191
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Developing culturally-situated student feedback literacy through multi-peer feedback giving: an online community-based approach

Received 08 Mar 2023, Accepted 30 Jan 2024, Published online: 26 Feb 2024

References

  • Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondary-level students. ELT Journal, 69(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu036
  • Carless, D. (2012). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. Routledge.
  • Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787420945845
  • Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  • Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1994). Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5
  • Chen, W., & Gao, J. (2022). Creating an online community of inquiry: Learner practice and perceptions of community-based feedback giving in academic writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2043381
  • Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). Implementing collaborative writing in teacher-centered classroom contexts: Student beliefs and perceptions. Language Awareness, 28(4), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1675680
  • Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
  • Chong, S. W. (2021). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765
  • Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012). Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.1.c
  • Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257–276.
  • Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1996). Culture of learning: Language classrooms in China. In H. Coleman (ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 169–206). Cambridge University Press.
  • Gao, Y., Schunn, C. D. D., & Yu, Q. (2019). The alignment of written peer feedback with draft problems and its impact on revision in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1499075
  • Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  • Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback Han: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545
  • Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002
  • Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010). Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class. Instructional Science, 38(4), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1
  • Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
  • Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2006). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Routledge.
  • Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer.
  • Lee, M.-K., & Evans, M. (2019). Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. The Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12598
  • Liou, H.-C., & Peng, Z.-Y. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37(3), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005
  • Ma, Q. (2020). Examining the role of inter-group peer online feedback on wiki writing in an EAP context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1556703
  • Malecka, B., Boud, D., & Carless, D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: Mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(7), 908–922. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784
  • McConlogue, T. (2015). Making judgments: Investigating the process of composing and receiving peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1495–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.868878
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Min, H.-T. (2005). Training students to become successful peer reviewers. System, 33(2), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003
  • Min, H.-T. (2016). Effects of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004
  • Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
  • Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x
  • Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2021). Making internal feedback explicit: Exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Advance Online Publication.
  • Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2014). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: A peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  • Rovagnati, V., Pitt, E., & Winstone, N. (2021). Feedback cultures, histories and literacies: International postgraduate students’ experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(3), 347–359. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1916431
  • Sato, M. (2017). Oral peer corrective feedback: Multiple theoretical perspectives. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 19–34). Routledge.
  • Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2019). The learning science of multi-peer feedback for EFL students. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 189, 13–21.
  • Shi, L. (2006). The successors to Confucianism or a new generation? A questionnaire study on Chinese students’ culture of learning English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 19(1), 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310608668758
  • Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. (3rd ed.). Michigan ELT.
  • Tian, L., & Li, L. (2018). Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers. Language Awareness, 27(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1535602
  • Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003249
  • Wu, W.-C V., Petit, E., & Chen, C.-H. (2015). EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.937442
  • Yang, Y. F. (2011). A reciprocal peer review system to support college students’ writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 687–700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01059.x
  • Yang, Y. F. (2016). Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(4), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1016440
  • Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44 Article, 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451
  • Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Exploring Chinese students’ strategy use in a cooperative paper feedback writing group. System, 58, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.02.005
  • Yu, S., Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2016). Revisiting Chinese cultural issues in peer feedback in EFL writing: Insights from a multiple case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(2), 295–304.
  • Yu, S., Zhang, D., & Liu, C. (2022). Assessing L2 student writing feedback literacy: A scale development and validation study. Assessing Writing, 53, 100643.
  • Zhan, Y. (2019). Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105
  • Zou, Y., Schunn, C. D., Wang, Y., & Zhang, F. (2018). Student attitudes that predict participation in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 800–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.