Threat and reactions to violated expectations in groups: Adding control to the equation

References

• Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 78(5), 906–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams, D., Travaglino, G. A., Marques, J. M., Pinto, I., & Levine, J. M. (2018). Deviance credit: Tolerance of deviant ingroup leaders is mediated by their accrual of prototypicality and conferral of their right to be supported: Deviance credit. The Journal of Social Issues, 74(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostini, M., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. Psychological Bulletin, 147(7), 667–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1–51). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60235-X
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., & Ellemers, N. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35–58). Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brauer, M., & Chekroun, P. (2005). The relationship between perceived violation of social norms and social control: Situational factors influencing the reaction to deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(7), 1519–1539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02182.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekroun, P., & Nugier, A. (2011). “I’m ashamed because of you, so please, don’t do that!”: Reactions to deviance as a protection against a threat to social image: Reactions to deviance and social image. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J., & Cooper, A. J. (2016). The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ): Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 28(11), 1427–1440. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr, P. J., DeYoung, C. G., & McNaughton, N. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective: Motivation and personality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(3), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12016
   Google Scholar
• Costarelli, S. (2009). Intergroup threat and experienced affect: The distinct roles of causal attributions and in-group identification. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.3.393-401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., Dingle, G. A., Haslam, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Depression and social identity: An integrative review. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreeze, J., & Matschke, C. (2019). Don’t put me in this group: Assignment to non-preferred groups increases disidentification and a preference for negative ingroup information. Social Psychology, 50(2), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., Gedeon, E. Z., & Sassenberg, K. (2021). Favouring a disunited kingdom? How negative perceptions of the EU-referendum relate to individual mobility and collective action considerations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5547
   Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., Lüders, A., Jonas, E., & Sassenberg, K. (2019). Leader’s group-norm violations elicit intentions to leave the group – if the group-norm is not affirmed. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., Lüders, A., Jonas, E., & Sassenberg, K. (2022). You gotta fight! – why norm-violations and outgroup criticism lead to confrontational reactions. Cognition & Emotion, 36(2), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2002823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2016). It’s either you or me! Impact of deviations on social exclusion and leaving. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 630–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216638533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2017). Kicking out the trolls – antecedents of social exclusion intentions in Facebook groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditrich, L., Scholl, A., & Sassenberg, K. (2017). Time to go! Leaving the group in response to norm-deviations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelman, S., & Biernat, M. (2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00042-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelman, S., Silvia, P. J., & Biernat, M. (2006). Responding to deviance: Target exclusion and differential devaluation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1153–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206288720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgot, J., & Stewart, H. (2022, April 21). Boris Johnson will face commons inquiry over whether he lied to parliament. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/21/no-10-drops-attempt-to-delay-inquiry-into-whether-boris-johnson-misled-parliament
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. The American Psychologist, 48(6), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fousiani, K., Yzerbyt, V., Kteily, N., & Demoulin, S. (2019). Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(4), 869–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 57(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, D., & Abrams, D. (2010). The effect of difference oriented communication on the subjective validity of an in-group norm: Doc can treat the group. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 14(4), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, D., Abrams, D., Randsley de Moura, G., & Marques, J. (2010). The effects of cost, normative support, and issue importance on motivation to persuade in-group deviants. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 14(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, D., Hurst, J., Cleveland, C., Blascovich, J., & Abrams, D. (2012). Challenge, threat, and subjective group dynamics: Reactions to normative and deviant group members. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frings, D., & Pinto, I. R. (2018). They did it again! Social control responses to repeated incidences of deviance in small groups/¡Lo han vuelto a hacer! Respuestas de control social a la incidencia repetida de la desviación en grupos pequeños. International Journal of Social Psychology, 33(3), 578–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2018.1482055
   Google Scholar
• Fritsche, I. (2022). Agency through the we: Group-based control theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211068838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giessner, S. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Sleebos, E. (2009). License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2003). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (second ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway, K. H., Haslam, S. A., Cruwys, T., Branscombe, N. R., Ysseldyk, R., & Heldreth, C. (2015). From “we” to “me”: Group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 109(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinote, A., Brown, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Minority status decreases sense of control and increases interpretive processing. Social Cognition, 24(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Price, T. F. (2013). What is approach motivation? Emotion Review, 5(3), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913477509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M., Veit, S., & Fritsche, I. (2021). Blaming immigrants to enhance control: Exploring the control‐bolstering functions of causal attribution, in‐group identification, and hierarchy enhancement. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 5(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.73
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 5(3), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (2021). Uncertain self in a changing world: A foundation for radicalisation, populism, and autocratic leadership. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1827628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23(1), 258–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2012.741134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). ‘You can criticize because you care’: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(5), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, P., Abrams, D., Gutierrez, R., & Viki, G. T. (2008). Getting rid of the bad ones: The relationship between group identification, deviant derogation, and identity maintenance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 874–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, E., McGregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C., Nash, K., Proulx, T., & Quirin, M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 219–286). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4
   Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L. W., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., Ouwerkerk, J. W., & Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. M., & Ruback, R. B. (1980). Reaction to opinion deviance: Impact of a fence straddler’s rationale on majority evaluation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M. (1990). The black sheep effect: Outgroup homogeneity as a social comparison process. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 131–151). Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1. publ .
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Páez, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 400–424). Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch17
   Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 81(3), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter-and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. -P. (1988). The “Black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R., & Allegretti, A. (2022, April 12). Boris Johnson defies calls to quit after he and Rishi Sunak fined. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/12/boris-johnson-and-rishi-sunak-fined-for-breaking-covid-lockdown-laws
   Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Butler, T., Chan, E., Rogers, A., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2020). Reducing stress: Social support and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218818733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudd, S. A. (1968). Group sanction severity as a function of degree of behavior deviation and relevance of norm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 8(3, Pt.1), 258–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025593
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muldoon, O. T., Haslam, S. A., Haslam, C., Cruwys, T., Kearns, M., & Jetten, J. (2019). The social psychology of responses to trauma: Social identity pathways associated with divergent traumatic responses. European Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 311–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2020.1711628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A., & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 76(2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 99(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (2016). National identification as a function of perceived social control: A subjective group dynamics analysis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(2), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215577225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of social identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280440000062
   Google Scholar
• Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T., & Novak, R. J. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 89(5), 747–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2003). On the science of the art of leadership. In D. van Knippenberg & M. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 197–209). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216170.n15.
   Google Scholar
• Sani, F. (2005). When subgroups secede: Extending and refining the social psychological model of schism in groups. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(8), 1074–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204274092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sani, F. (2008). Schism in groups: A social psychological account. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00073.x
   Google Scholar
• Sani, F., & Pugliese, A. C. (2008). In the name of Mussolini: Explaining the schism in an Italian right-wing political party. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research & Practice, 12(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.12.3.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian communist party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 623–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199807/08)28:4<623:AID-EJSP885>3.0.CO;2-G
   Google Scholar
• Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1999). Identity, argument and schism: Two longitudinal studies of the split in the church of England over the ordination of women to the priesthood. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299023005
   Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., & Hansen, N. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassenberg, K., Matschke, C., & Scholl, A. (2011). The impact of discrepancies from ingroup norms on group members’ well-being and motivation: Group-based self-regulation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(7), 886–897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 46(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmader, T., Block, K., & Lickel, B. (2015). Social identity threat in response to stereotypic film portrayals: Effects on self-conscious emotion and implicit ingroup attitudes: Social identity threat. The Journal of Social Issues, 71(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl, A., Sassenberg, K., & Pfattheicher, S. (2019). Pressured to be excellent? Social identification prevents negative affect from high university excellence norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinel, W., Utz, S., & Koning, L. (2010). The good, the bad and the ugly thing to do when sharing information: Revealing, concealing and lying depend on social motivation, distribution and importance of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollberg, J., Fritsche, I., Barth, M., & Jugert, P. (2017). Extending control perceptions to the social self: Ingroups serve the restoration of control. In M. Bukowski, I. Fritsche, & A. Guinote (Eds.), Coping with lack of control in a social world (pp. 133–150). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Tata, J. (1996). Factors relating to the allocation of medical resources. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 11(3), 739. Periodicals Archive Online.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory pp. x, 239. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Toorn, J., Ellemers, N., & Doosje, B. (2015). The threat of moral transgression: The impact of group membership and moral opportunity: Group membership and moral opportunity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(5), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A. H., & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. C. (2003). Strategic collective action: Social psychology and social change. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 409–430). Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693421.ch20
   Google Scholar
• Zee, K. S., Bolger, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2020). Regulatory effectiveness of social support. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 119(6), 1316–1358. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar