Interpersonal, intrapersonal, and cognitive tactics: A thematic analysis of adults’ 21^st century learning management

References

• Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a tool to learn problem-solving skills. Computers & Education, 164, 104121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Johnson, A. M., & Chauncey, A. D. (2010). Measuring cognitive and metacognitive regulatory processes during hypermedia learning: Issues and challenges. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Mudrick, N. V., Taub, M., & Bradbury, A. E. (2019). Self-regulation in computer-assisted learning systems. In J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 587–618). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.024
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. S., D’Mello, S. K., Rodrigo, M. M. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive–affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(4), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 37–61). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2792-6_2
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Chinn, C. A. (2018). On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(3), 353–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belland, B. R., Walker, A. E., Kim, N. J., & Lefler, M. (2017). Synthesizing results from empirical research on computer-based scaffolding in STEM education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316670999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, M., Martin, T., Benton, T., Smith, C. P., & Davis, D. (2013). Using learning analytics to understand the learning pathways of novice programmers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(4), 564–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.836655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, I., & MacKenzie, A. (2019). Just google it! Digital literacy and the epistemology of ignorance. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1547276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. In B. G. Kinshuk & M. Maina (Eds.), The future of ubiquitous learning (pp. 25–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, R., & Schoenack, L. (2016). Adult student expectations and experiences in an online learning environment. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 64(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2016.1229072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C. K., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381–413). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, K. (2021). How kids manage self-directed programming projects: Strategies and structures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(4–5), 576–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1936531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, P., & Silman, A. (1992). Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. British Medical Journal, 304(6840), 1491–1494. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butler, A. B. (2007). Job characteristics and college performance and attitudes: A model of work-school conflict and facilitation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Care, E., Scoular, C., & Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of collaborative problem solving in education environments. Applied Measurement in Education, 29(4), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, B. H., & McCarthy, J. M. (2013). Managing work, family, and school roles: Disengagement strategies can help and hinder. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177185
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collom, G. D., Biddix, J. P., & Svoboda, B. L. (2021). “I’m not letting nothing stop me this time”: Transitions among adult learners using the Tennessee reconnect grant. Community College Review, 49(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/00915521211026679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corin, E. N., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Childers, G. M., & Stevens, V. (2017). Science hobbyists: Active users of the science-learning ecosystem. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1118664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., & Archer, L. (2017). Participation in informal science learning experiences: The rich get richer? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diep, A. N., Zhu, C., Cocquyt, C., De Greef, M., Vo, M. H., & Vanwing, T. (2019). Adult learners’ needs in online and blended learning. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 59(2), 223–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Nicoll, K. (2020). Flexible learning for adults. In G. Foley (Ed.), Understanding adult education and training (pp. 127–139). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmann, K., & Bannert, M. (2021). Analyzing temporal data for understanding the learning process induced by metacognitive prompts. Learning and Instruction, 72, Article 101205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., & Tennant, M. (2004). Understanding adult learners. In G. Foley (Ed.), Dimensions of adult learning (pp. 55–73). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fiore, S. M., Graesser, A., & Greiff, S. (2018). Collaborative problem-solving education for the twenty-first-century workforce. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 367–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0363-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369204200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J., Melkers, J., & Pallais, A. (2019). Can online delivery increase access to education? Journal of Labor Economics, 37(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/698895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. G., & Wiltrout, M. E. (2021). A framework for applying the learning sciences to MOOC design. Frontiers in Education, 5, 500481. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.500481
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Sabatini, J. P., & Li, H. (2022). Educational psychology is evolving to accommodate technology, multiple disciplines, and twenty-first-century skills. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-113042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heslin, P. A., Keating, L. A., & Ashford, S. J. (2020). How being in learning mode may enable a sustainable career across the lifespan. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 117, 103324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, F., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem-solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st Century skills (pp. 37–56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2
   Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, R., & Brockett, R. G. (2012). Reframing the meaning of self-directed learning: An updated model. In Proceedings of the Adult Education Research Conference (pp. 155–161). https://newprairiepress.org/aerc/2012/papers/22
   Google Scholar
• Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57(5), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, A. J., White, L. A., Dhuey, E., Foster, D., & Perlman, M. (2019). Training and skills development policy options for the changing world of work. Canadian Public Policy, 45(4), 460–482. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2019-024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P. (1987). Adult learning in the social context. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802724
   Google Scholar
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2015). Digital literacy and adult learners. In M. J. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (pp. 213–216). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Joyner, D. A., & Isbell, C. (2019, June). Master’s at scale: Five years in a scalable online graduate degree. In Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/3330430.3333630
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer, F. H. (1970). Self-regulation: Research, issues, and speculations. In C. Neuringer & L. Michael (Eds.), Behavior modification in clinical psychology (pp. 178–220). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R. (2012). Work motivation: Theory, practice, and future directions. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 455–495). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0014
   Google Scholar
• Karabenick, S. A., & Dembo, M. H. (2011). Understanding and facilitating self-regulated help seeking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2011(126), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.442
   Google Scholar
• Klein, C., DeRouin, R. E., & Salas, E. (2006). Uncovering workplace interpersonal skills: A review, framework, and research agenda. In G. P. Hodgkinson & J. K. Ford (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology 2006 (pp. 79–126). Wiley Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696378.ch3
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342070
   Google Scholar
• Kooij, D. T. A. M., & Kanfer, R. (2019). Lifespan perspectives on work motivation. In B. B. Baltes, C. W. Rudolph, & H. Zacher (Eds.), Work across the lifespan (pp. 475–493). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812756-8.00020-7
   Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. (2014). Three basic methods of qualitative text analysis. In U. Kuckartz (Ed.), Qualitative text analysis: Three basic methods of qualitative text analysis (pp. 65–120). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288719.n4
   Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, M. A. C. T., & Scheerens, J. (2006). Career competencies for the modern career. Journal of Career Development, 32(4), 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845305283006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2019). Becoming a competent self: A developmental process of adult distance learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, H. M. (2015). The importance of adaptability for the 21st century. Society, 52(2), 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-015-9874-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suarez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Fu, Y. C., & Hsung, R. M. (2001). Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In N. Lin, Y. Fu, & R.-M. Hsung (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 57–81). New York.
   Google Scholar
• Littlejohn, A., Milligan, C., & Margaryan, A. (2011). Collective learning in the workplace: Important knowledge sharing behaviours. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 4(4), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v4i4.1801
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S., Madgavkar, A., Manyika, J., & Smit, S. (2020). What’s next for remote work: An analysis of 2,000 tasks, 800 jobs, and nine countries. McKinsey Global Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2013). Self‐regulated learning in the workplace: Strategies and factors in the attainment of learning goals. International Journal of Training and Development, 17(4), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12013
   Google Scholar
• Markle, G. (2015). Factors influencing persistence among nontraditional university students. Adult Education Quarterly, 65(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615583085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Arbós, S., Castarlenas, E., & Dueñas, J. M. (2021). Help-seeking in an academic context: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(8), 4460. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2012). Information processing. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 85–99). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13273-004
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Mair, C. A. (2010). Social capital across the life course: Age and gendered patterns of network resources. Sociological Forum, 25(2), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2007). Traditional learning theories. In D. Brightman (Ed.), Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (pp. 275–297). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mischel, W., Cantor, N., & Feldman, S. (1996). Principles of self-regulation: The nature of willpower and self-control. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 329–360). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Money, W. H., & Dean, B. P. (2019). Incorporating student population differences for effective online education: A content-based review and integrative model. Computers & Education, 138, 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T. H., & Rohs, M. (2021). Digitization bolstering self-directed learning for information literate adults–A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100048
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, D., & McCutheon, J. (2019). Empowering older adults’ informal, self-directed learning: Harnessing the potential of online personal learning networks. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0104-5
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000) . How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and School: Expanded edition. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012) . Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neubert, J. C., Mainert, J., Kretzschmar, A., & Greiff, S. (2015). The assessment of 21st century skills in industrial and organizational psychology: Complex and collaborative problem solving. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(2), 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rand, A. M. (2006). Stratification and the life course: Life course capital, life course risks, and social inequality. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 145–162). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088388-2/50012-2
   Google Scholar
• Omarchevska, Y., Lachner, A., Richter, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). It takes two to tango: How scientific reasoning and self-regulation processes impact argumentation quality. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 31(2), 237–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1966633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottmar, E. (2019). The effects of deeper learning opportunities on student achievement: Examining differential pathways. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrino, J. (2017). Teaching, learning and assessing 21st century skills. In S. Guerriero (Ed.), Pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession (pp. 223–251). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270695-12-en
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B., Boman, J., Care, W. D., Edwards, M., & Park, C. (2008). Why do students withdraw from online graduate nursing and health studies education? Journal of Educators Online, 5(1), n1. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2008.1.2
   Google Scholar
• Persico, D., & Steffens, K. (2017). Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning (pp. 115–126). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02600-8_11
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
   Google Scholar
• Pool, I. A., Poell, R. F., Berings, M. G., & Ten Cate, O. (2016). Motives and activities for continuing professional development: An exploration of their relationships by integrating literature and interview data. Nurse Education Today, 38, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International. (1999). NVivo qualitative data analysis software [software]. https://qsrinternational.com/nvivo/nvivo-products/
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, A. S. (2000). Statistical methods in epidemiology: Towards an understanding of the kappa coefficient. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22(8), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382800296575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, D. (2015). Effects of classroom-based team experiences on undergraduate student leadership development: When practice does not make perfect. Journal of Leadership Education, 92(2), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.12806/V14/I3/R7
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., Bakia, M., Toyama, Y., & Patton, C. (2011). Eight issues for learning scientists about education and the economy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 3–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.528318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, S., & Cohen, L. J. (1986). Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. American Psychologist, 41(7), 813–819. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.7.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, J. E., Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2018). Grade increase: Tracking distance education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, J., Lentini, J., Rikoon, S., Seybert, J., & Noeth, R. (2016). The ETS Work Readiness Strength Assessment and Training System (WRSATS). Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Sie, R. L. L., Pataraia, N., Boursinou, E., Rajagopal, K., Margaryan, A., Falconer, I., Bitter-Rijpkema, M., Littejohn, A., & Sloep, P. B. (2013). Goals, motivation for, and outcomes of personal learning through networks: Results of a tweetstorm. Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 59–75. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1016244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerhoff, D., Szameitat, A., Vogel, F., Chernikova, O., Loderer, K., & Fischer, F. (2018). What do we teach when we teach the learning sciences? A document analysis of 75 graduate programs. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 319–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1440353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauß, S., & Rummel, N. (2020). Promoting interaction in online distance education: Designing, implementing and supporting collaborative learning. Information & Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2003). Writing and reading: A response to comments on plans and situated actions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Wang, M., Wegerif, R., & Peng, J. (2022). How do students generate ideas together in scientific creativity tasks through computer-based mind mapping? Computers & Education, 176, 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabvuma, V., Carter-Rogers, K., Brophy, T., Smith, S. M., & Sutherland, S. (2021). Transitioning from in person to online learning during a pandemic: An experimental study of the impact of time management training. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2010665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatel, C. E., Lyndgaard, S. F., Kanfer, R., & Melkers, J. E. (2022). Learning while working: Course enrollment behaviour as a macro-level indicator of learning management among adult learners. Journal of Learning Analytics, 9(3), 104–124. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7625
   Google Scholar
• Van Bavel, J., Schwartz, C. R., & Esteve, A. (2018). The reversal of the gender gap in education and its consequences for family life. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041215
   Google Scholar
• van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Pynoo, B., Thomas, V., Lombaerts, K., & Tondeur, J. (2019). An in-depth analysis of adult students in blended environments: Do they regulate their learning in an ‘old school’ way? Computers & Education, 128, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, T., & Taylor, V. (2018). Increasing women and underrepresented minorities in computing: The landscape and what you can do. Computer, 51(10), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3971359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15–32). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A. F. (2020). Educating data scientists and data literate citizens for a new generation of data. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1705678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, H. Y., & Lim, W. Y. R. (2020). Educating adult learners: Bridging learners’ characteristics and the learning sciences. Diversity and Inclusion in Global Higher Education, 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_4
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33(2/3), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 509–526). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar