Reconfiguring science education through caring human inquiry and design with pets

References

• Ackermann, E. (1996). Perspective-taking and object construction: Two keys to learning. In Y. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice (pp. 25–35). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, F. S. (2011). Lines of Practice: A Practice-Centered Theory of Interest Relationships. Cognition & Instruction, 29(2), 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.556834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, H., & Romanycia, S. (2013). Learning from Hermit Crabs, Mycelia and Banyan: Schools as centers of critical inquiry and renormatization. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International Handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 101–107). AERA Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813331-26
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M. (2016). Towards an ethic of decolonial trans-ontologies in sociocultural theories of learning and development. In I. Esmonde & A. N. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 115–138). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315685762
   Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/non/human agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(35), 13868–13874. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706627104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 68–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger, B. (2003). The last meow: Annals of veterinary medicine. The New Yorker.
   Google Scholar
• Bonus, J. A., & Mares, M.-L. (2018). When the sun sings science, are children left in the dark? Representations of science in children’s television and their effects on children’s learning. Human Communication Research, 44(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2016). Pet face: Mechanisms underlying human-animal relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 298. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.201600298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R. (1980). Scientific realism and naturalistic epistemology. PSA (East Lansing Mich), 1980(2), 613–662. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1980.2.192615
   Google Scholar
• Brayboy, B. M. J., & Castagno, A. E. (2008). How might native science inform “informal science learning?” Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3(3), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-008-9125-x
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
   Google Scholar
• Buch, E. D. (2015). Anthropology of aging and care. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucks, W. F. (1903). Cyno-psychoses: Children’s thoughts, reactions, and feelings toward pet dogs. The Pedagogical Seminary, 10(4), 459–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/08919402.1903.10532729
   Google Scholar
• Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, L. (2006). Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(1), 27–31. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124706.1121352
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cuccio-Schirripa, S., & Steiner, H. E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<210:AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish, J. A. (2014). Applying an activity theory lens to designing instruction for learning about the structure, behavior, and function of a honeybee system. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 100–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.856793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialisms: Interviews and cartographies. Open Humanities Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/ohp.11515701.0001.001
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. (2017a). The binding of Fenrir: Children in an emerging age of transhumanist technology. In IDC 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 328–333). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3078072.3079744
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. (2017b). Self-made: The body as frontier for the maker movement in education. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education (FabLearn 2017) (pp. 1–4). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3141798.3141800
   Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I., & Booker, A. I. (2017). Chapter 9. Toward critical sociocultural theories of learning. In I. Esmonde & A. I. Booker (Eds.), Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning (pp. 162–174). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faber Taylor, A., Butts-Wilmsmeyer, C., & Jordan, C. (2022). Nature-based instruction for science learning – a good fit for all: A controlled comparison of classroom versus nature. Environmental Education Research, 28(10), 1527–1546. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2076811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, A. (2010). Natural cultural encounters in Bali: Monkeys, temples, tourists, and ethnoprimatology. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 600–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geerdts, M. S., Van De Walle, G. A., & LoBue, V. (2016). Learning about real animals from anthropomorphic media. Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 36(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236615611798
   Google Scholar
• Gehlbach, H., Marietta, G., King, A. M., Karutz, C., Bailenson, J. N., & De de, C. (2015). Many ways to walk a mile in another’s moccasins: Type of social perspective taking and its effect on negotiation outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & the Middle School Through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. The American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., Pea, R., & Cooper, S. (2014). Remedying misperceptions of computer science among middle school students. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 343–348). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538934
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, N. N. (2007). Identification of ambiguity in the case study research typology: What is a unit of analysis? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 10(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750710720413
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2015). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226241531.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, D. G. (2017). The songs of trees: Stories from nature’s great connectors. Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Crowley, K. (2019). Unpacking the learning ecosystems framework: Lessons from the adaptive management of biological ecosystems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Nelson, T. (2021). Youth, place, and educator practices: Designing program elements to support relational processes and naturalist identity development. Environmental Education Research, 27(9), 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1928608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195180992.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., Ogle, E., Zaki, J., & Bastian, B. (2018). Building long-term empathy: A large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLoS One, 13(10), e0204494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirskyj-Douglas, I., Read, J. C., & Horton, M. (2017). Animal personas: Representing dog stakeholders in interaction design. In Proceedings of the 31st International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2017) 31 (pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2017.37
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, A. (2009). Inside of a dog: What dogs see, smell, and know. Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Information Institute. (2019). Facts + Statistics: Pet statistics. Retrieved March 14, 2022, from https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-pet-statistics
   Google Scholar
• Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jax, K., Calestani, M., Chan, K. M., Eser, U., Keune, H., Muraca, B., O’Brien, L., Potthast, T., Voget-Kleschin, L., & Wittmer, H. (2018). Caring for nature matters: A relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, B. (2018). Solidarity and care as relational practices. Bioethics, 32(9), 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking: Positioning a tangled construct within science education and beyond. Science & Education, 28(6–7), 605–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00044-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattmann, U. (2007). Learning biology by means of anthropomorphic conceptions?. In M. Hamman (Ed.), Biology in context: Learning and teaching for 21st century (pp. 21–26). London, UK: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. (1983). A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. W.H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, A., Johnson, G. M., Polman, J. L., Kane, S. K., & Shapiro, R. B. (2021). People, places, and pets: Situating STEM education in youths’ homes with their pets. In E. de Vries, Y. Hod, & J. Ahn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2021 (pp. 11–18). Bochum, Germany: International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/7417
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & Bowen, G. M. (2022). Why multispecies’ flourishing? Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31756/jrsmte.515
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerer, R. W. (2015). Braiding sweetgrass : Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and the teachings of plants / Robin Wall Kimmerer. Milkweed Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, N., Hirose, T., & Watanabe, G. (2013). Relationships between caregiving to domestic goats and gender and interest in science. Comprehensive Psychology, 2(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2466/09.IT.2.5
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1998). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner, P. N. (1992). Sampling methods in behavior research. Poultry Science, 71(4), 643–649. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R. (2012). Generating a learning stance through perspective-taking in a virtual environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1130–1139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Byrne, D., & Devendorf, L. (2018). Design for Collaborative Survival : An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173614
   Google Scholar
• Logan, M. R., & Russell, J. (2016). How could it be? Calling for science curricula that cultivate morals and values towards other animals and nature. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(4), 1023–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9727-z
   Google Scholar
• Losh, S. C. (2010). Stereotypes about scientists over time among US adults: 1983 and 2001. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662508098576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, L., Slattery, B., Jimenez, P., Lopez, B., & Moher, T. (2012). Don’t forget about the sweat : Effortful embodied interaction in support of learning. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148149
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, C. (2017). Towards an animal-centred ethics for animal-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 98, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A., & Bang, M. (2018). “Look it, this is how you know:” Family forest walks as a context for knowledge-building about the natural world. Cognition & Instruction, 36(2), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1429443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. D. (2004). Draw a computer scientist. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(4), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/1041624.1041628
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C. L., Kahle, J. B., & Gardner, A. L. (1991). Draw‐a‐scientist test: Future implications. School Science and Mathematics, 91(5), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12078.x
   Google Scholar
• McCabe, S., & Nekaris, K. A. I. (2019). The impact of subtle anthropomorphism on gender differences in learning conservation ecology in Indonesian school children. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 18(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2018.1427011
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, V. C., & Bell, P. (2022). “I now deeply care about the effects humans are having on the world”: Cultivating ecological care and responsibility through complex systems modelling and investigations. Educational & Developmental Psychologist, 39(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2022.2027212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M. (2009). Pedagogical transgression: Toward intersubjective agency and action. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restorying culture, environment, and education (pp. 211–224). Hampton Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Melson, G. (2005). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674040922
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. E., & Murphy, C. J. (1995). Vision in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 207(12), 1623–1634. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7493905/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. I. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2021). Rethinking learning: What the Interdisciplinary science tells us. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211047251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition & Instruction, 16(2), 119–172. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci16021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society, 4(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102
   Google Scholar
• Oh, S. Y., Bailenson, J., Weisz, E., & Zaki, J. (2016). Virtually old: Embodied perspective taking and the reduction of ageism under threat. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 398–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parekh, P., Polman, J. L., Kane, S. K., & Shapiro, R. B. (2022). Learning science while caring for pets: Findings from a virtual workshop for teens. In C. Chinn, E. Tan, C. Chan, & Y. Kali (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2022 (pp. 321–328). Hiroshima, Japan: International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/9045
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Danish, J., Zaitlen, B., Glosson, D., Jacobs, A., & Phelps, D. (2010, June). BeeSim: Leveraging wearable computers in participatory simulations with young children. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 246–249). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Philip, T. M., & Azevedo, F. S. (2017). Everyday science learning and equity: Mapping the contested terrain. Science Education, 101(4), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226668253.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polman, J. L., & Miller, D. (2010). Changing Stories: Trajectories of Identification Among African American Youth in a Science Outreach Apprenticeship. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 879–918. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210367513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children’s concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701206686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, P., McGinty, M., & Bang, M. (2019). Relational epistemologies in land-based learning environments: Reasoning about ecological systems and spatial indexing in motion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09922-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roan, L., Strong, B., Foss, P., & Yager, M. (2009). Social perspective taking (Technical Report 1259). Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Rossing, W., & Hogewerf, P. H. (1997). State of the art of automatic milking systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 17(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(96)01229-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, D. (2018). Molecular feminisms: Biology, becomings, and life in the lab. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. (2017). ‘Everything has to die one day:’ children’s explorations of the meanings of death in human-animal-nature relationships. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1144175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, C. R., & Arluke, A. (1993). If lions could speak: Investigating the animal-human relationship and the perspectives of nonhuman others. The Sociological Quarterly, 34(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1993.tb00117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, P., Dickes, A., & Farris, A. V. (2021). Coding and modeling as perspectival work. In P. Sengupta, A. Dickes, & A. V. Farris (Eds.), Voicing code in STEM: A dialogical imagination (pp. 41–62). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11668.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, H. G., Peterson, M. N., Stevenson, K. T., Frew, K. N., & Langerhans, R. B. (2017). Wildlife species preferences differ among children in continental and island locations. Environmental Conservation, 44(4), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1017/S03768929170001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsdotter Svensson, A. (2014). The impact of the animals on children’s learning and their development-A study of what children learn from and with pets: The example of dog and cat. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 59(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/14.59.77
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1959). Cumulative record (1999 Definitive ed.). B.F. Skinner Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1998). Human/Machine reconsidered. Cognitive Studies, 5(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.11225/jcss.5.1_5
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2020). Downstream river dialogues: An educational journey towards a planetary-scaled ecological imagination. In I. Silova, J. Rappleye and Y. You (Eds.) Special Issue. Beyond the western horizon in educational research: Toward a deeper dialogue about our interdependent futures. ECNU Review of Education, 3(1), 107–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120905194
   Google Scholar
• von Uexküll, J. (2001). The new concept of umwelt: A link between science and the humanities: Translated by Gosta Brunow. Semiotica, 134(1/4), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2001.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, M., Gould, G., & Alsop, S. (1997). Questions of understanding: Categorising pupils’ question in science. The School Science Review, 79, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190903
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U., & Reisman, K. (2006). Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theories—An embodied modeling approach. Cognition & Instruction, 24(2), 171–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. A., Brosnan, S. F., & Clay, Z. (2020). Anthropomorphism in comparative affective science: Advocating a mindful approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 115, 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 22(3), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2203_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winther-Lindqvist, D. A. (2021). Caring well for children in ECEC from a wholeness approach – the role of moral imagination. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 30(PB), 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100452
   Google Scholar
• Yong, E. (2022). An immense world: How animal senses reveal the hidden realms around us. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. T. (2012). Participating in science at home: Recognition work and learning in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 597–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biological education – heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<679::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar