3,974
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Longitudinal tests of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 198-254 | Received 02 Jul 2022, Accepted 12 Jun 2023, Published online: 22 Jun 2023

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2002a, September 1). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved September 1, 2002, from http://people.umass.edu/~aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Dorsey Press.
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-59789190020-T.
  • Ajzen, I. (2002b). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR060202.
  • Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.
  • Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. E. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513137.
  • Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889.
  • Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4.
  • Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). Changing behavior using the theory of planned behavior. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 17–31). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/97811086773180.002.
  • Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142.
  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. T. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Assessment of predictive validity and ‘perceived control’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164022.
  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. T. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1421–1432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263009.
  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. T. (2001a). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939/.
  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. T. (2001b). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939.
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(2), 178–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786945.
  • Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indices of psychological properties: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637.
  • Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446.
  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude–behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86(5), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.452.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1981). Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.2.226.
  • Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386.
  • Carter, E. C., Schonbrodt, F., Gervais, W., & Hilgard, J. (2019). Correcting for bias in psychology: A comparison of meta-analytic methods. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847196.
  • Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2005). Effects of a brief intervention based on the theory of planned behavior on leisure time physical activity participation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27(4), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.27.4.470.
  • Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hagger, M. S., & Smith, B. (2007). Influences of perceived autonomy support on physical activity within the theory of planned behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 934–954. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.407.
  • Cheung, M. W.-L. (2014). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968.
  • Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015a). Meta-analysis: A structural equation modeling approach. Wiley.
  • Cheung, M. W.-L. (2015b). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521.
  • Chevance, G., Caudroit, J., Romain, A. J., & Boiché, J. (2017). The adoption of physical activity and eating behaviors among persons with obesity and in the general population: The role of implicit attitudes within the theory of planned behavior. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 22(3), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2016.1159705.
  • Coburn, K. M., & Vevea, J. L. (2019). Package ‘weightr’. from https://vevealab.shinyapps.io/WeightFunctionModel/.
  • Cochran, W. G. (1952). The γ2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729380.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
  • Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146.
  • Conner, M. T. (2016). Social cognitions in health behaviour. In Y. Benyamini, M. Johnston, & E. C. Karademas (Eds.), Assessment in health psychology (pp. 19–30). Hogrefe.
  • Conner, M. T., & Abraham C. (2001). Conscientiousness and the theory of planned behavior: Toward a more complete model of the antecedents of intentions and behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(11), 1547–1561. 10.1177/01461672012711014
  • Conner, M. T., McEachan, R., Taylor, N., O’Hara, J., & Lawton, R. (2015). Role of affective attitudes and anticipated affective reactions in predicting health behaviors. Health Psychology, 34(6), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000143.
  • Conner, M. T., & McMillan, B. (1999). Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: Studying cannabis use. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164121.
  • Conner, M. T., & Norman, P. (2015). Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed.). Open University Press.
  • Conner, M. T., & Sparks, P. (2002). Ambivalence and attitudes. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000012.
  • Conner, M. T., & Sparks, P. (2015). The theory of planned behavior and reasoned action approach. In M. T. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models (3rd ed., pp. 142–188). Open University Press.
  • Cooke, R., Dahdah, M., Norman, P., & French, D. P. (2016). How well does the theory of planned behaviour predict alcohol consumption? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.947547.
  • Cooke, R., & Sheeran, P. (2004). Moderation of cognition-intention and cognition-behaviour relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(2), 159–186. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666041501688.
  • DeCharms, R., & Muir, M. S. (1978). Motivation: Social approaches. Annual Review of Psychology, 29(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.29.020178.000515.
  • Del Re, A. C., & Hoyt, W. T. (2018). Package ‘MAc’: Meta-analysis with correlations. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MAc/MAc.pdf.
  • Doll, J., & Ajzen, I. (1992). Accessibility and stability of predictors in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.754.
  • Egger, M., Smith, D. G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
  • Eggers, S. M., Taylor, M., Sathiparsad, R., Bos, A. E., & de Vries, H. (2015). Predicting safe sex: Assessment of autoregressive and cross-lagged effects within the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(11), 1397–1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313512354.
  • Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983594.
  • Geen, R. G. (1995). Human motivation: A social psychological approach. Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
  • Godin, G., Sheeran, P., Conner, M., Belanger-Gravel, A., Cecilia, M., Gallani, B. J., & Nolin, B. (2010). Social structure, social cognition, and physical activity: A test of four models. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(1), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709x429901.
  • Gollob, H. F., & Reichardt, C. S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130293.
  • Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2010). Preference for consistency and social influence: A review of current research findings. Social Influence, 5(3), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510903332378.
  • Gwet, K. L. (2008). Computing inter-rater reliability and its variance in the presence of high agreement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711006X126600.
  • Hagger, M. S. (2019). The reasoned action approach and the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. In D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780199828340-0240.
  • Hagger, M. S., Chan, D. K. C., Protogerou, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2016). Using meta-analytic path analysis to test theoretical predictions in health behavior: An illustration based on meta-analyses of the theory of planned behavior. Preventive Medicine, 89, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.020.
  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). The influence of self-efficacy and past behaviour on the physical activity intentions of young people. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(9), 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410152475847.
  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.24.1.3.
  • Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Biddle, S. J. H., & Orbell, S. (2001). Antecedents of children’s physical activity intentions and behaviour: Predictive validity and longitudinal effects. Psychology and Health, 16(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440108405515.
  • Hagger, M. S., Cheung, M. W. L., Ajzen, I., & Hamilton, K. (2022). Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 41(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001153.
  • Hagger, M. S., Gucciardi, D. F., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2017). On nomological validity and auxiliary assumptions: The importance of simultaneously testing effects in social cognitive theories applied to health behavior and some guidelines. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01933.
  • Hagger, M. S., Gucciardi, D. F., Turrell, A., & Hamilton, K. (2019). Self-control and health-related behavior: The role of implicit self-control, trait self-control, and lay beliefs in self-control. British Journal of Health Psychology, 24(4), 764–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12378.
  • Hagger, M. S., Hamilton, K., Phipps, D. J., Protogerou, C., Zhang, C.-Q., Girelli, L., Mallia, L., & Lucidi, F. (2023). Effects of habit and intention on behavior: Meta-analysis and test of key moderators. Motivation Science, 9(2), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000294.
  • Hagger, M. S., Polet, J., & Lintunen, T. (2018). The reasoned action approach applied to health behavior: Role of past behavior and test of some key moderators using meta-analytic structural equation modeling. Social Science & Medicine, 213, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.038.
  • Hagger, M. S., Trost, N., Keech, J., Chan, D. K. C., & Hamilton, K. (2017). Predicting sugar consumption: Application of an integrated dual-process, dual-phase model. Appetite, 116, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.032.
  • Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889.
  • Hamilton, K., Gibbs, I., Keech, J. J., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). Reasoned and implicit processes in heavy episodic drinking: An integrated dual process model. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJHP.12401.
  • Hamilton, K., & Johnson, B. T. (2020). Attitude and persuasive communication interventions. In M. S. Hagger, L. D. Cameron, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The handbook of behavior change (pp. 445–460). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/97811086773180.031.
  • Hamilton, K., Kirkpatrick, A., Rebar, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2017). Child sun safety: Application of an integrated behavior change model. Health Psychology, 36(9), 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000533.
  • Hamilton, K., Phipps, D. J., Loxton, N., Modecki, K. L., & Hagger, M. S. (2023). Reciprocal relations between past behavior, implicit beliefs, and habits: A cross-lagged panel design. Journal of Health Psychology, 13591053231164492. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053231164492.
  • Hamilton, K., van Dongen, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for parent-for-child health behaviors: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 39(10), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000940.
  • Hanbury, A., Wallace, L., & Clark, M. (2009). Use of a time series design to test effectiveness of a theory-based intervention targeting adherence of health professionals to a clinical guideline. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X369558.
  • Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., & Ebert, D. D. (2019). Doing meta-analysis in R: A hands-on guide. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2551803.
  • Hedges, L. V. (1984). Estimation of effect size under nonrandom sampling: The effects of censoring studies yielding statistically insignificant mean differences. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 9(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986009001061.
  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
  • Hertzog, C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1987). Beyond autoregressive models: Some implications of the trait-state distinction for the structural modeling of developmental change. Child Development, 58(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130294.
  • Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186.
  • Hobbis, I., & Sutton, S. (2005). Are techniques used in cognitive behaviour therapy applicable to behaviour change interventions based on the theory of planned behaviour? Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305048549.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398105.
  • Iyengar, S., & Greenhouse, J. B. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013012.
  • Joensuu, S., Viljamaa, A., Varamäki, E., Tornikoski, E., & Harry Matlay, P. (2013). Development of entrepreneurial intention in higher education and the effect of gender – a latent growth curve analysis. Education + Training, 55(8/9), 781–803. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2013-0084.
  • Keatley, D. A., Clarke, D. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2012). Investigating the predictive validity of implicit and explicit measures of motivation on condom use, physical activity, and healthy eating. Psychology and Health, 27(5), 550–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.605451.
  • Kroesen, M., Handy, S., & Chorus, C. (2017). Do attitudes cause behavior or vice versa? An alternative conceptualization of the attitude-behavior relationship in travel behavior modeling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 101, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.013.
  • Lawton, R., Conner, M. T., & McEachan, R. (2009). Desire or reason: Predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychology, 28(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013424.
  • Liska, A. E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033889.
  • Liska, A. E., Felson, R. B., Chamlin, M., & Baccaglini, W. (1984). Estimating attitude-behavior reciprocal effects within a theoretical specification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033884.
  • Luo, J., Zhang, B., Estabrook, R., Graham, E. K., Driver, C. C., Schalet, B. D., Turiano, N. A., Spiro Iii, A., & Mroczek, D. K. (2022). Personality and health: Disentangling their between-person and within-person relationship in three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(3), 493–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000399.
  • Marsh, H. W., Papaioannou, A., & Theodorakis, Y. (2006). Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: Reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology, 25(3), 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.316.
  • McAnally, K., & Hagger,M. S. (2023). Health literacy, social cognition constructs, and health behaviors and outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 42(4), 213–234. 10.1037/hea0001266
  • McAuley, E. (1992). The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00848378.
  • McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M. T., Taylor, N., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.521684.
  • McEachan, R. R. C., Taylor, N., Harrison, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Conner, M. T. (2016). Meta-analysis of the reasoned action approach (RAA) to understanding health behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(4), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9798-4.
  • McMillan, B., & Conner, M. (2007). Health cognition assessment. In A. B. S. Ayers, C. McManus, S. Newman, K. Wallston, J. Weinman, & R. West (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (2nd ed., pp. 260–266). Cambridge University Press.
  • McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662243.
  • Niepel, C., Burrus, J., Greiff, S., Lipnevich, A. A., Brenneman, M. W., & Roberts, R. D. (2018). Students’ beliefs and attitudes toward mathematics across time: A longitudinal examination of the theory of planned behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 63, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.010.
  • Norman, P., Cameron, D., Epton, T., Webb, T. L., Harris, P. R., Millings, A., & Sheeran, P. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of a brief online intervention to reduce alcohol consumption in new university students: Combining self-affirmation, theory of planned behaviour messages, and implementation intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 23(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12277.
  • Ogden, J. (2003). Some problems with social cognition models: A pragmatic and conceptual basis. Health Psychology, 22(4), 424–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.4.424.
  • Orth, U., Clark, D. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358.
  • Phipps, D. J., Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2020). Predicting limiting ‘free sugar’ consumption using an integrated model of health behavior. Appetite, 150, 104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104668.
  • Phipps, D. J., Hannan, T. E., Rhodes, R. E., & Hamilton, K. (2021). A dual-process model of affective and instrumental attitudes in predicting physical activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 54, 101899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101899.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Protogerou, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). A checklist to assess the quality of survey studies in psychology methods in psychology. Methods in Psychology, 3, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100031.
  • Protogerou, C., Johnson, B. T., & Hagger, M. S. (2018). An integrated model of condom use in sub-Saharan African youth: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 37(6), 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000604.
  • Randolph, W. A. (1981). Cross-lagged correlational analysis in dynamic settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66(4), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.66.4.431.
  • Reinecke, J., Schmidt, P., & Ajzen, I. (1996). Application of the theory of planned behavior to adolescents’ condom use: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(9), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01128.x.
  • Rich, A., Brandes, K., Mullan, B. A., & Hagger, M. S. (2015). Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(4), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9644-3.
  • Rivis, A., Sheeran, P., & Armitage, C. J. (2009). Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(12), 2985–3019. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00558.x.
  • Rogosa, D. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlation. Psychological Bulletin, 88(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.245.
  • Rosenthal, M. C. (1994). The fugitive literature. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 85–94). Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Schenker, N., & Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960.
  • Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843.
  • Sheeran, P., & Abraham, C. (2003). Mediator of moderators: Temporal stability of intention and the intention-behavior relation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239046.
  • Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Montanaro, E., Avishai-Yitshak, A., Bryan, A., Klein, W. M. P., Miles, E., & Rothman, A. J. (2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1178–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000387.
  • Sheeran, P., & Taylor, S. (1999). Predicting intentions to use condoms: A meta-analysis and comparison of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(8), 1624–1675. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02045.x.
  • Sherman, S. J., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1989). Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 40(1), 281–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.001433.
  • Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve and effect size: Correcting for publication bias using only significant results. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(6), 666–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614553988.
  • Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). An experimental test of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01013.x.
  • Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014). Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour. Health Psychology Review, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.869710.
  • Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095.
  • Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.
  • Steinmetz, H., Knappstein, M., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Kabst, R. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the Theory of planned behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology, 224(3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255.
  • St Quinton, T., & Trafimow, D. (2022). The unappreciated relevance of auxiliary assumptions for evaluating theory-based interventions in health psychology. Theory & Psychology, 32(6), 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221113263.
  • Trafimow, D. (2009). The theory of reasoned action: A case study of falsification in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 19(4), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309336319.
  • Trafimow, D. (2012). The role of auxiliary assumptions for the validity of manipulations and measures. Theory & Psychology, 22(4), 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311429996.
  • Trafimow, D., & Duran, A. (1998). Some tests of the distinction between attitude and perceived behavioural control. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01154.x.
  • Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Brookes/Cole.
  • van Aert, R. C. M. (2020). Package ‘puniform’. https://github.com/RobbievanAert/puniform
  • van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2018). Correcting for publication bias in a meta-analysis with the P-uniform* method. MetaArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/zqjr9.
  • Vevea, J. L., & Hedges, L. V. (1995). A general linear model for estimating effect size in the presence of publication bias. Psychometrika, 60(3), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294384.
  • Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
  • Wanberg, C. R., Glomb, T. M., Song, Z., & Sorenson, S. (2005). Job-search persistence during unemployment: A 10-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.411.
  • Weiner, B. (1990). Human motivation. Erlbaum.
  • Wilson, S. J., Polanin, J. R., & Lipsey, M. W. (2016). Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1199.