Simulation-driven design of a fast monohull

References

• Adams BM, Bohnhoff WJ, Dalbey KR, Ebeida MS, Eddy JP, Eldred MS, Hooper RW, Hough PD, Hu KT, Jakeman JD, et al. 2021. Dakota, A Multilevel Parallel Object-Oriented Framework for Design Optimization, Parameter Estimation, Uncertainty Quantification, and Sensitivity Analysis. Version 6.15 User’s Manual. Sandia Technical Report SAND2020-12495.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed O. 2022. Speeding-Up simulation driven design for high-speed planing boat [master thesis]. École Centrale de Nantes.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed O, Harries S, Lohse J, Salecker S-E. 2023. Parametric modeling, CFD simulations, DoE and machine learning for the design of a planing boat. Conference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries (COMPIT 2023), Drübeck, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Albert S, Harries S, Hildebrandt T, Reyer M. 2016. Hyrodynamic optimization of a power boat in the cloud. High-Performance marine vehicles (HIPER 2016), Cortona, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Albert S, Hildebrandt T, Harries S, Bergmann E, Kovacic M. 2021. Parametric modeling and hydrodynamic optimization of an electric catamaran ferry based on radial basis functions for an intuitive Set-up. Conference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries (COMPIT 2021), Tullamore, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Birk L, Harries S. 2003. OPTIMISTIC – Optimization in Marine Design. 39th WEGEMT, Mensch & Buch Verlag. ISBN 3-89820-514-2.
   Google Scholar
• Blount D. 2023. Design of Propeller Tunnels for High-speed Craft. [accessed 2023 January 31]. https://www.boatdesign.net/.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S. 1998. Parametric design and hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms. [PhD thesis]. Technical University Berlin, Mensch & Buch Verlag. ISBN 3-933346-24-X.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S. 2020. Practical shape optimization using CFD: state-Of-The-Art in industry and selected trends. Conference on computer applications and information technology in the maritime industries (COMPIT 2020), Pontignano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S, Abt C. 2019a. Faster turn-around times for the design and optimization of functional surfaces. Ocean Eng. 193:106470. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harries S, Abt C. 2019b. The holiship platform for process integration and design optimization. In: A. Papanikolaou, editor. A holistic approach to ship design – Vol. 1: optimisation of ship design and operation for life cycle. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S, Abt C, Brenner M. 2015. Upfront CAD – parametric modeling techniques for shape optimization. international conference on evolutionary and deterministic methods for design, optimization and control with applications to industrial and societal problems (EUROGEN 2015). In: Published by E. Minisci, editor. Advances in evolutionary and deterministic methods for design, optimization and control in engineering and sciences. Glasgow, UK: Springer; p. 191–211.
   Google Scholar
• Harries S, Uharek S. 2021. Application of radial basis functions for partially-parametric modeling and principal component analysis for faster hydrodynamic optimization of a catamaran. J Mar Sci Eng. 9(10):1069. doi:10.3390/jmse9101069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess JL, Smith AMO. 1962. Calculation of the Non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional bodies. Report No. E.S. 40622. Long Beach: Douglas Aircraft.
   Google Scholar
• Hilleary R. 1966. The tangent search method of constrained minimization. In: tech. Rep./Res.paper 59. Monterey: United States Naval Postgraduate School.
   Google Scholar
• ITTC. 2014. ITTC – Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, Practical Guidelines for Ship Self-Propulsion CFD, 7.5–03–03–01.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson L, Eliasson RE, Orych M. 2014. Principles of yacht design. International Marine/McGraw-Hill Education, Camden, Maine, USA. 4th ed. ISBN 978-0-07-182640-2.
   Google Scholar
• Lin W-C, Webster WC, Wehausen JV. 1963. Ships of minimal total resistance. Proc. Int. seminar on wave resistance, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki N. 1963. Potentialtheoretische Strömungs- und Sogberechnungen für schiffsähnliche Körper [PhD Thesis]. Berlin: Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Nowacki N. 2003. Design synthesis and optimization – An historical perspective. 39th WEGEMT, Mensch & Buch Verlag, 1–26. ISBN 3-89820-514-2.
   Google Scholar
• Papanikolaou A. 2024. On parametric modeling, digital siblings and ship design optimisation. Ship Technology Research – Schiffstechnik. To be Published.
   Google Scholar
• Pien PC, Moore WL. 1963. Theoretical and experimental study on wave-making resistance of ships. In: Proc. Int. seminar on wave resistance. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Sandia National Laboratories. 2023. DAKOTA – Reference Manual [accessed 2023 February 24]. https://dakota.sandia.gov/content/612-reference-manual.
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky D. 1964. Hydrodynamic design of planing hulls. Mar Technol. 1/1:71–95.
   Google Scholar
• Savitsky D, Brown PW. 1976. Procedures for hydrodynamic evaluation of planing hulls in smooth and rough water. Mar Technol. 13/4:381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol IM. 1976. Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property. Zh. vych. Mat. Mat. Fiz. 16: 1332–1337 (in Russian). U.S.S.R. Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 16:236–242. (in English).
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler MP, Matveev KI, Xing T. 2021. Numerical study of hydrodynamics of heavily loaded hard-chine hulls in calm water. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 9:2. doi:10.3390/jmse9020184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing T, Stern F. 2010. Factors of safety for Richardson extrapolation. J Fluids Eng. 132:061403. doi:10.1115/1.4001771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar