864
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Teacher language awareness in CLIL teacher education in Argentina, Colombia, and Ecuador: a multiple case study

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 16 Jun 2023, Accepted 09 Feb 2024, Published online: 22 Feb 2024

References

  • Andrews, S. (2009). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge University Press.
  • Andrews, S., & Lin, M. Y. (2018). Language awareness and teacher development. In P. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 57–74). Routledge.
  • Anglada, L. (2020). Reflections on English grammar instruction in EFL/ESL educational settings. In D. L. Banegas (Ed.), Content knowledge in English language teacher education: International experiences (pp. 49–64). Bloomsbury.
  • Argudo, J., Fajardo-Dack, T., & Abad, M. (2023). CLIL in educator. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning (pp. 433–445). Routledge.
  • Ball, P. (2016). Using language(s) to develop subject competences in CLIL-based practice. Pulso. Revista de Educación, 39(39), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.58265/pulso.5073
  • Banegas, D. L. (2019). Teacher professional development in language-driven CLIL: A case study. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 12(2), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.2.3
  • Banegas, D. L., & Mearns, T. (2023). The language quadriptych in content and language integrated learning: Findings from a collaborative action research study. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. Advance online publication. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2023.2281393
  • Banegas, D. L., & del Pozo Beamud, M. (2022). Content and language integrated learning: A duoethnographic study about CLIL pre-service teacher education in Argentina and Spain. RELC Journal, 53(1), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220930442
  • Bárcena Toyos, P. (2022). Teacher identity in CLIL: A case study of two in-service teachers. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 15(1), e1516–23. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.6
  • Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Cammarata, L., & Cavanagh, M. (2018). In search of immersion teacher educators’ knowledge base: Exploring their readiness to foster an integrated approach to teaching. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18009.cam
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. (8th ed.). Routledge.
  • Corrales, K., & Poole, P. (2023). CLIL in Colombia. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning (pp. 446–460). Routledge.
  • Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
  • Cummins, J. (1980). The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586312
  • DelliCarpini, M. (2021). Developing the C in content and language integrated learning: Teacher preparation that builds learners’ content knowledge and academic language through teacher collaboration and integrated pedagogical training. In C. Hemmi & D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 217–238). Palgrave.
  • Díaz-Magiolli, G. (2017). Ideologies and Discourses in the Standards for Language Teachers in South America: A Corpus-based Analysis. In L. D. Kamhi-Stein, G. Díaz-Maggioli & L. C. de Oliveira (Eds.), English language teaching in South America: Policy, preparation, and practices (pp. 31–53). Multilingual Matters.
  • Duff, P. (2020). Case study research: Making language learning complexities visible. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 144–153). Routledge.
  • Fürstenberg, U., Morton, T., Kletzenbauer, P., & Reitbauer, M. (2021). “I wouldn’t say there is anything language specific”: The disconnect between tertiary CLIL teachers’ understanding of the general communicative and pedagogical functions of language. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 14(2), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2021.14.2.5
  • García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Garzón-Díaz, E. (2021). Translanguaging in science lessons: Exploring the language of science in L2 low achievers in a public school setting in Colombia. In C. Hemmi & D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 85–106). Palgrave.
  • Hansen-Thomas, H., Langman, J., & Farias, T. (2018). The role of language objectives: Strengthening math and science teachers’ language awareness with emergent bilinguals in secondary classrooms. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.2
  • He, P., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2018). Becoming a “language-aware” content teacher: Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teacher professional development as a collaborative, dynamic, and dialogic process. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17009.he
  • Hu, J., & Gao, A. (2021). Understanding subject teachers’ language-related pedagogical practices in content and language integrated learning classrooms. Language Awareness, 30(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1768265
  • Humphrey, S., & Hao, J. (2019). New descriptions of metalanguage for supporting English language learners’ writing in the early years: A discourse perspective. In L. C. de Oliveira (Ed.), The handbook of TESOL in K-12 (pp. 213–230). Wiley.
  • König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauß, S., & Tachtsoglou, S. (2016). Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching English as a foreign language: Assessing the outcomes of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116644956
  • Krippendorff, K., & Craggs, R. (2016). The reliability of multi-valued coding of data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(4), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1228863
  • Lantolf, J. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57–72). Routledge.
  • Lin, A. M. Y., & Lo, Y.-Y. (2017). Trans/languaging and the triadic dialogue in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125
  • Li, W., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2019). Translanguaging classroom discourse: Pushing limits, breaking boundaries. Classroom Discourse, 10(3–4), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1635032
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
  • Lindahl, K. M. (2016). Teacher language awareness among pre-service K-12 educators of English language learners. In J. Crandall & M. Christison (Eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp. 127–140). Routledge.
  • Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lo, Y.-Y. (2019). Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: Does professional development help? International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(7), 818–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821
  • Lo, Y.-Y. (2020). Professional development of CLIL teachers. Springer.
  • Loewenberg Ball, D., Hoover, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Martin, J., & Doran, Y. (2015). Systemic functional linguistics. Routledge.
  • McDougald, J. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes on CLIL. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning (pp. 255–267). Routledge.
  • Met, M. (1999). Content-based instruction: Defining terms, making decisions. NFLC Reports. The National Foreign Language Center.
  • Moore, P. (2023). Translanguaging in CLIL. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
  • Morton, T. (2016). Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor
  • Morton, T. (2018). Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
  • Navarro, F. (2021). Más allá de la alfabetización académica: Las funciones de la escritura en educación superior. Revista Electrónica Leer, Escribir y Descubrir, 9(1), 38–56.
  • Ng, C. (2021). What kind of students persist in science learning in the face of academic challenges? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 195–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21652
  • Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2021). CLIL-ising EMI: An analysis of student and teacher training needs in monolingual contexts. In C. Hemmi & D. L. Banegas (Eds.), International perspectives on CLIL (pp. 171–192). Palgrave.
  • Sánchez, M. T., & García, O. (Eds.) (2022). Transformative translanguaging espacios: Latinx students and teachers rompiendo fronteras sin miedo. Multilingual Matters.
  • Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching: The essential guide to English language teaching. (3rd ed.). Macmillan.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Skinnari, K., & Bovellan, E. (2016). CLIL teachers’ beliefs about integration and about their professional roles: Perspectives from a European context. In T. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore & U. Smit (Eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp. 145–168). Multilingual Matters.
  • Sylvén, L. K., & Tsuchiya, K. (2023). CLIL in various forms around the world. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning (pp. 373–386). Routledge.
  • Xu, D., & Harfitt, G. J. (2019). Teacher language awareness and scaffolded interaction in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18023.xu
  • Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. (6th ed.). SAGE.
  • Yuan, L., & Lo, Y.-Y. (2023). CLIL and professional development. In D. L. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning (pp. 160–176). Routledge.