References
- ALLEA. 2023. European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Revised Edition. https://allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/European-Code-of-Conduct-Revised-Edition-2023.pdf.
- Anderson, M. S., M. A. Shaw, N. H. Steneck, E. Konkle, and T. Kamata. 2013. “Research Integrity and Misconduct in the Academic Profession.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 28, edited by M. B. Paulsen, 217–261. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_5.
- Carl, S. 2012. “Toward a Definition and Taxonomy of Public Sector Ombudsmen.” Canadian Public Administration 55 (2): 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00208.x.
- Chen, K., Y. Zhang, and X. Fu. 2019. “International Research Collaboration: An Emerging Domain of Innovation Studies?” Research Policy 48 (1): 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.005.
- Chou, C., I. L. Lee, and J. Fudano. 2023. “The Present Situation of and Challenges in Research Ethics and Integrity Promotion: Experiences in East Asia.” Accountability in Research 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2155144.
- The Danish Board on Research Misconduct. 2021. Årsberetning 2021. The Danish Board on Research Misconduct.
- Desmond, H., and K. Dierickx. 2021. “Research Integrity Codes of Conduct in Europe: Understanding the Divergences.” Bioethics 35 (5): 414–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12851.
- Downey, F., and R. Veitch. 2021. “Research Integrity—It’s About More Than Misconduct.” Forensic Sciences Research 6 (4): 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/20961790.2021.1971383.
- Embassy of Good Science. 2023. Facts & Figures. https://embassy.science/wiki/Special:BrowseData/Report.
- ENERI. 2019. EUREC – ENERI – European Network of Research Ethics and Research Integrity. http://www.eurecnet.org/eneri/.
- ENERI consortium. 2020. ENRIO Handbook: Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct. ENRIO. http://www.enrio.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/INV-Handbook_ENRIO_web_final.pdf.
- ENRIO. 2019a. Country Report: United Kingdom. http://www.enrio.eu/country-reports/united-kingdom/.
- ENRIO. 2019b. Country Reports Archive. http://www.enrio.eu/country-reports.
- ENRIO. 2023. “Members.” http://www.enrio.eu/members/.
- FEK. 2021. Årsrapport 2021. De nasjonale forskningsetiske komiteene FEK.
- Fischbach, R. L., and D. C. Gilbert. 1995. “The Ombudsman for Research Practice: A Proposal for a New Position and an Invitation to Comment.” Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4): 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02583257.
- The German Research Ombudsman. 2021. Jahresbericht 2021. The German Research Ombudsman.
- Godecharle, S., B. Nemery, and K. Dierickx. 2013. “Guidance on Research Integrity: No Union in Europe.” Lancet 381 (9872): 1097–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60759-X.
- Hsieh, H.-S., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
- Huistra, P., and H. Paul. 2022. “Systemic Explanations of Scientific Misconduct: Provoked by Spectacular Cases of Norm Violation?” Journal of Academic Ethics 20 (1): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09389-8.
- Kahneman, D., O. Sibony, and C. R. Sunstein. 2021. Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgement. Little Brown Spark.
- Krisch, N. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001.
- Langtvedt, N. J. 2020. The Act on Ethics and Integrity in Research. Forskningsetikk. https://www.forskningsetikk.no/en/resources/the-research-ethics-library/legal-statutes-and-guidelines/the-act-on-ethics-and-integrity-in-research/.
- Lov om organisering av forskningsetisk arbeid, LOV-2017-04-28-23. 2017. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2017-04-28-23?q=Forskningsetikkloven.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21896.
- Nolte, H., K. Videnoja, L. Tauginienė, H. Czesnick, and S. Rutiku. 2023. “ENRIO’s Leading Pathway to Research Integrity Promotion.” In Handbook of Academic Integrity, edited by S. E. Eaton, 1–18. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_168-1.
- Npof. 2021. Årlig rapport. Npof. https://npof.se/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Arlig-rapport-Npof-2021.pdf.
- NRIN. 2021. Jaarverslag 2020 & Jaarplan 2021. Netherlands Research Integrity Network (NRIN). https://www.nrin.nl/images/NRINJaarverslag20_Jaarplan21.pdf.
- Perković Paloš, A., R. Roje, V. Tomić, and A. Marušić. 2023. “Creating Research Ethics and Integrity Country Report Cards: Case Study from Europe.” Accountability in Research 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2163632.
- Pizzolato, D., and K. Dierickx. 2021. “Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Research Integrity Training Practices: A Qualitative Study.” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z.
- Reisman, W. M. 2008. “On the Causes of Uncertainty and Volatility in International Law.” In The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity, edited by T. Broude and Y. Shany, 1st ed., 33–50. Oxford: Hart Publishing; Bloomsbury Collections.
- Resnik, D. B., T. T. Neal, A. A. Raymond, and G. E. Kissling. 2015. “Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions: Introduction.” Accountability in Research 22 (1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.891943.
- Resnik, B. D., and A. E. Shamoo. 2011. “The Singapore Statement on Research Integrity.” Accountability in Research 18 (2): 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557296.
- Sheldon, T. 2011. “Dutch Research Community Is Shocked by Cases of Scientific Misconduct.” British Medical Journal 343: d7690. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7690.
- Spoof, S.-K. 2018. A Framework for Self-Regulation in Research Integrity: The Finnish Model, Step by Step. Responsible Research. https://vastuullinentiede.fi/en/planning/framework-self-regulation-research-integrity-finnish-model-step-step.
- Stieber, C. 2000. “57 Varieties: Has the Ombudsman Concept Become Diluted?” Negotiation Journal 16 (1): 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007546404573.
- Tauginienė, L., and I. Gaižauskaitė. 2022. “Jumping with a Parachute – Is Promoting Research Integrity Meaningful?” Accountability in Research, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2044318.
- TRUST. 2018. The TRUST Code – a Global Code of Conduct for Equitable Research Partnerships. https://doi.org/10.48508/GCC/2018.05.
- Vaismoradi, M., H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. “Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study.” Nursing and Health Sciences 15 (1): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048.
- VCWI. 2021. Jaarverslag 2021. VCWI. https://www.vcwi.be/sites/default/files/VCWI_jaarverslag2021.pdf.
- Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Macmillan.
- Yliopistolaki 558/2009. 2009. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2009/20090558.
- Zhang, Y., and B. M. Wildemuth. 2009. “Qualitative Analysis of Content.” In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science, edited by B. M. Wildemuth, 308–319. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.