298
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Charting a path for growth in middle school students’ attitudes toward computer programming

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & show all
Pages 4-36 | Received 17 Jul 2021, Accepted 07 Oct 2022, Published online: 04 Nov 2022

References

  • Adrion, W. R., Dunton, S. T., Ericson, B., Fall, R., Fletcher, C., & Guzdial, M. (2020, Dec). U.S. States must broaden participation while expanding access to computer science education. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 22–25. https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2020/12/248789-u-s-states-must-broaden-participation-while-expanding-access-to-computer-science-education/fulltext
  • Ahlqvist, S., London, B., & Rosenthal, L. (2013). Unstable identity compatibility: How gender rejection sensitivity undermines the success of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1644–1652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476048
  • Ahmed, W. (2018). Developmental trajectories of math anxiety during adolescence: Associations with stem career choice. Journal of Adolescence (London, England.), 67, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.06.010
  • Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
  • Ball, C., Huang, K. T., Cotten, S. R., & Rikard, R. V. (2017). Pressurizing the STEM pipeline: An expectancy-value theory analysis of youths’ STEM attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9685-1
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Bernacki, M. L., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Aleven, V. (2015). Examining self-efficacy during learning: Variability and relations to behavior, performance, and learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9127-x
  • Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
  • Blotnicky, K. A., Franz-Odendaal, T., French, F., & Joy, P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge, mathematics self-efficacy, career interests, and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3
  • Bohrnstedt, G. W., Zhang, J., Park, B. J., Ikoma, S., Broer, M., & Ogut, B. (2020). Mathematics identity, self-efficacy, and interest and their relationships to mathematics achievement: A longitudinal analysis. In R. T. Serpe R. Stryker & B. Powell (Eds.), Identity and Symbolic Interaction (pp. 169–210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41231-9_7
  • Brown, V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(1), 2515245920960351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351
  • Butler-Barnes, S. T., Cheeks, B., Barnes, D. L., & Ibrahim, H. (2021). STEM pipeline: Mathematics beliefs, attitudes, and opportunities of racial/ethnic minority girls. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-021-00059-x
  • Camp, T., Adrion, W., Bizot, B., Davidson, S., Hall, M., Hambrusch, S., Walker, E., & Zweben, S. (2017). Generation CS: The growth of computer science. ACM Inroads, 8(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3084362
  • Campe, S., Denner, J., Green, E., & Torres, D. (2020). Pair programming in middle school: Variations in interactions and behaviors. Computer Science Education, 30(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2019.1648119
  • Casad, B. J., Oyler, D. L., Sullivan, E. T., McClellan, E. M., Tierney, D. N., Anderson, D. A., Greeley, P. A., Fague, M. A., & Flammang, B. J. (2018). Wise psychological interventions to improve gender and racial equality in STEM. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 767–787. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218767034
  • Catsambis, S. (1994). The path to math: gender and racial-ethnic differences in mathematics participation from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 67(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112791
  • Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
  • Ching, Y. H., Yang, D., Wang, S., Baek, Y., Swanson, S., & Chittoori, B. (2019). Elementary school student development of STEM attitudes and perceived learning in a STEM integrated robotics curriculum. TechTrends, 63(5), 590–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00388-0
  • Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, science, and technology in the early grades. The Future of Children, 26(2), 75–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2016.0013
  • Code.org, C. S. T. A., & Alliance, E. C. E. P. (2022). 2022 State of Computer Science Education: Illuminating Disparities. https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs
  • Degenhart, S. H., Wingenbach, G. J., Dooley, K. E., Lindner, J. R., Mowen, D. L., & Johnson, L. (2007). Middle school students’ attitudes toward pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and math. NACTA Journal, 52–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43766229
  • Denissen, J. J., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain‐specific achievement, self‐concept, and interest. Child Development, 78(2), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x
  • Doerschuk, P., Liu, J., & Mann, J. (2007). Pilot summer camps in computing for middle school girls: From organization through assessment. In Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, Dundee, Scotland (pp. 4–8). https://doi.org/10.1145/1268784.1268789
  • Donohue, M. C., Gamst, A. C., & Edland, S. D. (2021). Package ‘longpower’. CRAN. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/longpower/longpower.pdf
  • Downes, T., & Looker, D. (2011). Factors that influence students’ plans to take computing and information technology subjects in senior secondary school. Computer Science Education, 21(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2011.579811
  • Du, J., & Wimmer, H. (2019). Hour of code: A study of gender differences in computing. Information Systems Education Journal, 17(4), 91–100. http://isedj.org/2019-17/n4/ISEDJv17n4p91.html
  • Else-Quest, N., Mineo, C. C., & Higgins, A. (2013). Math and science attitudes and achievement at the intersection of gender and ethnicity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313480694
  • Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Okpodu, C. M., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M. F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. (2016). Improving underrepresented minority student persistence in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038
  • Friend, M. (2015). Middle school girls’ envisioned future in computing. Computer Science Education, 25(2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1033128
  • Gainor, K. A., & Lent, R. W. (1998). Social cognitive expectations and racial identity attitudes in predicting the math choice intentions of black college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45(4), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.403
  • Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., Chu, F., Scofield, J. E., & Ferguson Hibbard, D. (2019). Sex differences in mathematics anxiety and attitudes: concurrent and longitudinal relations to mathematical competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(8), 1447–1461. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000355
  • Gladstone, J. R., Häfner, I., Turci, L., Kneißler, H., & Muenks, K. (2018). Associations between parents and students’ motivational beliefs in mathematics and mathematical performance: The role of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.009
  • Gottlieb, J. J. (2018). STEM career aspirations in Black, Hispanic, and White ninth‐grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1365–1392. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21456
  • Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.010
  • Grover, S., Fisler, K., Lee, I., & Yadav, A. (2020, February). Integrating computing and computational thinking into K-12 STEM learning. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland, OR, USA (pp. 481–482). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366970
  • Huang, X., Zhang, J., & Hudson, L. (2019). Impact of math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and growth mindset on math and science career interest for middle school students: The gender moderating effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0403-z
  • Huber, P. J. (1967, June). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Berkeley, CA, USA (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 221–233).
  • Hughes, R. A., Heron, J., Sterne, J. A., & Tilling, K. (2019). Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: Multiple imputation is not always the answer. International Journal of Epidemiology, 48(4), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz032
  • Hur, J. W., Andrzejewski, C. E., & Marghitu, D. (2017). Girls and computer science: Experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations. Computer Science Education, 27(2), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1376385
  • Jiang, S., Simpkins, S. D., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). Individuals’ math and science motivation and their subsequent STEM choices and achievement in high school and college: A longitudinal study of gender and college generation status differences. Developmental Psychology, 56(11), 2137–2151. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001110
  • Jo Campbell, N., & Williams, J. E. (1990). Relation of Computer Attitudes and Computer Attributions to Enrollment in High School Computer Courses and Self-Perceived Computer Proficiency. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1990.10781921
  • Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
  • Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students’ interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.026
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. D. Brown Ed. In Career Choice and Development (4th ed., pp. 255–311). Jossey-Bass.
  • Lent, R. W., Morris, T. R., Penn, L. T., & Ireland, G. W. (2019). Social–cognitive predictors of career exploration and decision-making: Longitudinal test of the career self-management model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000307
  • Leyva, E., Walkington, C., Perera, H., & Bernacki, M. (2022). Making mathematics relevant: An examination of student interest in mathematics, interest in STEM careers, and perceived relevance. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00159-4
  • Lichtenberger, E., & George-Jackson, C. (2013). Predicting high school students’ interest in majoring in a STEM field: insight into high school students’ postsecondary plans. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 28(1), 19–38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1043177
  • Lin, L., Lee, T., & Snyder, L. A. (2018). Math self-efficacy and STEM intentions: A person-centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2033. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02033
  • Linnel, N., Dayal, A., Gonsalves, P., Kakodkar, M., Ribiero, B., Starr, A., & Zdankus, J. (2020). Curated pathways to innovation: Personalized CS education to promote diversity. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 35(10), 39–45. https://www.ccsc.org/publications/journals/SW2020.pdf#page=39
  • Liu, G., & Liang, K. Y. (1997). Sample size calculations for studies with correlated observations. Biometrics, 53(3), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533554
  • London, J. S., Lee, W. C., & Hawkins Ash, C. D. (2021). Potential engineers: A systematic literature review exploring black children’s access to and experiences withSTEM. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(4), 1003–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20426
  • Low, K. S. D., Yoon, M., Roberts, B. W., & Rounds, J. (2005). The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 713–737. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.713
  • Madley-Dowd, P., Hughes, R., Tilling, K., & Heron, J. (2019). The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 110, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.016
  • Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20441
  • McNeish, D. (2018). Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000144
  • Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
  • Meade, A. W., Lautenschlager, G. J., & Hecht, J. E. (2005). Establishing measurement equivalence and invariance in longitudinal data with item response theory. International Journal of Testing, 5(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0503_6
  • Miller, D. I., & Wai, J. (2015). The bachelor’s to Ph.D. STEM pipeline no longer leaks more women than men: A 30-year analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00037
  • Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and maths aspirations and attitudes among young people aged 17/18. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1228–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21628
  • Niepel, C., Burrus, J., Greiff, S., Lipnevich, A. A., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2018). Students’ beliefs and attitudes toward mathematics across time: A longitudinal examination of the theory of planned behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.010
  • O’Brien, L. T., Blodorn, A., Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., & Hammer, E. (2015). Ethnic variation in gender-STEM stereotypes and STEM participation: An intersectional approach. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037944
  • Olivera-Aguilar, M. (2013). Impact of violations of longitudinal measurement invariance in latent growth models and autoregressive quasi-simplex models. [Dissertation].Arizona State University. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79567262.pdf
  • Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0991
  • Pantic, K., Clarke-Midura, J., Poole, F., Roller, J., & Allan, V. (2018). Drawing a computer scientist: Stereotypical representations or lack of awareness? Computer Science Education, 28(3), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533780
  • Plant, E. A., Baylor, A. L., Doerr, C. E., & Rosenberg-Kima, R. B. (2009). Changing middle-school students’ attitudes and performance regarding engineering with computer-based social models. Computers & Education, 53(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.013
  • Pollock, L., McCoy, K., Carberry, S., Hundigopal, N., & You, X. (2004). Increasing high school girls’ self-confidence and awareness of CS through a positive summer experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(1), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028174.971369
  • Ram, N., & Grimm, K. (2007). Using simple and complex growth models to articulate developmental change: Matching theory to method. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025407077751
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., & Grodsky, E. (2010). Racial-ethnic differences at the intersection of math course-taking and achievement. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040710375689
  • Rogers, M. E., & Creed, P. A. (2011). A longitudinal examination of adolescent career planning and exploration using a social cognitive career theory framework. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.12.010
  • Ryoo, J. J., Tanksley, T., Estrada, C., & Margolis, J. (2020). Take space, make space: How students use computer science to disrupt and resist marginalization in schools. Computer Science Education, 30(3), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805284
  • Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Hazari, Z., & Tai, R. (2012). Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: A gender study. Science Education, 96(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21007
  • Saw, G., Chang, C., & Chan, H. (2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18787818
  • Seo, E., Shen, Y., & Alfaro, E. C. (2019). Adolescents’ beliefs about math ability and their relations to STEM career attainment: Joint consideration of race/ethnicity and gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0911-9
  • Štuikys, V., & Burbaitė, R. (2018). Smart STEM-driven computer science education: Theory, methodology and robot-based practices. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78485-4
  • Su, R. (2020). The three faces of interests: An integrative review of interest research in vocational, organizational, and educational psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 103240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.016
  • Taub, R., Armoni, M., & Ben-Ari, M. (2012). CS unplugged and middle-school students’ views, attitudes, and intentions regarding CS. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160547.2160551
  • Thomas, J. A., & Strunk, K. K. (2017). Expectancy‐value and children’s science achievement: Parents matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21382
  • Tsybulsky, D. (2020). Digital curation for promoting personalized learning: A study of secondary-school science students’ learning experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728447
  • Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915571160
  • Urdan, T. (2019). Curated Pathways to Innovation Survey. Unpublished survey instrument.
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS]. (2021). Occupational Outlook Handbook: Computer and Information Research Scientists. Retrieved 11 Feb 2021. From https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-and-information-research-scientists.htm#tab-6
  • U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF]. (2019, Sept). Science and Engineering Labor Force: Demographic Trends of the S&E Workforce. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20198/demographic-trends-of-the-s-e-workforce
  • U.S. National Science Foundation [NSF] & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics [NCSES]. (2019, March). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: glossary and key to acronyms. Report created with surveys by the Surveys conducted by the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). Retrieved 12 Feb 2021 from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/digest/glossary-and-key-to-acronyms
  • van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
  • Vandenberg, J., Tsan, J., Boulden, D., Zakaria, Z., Lynch, C., Boyer, K. E., & Wiebe, E. (2020). Elementary students’ understanding of CS terms. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 20(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386364
  • Varma, R. (2018). US science and engineering workforce: Underrepresentation of women and minorities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(5), 692–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276421876884
  • Vegas, E., & Fowler, B. (2020). What do we know about the expansion of K-12 computer science education. Brookings Institute. Retrieved February, 2. 2021https://www.brookings.edu/research/what-do-we-know-about-the-expansion-of-k-12-computer-science-education/.
  • Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622
  • Wang, M. T., Binning, K. R., Del Toro, J., Qin, X., & Zepeda, C. D. (2021). Skill, thrill, and will: The role of metacognition, interest, and self‐control in predicting student engagement in mathematics learning over time. Child Development, 92(4), 1369–1387. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13531
  • Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
  • Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
  • Wang, Z., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N., Schofield, K., & Malanchini, M. (2020). The longitudinal role of mathematics anxiety in mathematics development: Issues of gender differences and domain-specificity. Journal of Adolescence, 80, 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.03.003
  • Wiebe, E., Unfried, A., & Faber, M. (2018). The relationship of STEM attitudes and career interest. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92286
  • You, S. (2013). Gender and ethnic differences in precollege mathematics coursework related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(1), 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.681384

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.