What happened to the interdisciplinary study of learning in humans and machines?

References

• Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1143370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D., & Wilensky, U. (2005). Piaget? Vygotsky? I’m game!–agent-based modeling for psychology research [Paper presentation]. The 35th Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society. https://ccl.northwestern.edu/papers/Abrahamson_Wilensky_JPS20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. J. (2000). The roles of models in artificial intelligence and education research: A prospective view. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 11(2), 122–143.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., Cherkes-Julkowski, M., Swenson, R., Garrett, S., Shaw, R. E., & Young, M. (1999). Principles of self-organization: Learning as participation in autocatakinetic systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3–4), 349–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1999.9672074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booker, A. N., Vossoughi, S., & Hooper, P. K. (2014). Tensions and possibilities for political work in the learning sciences. In J. L. Polman, E. A. Kyza, D. K. O'Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O'Connor, T. Lee & L. D'Amico (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2014 (Vol. 2, pp. 919–926). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22318/icls2014.919
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In R. L. Launer & G. N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Robustness in statistics (pp. 201–236). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2
   Google Scholar
• Carley, K. (1986). Knowledge acquisition as a social phenomenon. Instructional Science, 14(3), 381–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carley, K., Martin, M. K., & Hirshman, B. R. (2009). The etiology of social change. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(4), 621–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01037.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancey, W. J. (2008). Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 11–34). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.002
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. P. (2019). Multidisciplinary flux and multiple research traditions within cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 869–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition & Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2018). A friendly introduction to “Knowledge in Pieces”: Modeling types of knowledge and their roles in learning. In Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 65–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_11
   Google Scholar
• Doroudi, S. (2020). The bias-variance tradeoff: How data science can inform educational debates. AERA Open, 6(4), 233285842097720. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420977208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doroudi, S. (2022). The intertwined histories of artificial intelligence and education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00313-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doroudi, S., & Rastegar, S. A. (2023). The bias–variance tradeoff in cognitive science. Cognitive Science, 47(1), e13241. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbus, K. D. (2010). AI and cognitive science: The past and next 30 years. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01083.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1987). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (2019). Cognitive science is and should be pluralistic. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 884–891. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, A. (2022). Looking back, looking ahead: Symbolic versus connectionist ai. AI Magazine, 42(4), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v42i4.15111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Situativity and symbols: Response to vera and Simon. Cognitive Science, 17(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig, C. (2003). How wrong models become useful—and correct models become dangerous. In M. Schader, W. Gaul & M. Vichi (Eds.), Between data science and applied data analysis (pp. 235–243). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18991-3_27
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, C. (2010). Mathematical models and reality: A constructivist perspective. Foundations of Science, 15(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-009-9167-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hof, B. (2021). The turtle and the mouse: How constructivist learning theory shaped artificial intelligence and educational technology in the 1960s. History of Education, 50(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760X.2020.1826053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1990). The technology of team navigation. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (Vol. 1, pp. 191–220). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315807645-10
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., & Hazlehurst, B. (1991). Learning in the cultural process. In C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Artificial life II. SFI studies in the sciences of complexity (Vol. 10, pp. 689–706). Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E., & Hazlehurst, B. (1995). How to invent a lexicon: The development of shared symbols in interaction. In N. Gilbert & R. Conte (Eds.), Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life (pp. 157–189). UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993699
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., Kapur, M., & Reimann, P. (2016). Conceptualizing debates in learning and educational research: Toward a complex systems conceptual framework of learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1166963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. M. (2021). Algorithmic bias: On the implicit biases of social technology. Synthese, 198(10), 9941–9961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02696-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1989). Embodied knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(4), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1989.11075338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L. (1991). The Journal of the Learning Sciences: Effecting changes in education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_1
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (2020). The next decade in AI: Four steps towards robust artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.06177.
   Google Scholar
• Martınez-Plumed, F., Loe, B. S., Flach, P., O hEigeartaigh, S., Vold, K., & Hernández-Orallo, J. (2018). The facets of artificial intelligence: A framework to track the evolution of AI. In J. Lang (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 5180–5187). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/718
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L. (2009). The place of modeling in cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 11–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01003.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E. PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 1). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478259
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1988). The society of mind. Simon and Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(91)90036-J
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1991). Logical versus analogical or symbolic versus connectionist or neat versus scruffy. AI Magazine, 12(2), 34–34. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v12i2.894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasir, N. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & McKinney de Royston, M. (2021). Rethinking learning: What the interdisciplinary science tells us. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211047251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, N. J. (2009). The quest for artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press. https://ai.stanford.edu/~nilsson/QAI/qai.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pask, G. (1961). An approach to cybernetics. Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Pask, G. (1965). The cybernetics of human learning and performance: A guide to theory and research. Hutchinson Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, cognition and learning: A cybernetic theory and methodology. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pask, G., & Kopstein, F. F. (1977). Teaching machines revisited in the light of conversation theory. Educational Technology, 17(10), 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Perconti, P., & Plebe, A. (2020). Deep learning and cognitive science. Cognition, 203, 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2013). Computational grounded cognition: A new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2005). Introduction: The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (1st ed., pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816833.002
   Google Scholar
• Schöner, G. (2008). Dynamical systems approaches to cognition. In Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 101–126). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816772.007
   Google Scholar
• Scott, B. (2001a). Gordon pask’s contributions to psychology. Kybernetes, 30(7/8), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, B. (2001b). Gordon pask’s conversation theory: A domain independent constructivist model of human knowing. Foundations of Science, 6(4), 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011667022540
   Google Scholar
• Self, J. (2016). The birth of IJAIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-015-0040-5
   Google Scholar
• Sun, R., & Alexandre, F. (1997). Connectionist-symbolic integration: From unified to hybrid approaches. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Synced. (2018). The AAAI 2018 keyword is “learning”. https://medium.com/syncedreview/the-aaai-2018-keyword-is-learning-d0aefcccde3a
   Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). Norton.
   Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1992). Declaration of the American Society for Cybernetics. http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/065
   Google Scholar