886
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Engaging girls in computer science: gender differences in attitudes and beliefs about learning scratch and python

Pages 600-620 | Received 01 Dec 2021, Accepted 26 Jun 2022, Published online: 06 Jul 2022

References

  • Armoni, M., Meerbaum-Salant, O., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). From scratch to “real” programming. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(4), 25. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677087
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  • Barker, L. J., McDowell, C., & Kalahar, K. (2009). Exploring factors that influence computer science introductory course students to persist in the major. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(2), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508923
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
  • Bian, L., Leslie, S.-J., & Cimpian, A. (2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355(6323), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6524
  • Carifio, J., & Perla, R. (2008). Resolving the 50‐year debate around using and misusing likert scales. Medical Education, 42(12), 1150–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
  • Cherney, I. D., & Campbell, K. L. (2011). A league of their own: Do single-sex schools increase girls’ participation in the physical sciences? Sex Roles, 65(9–10), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0013-6
  • Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016239
  • Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1825–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.004
  • Code org, CSTA, & ECEP Alliance. (2021). 2021 State of computer science education: Accelerating action through advocacy. https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs
  • Cohen, G. L., & Garcia, J. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(6), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00607.x
  • Danaher, K., & Crandall, C. S. (2008). Stereotype threat in applied settings re-examined. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1639–1655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00362.x
  • Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M., & Hunsinger, M. (2014). The effect of peers on women in engineering [ Unpublished manuscript], University of Massachusetts Amherst.
  • Davies, P. G., Steele, C. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276
  • De Cohen, C. C., & Deterding, N. (2009). Widening the net: National estimates of gender disparities in engineering. The Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01020.x
  • Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342
  • Eastwood, B. (2020, June 18). The 10 most popular programming languages to learn in 2021. Northeastern University Graduate Programs. https://www.northeastern.edu/graduate/blog/most-popular-programming-languages/
  • Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x
  • Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., Lindzey, G. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (4 ed., Vol. 2). McGraw Hill.
  • Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002
  • Gallup (2020). Current perspectives and continuing challenges in computer science education in U.S. K-12 schools. https://csedu.gallup.com/home.aspx
  • Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004
  • Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659
  • Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66, 153–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2
  • Guo, P. (2014, July 7). Python is now the most popular introductory teaching language at top U.S. universities. https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/176450-python-is-now-the-most-popular-introductory-teaching-language-at-top-u-s-universities/fulltext
  • Hausmann, L. R., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9052-9
  • Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM Identity Among Young Women: A Social Identity Perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
  • Knisely, K. A., & Wind, S. A. (2017). Developing a survey to explore of sense of belongingness related to language learning using rasch measurement theory. Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 54(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.54.2.2017.2
  • Lewis, C. M. (2010, March). How programming environment shapes perception, learning and goals: Logo vs. scratch. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 346–350). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734383
  • Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Finkelstein, N. D., Pollock, S. J., Miyake, A., Cohen, G. L., & Ito, T. A. (2017). Fitting in to move forward: Belonging, gender, and persistence in the physical sciences, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pSTEM). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 41(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317720186
  • Marx, D. M., & Goff, P. A. (2005). Clearing the air: The effect of experimenter race on target’s test performance and subjective experience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 645–657. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604X17948
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061
  • Master, A., Cheryan, S., Moscatelli, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2017). Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013
  • Matsuzawa, Y., Ohata, T., Sugiura, M., & Sakai, S. (2015). Language migration in non-cs introductory programming through mutual language translation environment. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 185–190). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677230
  • McMahon, S. D., Wernsman, J., & Rose, D. S. (2009). The relation of classroom environment and school belonging to academic self-efficacy among urban fourth-and fifth-grade students. The Elementary School Journal, 109(3), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1086/592307
  • Miura, I. T. (1987). The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college. Sex Roles, 16(5–6), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289956
  • Murphy, E., Crick, T., & Davenport, J. H. (2017). An analysis of introductory programming courses at UK universities. Art Sci. Eng. Program, 1(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.22152/programming-journal.org/2017/1/18
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) (2019). Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. Special Report NSF 21-321. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd.
  • Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035740
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
  • Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 440. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.440
  • Scratch. (n.d.). In scratch wiki. https://en.scratch-wiki.info/wiki/Scratch
  • Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0
  • Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596607
  • Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212468332
  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
  • Steele, J. R., & Ambady, N. (2006). “Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(4), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.06.003
  • Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385
  • Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
  • Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.