The role of bottom-up strategy instruction and proficiency level in L2 listening test performance: an intervention study

References

• Alderson, J. C. (1984). Reading in a foreign language: A reading or a language problem? In J. C. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.), Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1–24). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., Van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62, 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp. 28–61). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., & Brown, K. K. (2006). Introducing connected speech. In J. D. Brown & K. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers (pp. 1–16). National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D., & Hilferty, A. (1986). Listening for reduced forms. TESOL Quarterly, 20(4), 759–763. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M. (2018). Japanese university students’ perspectives on the TOEIC test. Osaka JALT Journal, 5, 44–74.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (2014). Using test-wiseness strategy research in task development. In A. J. Kunnan (Ed.), The companion to language assessment Volume II: Approaches and development (pp. 893–906). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla006
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2010). Raising L2 listeners’ metacognitive awareness: a sociocultural theory perspective. Language Awareness, 19(4), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2010.519033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalman, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022). The effectiveness of second-language listening strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216882110729.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (2020). Skill acquisition theory. In B. Vanpatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 83–104). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2013). Cognitive validity. In A. Geranpayeh & L. Taylor (Eds.), Examining listening (pp. 77–151) Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4325
   Google Scholar
• Fung, D., & Macaro, E. (2021). Exploring the relationship between linguistic knowledge and strategy use in listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 540–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819868879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada, Y. (2016). Shadowing: Who benefits and how? Uncovering a booming EFL teaching technique for listening comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815597504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H. (1990). A comparison between the information-processing and the analysis/control approaches to language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.1.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulstijn, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/call.16.5.413.29488
   Google Scholar
• International Institution of Business Communication. (2017). Koushiki TOEIC listening and reading mondaishu, 3 [Official TOEIC Listening & Reading Practice Test vol. 3].
   Google Scholar
• International Institution of Business Communication. (2018). Koushiki TOEIC listening and reading mondai-shu, 4 [Official TOEIC Listening & Reading Practice Test vol. 4].
   Google Scholar
• International Institution of Business Communication. (2019). Eigo-katsuyou Jittai Chousa [TOEIC score use survey]. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://www.iibc-global.org/library/default/toeic/official_data/lr/katsuyo_2019/pdf/katsuyo_2019_school.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• International Institution of Business Communication. (2022). TOEIC program data and analysis 2022. Retrieved November 21, 2022, from https://www.iibc-global.org/library/default/toeic/official_data/pdf/DAA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2017). Using Eiken, TOEFL, and TOEIC to award EFL course credits in Japanese universities. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(3), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1262375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., & Koizumi, R. (2022). The relationship between L2 listening and metacognitive awareness across listening tests and learner samples. International Journal of Listening, 36(2), 100–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2021.1955683
   Google Scholar
• Jafarpur, A., & Yamini, M. (1993). Does practice with dictation improve language skills? System, 21(3), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(93)90026-D
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. (2005). Validating high-stakes testing programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2002.tb00083.x
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL Learners. The Journal of AsiaTEFL, 15(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.4.310
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2020). Winsteps (47.0 version) [Computer software]. http://www.winsteps.com.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L. (2014). Investigating the relationship between test preparation and TOEFL iBT® performance. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12016
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1981). Issues of effectiveness and equity in the coaching controversy: Implications for educational and testing practice (Research report). RP-81-19. Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1981.tb01254.x
   Google Scholar
• Milliner, B., & Dimoski, B. (2021). The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216882110046.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Y. (2010). Enhancing students’ communicative competency and test-taking skills through TOEIC preparatory materials. TESOL Journal, 3, 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Y., & In’nami, Y. (2015). Relationships between strategy use, listening proficiency level, task type, and scores in an L2 listening test. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18, 45–77.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching in listening. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2005). L2 listening. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 503–527). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Saida, C., & Yanagawa, K. (2011). Kyoutsu koumoku dezainn-ni-yoru kanagawaken koutougakko kennka issei gakuryoku tesuto-no kaihatsu: Koumoku outorironn-wo mochiita touka-niyoru tesuto-no saihyouka-to tembou [Development of Kanagawa prefecture high school English tests with a common-item design: Test evaluation by IRT equating]. Japanese Journal for Research on Testing, 7, 122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sick, J. (2010). Rasch measurement in language education Part 5: Assumptions and requirements of Rasch measurement. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 14(2), 23–29. https://hosted.jalt.org/test/sic_5.htm
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, J. (2014). Exploring L2 listening instruction: Examinations of practice. ELT Journal, 68(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, J., & Siegel, A. (2015). Getting to the bottom of L2 listening instruction: Making a case for bottom-up activities. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2015.5.4.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. V. Jr., (2005). Effect of item redundancy on Rasch item and person estimates. Journal of Applied Measurement, 6(2), 147–163.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzukida, Y., & Saito, K. (2021). Which segmental features matter for successful L2 comprehensibility? Revisiting and generalizing the pedagogical value of the functional local principle. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819858246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchihara, T., & Harada, T. (2018). Roles of vocabulary knowledge for success in English-medium instruction: Self-perceptions and academic outcomes of Japanese undergraduates. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 564–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafaee, P., & Suzuki, Y. (2020). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary knowledge in second language listening ability. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Baker, S. (2015). Learner variables in second language listening comprehension: An exploratory path analysis. Language Learning, 65(2), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2011). Teaching and testing listening comprehension. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 395–411). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287749
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M. P. (2022). Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Language Learning, 72(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winke, P., & Lim, H. (2017). The effects of test preparation on second-language listening test performance. Language Assessment Quarterly, 14(4), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1399396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Q. (2013). Does test preparation work? Implications for score validity. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.721423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagawa, K. (2014). Introduction of the center listening test: Perceptions of English teachers and students. English Language Education Council (ELEC) Bulletin, 121, 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Yeldham, M. (2016). Second language listening instruction: Comparing a strategies-based approach with an interactive, strategies/bottom-up skills approach. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 394–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar