References
- For a more thorough history, see: Williams WL, Zeng L, Gensch T, et al. The evolution of data-driven modeling in organic chemistry. ACS Cent Sci. 2021;7(10):1622–1637. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00535
- Brønsted J, Pedersen K. Die Katalytische Zersetzung Des Nitramids Und Ihre Physikalisch-Chemische Bedeutung. Z Phys Chem. 1924;108(1):185–235. doi: 10.1515/zpch-1924-10814
- Ritchie CD, Sager WF. An examination of structure-reactivity relationships. In: Cohen S, Streitwieser A, and Taft R, editors. Prog Phys Organic Chem; 1964. pp. 323–400. doi: 10.1002/9780470171813.ch6
- Taft RW, Topsom RD. The nature and analysis of substituent electronic effects. Prog Phys Org Chem. 2007;16:1–83. doi: 10.1002/9780470171950.ch1
- Shi Y-F, Yang Z-X, Ma S, et al. Machine learning for chemistry: basics and applications. Eng. 2023;27:70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2023.04.013
- Herrera BT, Pilicer SL, Anslyn EV, et al. Optical analysis of reaction yield and enantiomeric excess: a new paradigm ready for prime time. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(33):10385–10401. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b06607
- Howard JR, Bhakare A, Akhtar Z, et al. Data-driven prediction of circular dichroism-based calibration curves for the rapid screening of chiral primary amine enantiomeric excess values. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144(37):17269–17276. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c08127