78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Knowledge Conversion Abilities and Innovative Work Behavior of Indonesian Academic Librarians

, , , &

References

  • Adekoya, C. O., & Fasae, J. K. (2021). Mentorship in librarianship: Meeting the needs, addressing the challenges. The Bottom Line, 34(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-09-2020-0063
  • Afful-Arthur, P., Kwafoa, P. N. Y., Ampah-Johnston, M., & Mensah, V. (2021). Managing and accessing indigenous knowledge for national development: The role of academic libraries in Ghana. Information Development, 38(4), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211009916
  • Aggarwal, S., Mandil, A. K., & Banerjee, R. (2022). A Study Of Social Success Factors Of Km For Creation Of New Knowledge In Higher Education. Research Ambition an International Multidisciplinary E-Journal, 7(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.53724/ambition/v7n3.05
  • Ali, I., Hong, L., & Chen, J. (2022). Remote cataloging productivity: An exploratory study in a national library. Library Management, 43(6/7), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2021-0109
  • Appleton, L. (2021). Editorial–Academic librarians and engaging with scholarship. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 27(2), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1944747
  • Arsawan, I. W. E., Koval, V., Rajiani, I., Rustiarini, N. W., Supartha, W. G., & Suryantini, N. P. S. (2022). Leveraging knowledge sharing and innovation culture into SMEs sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(2), 405–428. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2020-0192
  • Awais, S., & Ameen, K. (2021). The current influential factors in adoption of innovations in university libraries of Pakistan. Library Management, 42(6-7), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-12-2020-0179
  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods (4th ed.), OUP, Oxford United Kingdom.
  • Carnes, C. M., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., Chirico, F., & Huh, D. W. (2022). Leveraging resources for innovation: The role of synchronization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12606
  • Cheah, J. H., Memon, M. A., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Ramayah, T. (2018). Assessing reflective models in marketing research: A comparison between PLS and PLSc estimates. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(1), 139–160. http://www.ijbs.unimas.my/images/repository/pdf/Vol19-no1-paper10.pdf
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science. Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah.
  • Dei, D.-G. J., & Asante, F. Y. (2022). Role of academic libraries in the achievement of quality education as a sustainable development goal. Library Management, 43(6/7), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-02-2022-0013
  • Dyna Herlina, S., Benni, S., & Siti, M. (2022). Developing digital literacy practices in yogyakarta elementary schools. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.2.2602
  • Enakrire, R. T., Chisita, C. T., & Chigwada, J. P. (2019). Knowledge Sharing for Professional Growth: Views from Academic Librarians in Zimbabwe" (2019). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2228
  • Esmailzadeh, M., Bahrami, M., & Soleymani, M. R. (2020). Competences of academic librarians in providing health research services: A qualitative study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(1), 220. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_254_20
  • Habibi, A., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Sofwan, M. (2022). Student use of digital libraries during COVID-19: Structural equation modelling in Indonesian and Malaysian contexts. The Electronic Library, 40(4), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2021-0212
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Hulland, J., Baumgartner, H., & Smith, K. M. (2017). Marketing survey research best practices: Evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0532-y
  • Hulseberg, A. (2023). Librarian as advisor: Parallels in standards in librarianship and advising. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 30(1-2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2023.2175756
  • Islam, T., Zahra, I., Rehman, S. U., & Jamil, S. (2022). How knowledge sharing encourages innovative work behaviour through occupational self-efficacy? The moderating role of entrepreneurial leadership. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 73(1/2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0041
  • Jiang, H., Yang, J., & Liu, W. (2022). Innovation ecosystem stability and enterprise innovation performance: The mediating effect of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(11), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2022-0275
  • Johan, J., Poltak, S., & Rudy, P. (2023). University Libraries Innovation Capability: A Framework from Indonesia. Education for Information, 39(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-220035
  • Johnson-Barlow, E. M., & Lehnen, C. (2021). A scoping review of the application of systematic instructional design and instructional design models by academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102382
  • Kaffashan Kakhki, M., Zarqi, M., Harati, H., Asemandoreh, Y., & Namdar Joyame, E. (2022). Innovation in using IT: Understanding the impact of knowledge absorptive capacity on academic librarians. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1843–1868. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2020-0065
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.
  • Koloniari, M., Vraimaki, E., & Fassoulis, K. (2019). Factors affecting knowledge creation in academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616668958
  • Laskowska, A. (2022). Publication Patterns of Academic Librarians from Norwegian Higher Education Institutions 2016–2020. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 29(4), 327–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2138478
  • Lazarus, F. C., & Suryasen, R. (2022). Enhancing users’ perceived significance of academic library with MOOC services. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 17(2), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30016
  • Lee, M. S., Hughes, A., Lockmiller, C., Day, A., Brown, M., & Jenson, R. (2022). Working Together: How Academic Librarians Can Help Researchers Prepare for a Grey Literature Search for Systematic Reviews Involving Minoritized Populations. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6), 102626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102626
  • Lembinen, L. (2021). Innovation in European academic libraries – leadership perspective. Journal of Library Administration, 61(8), 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1984136
  • Louderback, P. J. (2022). Assessing the impact of academic librarians upon student satisfaction through reference desk interactions: A preliminary pilot study. Journal of Library Administration, 62(8), 1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2127592
  • Luo, J. (2017). Shall we chat? A statistical case study of chat reference utilization. The Bottom Line, 30(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-02-2017-0003
  • Mabunda, T. T., & Du Plessis, T. (2022). Knowledge management as a change enabler in academic libraries in the digital age. SA Journal of Information Management, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1450
  • Maras, M.-H., Arsovska, J., Wandt, A. S., Knieps, M., & Logie, K. (2022). The SECI model and darknet markets: Knowledge creation in criminal organizations and communities of practice. European Journal of Criminology, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221115167
  • Masrek, M. N., & Heriyanto, H. (2021). Prosedur Perbaikan untuk Mengontrol dan Meminimalkan Varians Metode Umum dalam Survei Penelitian Perpustakaan dan Ilmu Informasi. Palimpsest: Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Dan Perpustakaan, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20473/pjil.v12i1.25062
  • Masrek, M. N., Noordin, S. A., Yusof, N. I., & Sani, M. K. J. A. (2017). An Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) on the relationship between knowledge creation abilities and innovative work behaviour. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 2686–2690. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7676
  • Mendoza, N. B., Cheng, ECK., & Yan, Z. (2022). Assessing teachers’ collaborative lesson planning practices: Instrument development and validation using the SECI knowledge-creation model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73, 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101139
  • Munir, R., & Beh, L.-S. (2020). Measuring and enhancing organisational creative climate, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behaviour in startups development. The Bottom Line, 32(4), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2019-0076
  • Murumba, J. W., Kwanya, T., & Maina, J. C. (2020). Effects of tacit knowledge on the performance of selected universities in Kenya. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 125–144. https://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/356/301 https://doi.org/10.2478/mdke-2020-0009
  • Naveed, M. A., Siddique, N., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Development and validation of core technology competencies for systems librarian. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-03-2021-0022
  • Nguyen, T., Nguyen, K., Do, T., & Nguyen, T. (2019). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behaviour: The case of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.5.001
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company., Oxford University Press.
  • Nurul, I., Khairul, I., & Monulirul, I. (2023). Exploring the potential of big data analytics in improving library management in Indonesia: Challenges, opportunities, and best practice. Internet Reference Services Quaterly, 27(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2023.2184900
  • ODonnell, P., & Anderson, L. (2022). The university library: Places for possibility. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(3), 232–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1906718
  • Onifade, F. N., Oyelude, A. A., & Uthman, K. O. (2023). Knowledge Management Practices (KMP) in University Libraries in Nigeria: Connecting and Inspiring Librarians for Professional Development. International Information & Library Review, 55(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2023.2159623
  • Otike, F., Barát, Á. H., & Kiszl, P. (2022). Innovation strategies in academic libraries using business entrepreneurial theories: Analysis of competing values framework and disruptive innovation theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(4), 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102537
  • Pellack, L. J. (2022). Academic Library Innovation: A Selective Review. Library Leadership & Management, 36(3), 1–19. https://llm-ojs-tamu.tdl.org/llm/article/view/7528 https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v36i3.7528
  • Peng, Y. P. (2020). Relationship between job involvement, leader-member exchange, and innovative behaviour of public librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(2), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618810378
  • Qayyum, M. A., & Smith, D. (2019). Improving the task understanding for knowledge creation in assessments. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 18(04), 1950041. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649219500412
  • Ramayah, T., Cheah, J., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Memon, M. A. (2018). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) Using SmartPLS3.0: An Updated and Practical Guide to Statistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Pearson, Kuala Lumpur.
  • Roughen, P. F., & Swain, D. E. (2020). Building innovative brands: Cases of tacit and explicit knowledge conversion in children’s library. Public Library Quarterly, 39(6), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2019.1702448
  • Shea, G., & Derry, S. (2022). A survey of library services for autistic college students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(6), 102591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102591
  • Shin, E. J. (2021). Embedded librarians as research partners in South Korea. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(3), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000620962550
  • Srirahayu, D. P., Anugrah, E. P., & Layyinah, K. (2021). Influence of satisfaction and loyalty on Net Promoter Score (NPS) in academic libraries in Indonesia. Library Management, 42(6/7), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-06-2020-0090
  • Tallolli, S. B., Mulla, K. R., & Kantharaja, C. T. (2022). Professional Competency for working LIS Professionals in Engineering College Library: A Study. International Journal of Research in Library Science, 8(3), 117–125.). https://doi.org/10.26761/ijrls.8.3.2022.1570
  • Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2022). Academic librarians and their role in disseminating accurate knowledge and information about the gray zone in predatory publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2022.2039242
  • Trivedi, K., & Srivastava, K. B. L. (2022). The role of knowledge management processes in leveraging competitive strategies to achieve firm innovativeness. The Bottom Line, 35(2/3), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-06-2021-0071
  • Ugwu, C. I., & Ejikeme, A. (2023). Knowledge management, organizational culture and job performance in Nigerian university libraries. IFLA Journal, 49(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352221103896
  • Ujwary-Gil, A. (2023). A Study of Academic Library through the Prism of Knowledge Use and Problem Solving Networks. Libri, 73(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2022-0014
  • Xia, P., Yangwei, X., Zequan, X., & Li, Y. (2022). Exploring librarians’ intentions to collaborate in research: A model integrating the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Social Exchange Theory. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(3), 744–762. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221104259
  • Yuan, J., & Yang, N. (2023). On factors affecting users’ willingness to participate in the smart services of academic library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221146298
  • Zhang, K., & Lu, P. (2022). What are the key indicators for evaluating the service satisfaction of WeChat official accounts in Chinese academic libraries? Library Hi Tech, 41(3), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2021-0218
  • Zhou, Z., Duan, Y., Qiu, J., & Yang, L. (2022). The influence of organizational learning on library service innovation. Library Hi Tech, https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-04-2021-0148

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.