ChatGPT as an “author”: Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship

References

• Abalkina, A. 2023. “Publication and Collaboration Anomalies in Academic Papers Originating from a Paper Mill: Evidence from a Russia-Based Paper Mill.” Learned Publishing 36 (4): 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berdejo-Espinola, V., and T. Amano. 2023. “AI Tools Can Improve Equity in Science.” Science 379 (6636): 991–991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg9714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering. 2024. “Submission guidelines.” Accessed April 8, 2024. https://link.springer.com/journal/12195/submission-guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, J. 2021. “The Raw Truth About Paper Mills.” FEBS Letters 595 (13): 1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.14143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). 2024. “Authorship and AI Tools.” Accessed April 8, 2024. https://publicationethics.org/cope-position-statements/ai-author.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M., L. M. Rasmussen, and D. B. Resnik. 2024. “Using AI to Write Scholarly Publications.” Accountability in Research 1–9. (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M., D. B. Resnik, and K. Holmes. 2023. “The Ethics of Disclosing the Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Writing Scholarly Manuscripts.” Research Ethics 19 (4): 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449.
   Google Scholar
• Hutson, M. 2022. “Could AI Help You to Write Your Next Paper?” Nature 611 (7934): 192–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors). 2024. “Recommendations.” Accessed April 8, 2024. https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Joelving, F. 2024. “Paper Trail.” Science 383 (6680): 252–255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado0309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaebnick, G. E., D. C. Magnus, A. Kao, M. Hosseini, D. Resnik, V. Dubljević, C. Rentmeester, B. Gordijn, and M. J. Cherry. 2023. “Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.” The Hastings Center Report 53 (5): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, M. R., and chatGPT [sic]. 2023. “A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education.” Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering 16 (1): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, B. D., and K. T. Naheem. 2024. “Can ChatGPT Be an Author? A Study of Artificial Intelligence Authorship Policies in Top Academic Journals.” Learned Publishing 37 (1): 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, B. D., T. Wang, N. R. Mannuru, B. Nie, S. Shimray, and Z. Wang. 2023. “ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence‐Written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 74 (5): 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, S. 2023. “Open Artificial Intelligence Platforms in Nursing Education: Tools for Academic Progress or Abuse?” Nurse Education in Practice 66:103537. corrigendum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, B. 2023. “How Nature Readers Are Using ChatGPT.” Nature 615 (7950): 20. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00500-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prillaman, M. 2024. “Is ChatGPT Making Scientists Hyper-Productive? The Highs and Lows of Using AI.” Nature 627 (8002): 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00592-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PubMed. 2024. (last Accessed April 8, 2024). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36660590/.
   Google Scholar
• Springer Nature. 2024. Authorship. Accessed April 8, 2024. https://www.nature.com/nature-portfolio/editorial-policies/authorship.
   Google Scholar
• Springer Nature. 2024. “Authorship Principles.” Accessed April 8, 2024. https://www.springer.com/us/editorial-policies/authorship-principles.
   Google Scholar
• Stokel-Walker, C., and R. Van Noorden. 2023. “What ChatGPT and Generative AI Mean for Science.” Nature 614 (7947): 214–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, G. 2024. “Letter to Editor: Academic Journals Should Clarify the Proportion of NLP-Generated Content in Papers.” Accountability in Research 1–2. (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2180359.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. 2017. “Ethical Exceptionalism: Can Publishing Rules Be Manipulated to Give the Impression of Ethical Publishing?” Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science 16 (4): 610–614. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v16i4.33623.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. 2021. “Assessing the Ethics of Stings, Including from the Prism of Guidelines by Ethics-Promoting Organizations (COPE, ICMJE, CSE).” Publishing Research Quarterly 37 (1): 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09784-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. 2023a. “Is ChatGPT a Valid Author?” Nurse Education in Practice 68:103600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. 2023b. “A Reflection on Springer Nature’s Current Editorial Policies Related to “Predatory” Journals and References: A Pertinent Lesson for Other Publishers.” Science Editor and Publisher 8 (2): 110–123. https://doi.org/10.24069/SEP-23-17.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. 2023c. “Letter to the Editor in Response to Article by Vaishya et al ChatGPT: Is This Version Good for Healthcare and Research?” Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 17 (5): 102779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp, H. H. 2023. “ChatGPT Is Fun, but Not an Author.” Science 379 (6630): 313–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg7879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Woudenberg, R., C. Ranalli, and D. Bracker. 2024. “Authorship and ChatGPT: A Conservative View.” Philosophy & Technology 37 (1): 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00715-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wykes, T., and A. Parkinson. 2023. “The Anxiety of the Lone Editor: Fraud, Paper Mills and the Protection of the Scientific Record.” Journal of Mental Health 32 (5): 865–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2023.2232217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar