Support on the way to the top? The effects of family-friendly flexible working arrangements in organisations on the promotion of women to management positions—the case of Germany

References

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In Gender and society (Vol. 4, pp. 139–158). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, R. (2019). Vereinbarkeit von Beruf und Familie: Herausforderung für Staat und Zivilgesellschaft. In M. Freise & A. Zimmer (Eds.), Zivilgesellschaft und Wohlfahrtsstaat im Wandel (pp. 285–309). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. (2009). Fixed effects regression models - Quantitative Application in the Social Sciences, 160. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. (2015). What’s so special about logit? https://statisticalhorizons.com/whats-so-special-about-logit/
   Google Scholar
• Arntz, M., Sarra, B. Y., & Berlingieri, F. (2019). Working from home: Heterogeneous effects on hours worked and wages. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, 19–015.
   Google Scholar
• Artz, B. (2010). Fringe benefits and job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, 31(6), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011073346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächmann, A.-C., & Frodermann, C. (2020). Warum Mütter wechseln, wenn sie bleiben könnten? Der Einfluss betrieblicher Merkmale auf Arbeitgeberwechsel von Müttern nach der Geburt des ersten Kindes. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 49(2–3), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2020-0018
   Google Scholar
• Bächmann, A.-C., Frodermann, C., & Müller, D. (2020b). Does the firm make the difference? The influence of organizational family-friendly arrangements on the duration of employment interruptions after childbirth. European Sociological Review, 36(5), 798–813. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bächmann, A.-C., Frodermann, C., Grunow, D., Hagen, M., & Müller, D. (2020a). Family-friendly organizational arrangements – Anything but “a fuss” (over nothing)! IAB-Forum, February 20.
   Google Scholar
• Bainbridge, H. T., & Townsend, K. (2020). The effects of offering flexible work practices to employees with unpaid caregiving responsibilities for elderly or disabled family members. Human Resource Management, 59(5), 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, D., Jessen, J., & Spieß, C. K. (2020). Mütter in Ost und West: Angleichung bei Erwerbstätigenquoten und Einstellungen, nicht bei Vollzeiterwerbstätigkeit. DIW Weekly Report, 87(38), 699–706.
   Google Scholar
• Bastardoz, N., Matthews, M. J., Sajons, G. B., Ransom, T., Kelemen, T. K., & Matthews, S. H. (2023). Instrumental variables estimation: Assumptions, pitfalls, and guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 34(1), 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2022.101673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, J. B. (2021). Forget the “Mommy Track”: Temporal flexibility increases promotion aspirations for women and reduces gender gaps. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(3), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211003070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechmann, S., Tschersich, N., Ellguth, P., Kohaut, S., & Baier, E. (2021). Technical report on the IAB establishment panel-wave 27. FDZ-Methodenreport, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Begall, K., van Breeschoten, L., van der Lippe, T., & Poortman, A.-R. (2022). Supplemental family leave provision and employee performance: Disentangling availability and use. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(3), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1737176
   Google Scholar
• Bellmann, L. (2019). Warum Jobsharing mehr Chancen als Risiken bietet. IAB-Forum, July 18.
   Google Scholar
• Bellmann, L., Ellguth, P., Grunau, P., Hohendanner, C., Koch, T., Kohaut, S., Leber, U., Möller, I., Schwengler, B., Stegmaier, J., Umkehrer, M., Walz, H., Nußbeck, V., & Oberg, S. (2020). IAB-Betriebspanel (IAB BP) – Version 9319 v1. Forschungsdatenzentrum der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (BA) im Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB).
   Google Scholar
• Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2013). Female labor supply: Why is the United States falling behind? American Economic Review, 103(3), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blome, A., & Fuchs, G. (2017). Macht und substantielle Repräsentation von Frauen. Femina Politica–Zeitschrift für Feministische Politikwissenschaft, 26(1), 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, N., Kretschmer, T., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Are family-friendly workplace practices a valuable firm resource? Strategic Management Journal, 32(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourhis, A., & Mekkaoui, R. (2010). Beyond work-family balance: Are family-friendly organizations more attractive? Relations Industrielles, 65(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.7202/039529ar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budd, J. W., & Mumford, K. A. (2006). Family-friendly work practices in Britain: Availability and perceived accessibility. Human Resource Management, 45(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2010). KldB2010 – German classification of occupations 2010. Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
   Google Scholar
• Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2019). Grundlagen: Methodenbericht – Beschäftigte mit Leitungsfunktion. Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
   Google Scholar
• Bünning, M., & Hipp, L. (2022). How can we become more equal? Public policies and parents’ work–family preferences in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287211035701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch-Heizmann, A., Rinke, T., & Rastetter, D. (2018). Geschlechterungleichheit in Erwerbsorganisationen: Zur Verschränkung von “Struktur” und “Kultur”. Arbeit, 27(1), 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-2018-0004
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2016). Women face a labyrinth: An examination of metaphors for women leaders. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31(8), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2015-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, T. (2020). Orts- und zeitflexibles Arbeiten: Alte Geschlechterungleichheiten und neue Muster der Arbeitsteilung durch Digitalisierung. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 74(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-020-00213-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cetnarowski, I., Breuer, K., & Sliwka, D. (2013). Karriere in Teilzeit – Ein schwieriges Unterfangen mit “Klebeeffekt”. Personal Quarterly, 3, 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, G. (1980). Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Zhang, Y., Sanders, K., & Xu, S. (2018). Family-friendly work practices and their outcomes in China: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment and the moderating role of gender. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(7), 1307–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1195424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Fulmer, I. S. (2018). Fine-tuning what we know about employees’ experience with flexible work arrangements and their job attitudes. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. (2018). Dualization and the access to occupational family-friendly working-time arrangements across Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. (2020). Gender, flexibility stigma and the perceived negative consequences of flexible working in the UK. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collischon, M. (2023). Identifying supervisory or managerial status in german administrative records. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 243(2), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2022-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisman-Cox, C. (2021). Estimating substantive effects in binary outcome panel models: A comparison. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1086/709839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauth, W., & Eppelsheimer, J. (2020). Preparing the sample of integrated labour market biographies (SIAB) for scientific analysis: A guide. Journal for Labour Market Research, 54(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-020-00275-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Dulk, L., & Peper, B. (2007). Working Parents’ use of work-life policies. Sociologia, 53, 51–70.
   Google Scholar
• Deschacht, N. (2017). Part-time work and women’s careers: A decomposition of the gender promotion pap. Journal of Labor Research, 38(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-017-9242-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destatis (2021). Europe: Women in executive positions: Germany below EU average.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, E. L., Bartel, A. P., & Waldfogel, J. (2019). Gender in the labor market: The role of equal opportunity and family-friendly policies. The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(5), 168–197. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2019.5.5.09
   Google Scholar
• Durbin, S., & Tomlinson, J. (2014). Female part-time managers: Careers, mentors and role models. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellguth, P., Kohaut, S., & Möller, I. (2017). Wo schaffen es Frauen an die Spitze? Eine empirische Analyse mit Betriebsdaten. Industrielle Beziehungen, 24(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.3224/indbez.v24i2.05
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound (2018). Women in management: Underrepresented and overstretched? Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fakih, A. (2014). Availability of family-friendly work practices and implicit wage costs: New evidence from Canada. IZA Discussion Paper, 8190.
   Google Scholar
• FDZ IAB (2023). The IAB establishment panel – Questionnaires 1993–2021. https://doku.iab.de/fdz/iabb/IAB-BP_Frageboegen_EN.zip.
   Google Scholar
• Fehre, K., Lindstädt, H., & Picard, A. (2014). Förderung von Frauen in Führungspositionen: Bezugsrahmen und empirische Analyse der unternehmerischen Maßnahmen. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 66(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03372891
   Google Scholar
• Fitzenberger, B., & Seidlitz, A. (2020). The 2011 break in the part-time indicator and the evolution of wage inequality in Germany. Journal for Labour Market Research, 54(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-019-0265-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formánková, L., & Křížková, A. (2015). Flexibility trap – The effects of flexible working on the position of female professionals and managers within a corporate environment. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2014-0027
   Google Scholar
• Foster, E. M. (1997). Instrumental variables for logistic regression: An illustration. Social Science Research, 26(4), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1997.0606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frodermann, C., Müller, D., & Abraham, M. (2013). Determinanten des Wiedereinstiegs von Müttern in den Arbeitsmarkt in Vollzeit oder Teilzeit. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 65(4), 645–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-013-0236-3
   Google Scholar
• Garg, S., & Agrawal, P. (2020). Family-friendly practices in the organization: A citation analysis. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(7/8), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2019-0251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gärtner, M., Garten, T., & Huesmann, M. (2016). Flexible Arbeitsmodelle für Führungskräfte. Zum Stand der Forschung. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 70(4), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-016-0038-3
   Google Scholar
• Gascoigne, C., & Kelliher, C. (2018). The transition to part-time: How professionals negotiate ‘reduced time and workload’ i-deals and craft their jobs. Human Relations, 71(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717722394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, A. H. (2005). Trends in policies for family-friendly societies. In Macura, M., MacDonald, A. L. & Haug, W. (Eds.) The new demographic regime: Population challenges and policy responses (pp. 95–110). United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Giesselmann, M., & Windzio, M. (2013). Regressionsmodelle zur Analyse von Paneldaten. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Granato, N. (2017). Geschlechterungleichheit in Führungspositionen: Der Einfluss von Arbeitsmarktsegregation und beruflichen Opportunitätsstrukturen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 46(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-2017-1011
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M., & Tudball, J. (2003). Family-friendly work practices: Differences within and between workplaces. Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(3), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1472-9296.00084
   Google Scholar
• Grunow, D., Aisenbrey, S., & Evertsson, M. (2011). Familienpolitik, Bildung und Berufskarrieren von Müttern in Deutschland, USA und Schweden. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie & Sozialpsychologie, 63(3), 395–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-011-0139-0
   Google Scholar
• Guedes, M. J., Soares, M. E., Mosquera, P., & Borregana, J. (2023). Does it pay off to offer family-friendly practices? Exploring the missing links to performance. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 19(2), 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00841-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulden, V.-S., & Thomsen, S. L. (2021). Frauen in Führungspositionen: Chancen und Risiken durch die COVID-19-Pandemie. Wirtschaftsdienst, 101(4), 305–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-021-2900-y
   Google Scholar
• Hammermann, A., Schmidt, J., & Stettes, O. (2019). Unternehmensmonitor Familienfreundlichkeit 2019. Gutachten gefördert durch das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ).
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G. H., Tzafrir, S. S., & Baruch, Y. (2003). Achieving organizational effectiveness through promotion of women into managerial positions: HRM practice focus. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958519021000029108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, E. J., Hawkins, A. J., Ferris, M., & Weitzman, M. (2001). Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations, 50(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00049.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipp, L., & Stuth, S. (2013). Management und Teilzeit? – Eine empirische Analyse zur Verbreitung von Teilzeitarbeit unter Managerinnen und Managern in Europa. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 65(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-013-0193-x
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, B. (2013). The impact of female managers on the gender pay gap: Evidence from linked employer–employee data for Germany. Economics Letters, 119(3), 348–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, E., & Friedrich, M. (2016). Hohe Führungspositionen: In der Finanzbranche haben Frauen im Vergleich zu Männern besonders geringe Chancen. DIW Weekly Report, 37, 827–838.
   Google Scholar
• Holst, E., & Marquardt, A. (2018). Differences in full-time work experience explain almost a quarter of the gender pay gap in management positions. DIW Weekly Report, 8, 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Hotz, V. J., Johansson, P., & Karimi, A. (2018). Parenthood, family friendly workplaces, and the gender gaps in early work careers. National Bureau of Economic Research, w24173, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24173
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, M. L., King, J., & Reichelt, M. (2017). Equality for whom? Organizational policies and the gender gap across the German earnings distribution. ILR Review, 70(1), 16–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793916673974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilieva, B., & Wrohlich, K. (2022). Gender gaps in employment, working hours and wages in Germany: Trends and developments over the last 35 years. CESifo Forum, 23, 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Joecks, J., Kurowska, A., & Pull, K. (2021). Is the push by female employees for family-friendly practices context-dependent? Comparative evidence from Sweden, Poland and Germany. Journal of Business Research, 126, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. (2001). Proper nouns and methodological propriety: Pooling dyads in international relations data. International Organization, 55(2), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, J., Hur, S., & Smith-Walter, A. (2013). Family-friendly work practices and job satisfaction and organizational performance: Moderating effects of managerial support and performance-oriented management. Public Personnel Management, 42(4), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013505503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohaut, S., & Möller, I. (2009). Vereinbarungen zur Chancengleichheit: Kaum Fortschritte bei der betrieblichen Förderung. IAB-Kurzbericht, 26, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kohaut, S., & Möller, I. (2023a). Führungspositionen in Deutschland 2022: Frauen bleiben nach wie vor unterrepräsentiert. IAB-Kurzbericht, 22, 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Kohaut, S., & Möller, I. (2023b). Women and leading positions in Germany: The role of promotion programs for women. Management Revue, 34(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2023-1-30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S., & Breisig, T. (1999). Teilzeitarbeit für Führungskräfte? Arbeit, 8(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1515/arbeit-1999-0205
   Google Scholar
• Körner, T., & Günther, L. (2011). Frauen in Führungspositionen – Ansatzpunkte zur Analyse von Führungskräften in Mikrozensus und Arbeitskräfteerhebung. Wirtschaft und Statistik, 5, 434–451.
   Google Scholar
• Lauber, V., Reiter, S., & Storck, J. (2015). Familienfreundlichkeit in Unternehmen – Status Quo in Deutschland und Forschungsstand. In DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus (Vol. 77). DIW Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., & Hong, J. H. (2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 870–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, L. M., Manchester, C. F., Park, T. Y., & Mehng, S. A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1407–1428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochner, B., & Merkl, C. (2022). Gender-specific application behavior, matching, and the residual gender earnings gap. IAB-Discussion Paper, 22.
   Google Scholar
• MacDermid, S. M., Dean Lee, M., Buck, M., & Williams, M. L. (2001). Alternative work arrangements among professionals and managers: Rethinking career development and success. Journal of Management Development, 20(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710110388965
   Google Scholar
• Meeussen, L., Begeny, C. T., Peters, K., & Ryan, M. K. (2022). In traditionally male-dominated fields, women are less willing to make sacrifices for their career because discrimination and lower fit with people up the ladder make sacrifices less worthwhile. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(8), 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, T. S. (2020). Why don’t employees use family-friendly work practices? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 58(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, D., Filser, A., & Frodermann, C. (2022). Update: Identifying mothers in administrative data. FDZ-Methodenreport, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Ochsenfeld, F. (2012). Gläserne Decke oder goldener Käfig: Scheitert der Aufstieg von Frauen in erste Managementpositionen an betrieblicher Diskriminierung oder an familiären Pflichten? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 64(3), 507–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-012-0178-1
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2023a). Employment rate (indicator). Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://www.oecd.org/berlin/statistiken/beschaeftigungsrate.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2023b). Part-time employment rate. Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://data.oecd.org/emp/part-time-employment-rate.htm
   Google Scholar
• Reskin, B. F., McBrier, D. B., & Kmec, J. A. (1999). The determinants and consequences of workplace sex and race composition. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohwer, A. (2011). Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf im europäischen Vergleich. Ifo Schnelldienst, 64(10), 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ruf, K., Schmidtlein, L., Seth, S., Stüber, H., & Umkehrer, M. (2021b). Linked-Employer-Employee-Daten des IAB: LIAB Längsschnittmodell (LIAB LM) 1975–2019. FDZ-Datenreport, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ruf, K., Schmidtlein, L., Seth, S., Stüber, H., Umkehrer, M., Grießemer, S., & Kaimer, S. (2021a). Linked-Employer-Employee-Daten des IAB (LIAB). LIAB-Längsschnittmodell 1975–2019, Version 1. Forschungsdatenzentrum der Bundesagentur für Arbeit (BA) im Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB).
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016). Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samtleben, C., Bringmann, J., Bünning, M., & Hipp, L. (2019). What helps and what hinders? Exploring the role of workplace characteristics for parental leave use and its career consequences. Social Sciences, 8(10), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100270
   Google Scholar
• Schein, C., & Schneider, A. K. (2017). Nicht-staatliche Akteure in der Familienpolitik – Die besondere Bedeutung von Arbeitgebenden. In I. Gerlach (Ed.) Elternschaft (pp. 161–195). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Spence, A. M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In P. Diamond & M. Rothschild (Eds.) Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281–306). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiftung, A. (2017). Ein ewiger Thomas-Kreislauf. Wie deutsche Börsenunternehmen ihre Vorstände rekrutieren, AllBright Bericht März 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stojmenovska, D., & England, P. (2021). Parenthood and the gender gap in workplace authority. European Sociological Review, 37(4), 626–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, J., & Durbin, S. (2010). Female part-time managers: Work-life balance, aspirations and career mobility. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/02610151011028859
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Reyna, O. (2007). Panel data analysis fixed and random effects using Stata (v. 4.2). Data & Statistical Services, Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Veld, M., & Alfes, K. (2017). HRM, climate and employee well-being: Comparing an optimistic and critical perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(16), 2299–2318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1314313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicari, B., Bächmann, A.-C., & Zucco, A. (2023). Frauen üben seltener als Männer Tätigkeiten mit hohem Anforderungsniveau aus. IAB-Forum, April 25.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, P. (2015). What’s so special about logit? https://statisticalhorizons.com/linear-vs-logistic/
   Google Scholar
• Wanger, S. (2020). Entwicklung von Erwerbstätigkeit, Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsvolumen nach Geschlecht - Ergebnisse der IAB-Arbeitszeitrechnung nach Alter und Geschlecht für die Jahre 1991-2019. IAB-Forschungsbericht, 16, 1–112.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender. Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. (2013). Cultural schemas, social class, and the flexibility stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F. (2022). Managing the gender wage gap—How female managers influence the gender wage gap among workers. European Sociological Review, 38(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcab046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmert, F. (2023). Early child care and the employment potential of mothers: Evidence from semi-parametric difference-in-differences estimation. Journal of Labour Market Research, 57(19), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-023-00344-9
   Google Scholar
• Zimmert, F., & Zimmert, M. (2020). Paid parental leave and maternal reemployment: Do part-time subsidies help or harm? Discussion Paper, Nr. 2002. University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Zoch, G. (2020). Public childcare provision and employment participation of East and West German mothers with different educational backgrounds. Journal of European Social Policy, 30(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928719892843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar