How students develop collaborative drawing to represent the transmission of sound: An analysis of explanatory scientific drawings with discourse maps

References

• Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333(6046), 1096–1097. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge, M., Ong, Y. S., & Rosé, C. P. (2018). Learning to monitor and regulate collective thinking processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9270-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, M., & Windschitl, M. (2011). Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education. Science Education, 95(4), 639–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J., Park, J., Tang, K. S., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2020). The features of norms formed in constructing student-generated drawings to explain physics phenomena. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1362–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1762138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, N. (2012). The role of drawing in young children’s construction of science concepts. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(3), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0511-3
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claros, I., Cobos, R., & Collazos, C. A. (2015). An approach based on social network analysis applied to a collaborative learning experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(2), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2015.2453979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Andrade, V., Shwartz, Y., Freire, S., & Baptista, M. (2021). Students’ mechanistic reasoning in practice: Enabling functions of drawing, gestures and talk. Science Education, 106(1), 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R. J. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for social network analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Traum, D. (2006). Sharing solutions: Persistence and grounding in multimodal collaborative problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1501_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00051-7
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287:AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, L. (2012). Young children’s metarepresentational competence in data modelling. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding Horizons (Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 266–273). MERGA.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, C., Guastella, I., Sperandeo‐Mineo, R. M., & Tarantino, G. (2008). Modelling mechanical wave propagation: Guidelines and experimentation of a teaching–learning sequence. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1491–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802234017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, E. L. F., van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2016). Toward a classification of discourse patterns in asynchronous online discussions. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(4), 441–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11412-016-9245-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijlers, H., Weinberger, A., van Dijk, A. M., Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. (2013). Collaborative drawing on a shared digital canvas in elementary science education: The effects of script and task awareness support. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9180-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). The contribution of visualisation to modelling-based teaching. In J. K. Gilbert & R. Justi (Eds.), Modelling-based teaching in science education (pp. 121–148). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijnes, D., van Joolingen, W., & Leenaars, F. (2018). Stimulating scientific reasoning with drawing-based modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9707-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heineke, S. F. (2013). Coaching discourse: Supporting teachers’ professional learning. The Elementary School Journal, 113(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/668767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379–432. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houle, M. E., & Barnett, G. M. (2008). Students’ conceptions of sound waves resulting from the enactment of a new technology-enhanced inquiry-based curriculum on urban bird communication. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9094-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isohätälä, J., Näykki, P., & Järvelä, S. (2019). Cognitive and socio-emotional interaction in collaborative learning: Exploring fluctuations in students’ participation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(6), 831–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1623310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: A literature review. Pearson Publisher [online]. https://images-insite.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/dunia_buku/koleksi-buku-lainnya/collaboration-a-literature-review-pdfdrivecom-23181583384408.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Lampi, E. (2021). What do we do when we analyse the temporal aspects of computer-supported collaborative learning?: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 33, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Developing model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00049-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and science literacy. In K. A. Renninger, I. E. Sigel, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (pp. 153–196). John Wiley & Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, C. J. (1993). University physics students’ conceptualizations of factors affecting the speed of sound propagation. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 655–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069930150603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E., & Georgen, C. (2023). Interlocking models in classroom science. Science Education, 107(6), 1399–1434. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, R., & Suthers, D. (2013). Inscriptions becoming representations in representational practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.737390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2012). Collective case study. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of case study research (pp. 164–165). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. C. (1983). Case and situation analysis. The Sociological Review, 31(2), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1983.tb00387.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, J., & Song, J. (2014). Why everyday experience? Interpreting primary students’ science discourse from the perspective of John Dewey. Science & Education, 23(5), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9637-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Chang, J., Tang, K. S., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2020). Sequential patterns of students’ drawing in constructing scientific explanations: Focusing on the interplay among three levels of pictorial representation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1724351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Tang, K. S., & Chang, J. (2021). Plan‐draw‐evaluate (PDE) pattern in students’ collaborative drawing: Interaction between visual and verbal modes of representation. Science Education, 105(5), 1013–1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillin, K., Thomas, S., & Ledbetter, M. L. (2015). Drawing-to-Learn: A framework for using drawings to promote model-based reasoning in biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es2–16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnaubert, L., & Bodemer, D. (2019). Providing different types of group awareness information to guide collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(1), 7–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9293-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B., Neuman, Y., Gil, J., & Ilya, M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 219–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjøberg, M., Furberg, A., & Knain, E. (2022). Undergraduate biology students’ model‐based reasoning in the laboratory: Exploring the role of drawings, talk, and gestures. Science Education, 107(1), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building. In B. Fishman & S. O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 70–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S. (2020). Discourse strategies for science teaching and learning: Research and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K. S., Won, M., Mocerino, M., Treagust, D. F., & Tasker, R. (2020). Multimodal affordances of immersive virtual reality for visualising and learning molecular interactions. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Learning from animations in science education. Innovations in science education and technology (Vol. 25). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56047-8_4.
   Google Scholar
• Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361–384). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J. L., & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science Education, 85(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<137:AID-SCE30>3.0.CO;2-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J., & Gorur, R. (2020). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L., Tytler, R., Fenwick, L., Humphrey, S., Chandler, P., Herrington, M., & Pham, L. (2022). Multimodal literacy in school science: Transdisciplinary perspectives on theory, research and pedagogy. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, C., Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, A. M., Gijlers, H., & Weinberger, A. (2014). Scripted collaborative drawing in elementary science education. Instructional Science, 42(3), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9286-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, P., & Garner, J. (2005). The promise and practice of learner-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-8136-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, D., & Russell, T. (1990). Sound, primary SPACE project research report. Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007). Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, E., & Wallin, A. (2013). Students’ learning of a generalized theory of sound transmission from a teaching–learning sequence about sound, hearing and health. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 980–1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.589479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongpakaran, N., Wongpakaran, T., Wedding, D., & Gwet, K. L. (2013). A comparison of Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: A study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-61
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeo, J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2014). Constructing a scientific explanation—A narrative account. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1902–1935. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.880527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar