Publishing important work that lacks validity or reproducibility – pushing frontiers or corrupting science?

References

• Abbasi, K. 2020. “Covid-19: Politicisation, “Corruption,” and Suppression of Science.” British Medical Journal 371:m4425. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, C., and D. M. A. Mehler. 2019. “Open Science Challenges, Benefits and Tips in Early Career and Beyond.” PloS Biology 17 (5): e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, C. 2021. “HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining As Questionable Research Practices.” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 82 (1): 20f13804. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. 2016. “1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility.” Nature 533 (7604): 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, S. J. 2014. “Socially Responsible Science Is More Than “Good science”.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15 (2): 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.870.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biswas, A., S. Parmar, A. Jana, R. Chaudhary, and S. Ogal 2018. “Absence of Superconductivity in Pulsed Laser Deposited Au/Ag Modulated Nanostructured Thin Films.” arXiv. Accessed December , 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.10699.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. P., and B. Holman. 2019. “Self-Correction in Science: Meta-Analysis, Bias and Social Structure.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78:93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burget, M., E. Bardone, and M. Pedaste. 2017. “Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos-Varela, I., and A. Ruano-Raviña. 2019. “Misconduct As the Main Cause for Retraction. A Descriptive Study of Retracted Publications and Their Authors.” Gaceta Sanitaria 33 (4): 356–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, and P. Jarillo-Herrero. 2018. “Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices.” Nature 556 (7699): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature26160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelvecchi, D. 2018. “Physicists Doubt Bold Superconductivity Claim Following Social-Media Storm.” Nature. Accessed 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06023-x.
   Google Scholar
• Chabner, B. A. 2020. “The Corruption of Science.” The Oncologist 25 (11): 907–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/onco.13549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, D. 2023. “Unearned Authorship Pervades Science.” Nature. Accessed 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00016-1.
   Google Scholar
• Dalai, M. K., B. B. Singh, S. K. Sethy, S. Sahoo, and S. Bedanta. 2021. “Superconductivity in Ag Implanted Au Thin Film.” Physica B: Condensed Matter 601:412607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2020.412607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasenbrock-Gammon, N., E. Snider, R. McBride, H. Pasan, D. Durkee, and N. Khalvashi-Sutter. 2023a. “Evidence of Near-Ambient Superconductivity in a N-Doped Lutetium Hydride.” Nature 615 (7951): 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05742-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasenbrock-Gammon, N., E. Snider, R. McBride, H. Pasan, D. Durkee, and N. Khalvashi-Sutter. 2023b. “Retraction Note: Evidence of Near-Ambient Superconductivity in a N-Doped Lutetium Hydride.” Nature 624 (7991): 460–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06774-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debessai, M., T. Matsuoka, J. J. Hamlin, J. S. Schilling, and K. Shimizu. 2021. “Retraction: Pressure-Induced Superconducting State of Europium Metal at Low Temperatures [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 197002 (2009)].” Physical Review Letters 127 (26): 269902–02. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.269902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo-Martín, I., and K. Intemann. 2023. “Socially Responsible Science: Exploring the Complexities.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3): 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-023-00537-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, H. 2020. “Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3): 1287–1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00143-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozdov, A. P., M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin. 2015. “Conventional Superconductivity at 203 Kelvin at High Pressures in the Sulfur Hydride System.” Nature 525 (7567): 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozdov, A. P., P. P. Kong, V. S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, M. A. Kuzovnikov, and S. Mozaffari. 2019. “Superconductivity at 250 K in Lanthanum Hydride Under High Pressures.” Nature 569 (7757): 528–531. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1201-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkee, D., N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, G. A. Smith, E. Snider, D. Smith, C. Childs, S. A. J. Kimber, K. V. Lawler, and A. Salamat. 2023. “Retraction: Colossal Density-Driven Resistance Response in the Negative Charge Transfer Insulator MnS2 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 016401 (2021)].” Physical Review Letters 131 (7): 079902–02. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.079902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington, T. M., M. Mathur, C. K. Soderberg, A. Denis, N. Perfito, E. Iorns, and B. A. Nosek. 2021. “Investigating the Replicability of Preclinical Cancer Biology.” eLife 10. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fage-Butler, A., L. Ledderer, and K. H. Nielsen. 2022. “Public Trust and Mistrust of Climate Science: A Meta-Narrative Review.” Public Understanding of Science 31 (7): 832–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221110028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. C., R. G. Steen, and A. Casadevall. 2012. “Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 109 (42): 17028–17033. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, P. P., L. J. Conway, A. Cucciari, S. Di Cataldo, F. Giannessi, and E. Kogler. 2023. “Search for Ambient Superconductivity in the Lu-N-H System.” Nature Communications 14 (1): 5367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41005-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flier, J. S. 2022. “The Problem of Irreproducible Bioscience Research.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 65 (3): 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2022.0032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. P., I. M. Cockburn, and T. S. Simcoe. 2015. “The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research.” PloS Biology 13 (6): e1002165. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garisto, D. 2022. “Plagiarism Allegations Pursue Physicist Behind Stunning Superconductivity Claims.” Science. Accessed 2023. https://www-science-org.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/content/article/plagiarism-allegations-pursue-physicist-behind-stunning-superconductivity-claims.
   Google Scholar
• Garisto, D. 2023a. “Allegations of Scientific Misconduct Mount As Physicist Makes His Biggest Claim Yet. Physics Magazine (American Physical Society).” Accessed August, 2023. https://physics.aps.org/articles/v16/40.
   Google Scholar
• Garisto, D. 2023b. “LK-99 isn’t a Superconductor — How Science Sleuths Solved the Mystery.” Nature 620 (7975): 705–706. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02585-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garisto, D. 2023c. “‘A Very Disturbing picture’: Another Retraction Imminent for Controversial Physicist.” Nature. Accessed August, 2023. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02401-2.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, M. J. 2023. “Public Trust in Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 48 (2): 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, K., Y. Li, and S. Jia. 2023. “Ferromagnetic Half Levitation of LK-99-like Synthetic Samples.” Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 66 (10): 107411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2201-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2018. “A Superconductor Scandal? Scientists Question a Nobel Prize–Worthy Claim.” Scientific American. Accessed 2023. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-superconductor-scandal-scientists-question-a-nobel-prize-worthy-claim/.
   Google Scholar
• Hannun, Y. A. 2021. “Build a Registry of Results That Students Can Replicate.” Nature 600 (7890): 571. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03707-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, B. L. 2017. “Four Decades of Open Science.” Nature Physics 13 (6): 523–525. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettinger, T. P. 2010. “Misconduct: Don’t Assume Science Is Self-Correcting.” Nature 466 (7310): 1040. https://doi.org/10.1038/4661040b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. 2012. “The Origin of the Meissner Effect in New and Old Superconductors.” Physica Scripta 85 (3): 035704. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/85/03/035704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E., and F. Marsiglio. 2021. “Unusual Width of the Superconducting Transition in a Hydride.” Nature 596 (7873): E9–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03595-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research (3ed). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12192.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2012. “Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6): 645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, P. 2023. “Phase Transition of Copper (I) Sulfide and Its Implication for Purported Superconductivity of LK-99.” arXiv. Accessed 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05222.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlov, M. 2022. “How a Scandal in Spider Biology Upended researchers’ Lives.” Nature. Accessed August, 2022. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02156-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., J. Kim, S. Im, S. An, Y. Kwon, and K. Auh. 2023a. “Consideration for the Development of Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor (LK-99).” Journal of the Korean Crystal Growth and Crystal Technology 33 (2): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.6111/JKCGCT.2023.33.2.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., J. Kim, H. T. Kim, S. Im, and K. An SMAuh. 2023b. “Superconductor Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O Showing Levitation at Room Temperature and Atmospheric Pressure and Mechanism.” arXiv. Accessed September, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12037.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., J. Kim, and Y. Kwon. 2023c. “The First Room-Temperature Ambient-Pressure Superconductor.” arXiv. Accessed September, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.12008.
   Google Scholar
• Lenk, H. 2022. “Responsibility in Science: The Philosophical View.” In The Responsibility of Science, edited by H. A. Mieg, 11–50. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mankowsky, R., A. Subedi, M. Först, S. O. Mariager, M. Chollet, and H. T. Lemke. 2014. “Nonlinear Lattice Dynamics As a Basis for Enhanced Superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.5.” Nature 516 (7529): 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, M. B., and M. P. Fox. 2023. “Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology.” American Journal of Epidemiology 192 (4): 658–664. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, J., D. Malakoff, R. F. Service, and K. Kupferschmidt. 2023. “Breakdowns of the Year.” Science 382 (6676): 1234–1235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn4880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mieg, H. A. 2022. “Science As a Profession: And Its Responsibility.” In The Responsibility of Science, edited by H. A. Mieg, 67–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ming, X., Y. J. Zhang, X. Zhu, Q. Li, C. He, and Y. Liu. 2023. “Absence of Near-Ambient Superconductivity in LuH2±xny.” Nature 620 (7972): 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06162-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt, B. 2018. “Scientific Authorship, Pluralism, and Practice.” Accountability in Research 25 (4): 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1437347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugiraneza, S., and A. M. Hallas. 2022. “Tutorial: A beginner’s Guide to Interpreting Magnetic Susceptibility Data with the Curie-Weiss Law.” Communications Physics 5 (1): 95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00853-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munafò, M., B. Nosek, D. Bishop, K. Button, C. Chambers, and N. Percie du Sert. 2018. “A manifesto for reproducible science.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (1): 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill, U. S. 2008. “Publish or Perish, but at What Cost.” Journal of Clinical Investigation 118 (7): 2368. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI36371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normile, D. 2014. “Senior RIKEN scientist involved in stem cell scandal commits suicide.” Science. Accessed 2023. https://www.science.org/content/article/senior-riken-scientist-involved-stem-cell-scandal-commits-suicide.
   Google Scholar
• Oransky, I. 2015. “How Publish or Perish Promotes Inaccuracy in Science – and Journalism.” AMA Journal of Ethics 17:1172–1175. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.sect1-1512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasan, H., E. Snider, S. Munasinghe, S. Dissanayake, N. Salke, M. Ahart, N. Khalvashi-Sutter, N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. McBride, G. Smith, et al. 2023. “Observation of Conventional Near Room Temperature Superconductivity in Carbonaceous Sulfur Hydride.” arXiv. Accessed August, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08622.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1992. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prasanna, A. R. 2022. “Science As a Profession.” In How to Learn and Practice Science, edited by A. R. Prasanna, 113–120. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prinz, F., T. Schlange, and K. Asadullah. 2011. “Believe it or Not: How Much Can We Rely on Published Data on Potential Drug Targets?” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 10 (9): 712. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puphal, P., M. Akbar, M. Hepting, E. Goering, M. Isobe, A. Nugroho, and B. Keimer 2023. “Single Crystal Synthesis, Structure, and Magnetism of Pb10−xcux(po4)6o.” arXiv. Accessed 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06256.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, E. 2009. Plastic Fantastic: How the Biggest Fraud in Physics Shook the Scientific World. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., and A. E. Shamoo. 2017. “Reproducibility and Research Integrity.” Accountability in Research 24 (2): 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2016.1257387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochios, C., and J. L. Richmond. 2022. “Are We All on the Same Page? Subfield Differences in Open Science Practices in Psychology.” Infant and Child Development 33 (1): e2361. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salke, N., A. Mark, M. Ahart, and R. Hemley 2023. “Evidence for Near Ambient Superconductivity in the Lu-N-H System.” arXiv. Accessed August , 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.06301.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, A., M. Cantoni, J. D. Guo, and H. R. Ott. 1993. “Superconductivity Above 130 K in the Hg–Ba–Ca–Cu–O System.” Nature 363 (6424): 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/363056a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra-Garcia, M., and U. Gneezy. 2021. “Nonreplicable Publications Are Cited More Than Replicable Ones.” Science Advances 7 (21). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Service, R. 2021. “Breakthrough or Bust? Claim of Room-Temperature Superconductivity Draws Fire.” Science. Accessed 2023. https://www.science.org/content/article/breakthrough-or-bust-claim-room-temperature-superconductivity-draws-fire.
   Google Scholar
• Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2022. Responsible Conduct of Research. 4th ed. New York: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Siekevitz, P. 1970. “Scientific responsibility.” Nature 227 (5265): 1301–1303. https://doi.org/10.1038/2271301a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. 2018. “Repeated Noise Pattern in the Data of arXiv: 1807.08572, “Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures”. arXiv. Accessed 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.02929.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, E., N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. McBride, M. Debessai, H. Vindana, K. Vencatasamy, K. V. Lawler, A. Salamat, and R. P. Dias. 2020. “Retracted article: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride.” Nature 586 (7829): 373–377. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2801-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider, E., N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. McBride, M. Debessai, H. Vindana, K. Vencatasamy, K. V. Lawler, A. Salamat, and R. P. Dias. 2022. “Retraction Note: Room-temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride.” Nature 610 (7933): 804–04. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05294-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, J., and Y. Jie 2023. “Superconductors’ Viral ‘LK-99’ Moment Takes Investors for a Wild Ride.” The Wall Street Journal. Accessed 2023. https://www.wsj.com/articles/superconductors-new-lk-99-viral-moment-takes-investors-for-a-wild-ride-20b9599b.
   Google Scholar
• Somayazulu, M., M. Ahart, A. K. Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y. Meng, V. V. Struzhkin, and R. J. Hemley. 2019. “Evidence for Superconductivity Above 260 K in Lanthanum Superhydride at Megabar Pressures.” Physical Review Letters 122 (2): 027001–01. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgis, P., I. Brunton-Smith, and J. Jackson. 2021. “Trust in Science, Social Consensus and Vaccine Confidence.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (11): 1528–1534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H., M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, et al. 2023. “Signatures of Superconductivity Near 80 k in a Nickelate Under High Pressure.” Nature 621:493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06408-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, B. L. 2018. “Letter to the Editor: On Plurality and Authorship in Science.” Accountability in Research 25 (4): 254–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1457959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, G., M. Schulze, and M. Ruck 2023. “On the Synthesis Methodologies to Prepare Pb9Cu(PO4)6O – Phase, Composition, Magnetic Analysis and Absence of Superconductivity.” arXiv. Accessed 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05776.
   Google Scholar
• Thapa, D., S. Islam, S. Saha, P. Mahapatra, B. Bhattacharyya, T. Sai, R. Mahadevu, S. Patil, A. Ghosh, and A. Pandey 2019. “Coexistence of Diamagnetism and Vanishingly Small Electrical Resistance at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures.” arXiv. Accessed September, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.08572.
   Google Scholar
• US Office of Research Integrity. 2022. Definition of Research Misconduct. US Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed December 2022 https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-research-misconduct.
   Google Scholar
• van der Marel, D., and J. E. Hirsch. 2022. “Room-Temperature Superconductivity — or Not? Comment on Nature 586, 373 (2020) by E. Snider et al.” International Journal of Modern Physics B 37 (4): 2375001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979223750012.
   Google Scholar
• Vazire, S., and A. O. Holcombe. 2021. “Where Are the Self-Correcting Mechanisms in Science?” Review of General Psychology 26 (2): 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211033912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verfaellie, M., and J. McGwin. 2011. The case of Diederik Stapel. American Psychological Association. Accessed Sept 2022. https://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2011/12/diederik-stapel.
   Google Scholar
• Verhoog, H. 1981. “The Responsibilities of Scientists.” Minerva 19 (4): 582. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente-Saez, R., and C. Martinez-Fuentes. 2018. “Open Science Now: A Systematic Literature Review for an Integrated Definition.” Journal of Business Research 88:428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, G. 2023. “Transplant Surgeon Sentenced to Prison for Failed Stem Cell Treatments.” Science. Accessed June , 2023. https://www-science-org.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/content/article/transplant-surgeon-gets-prison-sentence-failed-stem-cell-treatments.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. K., J. R. Ashburn, C. J. Torng, P. H. Hor, R. L. Meng, L. Gao, Z. J. Huang, Y. Q. Wang, and C. W. Chu. 1987. “Superconductivity at 93 K in a New Mixed-Phase Y-Ba-Cu-O Compound System at Ambient Pressure.” Physical Review Letters 58 (9): 908–910. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarborough, M. 2014. “Openness in Science Is Key to Keeping Public Trust.” Nature 515 (7527): 313–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/515313a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo-Teh, N. S., and B. L. Tang. 2022. “Sustained Rise in Retractions in the Life Sciences Literature During the Pandemic Years 2020 and 2021.” Publications 10 (3): 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S., W. Wu, Z. Li, and J. Luo. 2023. “First-Order Transition in LK-99 Containing Cu2S.” Matter 6 (12): 4401–4407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2023.11.001.
   Google Scholar