‘All the same under the skin’: representations of class and gender in Michel Faber’s Under the Skin

References

• Adams, C. J. (2010). The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, L. (1995). Gendered work: Sexuality, family and the labour market. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baralt, L., Kalof, L., & Fitzgerald, A. (2004). Animals, women, and weapons: Blurred sexual boundaries in the discourse of sport hunting. Society & Animals, 12(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568530042880695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Bastian, B. (2011). The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57(1), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calarco, M. (2019). Belonging to this world: On living like an animal in Michel Faber’s under the skin. In S. McCorry & J. Miller (Eds.), Literature and meat since 1900 (pp. 197–211). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Calarco, M. (2020). Beyond the Anthropological Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caracciolo, M. (2017). Murky mercy. College Literature, 44(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2017.0035
   Google Scholar
• Cartmill, M. (1996). A view to a death in the morning: Hunting and nature through history. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crompton, R. (2006). Gender and work. In K. Davis, M. Evans, & J. Lorber (Eds.), Handbook of gender and women’s studies (pp. 253–271). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Damaske, S. (2011). For the family?: How class and gender shape women’s work. Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeseredy, W. S., & Schwartz, M. D. (2005). Masculinities and interpersonal violence. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 353–366). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I Am (perspectives in continental Philosophy). Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, S. (2011). It’sa Question of Words, Therefore: Becoming-Animal in Michel Faber’s Under the Skin. Science Fiction Studies, 38(1), 134–154.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. (2016). Do you know where the light is?” factory farming and industrial slaughter in Michel Faber’s under the skin. In A. Potts (Ed.), Meat culture (pp. 149–162). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Edley, N. (2017). Men and masculinity: The basics. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenreich, B. (2016). Breadwinners and losers: Sanctions against male deviance. In C. J. Pascoe & T. Bridges (Eds.), Exploring masculinities: Identity, inequality, continuity and change (pp. 100–106). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M. (2008). Under the skin. Canongate Books.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, M. (2020, December 5). Michel Faber: ‘Under the skin changed my life for good’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/dec/05/michel-faber-under-the-skin-changed-my-life-for-good
   Google Scholar
• Gerschick, T. J. (2005). Masculinity and degrees of bodily heteronormativity in Western culture. In M. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R.W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 367–378.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, S. L. (1992). Black bodies, white bodies: Towards an iconography of female sexuality in late nineteenth century art, medicine and literature. In J. Donald & A. Rattansi (Eds.), Race, culture and difference (pp. 171–198). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gowland, R. (2018). A mass of crooked alphabets’: The construction and othering of working class bodies in industrial England. In P. Stone (Ed.), Bioarchaeological analyses and bodies: New ways of knowing anatomical and archaeological skeletal collections (pp. 147–160). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gymnich, M., & Costa, A. S. (2006). Of humans, pigs, fish, and apes: The literary motif of human-animal metamorphosis and its multiple functions in contemporary fiction. L’Esprit Créateur, 46(2), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2006.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, L. (2007). Estates: An Intimate History. London: Granta Books.
   Google Scholar
• Haylett, C. (2001). Illegitimate subjects?: Abject whites, neoliberal modernisation, and middle-class multiculturalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1068/d237t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hortle, L., & Stark, H. (2019). Non/Human appetites and the perils of consumption in under the skin. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 60(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2018.1487380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansz, J. (2000). Masculine identity and restrictive emotionality. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 166–186). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, J. (2016, July 8). Michel Faber: ‘I would have been a different writer without my wife’. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/jul/08/books-interview-michel-faber-undying-a-love-story-under-the-skin
   Google Scholar
• Kark, M., & Vanderbeke, D. (2020). Empathy with the Butcher, or: The inhuman non-human in Michel Faber’s under the skin. Connotations: A Journal for Critical Debate, 29, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.25623/conn029-kark-vanderbeke-1
   Google Scholar
• Kheel, M. (1996). The killing game: An ecofeminist critique of hunting. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 23(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1996.9714529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laviolette, P. (2020). Hitchhiking: Cultural inroads. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 8(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/8.2.152
   Google Scholar
• Lindfield-Ott, K. (2016). Fear in Fearn: Place and imagination in Michel Faber’s Ross-shire fiction. Northern Scotland, 7(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.3366/nor.2016.0108
   Google Scholar
• Marvin, G. (2006). Wild killing: Contesting the animal in hunting. In Killing Animals (pp. 10–29). University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, K. L. (2018). Resolving the ‘highland problem’: The highlands and islands of Scotland and the European Union. Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 33(4), 421–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218779516
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant masculinities? Employment change and white working class youth. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2005). Class and masculinity. In M. S. Kimmel, J. Hearn, & R. W. Connell (Eds.), Handbook of studies on men and masculinities (pp. 165–177). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. (2017). Reading disability in a time of Posthuman work: Speed and embodiment in Joshua Ferris’ the unnamed and Michael Faber’s under the skin. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i4.6104
   Google Scholar
• National Library of Medicine. (2023, January). Pectus Carinatum. National Institutes of Health. https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/003321.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, D. (2018). Yearning to labour? working-class men in post-industrial Britain. In C. Walker & S. Roberts (Eds.), Masculinity, Labour, and neoliberalism: Working-class men in international perspective (pp. 53–76). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton, S., Fahmy, E., Sutton, E., & Bell, K. (2016). Navigating the stigmatised identities of poverty in austere times: Resisting and responding to narratives of personal failure. Critical Social Policy, 36(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018315601799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece, J. (2018). Immobility and insecure labour markets: An active response to precarious employment. Urban Studies, 55(8), 1783–1799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017736258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., & Bennett, E. L. (Eds.). (2000). Hunting for sustainability in tropical forests. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (2001, May). The toilet paper: Femininity, class and mis-recognition. In Women’s Studies International Forum (Vol. 24, No. 3–4, pp. 295–307). Pergamon.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, K., & Soldatic, K. (2020). Productive bodies: How neoliberalism makes and unmakes disability in non-human animals. In S. Jenkins, K. Struthers Monford, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Animality and disability: Crip perspectives in critical animal studies (pp. 35–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor‐Gooby, P. (2013). Why do people stigmatise the poor at a time of rapidly increasing inequality, and what can be done about it? The Political Quarterly, 84(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2013.02435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vint, S. (2015). Skin deep: Alienation in under the skin. Extrapolation, 56(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2015.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walby, S. (1986). Patriarchy at work. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C., & Roberts, S. (Eds.). (2018). Masculinity, labour, and neoliberalism: Working-class men in international perspective. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar