Rethinking the author name ambiguity problem and beyond: The case of the Chinese context

References

• Adams, J., R. Fry, D. Pendlebury, R. Potter, and G. Rogers. 2023. Global Research Report: China’s Research Landscape. Institute for Scientific Information. https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2023/10/XBU1202260247-ISI-GRR-Q4_Chinas-Research-Landscape-Report_DIGITAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• American Astronomical Society. n.d. “Including Author Names Using Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Characters.” Accessed November 8, 2023. https://journals.aas.org/nonroman/#:~:text=Authors%20have%20the%20option%20to,parentheses%20after%20the%20English%20name.
   Google Scholar
• Bagga, A., and B. Baldwin. 1998. “Entity-Based Cross-Document Coreferencing Using the Vector Space Model.” In 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 79–85. Vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, H. 2015. “Introduction of Integration Between ORCID and Institutional Repository.” New Technology of Library and Information Service 3:8–17. ht tps://d oi.org/CNKI:SUN:XDTQ.10.2015/03/003.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. 2015. Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: Image Repair Theory and Research. 2nd ed. Edited by William L. Benoit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boudry, C. 2021. “Availability of ORCIDs in Publications Archived in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science Core Collection.” Scientometrics 126 (4): 3355–3371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03825-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., and T. Demeranville. 2018. “A Year in ORBIT.” ORCiD. Last Modified November 28, 2018. Accessed January 27. https://info.orcid.org/a-year-in-orbit/.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. 2012. “Scientists: Your Number Is Up.” Nature 485 (7400): 564. https://doi.org/10.1038/485564a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, C. B., and C. F. Blanford. 2017. “All Authors Must Now Supply ORCID Identifiers.” Journal of Materials Science 52 (11): 6147–6149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0919-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, M. 2009. “Authors’ Names in a Globalized American Journal of Neuroradiology.” American Journal of Neuroradiology 30 (3): 441–442. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R. 2016. “Strengthen Review of authors’ Information to Prevent Academic Cheating: Englightenments from a Case of Suspected Academic Cheating.” Acta Editologica 28 (2): 144–146. https://doi.org/10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2016.02.015.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, L. 2006. “Indexing Personal Names.” The Indexer 25 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Dai, N. 2021. “Enhance the Safety Consciousness and Hold the Bottom Line of Science and Technology Security.” Acta Editologica 33 (5): 492–496. https://doi.org/10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, T., S. Zhang, and B. Zhang. 2022. “Current Situation, Risks and Countermeasures of ORCID.” Digital Library Forum 2:47–52. https://doi.org/10.3772/j.issn.1673-2286.2022.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Du, G. 2007. “Name Game: Most Chinese Use 3 Characters, Some Use 10 or More.” China View. Last Modified December 12. Accessed November 7, 2023. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-12/12/content_7234658.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial Committee of Chinese Academic Journals. 1999. Data Norm for Retrieval and Evaluation of Chinese Academic Journal (CD) (CAJ-CD B/T1-1998). Beijing, China: General Administration of Press and Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial Committee of Chinese Academic Journals. 2006. Data Norm for Retrieval and Evaluation of Chinese Academic Journal (CD) (CAJ-CD B/T 1-2006). Beijing, China: General Administration of Press and Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A., L. A. Carey, P. B. Fontanarosa, S. G. Phillips, B. P. Pace, G. D. Lundberg, and D. Rennie. 1998. “Prevalence of Articles with Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals.” JAMA 280 (3): 222–224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X. A., and Y. Zheng. 2018. “‘Heavy mountains’ for Chinese Humanities and Social Science Academics in the Quest for World-Class Universities.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 50 (4): 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1538770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparyan, A. Y., M. Yessirkepov, A. N. Gerasimov, E. I. Kostyukova, and G. D. Kitas. 2016. “Scientific Author Names: Errors, Corrections, and Identity Profiles.” Biochemia Medica 26 (2): 169–173. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2016.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granshaw, S. I. 2019. “Research Identifiers: ORCID, DOI, and the Issue with Wang and Smith.” Photogrammetric Record 34 (167): 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/phor.12290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, L. L. 2014. “iAuthor and ORCID: Supporting International Identifiers for Chinese Researchers at the National Science Library of the Chinese Academies of Sciences.” Last Modified December 3, 2014. Accessed January 31 https://info.orcid.org/iauthor-and-orcid-supporting-international-identifiers-for-chinese-researchers-at-the-national-science-library-of-the-chinese-academies-of-sciences/.
   Google Scholar
• Haak, L. L., M. Fenner, L. Paglione, E. Pentz, and H. Ratner. 2012. “ORCID: A System to Uniquely Identify Researchers.” Learned Publishing 25 (4): 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak, L. L., A. Meadows, and J. Brown. 2018. “Using ORCID, DOI, and Other Open Identifiers in Research Evaluation.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00028.
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W. 2015. “Health Warning: Might Contain Multiple Personalities—The Problem of Homonyms in Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators.” Scientometrics 105 (3): 2259–2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1699-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., ed. 2003. The Hundred Surnames. Qingdao, China: Qingdao Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Household Management Research Center of the Ministry of Public Security. 2021. ““2020 National Name Report” Released.” Last Modified February 8. Accessed November 5, 2023. https://www.mps.gov.cn/n2254314/n6409334/c7726021/content.html.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., B. Yang, S. Yan, and R. Rousseau. 2014. “Institution Name Disambiguation for Research Assessment.” Scientometrics 99:823–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1214-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Q. Yu, and J. Zhang. 2017. “Research and Realization of Interactions in Multiple Systems Based on ORCID iD.” Library Journal 36 (11): 70–78. https://doi.org/10.13663/j.cnki.lj.2017.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 1982. “Information and Documentation: Romanization of Chinese (ISO Standard No. 7098: 1982).” https://www.iso.org/standard/13682.html.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2015. “Information and Documentation: Romanization of Chinese (ISO Standard No. 7098: 2015).” https://www.iso.org/standard/61420.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kałużyńska, I. 2015. “Chinese Naming–Substitution by Homophones.” Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia (28):79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., H. Shu, and P. Li. 2007. “Word Naming and Psycholinguistic Norms: Chinese.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (2): 192–198. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Y. Xu, and C. Shi. 2016. “The Application of ORCID in Scientific Journals in China and Its Benefits for Researchers.” Publishing Research 11:42–45. https://doi.org/10.19393/j.cnki.cn11-1537/g2.2016.11.010.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., and J. Huang. 2016. “Realization of Application of iAuthor on Research Evaluation of Institutions.” Journal of Library Science in China 42 (222): 97–108. https://doi.org/10.13530/j.cnki.jlis.162007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallapaty, S. 2024. “China Conducts First Nationwide Review of Retractions and Research Misconduct.” Nature 626 (8000): 700–701. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00397-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcus, A. 2021. “Author, Author! Or Perhaps We Should Say Fake Author, Fake Author!” Retraction Watch (Blog). March 31. https://retractionwatch.com/2021/03/31/author-author-or-perhaps-we-should-say-fake-author-fake-author/.
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, A. 2003. “The Corpus of English As Lingua Franca in Academic Settings.” TESOL Quarterly 37 (3): 513–527. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., L. Bouter, S. Kleinert, P. Glasziou, M. Har Sham, V. Barbour, A.-M. Coriat, N. Foeger, and U. Dirnagl. 2020. “The Hong Kong Principles for Assessing Researchers: Fostering Research Integrity.” PLOS Biology 18 (7): e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morillo, F., I. Santabárbara, and J. Aparicio. 2013. “The Automatic Normalisation Challenge: Detailed Addresses Identification.” Scientometrics 95:953–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0965-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notay, B. 2018. “Funders sign up to ORCID Open Letter.” Accessed January 27. Last Modified December 7, 2018. https://org/scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2018/12/07/funders-sign-up-to-orcid-open-letter/
   Google Scholar
• Oransky, I. 2021. “Researcher Uses Fake Email Address to Submit a Paper Mill Manuscript without Corresponding author’s Knowledge.” Retraction Watch (Blog). December 13. https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/13/researcher-uses-fake-email-address-to-submit-a-paper-mill-manuscript-without-corresponding-authors-knowledge/.
   Google Scholar
• ORCID. 2015. “ORCID in Publications.” https://info.orcid.org/requiring-orcid-in-publications/.
   Google Scholar
• ORCID. n.d.-a. “ORCID Member Organizations.” Accessed January 31 https://orcid.org/members.
   Google Scholar
• ORCID. n.d.-b. “ORCID Statistics.” Accessed January 31, 2024. https://info.orcid.org/orcid-statistics/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Q., J. Su, L. Zhang, J. Bai, C. Zhang, and C. Xiao. 2020. “Application Status and Enlightenment of ORCID Marking in Chinese Academic Journals.” Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals 31 (2): 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Perron, B. E., O. T. Hiltz-Perron, and B. G. Victor. 2021. “Revealed: The Inner Workings of a Paper Mill.” Retraction Watch (Blog). December 20. https://retractionwatch.com/2021/12/20/revealed-the-inner-workings-of-a-paper-mill/.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, J. 2008. “Identity Crisis: Chinese Authors Are Publishing More and More Papers, but Are They Receiving Due Credit and Recognition for Their Work? Not if Their Names Get Confused Along the Way.” Nature 451 (7180): 766–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/451766a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanyal, D. K., K. P. Bhomick, and P. P. Das. 2021. “A Review of Author Name Disambiguation Techniques for the PubMed Bibliographic Database.” Journal of Information Science 47 (2): 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519888605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., T. Kim, J. Choi, and J. Kim. 2014. “Author Name Disambiguation Using a Graph Model with Node Splitting and Merging Based on Bibliographic Information.” Scientometrics 100:15–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1289-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalheiser, N. R., and V. I. Torvik. 2009. “Author Name Disambiguation.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43 (1): 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2009.1440430113.
   Google Scholar
• State Council of China. 1978. The State Council Approved the Report on the Use of the Chinese Pinyin Scheme As the Unified Standard for the Roman Alphabet Spelling of Names of People and Places in China.
   Google Scholar
• Strotmann, A., and D. Zhao. 2012. “Author Name Disambiguation: What Difference Does it Make in Author-Based Citation Analysis?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (9): 1820–1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, T., J. Huang, J. Zhang, and Y. Huang. 2015. “Study on the International Identifiers for Scientists.” Library and Information Service 59 (1): 17–22; 44. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, X., and J. Zhou. 2002. “English Versions of Chinese authors’ Names in Biomedical Journals: Observations and Recommendations.” Science Editor 25 (1): 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, L., and J. Walsh. 2010. “Bibliometric Fingerprints: Name Disambiguation Based on Approximate Structure Equivalence of Cognitive Maps.” Scientometrics 84 (3): 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0196-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, L., L. Wang, and G. Hu. 2023. “Research Misconduct Investigations in China’s Science Funding System.” Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00459-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. 2004. “The Role of English in Scientific Communication: Lingua Franca or Tyrannosaurus Rex?” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3 (3): 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001.
   Google Scholar
• Torvik, V. I., and N. R. Smalheiser. 2009. “Author Name Disambiguation in MEDLINE.” ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 3 (3): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To, W. M., and B. T. Yu. 2020. “Rise in Higher Education Researchers and Academic Publications.” Emerald Open Research 2:3. https://doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13437.1.
   Google Scholar
• van Noorden, R. 2023. “More Than 10,000 Research Papers Were Retracted in 2023 - a New Record.” Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., J. Huang, and X. Liu. 2015. “The Application Research of ORCID in Institutional Repository Construction.” Library and Information Service 59 (17): 134–140. https://doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2015.17.020.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Z. 2015. “The Application of the International Academic Identifier ORCID in Chinese Scientific Journals.” Research & Education 5:101–104. https://doi.org/10.16510/j.cnki.kjycb.2015.05.029.
   Google Scholar
• Woolston, C. 2023. “Nature Index Annual Tables 2023: China Tops Natural-Science Table.” Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-01868-3.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H. 2023. “Misconduct Performances and Suggestions for Processing Retracted Papers of Chinese Journal Databases.” Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals 34 (11): 1554–1561. https://doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202308150620.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S. B., and G. Hu. 2022. “Retraction Stigma and Its Communication via Retraction Notices.” Minerva 60 (3): 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09465-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youtie, J., S. Carley, A. L. Porter, and P. Shapira. 2017. “Tracking Researchers and Their Outputs: New Insights from ORCIDs.” Scientometrics 113:437–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2473-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., and X. A. Gao. 2016. “Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences scholars’ Language Choices in International Scholarly Publishing: A ten-Year Survey.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 48 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar