371
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Ideological sensemaking in an elementary science professional development community

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 573-621 | Received 15 Apr 2022, Accepted 27 Jun 2023, Published online: 09 Nov 2023

References

  • Aschbacher, R., & Alonzo, A. (2006). Examining the utility of elementary science notebooks for formative assessment purposes. Educational Assessment, 11(3–4), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2006.9652989
  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes, (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–22). Wiley.
  • Ball, D. L., Sleep, L., Boerst, T. A., & Bass, H. (2009). Combining the development of practice and the practice of development in teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1086/596996
  • Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5–6), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322
  • Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2017). Translanguaging and the body. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315809
  • Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165
  • Boerst, T. A., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2011). Preparing teachers to lead mathematics discussions. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 113(12), 2844–2877. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301207
  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
  • Burgess, T., & Patterson Williams, A. (2022). Utilizing theory to elucidate the work of creating equity for transformation within the science classroom. Science Education, 106(5), 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21721
  • Chang-Bacon, C. K. (2020a). Monolingual language ideologies and the massachusetts sheltered english immersion endorsement initiative: A critical policy analysis. Educational Policy, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820901465
  • Chang-Bacon, C. K. (2020b). Who’s being ‘sheltered?’: How monolingual language ideologies are produced within education policy discourse and sheltered english immersion. Critical Studies in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1720259
  • Cole, M. (2003). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
  • Colley, C. (2019, February 9). Puddles Mini-Unit for K, 1st, 2nd grade. Tools for Ambitious Science Teaching. https://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/puddles-mini-unit-for-k-1st-2nd-grade/
  • Crawford, B. A. (2012). Moving the essence of inquiry into the classroom: Engaging teachers and students in authentic science. In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research (pp. 25–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_3
  • Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2017). Critical race theory: An introduction. University Press.
  • Delpit, L. D. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4
  • Dewey, J. (1981). The philosophy of John Dewey (Vol. 1 and 2). University of Chicago Press.
  • DiAngelo, R. (2021). Nice racism: How progressive White people perpetuate racial harm. Beacon Press.
  • diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
  • Dressler, R. A., & Kreuz, R. J. (2000). Transcribing oral discourse: A survey and a model system. Discourse Processes, 29(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950dp2901_2
  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  • Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory. Polity.
  • Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity (pp. 22–31). Cambridge University Press.
  • Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and power (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Flores, N., & García, E. S. (2020). Power, language, and bilingual learners. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. M. de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (1st ed., pp. 178–191). Routledge.
  • Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.149
  • Flores, N., & Rosa, J. (2022). Undoing competence: Coloniality, homogeneity, and the overrepresentation of whiteness in applied linguistics. Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12528
  • Forsythe, M., & Johnson, H. (2017). What to see, what to say: Tips for participating in teacher video clubs. Tools for Learning Schools, 20(2), 1–7.
  • García, E. (1987). Education of linguistically and culturally diverse students: Effective instructional practices. National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
  • García, O. (2020). The education of Latinx bilingual children in times of isolation: Unlearning and relearning. MinneTESOL Journal, 36(1), 1–7.
  • García, O., Flores, N., Seltzer, K., Wei, L., Otheguy, R., & Rosa, J. (2021). Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals: A manifesto. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(3), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2021.1935957
  • García, O., Johnson, S. I., Seltzer, K., & Valdés, G. (2017). The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Caslon.
  • García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765_4
  • García, O., & Solorza, C. (2020). Academic language and the minoritization of U.S. bilingual Latinx students. Language and Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1825476
  • Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.
  • Gerard, L. F., Spitulnik, M., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Teacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1037–1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20367
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  • Gomoll, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Šabanović, S. (2022). Co-constructing professional vision: Teacher and researcher learning in co-design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010210
  • González-Howard, M., & Suárez, E. (2021). Retiring the term English language learners: Moving toward linguistic justice through asset-oriented framing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 749–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21684
  • Gooding, D. C. (2006). From phenomenology to field theory: Faraday’s visual reasoning. Perspectives on Science, 14(1), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.2006.14.1.40
  • Goodwin, C. (2007a). Interactive footing. In R. Clift & E. Holt (Eds.), Reporting talk: reported speech in interaction (pp. 16–46). Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (2007b). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457
  • Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
  • Grapin, S. (2019). Multimodality in the new content standards era: Implications for english learners. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.443
  • Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, T. B. Curran, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Culture, society and the media (pp. 56–90). Methuen.
  • Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In D. Morley & K. Chen (Eds.), Stuart hall: critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 25–46). Routledge.
  • Hall, R., & Horn, I. S. (2012). Talk and conceptual change at work: Adequate representation and epistemic stance in a comparative analysis of statistical consulting and teacher workgroups. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.688233
  • Hall, R., & Jurow, A. S. (2015). Changing concepts in activity: Descriptive and design studies of consequential learning in conceptual practices. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075403
  • Hall, R., Wieckert, K., & Wright, K. (2010). How does cognition get distributed? Case studies of making concepts general in technical and scientific work. In M. T. Banich & D. Caccamise (Eds.), Generalization of knowledge: multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 225–246). Psychology Press.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Harper, A., & Kayumova, S. (2022). Invisible multilingual black and brown girls: Raciolinguistic narratives of identity in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21826
  • Harris, C. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106(8), 1701–1791. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341787
  • Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004
  • Holdway, J., & Hitchcock, C. H. (2018). Exploring ideological becoming in professional development for teachers of multilingual learners: Perspectives on translanguaging in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.015
  • Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400709336942
  • Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.73.1.hnq801u57400l877
  • Jaspers, J. (2018). The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language and Communication, 58, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2017.12.001
  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 24–31). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
  • Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
  • Keifert, D., & Stevens, R. (2019). Inquiry as a members’ phenomenon: Young children as competent inquirers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508402.2018.1528448
  • Ko, M. M., Hall, A., & Goldman, S. R. (2022). Making teacher and researcher learning visible: Collaborative design as a context for professional growth. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010212
  • Kolluri, S., & Tichavakunda, A. A. (2022). The counter-deficit lens in educational research: Interrogating conceptions of structural oppression. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221125225
  • Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.674
  • Kuhn, D. (2016). What do young science students need to learn about variables? Science Education, 100(2), 392–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21207
  • Ladson-Billings, G. J. (2007). Can we at least have plessy? The struggle for quality education. North Carolina Law Review, 85(5), 1279–1292.
  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
  • Li, W. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039
  • Little, J. W. (2004). Looking at student work in the United States: Countervailing impulses in professional development. In C. Day & J. Sachs (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers (pp. 94–118). Routledge.
  • Little, J. W., Gearhart, M., Curry, M., & Kafka, J. (2003). Looking at student work for teacher learning, teacher community, and school reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308500305
  • Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
  • Louie, N. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9775-2
  • Louie, N. (2020). Agency discourse and the reproduction of hierarchy in mathematics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 38(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1677664
  • Louie, N., Adiredja, A. P., & Jessup, N. (2021). Teacher noticing from a sociopolitical perspective: The FAIR framework for anti-deficit noticing. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(1), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01229-2
  • Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599255
  • Mendoza, E., Hand, V., van Es, E. A., Hoos, S., & Frierson, M. (2021). “The ability to lay yourself bare”: Centering rupture, inherited conversations, and vulnerability in professional development. Professional Development in Education, 47(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1891955
  • Menken, K., & Sánchez, M. (2019). Translanguaging in English-only schools: From pedagogy to stance in the disruption of monolingual policies and practices. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.513
  • Mensah, F. M., & Jackson, I. (2018). Whiteness as property in science teacher education. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 120(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000108
  • Mundry, S., & Stiles, K. E. (Eds). (2009). Professional learning communities for science teaching: Lessons from research and practice. NSTA Press.
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [NASEM]. (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning english: promising futures. National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
  • Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7967.001.0001
  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
  • Norris, S., & Jones, R. H. (2005). Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. Routledge.
  • Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1992). Science at dinner. In C. Kramsch & S. Ginet-McConnell (Eds.), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 29–45). D C Heath & Co.
  • Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014
  • Pacheco, M. B., Kang, H. S., & Hurd, E. (2019). Scaffolds, signs, and bridges: Language ideologies and translanguaging in student-teaching experiences. Bilingual Research Journal, 42(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2019.1596179
  • Patterson Williams, A. D., Athanases, S. Z., Higgs, J., & Martinez, D. C. (2020). Developing an inner witness to notice for equity in the fleeting moments of talk for content learning. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(4), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2020.1791282
  • Philip, T. M. (2011). An “ideology in pieces” approach to studying change in teachers’ sensemaking about race, racism, and racial justice. Cognition and Instruction, 29(3), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.583369
  • Philip, T. M., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Why ideology matters for learning: A case of ideological convergence in an engineering ethics classroom discussion on drone warfare. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381964
  • Philip, T. M., Pham, J. H., Scott, M., & Cortez, A. (2022). Intentionally addressing nested systems of power through teacher solidarity co-design. Cognition and Instruction, 40(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.2010208
  • Pierson, A. E., Brady, C. E., Clark, D. B., & Sengupta, P. (2023). Students’ epistemic commitments in a heterogeneity-seeking modeling curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 41(2), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2111431
  • Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Brady, C. (2021). Scientific modeling and translanguaging: A multilingual and multimodal approach to support science learning and engagement. Science Education, 105(4), 776–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21622
  • Pierson, A. E., & Grapin, S. E. (2021). A disciplinary perspective on translanguaging. Bilingual Research Journal, 44(3), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2021.1970657
  • Pierson, A. E., Keifert, D. T., Daniel, B. D., Lee, S. J., Jen, T., Bell, A., Johnson, H. J., Askew, R., & Henrie, A. (under review). Designing professional development to support equity-as-transformation perspectives for elementary science teachers. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Pierson, A. E., Keifert, D. T., Lee, S. J., Henrie, A., Johnson, H. J., & Enyedy, N. (2022). Multiple representations in elementary science: Building shared understanding while leveraging students’ diverse ideas and practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2143612
  • Rosa, J. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12116.
  • Rosa, J., & Burdick, C. (2017). Language ideologies. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 103–124). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212896.013.15
  • Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20408
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163
  • Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382.
  • Sengupta-Irving, T., Tunney, J., & Macias, M. (2021). Stories of garlic, butter, and ceviche: Racial-ideological micro-contestation and microaggressions in secondary STEM professional development. Cognition and Instruction, 39(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1812612
  • Shah, N., & Coles, J. A. (2020). Preparing teachers to notice race in classrooms: Contextualizing the competencies of preservice teachers with antiracist inclinations. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119900204
  • Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
  • Sherin, M., & van Es, E. (2005). Using video to support teachers’ ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.
  • Shim, S., & Thompson, J. (2022). Four years of collaboration in a professional learning community: Shifting toward supporting students’ epistemic practices. Science Education, 106(3), 674–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21704
  • Stein, S. J. (2004). The culture of education policy. Teachers College Press.
  • Takeuchi, M., Kayumova, S., de Araujo, Z., & Madkins, T. (2022). Going beyond # RetireELL: A call for anti-colonial approaches to languages in STEM education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(5), 876–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21764
  • Tennessee Department of Education. (2018). Tennessee Academic Standards for Science. https://www.tn.gov/education/instruction/academic-standards/science-standards.html
  • Thompson, J. J., Hagenah, S., McDonald, S., & Barchenger, C. (2019). Toward a practice-based theory for how professional learning communities engage in the improvement of tools and practices for scientific modeling. Science Education, 103(6), 1423–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.201547
  • Tian, Z., & Shepard-Carey, L. (2020). Re imagining the future of translanguaging pedagogies in TESOL through teacher–researcher collaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 1131–1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.614
  • Tools for Ambitious Science Teaching, University of Washington. (2015). Circuits unit revision. tools for ambitious science teaching. https://ambitiousscienceteaching.org/wp-content/plugins/download-attachments/includes/download.php?id=125469
  • Turner, M., & Lin, A. M. (2020). Translanguaging and named languages: Productive tension and desire. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(4), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1360243
  • van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  • Walkoe, J. D., & Luna, M. J. (2020). What we are missing in studies of teacher learning: A call for microgenetic, interactional analyses to examine teacher learning processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 285–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1681998
  • Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1017
  • Warren, B., Ogonowski, M., & Pothier, S. (2005). “Everyday” and “scientific”: Rethinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in science learning. In R. Nemirovsky, A. S. Rosebery, J. Solomon, & B. Warren (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 119–148). Routledge.
  • Warren, B., Vossoughi, S., Rosebery, A. S., Bang, M., & Taylor, E. V. (2020). Multiple ways of knowing*: Re-imagining disciplinary learning. In N. S. Nasir, C. D. Lee, R. Pea, & M. McKinney de Royston (Eds.), Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 277–294). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774977-19
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.2102/
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2019). Sharing a vision, sharing practices: How communities of educators improve teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518810796
  • Yoon, I. H. (2012). The paradoxical nature of whiteness-at-work in the daily life of schools and teacher communities. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(5), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2011.623506

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.