536
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Path contingency: advancing a spatial-institutionalist perspective on decision pathways for disaster risk governance

Pages 37-54 | Accepted 06 Dec 2023, Published online: 21 Dec 2023

References

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., Bryan D. Jones, and Peter B. Mortensen. 2018. “Punctuation Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 4th ed., 55–102. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284
  • Bell, Stephen. 2011. “Do we Really Need a New ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’ to Explain Institutional Change?” British Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 883–906. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000147.
  • Berkhout, Frans. 2002. “Technological Regimes, Path Dependency and the Environment.” Global Environmental Change 12 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00025-5.
  • Cairney, Paul. 2013. Understanding Public Policy - Theories and Issues. 2nd ed. London, UK: RedGlobe Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9302.12016_5
  • Choi, Chang G., Sugie Lee, Heungsoon Kim, and Eun Y. Seong. 2019. “Critical Junctures and Path Dependence in Urban Planning and Housing Policy: A Review of Greenbelts and New Towns in Korea’s Seoul Metropolitan Area.” Land Use Policy 80: 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.027.
  • Coe, Neil M. 2011. “Geographies of Production I: An Evolutionary Revolution?” Progress in Human Geography 35 (1): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510364281.
  • Cook, Margaret 2016. “Damming the ‘Flood Evil’ on the Brisbane River.” History Australia 13 (4): 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14490854.2016.1231161.
  • Davidescu, Simona, Ralitsa Hiteva, and Tomas Maltby. 2018. “Two Steps Forward, one Step Back: Renewable Energy Transitions in Bulgaria and Romania.” Public Administration 96 (3): 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12522.
  • Djelic, Marie-laure, and Sigrid Quack. 2007. “Overcoming Path Dependency: Path Generation in Open Systems.” Theory and Society 36 (2): 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9026-0.
  • Gains, Francesca, Peter C. John, and Gerry Stoker. 2005. “Path Dependency and the Reform of English Local Government.” Public Administration 83 (1): 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00436.x.
  • Harty, Siobhán 2005. “Theorizing Institutional Change.” In New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis, edited by André Lacours, 1–26. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442677630-003
  • Hay, Colin 2011. “Interpreting Interpretivism Interpreting Interpretations: The new Hermeneutics of Public Administration.” Public Administration 89 (1): 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01907.x.
  • Heazle, Michael, Peter Tangney, Paul Burton, Michael Howes, Deana Grant-Smith, Kim Reis, and Karen Bosomworth. 2013. “Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation: An Incremental Approach to Disaster Risk Management in Australia.” Environmental Science & Policy 33: 162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.009.
  • Howes, Michael, Peter Tangney, Kim Reis, Deanna Grant-Smith, Michael Heazle, Karen Bosomworth, and Paul Burton. 2015. “Towards Networked Governance: Improving Interagency Communication and Collaboration for Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change Adaptation in Australia.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58 (5): 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.891974.
  • Howlett, Michael 2009. “Process Sequencing Policy Dynamics: Beyond Homeostasis and Path Dependency.” Journal of Public Policy 29 (3): 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X09990158.
  • James, Toby S. 2016. “Neo-Statecraft Theory, Historical Institutionalism and Institutional Change.” Government and Opposition 51 (1): 84–110.
  • Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Daniel Nohrstedt, Christopher M. Weible, and Karin Ingold. 2018. “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Overview of the Research Program.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 4th ed., 135–172. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284
  • Johnson, Juliet 2003. “Past” Dependence or Path Contingency? Institutional Design in Postcommunist Financial Systems.” In Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Grzegorz Ekiert and Stephen E. Hanson, 253–316. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jungblut, Marc, and Jens Jungblut. 2022. “Do Organizational Differences Matter for the use of Social Media by Public Organizations? A Computational Analysis of the way the German Police use Twitter for External Communication.” Public Administration 100(4), 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12747.
  • Kay, Adrian 2005. “A Critique of the use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies.” Public Administration 83 (3): 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00462.x.
  • Koning, Edward A. 2016. “The Three Institutionalisms and Institutional Dynamics: Understanding Endogenous and Exogenous Change.” Journal of Public Policy 36 (4): 639–664. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X15000240.
  • Korinek, Rebecca-Lea, and Sylvia Veit. 2015. “Only Good Fences Keep Good Neighbours! The Institutionalization of Ministry–Agency Relationships at the Science–Policy Nexus in German Food Safety Policy.” Public Administration 93 (1): 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12117.
  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics.” Comparative Politics 16 (2): 223–246. https://doi.org/10.2307/421608.
  • Levin, Kelly, Benjamin Cashore, Steven Bernstein, and Graeme Auld. 2010. Playing it Forward: Path Dependency, Progressive Incrementalism, and the ‘Super Wicked’ Problem of Global Climate Change. Chicago, IL: The International Studies Association Convention. USA February 28-March 3. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi = 10.1.1.464.5287&rep = rep1&type = pdf.
  • Meecham, Megan 2009. Path Dependency of Infrastructure: Implications for the Sanitation System of Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Masters Thesis, Stockholm University, Sweden. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid = diva2%3A329209anddswid = −938.
  • Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and Jimmy Walker. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9739.
  • Page, Scott E. 2006. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00000006.
  • Peters, B. Guy 2019. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. Washington, DC, USA: Pinter Press. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0024
  • Peters, B. Guy, Jon Pierre, Desmond S. King. 2005. “The Politics of Path Dependency: Political Conflict in Historical Institutionalism.” The Journal of Politics 67: 1275–1300.
  • Pierson, Paul 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011.
  • Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry [QFCI]. 2011. Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry: Interim Report (August 2011). Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry. http://www.floodcommission.qld.gov.au/publications/interimreport.
  • Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry [QFCI]. 2012. Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry: Final Report (March 2012). Queensland Floods Commission of Inquiry. www.floodcommission.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/11698/QFCI-Final-Report-March-2012.pdf.
  • Rixen, Thomas, and Lora A. Viola. 2015. “Putting Path Dependence in its Place: Toward a Taxonomy of Institutional Change.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 27 (2): 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629814531667.
  • Sarigil, Zeki 2015. “Showing the Path to Path Dependence: The Habitual Path.” European Political Science Review 7 (2): 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000198.
  • Smith, Adrian, Andy Stirling, and Frans Berkhout. 2005. “The Governance of Sustainable Socio-Technical Transitions.” Research Policy 34 (10): 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005.
  • Soifer, Hillel D. 2012. “The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (12): 1572–1597.
  • Sorensen, Andre 2015. “Taking Path Dependence Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 30 (1): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2013.874299.
  • Sorensen, André 2018. “Multiscalar Governance and Institutional Change: Critical Junctures in European Spatial Planning.” Planning Perspectives 33 (4): 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2018.1512894.
  • Stark, Alastair 2018. “New Institutionalism, Critical Junctures and Post-Crisis Policy Reform.” Australian Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2017.1409335.
  • Supreme Court of New South Wales. 2019. "Judgment – Queensland Flood Class Action: 10.00 AM (AEDT) Friday 29 November 2019." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJXVTEg7TT4&list=WL&index=27&t=0s.
  • Tangney, Peter 2015. “Brisbane City Council’s Q100 Assessment: How Climate Risk Management Becomes scientised.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14 (4): 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.10.001.
  • Tangney, Peter 2017. Climate Adaptation Policy and Evidence: Understanding the Tensions Between Politics and Expertise in Public Policy. London, UK: Routledge-Earthscan.
  • Tangney, Peter 2020. “Dammed if you do, Dammed if you Don’t: The Impact of Economic Rationalist Imperatives on the Adaptive Capacity of Public Infrastructure in Brisbane, Australia and Cork, Ireland.” Environmental Policy and Governance 30 (6): 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1893.
  • Thelen, Kathleen 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369.