Investigating the interplay of epistemological and positional framing during collaborative uncertainty management

References

• Ara, F. (2013). Investigating students’, teachers’ and designers’ ideas about design and developing design activities for Indian middle school students. HBCSE, TIFR Deemed University.
   Google Scholar
• Argyle, M. (1972). Non-verbal communication in human social interaction. Non-Verbal Communication, 2(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420010307
   Google Scholar
• Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94(6), 1008–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case studies guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Lowrence Erlbaum associates. Inc. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bossér, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students’ positioning in the classroom: A study of teacher-student interactions in a socioscientific issue context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9627-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardella, M. E., & Atman, C. J. (2005). Engineering students’ mathematical problem solving strategies in capstone projects. Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. https://peer.asee.org/engineering-students-mathematical-problem-solving-strategies-in-capstone-projects
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-C. (2020). Dialogic pathways to manage uncertainty for productive engagement in scientific argumentation. Science & Education, 29(2), 331–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00111-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, C. M. (2009). Engineering is elementary. The Bridge, 30(3), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Daalhuizen, J., Badke-Schaub, P., & Batill, S. (2009). Dealing with uncertainty in design practice: Issues for designer-centered methodology. In ICED 09 - The 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol 9: Human Behavior in Design (Vol. 9, pp. 147–158). Design Society. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/87524494/ds58_9_147.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeLiema, D., Enyedy, N., & Danish, J. A. (2019). Roles, rules, and keys: How different play configurations shape collaborative science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 513–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1675071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. DC Heath.
   Google Scholar
• DiSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L., Little, P., Orwin, E. J., & Spjut, E. (2009). Engineering design: A project-based introduction. John Wiley and sons.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451–498. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, D., & Shaw, R. L. (2009). The psychology of news influence and the development of media framing analysis. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00180.x
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children (Vol. 618). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (2009). A theory bite on contextualizing, framing, and positioning: A companion to son and Goldstone. Cognition and Instruction, 27(3), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000903014386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R., & Krishnamurthy, R. (2010). The discourse of climate change: A corpus-based approach. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 4(2), 125–146.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-18187-008
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. G. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives (pp. 89–120). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, K., & Fisherkeller, J. (2005). Dialogue as data: Assessing students’ scientific reasoning with interactive protocols. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 95–127). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012498365-6/50007-X
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, P., & Hammer, D. (2010). Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom. Science Education, 94(3), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E., Cheng, A. C. J., Schallert, D., Song, K., Lee, S. A., & Park, Y. (2014). “I guess my question is”: What is the co-occurrence of uncertainty and learning in computer-mediated discourse? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-014-9203-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E., & McDaniel, R. R. (2014). Managing uncertainty during collaborative problem solving in elementary school teams: The role of peer influence in robotics engineering activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 490–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.896254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (Eds). (2009). National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council Engineering in K-12 education. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, N., & Dasgupta, C. (2022). Investigating experts’ and middle school learners’ uncertainty management during collaborative engineering design tasks. In C. Chinn, E. Tan, C. Chan, & Y. Kali (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences - ICLS 2022 (pp. 107–114). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://dx.doi.org/10.22318/icls2022.107
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, N., Patel, A., & Dasgupta, C. (2019). Collaborative uncertainty management while solving an engineering design problem. In K. Lund, G. P. Niccolai, E. Lavoueé, C. Hmelo-Silver, G. Gweon, & M. Baker (Eds.), Collaborative uncertainty management while solving an engineering design problem, 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL), Lyon, France. Volume 2 (pp. 664–667). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://dx.doi.org/10.22318/cscl2019.664
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-003
   Google Scholar
• Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision-making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2013). Integrating the epistemic, conceptual, and social aspects of scientific modeling. Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Manz, E. (2018). Designing for and analyzing productive uncertainty in science investigations. International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.[ISLS].
   Google Scholar
• Odden, T. O. B., & Russ, R. S. (2019). Vexing questions that sustain sensemaking. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1052–1070. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1589655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radinsky, J. (2008). Students’ roles in group-work with visual data: A site of science learning. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 145–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000801980779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincon, R., Korn, R. M., & Williams, J. C. (2019, June). Examining Gender Bias in Engineering in India [Paper presentation]. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2757&context=faculty_scholarship
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015046621428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2006). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2009). Student behavior and epistemological framing: Examples from collaborative active-learning activities in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 27(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000902797379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, S., & Kim, H. (2018). Framing negotiation: Dynamics of epistemological and positional framing in small groups during scientific modeling. Science Education, 102(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, J. E. (1969). Lessons in uncertainty. The Elementary School Journal, 69(6), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1086/460516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2010). Group cognition as a foundation for the new science of learning. New Science of Learning Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1993). Framing in discourse. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Tauritz, R. (2012). How to handle knowledge uncertainty: Learning and teaching in times of accelerating change. In E. J. W. Arjen, & P. B. Corcoran (Eds.), Learning for sustainability in times of accelerating change (pp. 299–316). https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-757-8_19
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, D. G. (2001). Robust decision-making for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 12(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820010031580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Sande, C. C., & Greeno, J. G. (2012). Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Langenhove, L. & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing Positioning Theory. In R. T. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory. Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J., Hammer, D., Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Phillips, A. M. (2018). Positioning as not‐understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. J. (1986). Appraising goffman. The British Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/590645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
   Google Scholar