X-H. 1999. U–Pb zircon ages of granites from the southern margin of the Yangtze Block: timing of Neoproterozoic Jinning: Orogeny in SE China and implications for Rodinia Assembly. Precamb Res. 97(1-2):43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh GM, Ierardi AM. 2020. Confidence interval function analysis to evaluate the risk of mesothelioma among an expanded international cohort of cosmetic talc miners and millers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 115:104696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald JC. 1985. Health implications of environmental exposure to asbestos. Environ Health Perspect. 62:319–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolgavkar SH, Meza R, Turim J. 2009. Pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas in SEER: age effects and temporal trends, 1973-2005. Cancer Causes Control. 20(6):935–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon MC, Park JD, Choi BS, Park SY, Kim DW, Chung YH, Hisanaga N, Yu IJ. 2011. Risk assessment of baby powder exposure through inhalation. Toxicol Res. 27(3):137–141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NIOSH. 2019. NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM), fifth edition: method 7400, issue 3. asbestos and other fibers by PCM 7400. Cincinnati (OH): National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).
   Google Scholar
• NTP. 1993. Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of talc in F344/N rats and B6C3F mice. Technical report series no. 421: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program (NTP).
   Google Scholar
• Ozesmi M, Patiroglu TE, Hillerdal G, Ozesmi C. 1985. Peritoneal mesothelioma and malignant lymphoma in mice caused by fibrous zeolite. Br J Ind Med. 42(11):746–749.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pier J. 2017a. Wet sieve concentration applied to chrysotile in the analysis of talc for asbestos. Presentation at Johnson Conference, Burlington, VT, July, 2017. San Jose (CA): Imerys.
   Google Scholar
• Pier J. 2017b. Wet sieve concentration for the analysis of talc for asbestos. Presentation at Johnson Conference, Burlington, VT, July, 2017. San Jose (CA): Imerys.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce JS, Riordan AS, Miller EW, Gaffney SH, Hollins DM. 2017. Evaluation of the presence of asbestos in cosmetic talcum products. Inhal Toxicol. 29(10):443–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pira E, Coggiola M, Ciocan C, Romano C, Vecchia CL, Pelucchi C, Boffetta P. 2017. Mortality of talc miners and millers from Val Chisone, Northern Italy. J Occup Environ Med. 59(7):659–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pott F, Huth F, Friedrichs KH. 1974. Tumorigenic effect of fibrous dusts in experimental animals. Environ Health Perspect. 9:313–315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Price B. 2010. Industrial-grade talc exposure and the risk of mesothelioma. Crit Rev Toxicol. 40(6):513–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price B, Ware A. 2004. Mesothelioma trends in the united states: an update based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program data for 1973 through 2003. Am J Epidemiol. 159(2):107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price B, Ware A. 2009. Time trend of mesothelioma incidence in the United States and projection of future cases: an update based on SEER data for 1973 through 2005. Crit Rev Toxicol. 39(7):576–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen PE, Levesque C, Niu J, Gardner HD, Nilsson G, Macey K. 2019. Characterization of airborne particles emitted during application of cosmetic talc products. Int J Env Res Pub Health. 16(20):3830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohl AN, Langer AM. 1974. Identification and quantitation of asbestos in talc. Environ Health Perspect. 9:95–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohl AN, Langer AM, Selikoff IJ, Tordini A, Klimentidis R, Bowes DR, Skinner DL. 1976. Consumer talcums and powders: mineral and chemical characterization. J Toxicol Environ Health. 2(2):255–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner D, Markowitz G, Chowkwanyun M. 2019. “Nondetected”: the politics of measurement of asbestos in talc, 1971-1976. Am J Public Health. 109(7):969–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell RS, Merz RD, Sherman WT, Sivertson JN. 1979. The determination of respirable particles in talcum powder. Food Cosmet Tox. 17(2):117–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rustein M, Pier J, Crane D, Gunter M, Halterman D, Houck K, Poye L, Sanchez M, Seagrave A, Tomaoino G, et al. 2020. Stimuli to the revision process: modernization of asbestos testing in USP talc - part 2. Rockville (MD): U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP).
   Google Scholar
• Sahmel J, Avens HJ, Scott PK, Unice K, Burns A, Barlow CA, Madl AK, Henshaw J, Paustenbach DJ. 2015. Measured removal rates of chrysotile asbestos fibers from air and comparison with theoretical estimates based on gravitational settling and dilution ventilation. Inhal Toxicol. 27(14):787–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahmel J, Barlow CA, Gaffney S, Avens HJ, Madl AK, Henshaw J, Unice K, Galbraith D, DeRose G, Lee RJ, et al. 2016. Airborne asbestos take-home exposures during handling of chrysotile-contaminated clothing following simulated full shift workplace exposures. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 26(1):48–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandland GW. 1976. Talc. CTFA Cosmet J. 8(1):21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Smith WE, Hubert DA, Sobel HJ, Marquet E. 1979. Biologic tests of tremolite in hamsters. In: Leman R, Dement JM, editors. Dusts and disease. Park Forest South (IL): Pathotox Publishers, Inc.; p. 335–339.
   Google Scholar
• Snider DW, Pfeiffer DE, Mancuso JJ. 1972. Asbestosform impurities in commercial talcum powders. Compass Sig Ep. 49:65–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks LE. 2016. IAQ model for Windows RISK. Version 1.5. Research Triangle Park (NC): EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton MF, Layard M, Tegeris A, Miller E, May M, Morgan E, Smith A. 1981. Relation of particle dimension to carcinogenicity in amphibole asbestoses and other fibrous minerals. J Natl Cancer Inst. 67(5):965–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen JE, Tran T, Yimam M, Clancy KM, Bird TB, Rigler M, Longo W, Egilman DS. 2020. Serous ovarian cancer caused by exposure to asbestos and fibrous talc in cosmetic talc powders-a case series. J Occup Environ Med. 62(2):e65–e77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenback F, Rowland J. 1978. Role of talc and benzo(a)pyrene in respiratory tumor formation. Scand J Resp Dis. 59:130–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoiber T, Fitzgerald S, Leiba NS. 2020. Asbestos contamination in talc-based cosmetics: an invisible cancer risk. Env Health Insights. 14:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohmeier BR, Huntington JC, Bunker KL, Sanchez MS, Allison K, Lee RJ. 2010. What is asbestos and why is it important? Challenges of defining and characterizing asbestos. Int Geol Rev. 52(7–8):801–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teta MJ, Mink PJ, Lau E, Sceurman BK, Foster ED. 2008. US mesothelioma patterns 1973-2002: indicators of change and insights into background rates. Eur J Cancer Prev. 17(6):525–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gosen BS, Lowers HA, Sutley SJ, Gent CA. 2004. Using the geologic setting of talc desposits as an indicator of amphible asbestos content. Env Geol. 45(7):920–939.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner JC, Berry G, Cooke TJ, Hill RJ, Pooley FD, Skidmore JW. 1977. Animal experiments with talc. In: Walton WH, McGovern B, editors. Inhaled particles IV: proceedings of an international symposium organized by the British Occupational Hygiene Society, Edinburgh, 22-26 September 1975. Part 2. New York: Pergamon Press; p. 647–652.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner JC, Berry G, Hill RJ, Skidmore JW, Pooley FD. 1979. An animal model for inhalation exposure to talc. In: Lemen R, Dement JM, editors. Dusts and disease: proceedings of the conference on occupational exposures to fibrous and particulate dust and their extension into the environment. Park Forest South (IL): Pathotox Publishers; p. 389–392.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li Z-X. 2003. History of neoproterozoic rift basins in south China: implications for rodinia break-up. Precamb Res. 122(1–4):141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X-L, Zhou J-C, Qiu J-S, Zhang W-L, Liu X-M, Zhang G-L. 2006. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon geochronology of the neoproterozoic igneous rocks from Northern Guangxi, south China: implications for tectonic evolution. Precamb Res. 145(1–2):111–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehner AP, Zwicker GM, Cannon WC. 1977. Inhalation of talc baby powder by hamsters. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 15(2):121–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weissler A. 1973. Memo dated July 31, 1973 to Dr. R.M. Schaffner, Office of Technology, Re: Summary and Comments on Prof. Lewin’s Analytical Results for Asbestos in Talc. Washington (DC): Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Wergeland E, Andersen A, Baerheim A. 1990. Morbidity and mortality in talc-exposed workers. Am J Ind Med. 17(4):505–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wergeland E, Gjertsen F, Vos L, Grimsrud TK. 2017. Cause-specific mortality and cancer morbidity in 390 male workers exposed to high purity talc, a six-decade follow-up. Am J Ind Med. 60(9):821–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild P, Leodolter K, Refregier M, Schmidt H, Zidek T, Haidinger G. 2002. A cohort mortality and nested case-control study of French and Austrian talc workers. Occup Environ Med. 59(2):98–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie AG, Candela PA. 2015. Methodologies for determining the sources, characteristics, distribution, and abundance of asbestiform and nonasbestiform amphibole and serpentine in ambient air and water. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 18(1):1–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Cawood PA, Shu L, Santosh M, Li J. 2016. An early neoproterozoic accretionary prism ophiolitic melange from the western Jiangnan orogenic belt, south China. J Geol. 124(5):587–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar