544
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Power and politics across species boundaries: towards Multispecies Justice in Riverine Hydrosocial Territories

ORCID Icon, &
Received 25 Oct 2023, Accepted 15 Apr 2024, Published online: 26 Apr 2024

References

  • Benitez, J.P., et al. 2022. Assessment of fish abundance, biodiversity and movement periodicity changes in a Large River over a 20-year period. Environments, 9 (2), 1–22. doi:10.3390/environments9020022.
  • Berros, M.V., 2017. Defending rivers: vilcabamba in the South of Ecuador”, RCC Perspectives (6). In: Can Nature Have Rights? Legal and Political Insights, 37–44. doi:10.5282/rcc/8213.
  • Boelens, R., et al. 2016. Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective. Water International, 41 (1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898.
  • Boelens, R., et al. 2021. River lives, River movements. Fisher communities mobilizing local and official rules in defense of the Magdalena River. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 53 (3), 458–476. doi:10.1080/07329113.2021.2012376.
  • Boelens, R., et al. 2023. Riverhood: Political ecologies of socio-nature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. Journal of Peasant Studies, 50 (3), 1125–1156. doi:10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810.
  • Brevé, N., et al. 2014. Supporting decision-making for improving longitudinal connectivity for diadromous and potamodromous fishes in complex catchments. Science of the Total Environment, 496, 206–218. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.043
  • Celermajer, D., et al. 2021. Multispecies justice: theories, challenges, and a research agenda for environmental politics. Environmental Politics, 30 (1–2), 119–140. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1827608.
  • Collard, R.C., 2015. Ethics in research beyond the human. In: Bridge, McCarthy and Perreault, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. New York: Routledge, 127–139.
  • De Jong, L., et al. 2024. Making rivers, producing futures. the rise of an eco‐modern river imaginary in Dutch climate change adaptation. Water, 2024010943, 1–21.
  • Drapier, L., Germaine, M.A., and Lespez, L., 2023. The role of hydrosocial heritages produced by hydrosocial territories in understanding environmental conflicts: The case of Sélune dam removals (France). Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 25148486231179293, 251484862311792. doi:10.1177/25148486231179293
  • Druschke, C., et al. 2017. Centring fish agency in coastal dam removal and river restoration. Water Alternatives, 10 (3), 724–743.
  • Eckersley, R., 2004. The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty. London: MIT Press.
  • Escobar, A., 2018. Designs for the pluriverse: radical interdependence, autonomy, and the making of worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Fitz-Henry, E., 2021. Multi-species justice: a view from the rights of nature movement. Environmental Politics, 31 (2), 338–359. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1957615.
  • Foucault, M., 1980. Power/Knowledge: selected Interviews and other writings, 1972-79. Colin Gordon, Ed. New York: Pantheon.
  • Goedeke, T.L. and Rikoon, S., 2008. Otters as actors: scientific controversy, dynamism of networks, and the implications of power in ecological restoration. Social Studies of Science, 38 (1), 111–132. doi:10.1177/0306312707077363.
  • Götz, J.M. and Middleton, C., 2020. Ontological politics of hydrosocial territories in the Salween River basin, Myanmar/Burma. Political Geography, 78, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102115
  • The Guardian (2022). “‘This is what a river should look like’: Dutch rewilding project turns back the clock 500 years”, By Phoebe Weston, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/sep/20/dutch-rewilding-project-turns-back-the-clock-500-years-aoe. [Accessed 20 November 2022].
  • Haraway, D., 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hommes, L., Hoogesteger, J., and Boelens, R., 2022. (Re) making hydrosocial territories: materializing and contesting imaginaries and subjectivities through hydraulic infrastructure. Political Geography, 97, 102698. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102698
  • Hoogesteger, J., et al. 2023. River commoning and the state: a cross-country analysis of river defense collectives. Politics & Governance, 11 (2), 280–292. doi:10.17645/pag.v11i2.6316.
  • Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R., and Baud, M., 2016. Territorial pluralism: water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41 (1), 91–106. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1130910.
  • Hoogesteger, J. and Verzijl, A., 2015. Grassroots scalar politics: insights from peasant water struggles in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Andes. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 62, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.013
  • Houart, C., 2023. Engaging with water and rivers from a multispecies justice perspective. Blue Papers, 2 (1), 50–57. doi:10.58981/bluepapers.2023.1.05.
  • Immovilli, M., et al. 2022. Exploring contestation in rights of river approaches: comparing Colombia, India and New Zealand. Water Alternatives, 15 (3), 574–591.
  • Kauffman, C.M. and Martin, P., 2021. The politics of rights of nature: strategies for building a more sustainable future. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Kauffman, C. and Martin, P. (2018). “When rivers have rights: case comparisons of New Zealand, Colombia, and India”, International Studies Association Annual Conference, San Francisco.
  • Kinkaid, E., 2019. “Rights of nature” in translation: Assemblage geographies, boundary objects, and translocal social movements. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44 (3), 555–570. doi:10.1111/tran.12303.
  • Kirksey, E. and Chao, S., 2022. Introduction: who benefits from multispecies justice? In: Chao, Bolender and Kirksey, eds. The Promise of Multispecies Justice. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–21.
  • Kirksey, E. and Helmreich, S., 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25 (4), 545–576. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
  • Krenak, A., 2019. Ideias para Adiar o Fim do Mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
  • Laborde, S. and Jackson, S., 2022. Living waters or resource? Ontological differences and the governance of waters and rivers. Local Environment, 27 (3), 1–18. doi:10.1080/13549839.2022.2044298.
  • Latour, B., 2004. The politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Macpherson, E., Ventura, J.T., and Ospina, F.C., 2020. Constitutional law, ecosystems and indigenous peoples in colombia: biocultural rights and legal subjects. In: Transnational Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press, 1–29. doi:10.1017/S204710252000014X.
  • Magallanes, C.J.I., 2020. Nature as an ancestor: two examples of legal personality for Nature in New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Papers, 54, 1–19. doi:10.4000/vertigo.16199
  • Meijer, E., 2019. When animals speak: toward an interspecies democracy. New York University Press.
  • Menga, F.S. and Swyngedouw, E., 2018. Water, Technology and the Nation-State. London: Routledge.
  • Molle, F., Mollinga, P.P. and Wester, P., 2009. Hydraulic bureaucracies and the hydraulic mission: flows of water, flows of power. Water Alternatives, 2 (3), 328–349.
  • Ottinger, G., 2023. Careful knowing as an aspect of environmental justice. Environmental Politics, 33 (2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2185971.
  • Owens, K. et al., 2022. Delivering global water security: embedding water justice as a response to increased irrigation efficiency. Wileys Water, 9 (6), e1608.
  • Page, J. and Pelizzon, A., 2022. Of rivers, law and justice in the Anthropocene. The Geographical Journal, 1–11. doi:10.1111/geoj.12442
  • Parsons, M., Fisher, K., and Crease, R.P., 2021. Decolonising River Restoration: restoration as Acts of Healing and Expression of Rangatiratanga. In: Decolonising Blue Spaces in the Anthropocene. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61071-5_9
  • Plumwood, V., 2002. Environmental culture: the ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge.
  • RiverOflife, M., et al. 2021. Hearing, voicing and healing: Rivers as culturally located and connected. River Research and Applications, 38 (3), 422–434. doi:10.1002/rra.3843.
  • Rose, D.B., 2013. Val plumwood’s philosophical animism: attentive inter-actions in the sentient world. Environmental Humanities, 3, 93–109. doi:10.1215/22011919-3611248
  • Rose, D.B., 2015. The Ecological Humanities. In: K. Gibson, D.B. Rose, and R. Fincher, eds. Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books, 1–5.
  • Schlosberg, D., 2009. Defining Environmental Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stoffers, T., et al. 2021. 30 years of large river restoration: How long do restored floodplain channels remain suitable for targeted rheophilic fishes in the lower river Rhine? Science of the Total Environment, 755, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142931.
  • Tănăsescu, M., 2022. Ecocene Politics. Open Book Publishers. doi:10.11647/OBP.0274.
  • Thaler, M., 2021. What If: multispecies justice as the expression of utopian desire. Environmental Politics, 1–19. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1899683.
  • Tickner, D., et al. 2020. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. BioScience, 70 (4), 330–342. doi:10.1093/biosci/biaa002.
  • Tschakert, P., et al. 2020. Multispecies justice: Climate-just futures with, for and beyond humans. WIREs Climate Change, Wiley, 12 (2), 1–10. doi:10.1002/wcc.699.
  • Van Dooren, T. and Chrulew, M., 2022. Worlds of Kin: an Introduction. In: Van Dooren and Chrulew, eds. Kin: thinking with Deborah Bird Rose. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–14.
  • Van Dooren, T., Kirksey, E., and Münster, U., 2016. Multispecies studies: cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities, 8 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1215/22011919-3527695.
  • Vos, J., et al. 2020. Rooted water collectives: towards an analytical framework. Ecological Economics, 173, 106651. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106651
  • Vos, J. and Boelens, R., 2018. Neoliberal water governmentalities, virtual water trade, and contestations. In: R. Boelens, T. Perreault, and J. Vos, eds. Water Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283–301.
  • Whaley, L., 2022. Water governance research in a messy world. Water Alternatives, 15 (2), 218–250.
  • Winter, C.J. and Schlosberg, D., 2023. What matter matters as a matter of justice? Environmental Politics, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2220640
  • Woelfle-Erskine, C. and Cole, J., 2015. Transfiguring the anthropocene: stochastic reimaginings of human-beaver worlds. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2 (2), 297–316. doi:10.1215/23289252-2867625.
  • Wölfle Hazard, 2022. Underflows: queer Trans ecologies and river justice. Washington: University of Washington Press.
  • Yates, J.S., 2022. “Guides of water”: indigenous water justice and pastoral management beyond adaptation to climate change. Current Directions in Water Scarcity Research, 4, 167–187.
  • Zwarteveen, M.Z. and Boelens, R., 2014. Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water International, 39 (2), 143–158. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.891168.