88
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Place as creative partner: placemaking with a university arboretum

References

  • Allegranti, B.(2019). Moving kinship: Between choreography, performance, and the more-than-human. In The Routledge companion to dance studies (pp. 88–108). Routledge.
  • Bang, M., Curley, L., Kessel, A., Marin, A., Suzukovich, E. S., III, & Strack, G. (2014). Muskrat theories, tobacco in the streets, and living Chicago as indigenous land. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.865113
  • Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2015). Nature–culture constructs in science learning: Human/nonhuman agency and intentionality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 530–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21204
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
  • Barajas-López, F., & Bang, M. (2018). Indigenous making and sharing: Claywork in an Indigenous STEAM program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 51(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2018.1437847
  • Barrett, M. J., Harmin, M., Maracle, B., Patterson, M., Thomson, C., Flowers, M., & Bors, K. (2017). Shifting relations with the more-than-human: Six threshold concepts for transformative sustainability learning. Environmental Education Research, 23(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1121378
  • Barron, B. N. (2023). Re-creating the homeplace: More-than-human constellations and the political consequences of storytelling in central appalachian community-based theatre. Social & Cultural Geography, 24(6), 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2021.1983859
  • Basso, K. H. (2000). Stalking with stories. In E. Levinson (Ed.), Schooling and the symbolic animal: Social and cultural dimensions of education (pp. 41–52). Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Bennett, J.(2001). The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics. Princeton University Press.
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
  • Benson, M., & Jackson, E. (2013). Place-making and place maintenance: Performativity, place and belonging among the middle classes. Sociology, 47(4), 793–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512454350
  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232
  • Brown, A. D., Colville, I., & Pye, A. (2015). Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, 36(2), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614559259
  • Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Durango, CO: Kivaki Press.
  • Carvalho, I. C. D. M., Steil, C. A., & Gonzaga, F. A. (2020). Learning from a more-than-human perspective. Plants as teachers. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1726266
  • Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2018). Framing learning entanglement in innovative learning spaces: Connecting theory, design and practice. British Educational Research Journal, 44(6), 1120–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/BERJ.3483
  • Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press.
  • Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
  • Courage, C. (2020). The art of placemaking: A typology of art practices in placemaking. In T. Edensor, A. Kalandides, & U. Kothari (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Place (pp. 623–633). Routledge.
  • Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2000). Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(October), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164318
  • Duff, C. (2010). On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environment & Planning D, 28(5), 881–895. https://doi.org/10.1068/d16209
  • Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ehret, C., & Hollett, T. (2016). Affective dimensions of participatory design research in informal learning environments: Placemaking, belonging, and correspondence. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1169815
  • Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. Yale University Press.
  • Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. Routledge.
  • Feinberg, P. P. (2016). Towards a walking-based pedagogy. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 14(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.25071/1916-4467.40312
  • Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2013). Performative ontologies. Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning. European Journal for Research on the Education & Learning of Adults, 4(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0104
  • Fettes, M., & Judson, G. (2010). Imagination and the cognitive tools of place-making. The Journal of Environmental Education, 42(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2010.505967
  • Fletcher, R. (2007). How to write your life story. Harper Collins.
  • Fors, V., Bäckström, Å., & Pink, S. (2013). Multisensory emplaced learning: Resituating situated learning in a moving world. Mind Culture and Activity, 20(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.719991
  • Greeno, J. G.(1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, Vol 101, No 2, 336–342.
  • Gruenewald, D. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003619
  • Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (2007). Knowing one’s place: Space, theory, education. Critical Studies in Education, 48(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480601123750
  • Guntarik, O., Davies, H., & Innocent, T. (2023). Indigenous cartographies: Pervasive games and place-based storytelling. Space and Culture, 12063312231155348. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312231155348
  • Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N.(2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293
  • Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2014). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a change laboratory intervention. Journal of Education & Work, 29(2), 232–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2014.900168
  • Hall. (2004). Introduction. In K. Harmon (Ed.), You are here: Personal geographies and other maps of the imagination (pp. 15–19). Princeton Architectural Press
  • Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
  • Hickey-Moody, A., & Page, T. (Eds.). (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Hood, E. J., & Kraehe, A. M. (2017). Creative matter: New materialism in art education research, teaching, and learning. Art Education, 70(2), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2017.1274196
  • Hunter, J.(2012). A pedagogy of emplacement: Experiential storytelling and sense of place education in park interpretive programs. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
  • Ingold, T. (2010). The textility of making Cambridge. Journal of Economics, 34(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep042
  • Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Routledge.
  • Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
  • Ingold, T. (2015). The life of lines. Routledge.
  • Jornet, A., & Steier, R. (2015). The matter of space: Bodily performances and the emergence of boundary objects during multidisciplinary design meetings. Mind Culture and Activity, 22(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1024794
  • Kajamaa, A., & Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Agency in the making: Analyzing students’ transformative agency in a school-based makerspace. Mind Culture and Activity, 26(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1647547
  • Kawatoko, Y. (2017). Forming and Transforming Weavers’ agency: Agency in sociotechnical arrangements. Mind Culture and Activity, 24(2), 129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2017.1296466
  • Kinloch, V. (2009). Literacy, community, and youth acts of place-making. English Education, 41(4), 316–336.
  • Kostogriz, A. (2006). Putting “space” on the agenda of sociocultural research. Mind Culture and Activity, 13(3), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1303_2
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lynch, J., & Mannion, G. (2021). Place-responsive pedagogies in the Anthropocene: Attuning with the more-than-human. Environmental Education Research, 27(6), 864–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1867710
  • Ma, J. Y., & Munter, C. (2014). The spatial production of learning opportunities in skateboard parks. Mind Culture and Activity, 21(3), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.908219
  • March, P. L. (2019). Playing with clay and the uncertainty of agency. A material engagement theory perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9552-9
  • Marin, A. M. (2020). Ambulatory sequences: Ecologies of learning by attending and observing on the move. Cognition and Instruction, 38(3), 281–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1767104
  • Massey, D. (2005). Negotiating nonhuman/human place. Antipode, 37(2), 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00497.x
  • McDaid Barry, N., Bang, M., Bruce, F., & Barajas-López, F. (2023). “Then the Nettle People Won’t Be Lonely”: Recognizing the personhood of plants in an indigenous STEAM summer program. Cognition and Instruction, 41(4), 381–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2023.2220852
  • McLean, S. (2009). Stories and cosmogonies: Imagining creativity beyond “nature” and “culture”. Cultural Anthropology, 24(2), 213–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01130.x
  • Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). The cultural side of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(supplement_4), 13621–13626. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317510111
  • Meixi. (2022). Towards gentle futures: Co-developing axiological commitments and alliances among humans and the greater living world at school. Mind Culture and Activity, 29(4), 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2022.2142242
  • Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 23(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128
  • Nespor, J. (2008). Education and place: A review essay. Educational Theory, 58(4), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2008.00301.x
  • Nxumalo, F., & Ross, K. M. (2019). Envisioning black space in environmental education for young children. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 502–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592837
  • Orr, D. W. (2002). The nature of design: Ecology, culture, and human intention. Oxford University Press.
  • Paterson, M. (2009). Haptic geographies: Ethnography, haptic knowledges and sensuous dispositions. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 766–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509103155
  • Peppler, K., Dahn, M., & Ito, M.(2022). Connected arts learning: Cultivating equity through connected and creative educational experiences. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 264–287. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221084322
  • Peppler, K., Rowsell, J., & Keune, A. (2020). Advancing posthumanist perspectives on technology‐rich learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1240–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12979
  • Pink, S. (2008). An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography, 9(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108089467
  • Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography. Sage.
  • Powell, K. (2008). Re mapping the city: Palimpsest, place, and identity in art education research. Studies in Art Education, 50(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2008.11518752
  • Pyyry, N. (2017). Thinking with broken glass: Creating pedagogical spaces of enchantment in the city. Environmental Education Research, 23(10), 1391–1401.
  • Resnick, M. (1994). Learning about life. Artificial Life, 1(1_2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1162/artl.1993.1.1_2.229
  • Roberts, A. R. (2018). Performance as place preservation: The role of storytelling in the formation of Shankleville Community’s black counterpublics. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 5(3), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2018.1480002
  • Sarbin, T. R. (1983). Place identity as a component of self: An addendum. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(4), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80036-X
  • Schulte, C. M. (2019). Wild encounters: A more-than-human approach to children’s drawing. Studies in Art Education, 60(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2019.1600223
  • Shakespeare, W., Holland, O., & Braunmuller, G. (Ed.). (1999). Tempest. Shakespeare Pelican Series. Penguin.
  • Sheridan, M. P., Lemieux, A., Do Nascimento, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2020). Intra‐active entanglements: What posthuman and new materialist frameworks can offer the learning sciences. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12928
  • Smith, G. (2002). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594.
  • Sobel, D. (2004). Place-based education: Connecting classroom and community. Nature and Listening, 4, 1–7.
  • Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real and imagined places. Blackwell Publishers.
  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.
  • Sonu, D., & Snaza, N. (2015). The fragility of ecological pedagogy: Elementary social studies standards and possibilities of new materialism. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 12(3), 258–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2015.1103671
  • Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362
  • Streibel, M. J. (1998). The importance of physical place and lived topographies. Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT).
  • Swist, T., & Kuswara, A. (2016). Place-making in higher education: Co-creating engagement and knowledge practices in the networked age. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1128887
  • Tan, V., Keune, A., & Peppler, K. (2016). The materiality of design in e-textiles. In S. Goldman, & Z. Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking design thinking to school (pp. 198–212). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317327585
  • Tuck, E., McKenzie, M., & McCoy, K. (2014). Land education: Indigenous, post-colonial, and decolonizing perspectives on place and environmental education research. Environmental Education Research, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.877708
  • Wattchow, B. (2021). Place-Responsiveness in Outdoor Environmental Education. In T. Dyment, & H. Prince (Eds.), Outdoor Environmental Education in Higher Education. International Explorations in Outdoor and Environmental Education. Springer.
  • Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: The career of a concept. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social learning systems and communities of practice (pp. 179–198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-133-2_11
  • Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practicing cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa
  • Wolcott, H. F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Altamira Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.