Interacting with nature in and through boundary crossing learning: A case of bioart-making

References

• Akkerman, S. (2011). Learning at boundaries. International Journal of Educational Research, 50(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.04.005
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S., Admiraal, W., Simons, R., & Niessen, T. (2006). Considering diversity: Multivoicedness in international academic collaboration. Culture & Psychology, 12(4), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X06069947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., & Bruining, T. (2016). Multilevel boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 240–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1147448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anker, S. (2015). Foreword. In W. Myers (Ed.), Bio art - Altered realities (p. 6). Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, E., Mäki-Reinikka, K., O’Reilly, K. & Sederholm, H. (Eds.). (2020). Art as we don’t know it. Aalto. https://shop.aalto.fi/media/filer_public/6c/aa/6caa756a-bab7-4d9b-a5f1-07dd1bc171be/aaltoartsbooks_art_as_we_dont_know_it.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2017). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Data Protection Act, 1050/2018. (2018). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2018/en20181050.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, E. (2013). The misdiagnosis: Rethinking “nature-deficit disorder”. Environmental Communication A Journal of Nature and Culture, 7(3), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.802704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitriu, A. (2016). Trust me, I’m an artist: Building opportunities for art and science collaboration through an understanding of ethics. Leonardo, 51(1), 83–84. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (2008). Artscience: Creativity in the post-google generation. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (2007). Art and knowledge. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 3–12). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Agency for Education. (2020). The National core curriculum for general upper secondary education 2019. Regulations and guidelines 2019:2c https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/172124_lukion_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. (2019). The ethical principles with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland: Finnish national board on research integrity TENK guidelines 2019. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, A. D., Calvert, J., Schyfter, P., Elfick, A., & Endy, A. D. (Eds.). (2014). Synthetic aesthetics: Investigating synthetic biology’s designs on nature. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Constantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, E. (2021). How the arts can save education: Transforming teaching, learning and instruction. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, E., & Sawyer, K. (2022). Learning in and through the arts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014b). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, M., & Crowley, K. (2020). Unpacking the learning ecosystems framework: Lessons from the adaptive management of biological ecosystems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 264–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito, J. (2017). The antidisciplinary approach. IRI medal address. The antidiscplinary approach of the MIT Media Lab demonstrates how organizations might adapt to and take advantage of the evolving world of permissionless innovation. Research-Technology Management, 60(6), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1373047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, C. D., Abson, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Dorninger, C., Klaniecki, K., & Fischer, J. (2018). Reconnecting with nature for sustainability. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0542-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, C. D., Giusti, M., Fischer, J., Abson, D. J., Klaniecki, K., Dorninger, C., Laudan, J., Barthel, S., Abernethy, P., Martin-López, B., Raymond, C. M., Kendal, D., & von Wehrden, H. (2017). Human–nature connection: A multidisciplinary review. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., & Walker, J. T. (2020). Bringing 21st-century science into schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720956848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakind, A. (2017). Public libraries as sites of collision for arts education, the maker movement, and neoliberal agendas in education. Journal for Learning Through the Arts, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.21977/D913133234
   Google Scholar
• Land, M. (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317
   Google Scholar
• Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L., Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2020). STEAM maker education: Conceal/reveal of personal artistic and computational dimensions in high school student projects. Frontiers of Education, 5, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00051
   Google Scholar
• Ljokkoi, K., & Slotte Dufva, T. (2020). How to educate kids and youngsters to value art and science as equals – Pedagogy in practice. In E. Berger, K. Mäki-Reinikka, K. O’Reilly, & H. Sederholm (Eds.), Art as we don’t know it (pp. 194–207). Aalto.
   Google Scholar
• Lumber, R., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & Bastian, B. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0177186. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, M., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., Ladd, B., Pearon, J., & Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316
   Google Scholar
• Marshal, J., & D’Adamo, K. (2011). Art practice as research in the classroom: A new paradigm in art education. Art Education, 64(5), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2011.11519139
   Google Scholar
• May, S., & Clapp, E. P. (2017). Considering the role of the arts and aesthetics within maker-centered learning. Studies in Art Education, 58(4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2017.1368287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, S. (1998). Art-based research. Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. (2010). Bioart and the vitality of media. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muhr, M. M. (2020). Beyond words – The potential of arts-based research on human-nature connectedness. Ecosystems & People, 16(1), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1811379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (Eds.). (2016). Introduction to this volume. In Peppler, K., Halverson, E. R. & Kafai, Y. B.(Eds.). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments introduction to this (volume 1) (pp. 1–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726519-1
   Google Scholar
• Peppler, K., Rosenfeld Halverson, E. & Kafai, Y. B. (2016). Introduction to this volume. In K. Peppler, E. R. Halverson, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makers as learners (volume 2) (pp. 1–10). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726496-1
   Google Scholar
• Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkel, S. (2016). Stem, steam, steams. Editorial. Leonardo, 49(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_e_01161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöllanen, S. (2009). Contextualising craft: Pedagogical models for craft education. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 28(3), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01619.x
   Google Scholar
• Raatikainen, K. J., Juhola, K., Huhmarniemi, M., & Peña-Lagos, H. (2020). Face the cow: Reconnecting to nature and increasing capacities for pro-environmental agency. Ecosystems & People, 16(1), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1817151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society, 27(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regulation (EU). (2016). 2016/679 of the European parliament and of the council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/EC (general data protection regulation) (text with EEA relevance). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
   Google Scholar
• Rienties, B., & Tempelaar, D. (2018). Turning groups inside out: A social network perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(4), 550–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1398652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B., Topping, K., Baker-Sennett, J., & Lacasa, P. (2002). Mutual contributions of individuals, partners, and institutions: Planning to remember in girl scout cookie sales. Social Development, 11(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., Bernhard, J., & Larsen, M. C. (2021). Ecotones: A conceptual contribution to postdigital thinking. Postdigital Science & Education, 3(2), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00213-5
   Google Scholar
• Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2022). Creative expansion of knowledge-creating learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. In Case study research in practice (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sleigh, C., & Craske, S. (2017). Art and science in the UK: A brief history and critical reflection. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 42(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2017.1381223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, `Translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terranova C.N. (2016). Bioart and Bildung - wetware: Art, agency, animation: An exhibition as case study. Journal of Microbiology and Education, 17(3), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1172
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, G., & Myers, K. (2015). The anatomy of the case study. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009). Revisiting the notion of boundary object. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 3(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.006.0003
   Google Scholar
• van Rijsbergen, K., & de Rooij, A. (2019, July 3–5). Art-science collaboration: The role of problematization and artefact use [Paper presentation]. xCOAx 2019 - Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, H., Liljeström, A., & Enkenberg, J. (2012). Design-oriented pedagogy for technology-enhanced learning to cross over the borders between formal and informal environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(15), 2097–2119. https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-018-15-2097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, H., Vuojärvi, H., Saramäki, K., Eriksson, M., Ratinen, I., Torssonen, P., Vanninen, P., & Pöllänen, S. (2022). Cross-boundary collaboration and knowledge creation in an online higher education course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(5), 1304–1320. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wienroth, M., & Goldschmidt, P. (2017). Facilitating creative equality in art-science - A methodological experiment. Leonardo, 50(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_01058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetisen, A. K., Davis, J., Coskun, A. F., Church, G. M., & Yun, S. H. (2015). Bioart. Trends in Biotechnology, 33(12), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zylstra, M., Esler, K., Knight, A., & Le Grange, L. L. (2019). Integrating multiple perspectives on the human-nature relationship: A reply to Fletcher. 2017. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2018.1497582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar