Exploring gender-inclusive approaches in Turkish disaster risk management: insights from decision-makers, service providers, and NGOs

References

• Afsar, S. T. (2016). Violence against women and femicides in Turkey. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(5), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v2i1.p70-80
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank. (2014). Tip sheet: Gender-inclusive disaster risk management Asian development bank (ADB). Retrieved August 31, 2021, from. https://www.adb.org/documents/tip-sheet-gender-inclusive-disaster-risk-management
   Google Scholar
• Baştürk Akca, E. (2015). Media representations of motherhood and mommy wars: Mother of the Week. Kadın/Woman 2000-Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Bitsch, V. (2005). Qualitative research: A grounded theory example and evaluation criteria. Journal of Agribusiness, 23(1), 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Bora, A. (2001). Türk Modernleşme Sürecinde Annelik Kimliğinin Dönüşümü. Yerli Bir Feminizme Doğru, 77–107.
   Google Scholar
• Cavlin, A. (2020). Women in danger of femicide: Predicting population at risk of femicide from intimate partner violence survivors in Turkey. Kadın/Woman 2000, Journal for Women’s Studies, 21(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33831/jws.v21i1.77
   Google Scholar
• Ciampi, M. C., Gell, F., Lasap, L., & Turvill, E. (2011). Gender and disaster risk reduction: A training pack. Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. (2021). Istanbul convention action against violence against women and domestic violence: Council of Europe, 2021 available from. Retrieved Augst 15, 2021, from. https://www.coe.int/en/web/istanbul-convention/turkey
   Google Scholar
• Council TWs, H. (2007). A guide to creating gender-sensitive health services. The Women’s Health Council.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, P. L., & Shrader, E. (2000). Gender and post-disaster reconstruction: The case of hurricane mitch in Honduras and Nicaragua, decision review draft. LCSPG/LAC Gender Team, The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. (2023). Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 7.7 Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 7.6 Depremlerine İlişkin Ön Değerlendirme Raporu. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Kahramanmaras%20%20Depremleri_%20On%20Degerlendirme%20Raporu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Enarson, E., & Chakrabarti, P. D. (Eds.). (2009). Women, gender and disaster: Global issues and initiatives. SAGE Publications India.
   Google Scholar
• Enarson, E., Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. (2018). Gender and disaster: Foundations and new directions for research and practice. In R. Havidán, W. Donner, & J. E. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 205–223). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Enarson, E., & Morrow, B. H. (1998). Why gender? Why women? An introduction to women and disaster. In E. Enarson, & B. H. Morrow (Eds.), The Gendered Terrain of Disaster: Through women’s Eyes, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Erbaydar, N. P., Onal, E. I., & Kaya, E. (2021). Analysis of gender sensitivity of Turkey’s disaster legislation to create a disaster-resilient society. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 254(4), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.254.261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, A., de Vries Robbe, S. A., Thies, S. F., Kabir, K., & Maruo, M. (2021). Gender dimensions of disaster risk and resilience: Existing evidence. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Fothergill, A. (1998). The neglect of gender in disaster work: An overview of the literature. The gendered terrain of disaster: Through Women’s eyes. CT, Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. R. Gibbs (ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–56). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526441867
   Google Scholar
• Global Gender Gap Report. (2021, March). Insight report. World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Güdücü, B. (2018). Biyolojik cinsiyet ve toplumsal cinsiyet. In D. Şenol & H. Kaya (Eds.), Toplumsal cinsiyet sosyolojisi, Lisans Yayıncılık (pp. 13–33).
   Google Scholar
• Hançer, A. (2018). A critical view of the motherhood identity of the woman as a subject of the gender. Mediterranean Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies, 1(2), 177–202.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, B., Aydın, E., Kurt, B., Özgün, Ş., & Yıldırım, A. (2016). Feminizm herkes içindir: Tutkulu politika. Boğaziçi Gösteri Sanatları Topluluğu.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1967). The thesis of the natural standpoint and its suspension. In J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenology (pp. 68–79). Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E., & Moran, D. (2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inal, E., & Kaya, E. (2021). Health care students’ willingness to work during disasters in Turkey. International Emergency Nursing, 56, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassa, J. A., Boli, Y., Nakmofa, Y., Fanggidae, S., Ofong, A., & Leonis, H. (2018). Twenty years of community-based disaster risk reduction experience from a dryland village in Indonesia. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.502
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. Newbury Park.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, M. (1984). Mobilisation without emancipation? Women’s interests, state and revolution in Nicaragua. Critical Social Policy, 4(10), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101838400401004
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C. O. (1989). Gender planning in the third world: Meeting practical and strategic gender needs. World Development, 17(11), 1799–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(89)90201-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. (1994). ‘Women and children first’ introducing a gender strategy into disaster preparedness. Gender & Development, 2(1), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09682869308519991
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S., Mustalampi, U., & Sisto, I. (2016). Gender-responsive disaster risk reduction in the agriculture sector. FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Neyer, G., & Bernardi, L. (2011). Feminist perspectives on motherhood and reproduction. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(2), 162–176. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41151279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Analytica. (2021). Turkey will not welcome more Afghans from Iran. Emerald Expert Briefings, (oxan-es).
   Google Scholar
• Ozbay, F. (2015). Dünden bugüne: aile, kent ve nüfus. İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Peña-López, I. (2017). Making laws work for women and men: A practical Guide to gender-sensitive legislation. OSCE/ODIHR.
   Google Scholar
• Pincha, C. (2008). Gender Sensitive Disaster Management: A Toolkit for Practitioners (pp. 134–134). Earthworm Books.
   Google Scholar
• Şafak-Ayvazoğlu, A., Kunuroglu, F., & Yağmur, K. (2021). Psychological and socio-cultural adaptation of Syrian refugees in Turkey. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 80, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahinoglu, S., & Buken, N. (2010). Gender, infertility, motherhood, and assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Turkey. Human Reproduction & Genetic Ethics, 16(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1558/hrge.v16i2.218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sancar, S. (2014). Türk modernleşmesinin cinsiyeti: Erkekler devlet, kadınlar aile kurar. İletişimYayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Seçgin, F., & Tural, A. (2011). Attitudes on gender roles of primary school teacher candidates. EducationSciences, 6(4), 2446–2458.
   Google Scholar
• Sohrabizadeh, S. (2016). The neglect of women’s capacities in disaster management systems in Iran: A qualitative study. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 23(3), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521516656080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekkas Kerman, K., & Betrus, P. (2020). Violence against women in Turkey: A social ecological framework of determinants and prevention strategies. Trauma, Violence, &Abuse, 21(3), 510–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toprak, S., Ersoy, G., & Stöckl, H. (2017). Femicide in Turkey between 2000 and 2010. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0182409. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tugrul, Y. G. (2019). A gender-based fıeld study on the motherhood experiences of women in the context of gender. Journal of Social and Cultural Studies, (3), 71–90. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jscs/issue/49688/637035
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2021). Statement by UN women on Turkey’s withdrawal from the Istanbul convention UN WOMEN. Retrieved Augst 12, 2021, from. https://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2021/3/statement-un-women-turkey-withdrawal-from-the-istanbul-convention
   Google Scholar
• United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters, World Conference on disaster Reduction: I S D R-International strategy for disaster Reduction international strategy for disaster Reduction.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2009, June). Making disaster risk reduction gender sensitive: Policy and practical guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030.
   Google Scholar
• White, P. J. (2000). Primitive rebels or revolutionary modernizers: The kurdish nationalist movement in Turkey. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, P., Saville, N., Arjyal, A., Baral, S., Kostkova, P., & Fordham, M. (2021). A feminist vision for transformative change to disaster risk reduction policies and practices. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54, 102026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, T., & Göçgün, M. (2016). İdarenin Düzenleyici İşlemlerinde Eşitlik İlkesi. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 39–60.
   Google Scholar