Impact of Campaign Bundling on the Success of Donation-Based Crowdfunding

References

• Absolom, W. How to deal with NGOs’ corruption. Business Daily (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Adjakou, O.J.L. Crowdfunding: Genesis and comprehensive review of its state in Africa. Open Journal of Business and Management, 9, 2 (2021), 557–585.
   Google Scholar
• Aflaki, A.; and Pedraza Martinez, A. Competition and collaboration on fundraising for short-term disaster response: The impact on earmarking and performance. Available at SSRN 3705595, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlers, G.K.; Cumming, D.; Gunther, C.; and Schweizer, D. Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 4 (2015), 955–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G.; and Reno, R.R. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, T.H.; Davis, B.C.; Short, J.C.; and Webb, J.W. Crowdfunding in a prosocial microlending environment: Examining the role of intrinsic versus extrinsic cues. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 1 (2015), 53–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, T.H.; Davis, B.C.; Webb, J.W.; and Short, J.C. Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 6 (2017), 707–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amagoh, F. Improving the credibility and effectiveness of non-governmental organizations. Progress in Development Studies, 15, 3 (2015), 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri, A.; Chitsazan, H.; and Ebrahimi, A. Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors’ perspectives. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, (2019), 218–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M.; and Bowie, C. How international NGOs could do less harm and more good. Development in Practice, 18, 6 (2008), 748–754.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, M.J.; and Roy, T. Does exclusivity always pay off? Exclusive price promotions and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 74, 2 (2010), 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batti, R.C. Challenges facing local NGOs in resource mobilization. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 3 (2014), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, T.; Sarker, S.; and Sarker, S. A conceptual framework for understanding crowdfunding. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 17705 (2015), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Belleflamme, P.; Lambert, T.; and Schwienbacher, A. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 5 (2014), 585–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlo, D.K.; Lemert, J.B.; and Mertz, R.J. Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 4 (1969), 563–576.
   Google Scholar
• Bhargava, H.K. Retailer-driven product bundling in a distribution channel. Marketing Science, 31, 6 (2012), 1014–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, S.; Liu, Z.; and Usman, K. The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 71, (2017), 10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, M.; and Slivinski, A. Rival charities. Journal of Public Economics, 66, 3 (1997), 449–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, A.B.; and Grau, L. Explicit donations and inferred endorsements. Journal of Advertising, 38, 3 (2009), 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni, L.; Gilli, M.; and Pelligra, V. Reciprocity: Theory and facts. International Review of Economics, 55, 1 (2008), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, R.; Owens, T.; and Prakash, A. Global non-profit chains and the challenges of development aid contracting. Nonprofit Policy Forrum, De Gruyter (2018).
   Google Scholar
• Chao, E.J.; Serwaah, P.; Baah-Peprah, P.; and Shneor, R. Crowdfunding in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. Advances in Crowdfunding (2020), 319–339.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.; Baird, A.; and Straub, D. A linguistic signaling model of social support exchange in online health communities. Decision Support Systems, 130, (2020), 113233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholakova, M.; and Clarysse, B. Does the possibility to make equity investments in crowdfunding projects crowd out reward-based investments? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39, 1 (2015), 145–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, V.C.; and Ming Wong, C. The role of united charities in fundraising: The case of Singapore. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 74, 3 (2003), 433–464.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B.L.; Certo, S.T.; Ireland, R.D.; and Reutzel, C.R. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37, 1 (2011), 39–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney, C. Negative sentiment is weighted greater in a positive crowd: Endorsements in crowdfunding. Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY, 2017, p. 17750.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, C.; Dutta, S.; and Li, Y. Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 2 (2017), 265–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, D.; Hornuf, L.; Karami, M.; and Schweizer, D. Disentangling crowdfunding from fraudfunding. Journal of Business Ethics, (2021), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curley, C.; Levine Daniel, J.; Walk, M.; and Harrison, N. Competition and collaboration in the nonprofit sector: Identifying the potential for cognitive dissonance. Administration & Society, 53, 8 (2021), 1293–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M.; Erkens, D.H.; and Zhang, J. Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63, 11 (2017), 3628–3649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dushnitsky, G.; Piva, E.; and Rossi‐Lamastra, C. Investigating the mix of strategic choices and performance of transaction platforms: Evidence from the crowdfunding setting. Strategic Management Journal, 43, 3 (2022), 563–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, C.; Guney, B.; and Uler, N. Independent vs. coordinated fundraising: Understanding the role of information. European Economic Review, 127 (2020), 103476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, A.; and Galletta, D.F. How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 3 (2005), 56–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa-Armijos, M.; and Berns, J.P. Vulnerable populations and individual social responsibility in prosocial crowdfunding: Does the framing matter for female and rural entrepreneurs? Journal of Business Ethics (2021), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, E.; and Reuber, R. The good, the bad, and the unfamiliar: The challenges of reputation formation facing new firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31, 1 (2007), 53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, B.J. Persuasive technologie301398. Communications of the ACM, 42, 5 (1999), 26–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazley, B. Why not partner with local government? Nonprofit managerial perceptions of collaborative disadvantage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 1 (2010), 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazley, B.; and Guo, C. What do we know about nonprofit collaboration? A comprehensive systematic review of the literature. Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY, 2015, p. 15409.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, R.; Zhang, S.; and Zhao, H. Do expressions of sadness, anxiety and fear have different impacts on attracting donations? Evidence from a Chinese online charitable crowdfunding platform. Information Technology & People, ahead of print (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, E.R.; and Lewis, J.B. Voting in low information elections: Bundling and non-independence of voter choice. Presentation at the Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Gleasure, R.; and Feller, J. Does heart or head rule donor behaviors in charitable crowdfunding markets? International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 20, 4 (2016), 499–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, P.A.; Lake, D.A.; and Stein, J.G. The Credibility of Transnational NGOs: When Virtue Is Not Enough. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Greenland, S.; Mansournia, M.A.; and Altman, D.G. Sparse data bias: A problem hiding in plain sight. bmj, 352 (2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groth, J.C.; and McDaniel, S.W. The exclusive value principle: The basis for prestige racing. Journal of Consumer Marketing (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Gugerty, M.K. The effectiveness of NGO self‐regulation: Theory and evidence from Africa. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 28, 2 (2008), 105–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; and Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H.; and Hem, L.E. Brand extension evaluations: Effects of affective commitment, involvement, price consciousness and preference for bundling in the extension category. ACR North American Advances (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, R.R.; and Coney, K.A. The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing research, 19, 2 (1982), 255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. The effects of promotional bundling on consumers’ evaluations of product quality and risk of purchase. ACR North American Advances, (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, M.; and Buckley, T.R. Collaborating profitably? The fundraising practices of the contemporary art society, 1919–1939. Business History (2020), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, H.-C.; Chiu, C.L.; Mansumitrchai, S.; Yuan, Z.; Zhao, N.; and Zou, J. The influence of signals on donation crowdfunding campaign success during COVID-19 crisis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 14 (2021), 7715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C.I.; and Weiss, W. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 4 (1951), 635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, D.H. What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation? Journal of Finance, 59, 4 (2004), 1805–1844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S.; Pickernell, D.; Battisti, M.; and Nguyen, T. Signalling entrepreneurs’ credibility and project quality for crowdfunding success: Cases from the Kickstarter and Indiegogo environments. Small Business Economics (2021), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igra, M.; Kenworthy, N.; Luchsinger, C.; and Jung, J.-K. Crowdfunding as a response to COVID-19: Increasing inequities at a time of crisis. Social Science & Medicine, 282 (2021), 114105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T.; and Haines, R. Cross-cultural management in South African NGOs. South African Review of Sociology, 38, 1 (2007), 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Jancenelle, V.E.; Javalgi, R.R.G.; and Cavusgil, E. Cultural entrepreneurship and legitimate distinctiveness in international prosocial crowdfunding. International Business Review, 28, 4 (2019), 802–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerving, S. Kenya clamps down on NGOs after election. Devex (2017).
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, C.; Han, R.; Xu, Q.; and Liu, Y. The impact of soft information extracted from descriptive text on crowdfunding performance. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 43, (2020), 101002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y.; Ho, Y.-C.; Yan, X.; and Tan, Y. What’s in a “username”? The effect of perceived anonymity on herding in crowdfunding. Information Systems Research, 33, 1 (2022), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaartemo, V. The elements of a successful crowdfunding campaign: A systematic literature review of crowdfunding performance. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 15, 3 (2017), 291–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keengwe, M. NGO Roles and Relationships: Partnership Dilemmas for International and Local NGOs (in Kenya). IIED, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, P.H.; Buffart, M.; and Croidieu, G. TMI: Signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives. Group & Organization Management, 41, 6 (2016), 717–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimemia, D. Organizational Culture and Corruption: A Multiple Case Study of Non-Governmental Organizations in Kenya. Virginia Commonwealth University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kimemia, D. Non-Governmental Organizations and Corruption: The Case of Kenya. In G. Mudacumura and G. Morçöl (eds.), Challenges to Democratic Governance in Developing Countries. Cham: Springer, 2014, pp. 157–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinert, S.; Volkmann, C.; and Grünhagen, M. Third-party signals in equity crowdfunding: the role of prior financing. Small Business Economics, 54, 1 (2020), 341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, M.M.; Bretschneider, U.; Erler, M.; and Leimeister, J.M. An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding. Electronic Commerce Research, 17, 3 (2017), 425–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y.-F.; Lin, C.S.; and Wu, C.-H. Why do people intend to back crowdfunding projects? a perspective on social cognitive theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 21, 3 (2020), 180–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppuswamy, V.; and Bayus, B.L. Crowdfunding creative ideas: The dynamics of project backers. In D. Cummin and L. Hornuf (eds.), The Economics of Crowdfunding. Cham: Springer, 2018, pp. 151–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-C.; Tsai, D.C.; and Wu, M.-D. The dilemma of mixed bundles: The effects of price, brand, and content preference on music CD bundle choices. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 18, 5 (2011), 455–462.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L.; Suh, A.; and Wagner, C. Empathy or perceived credibility? An empirical study on individual donation behavior in charitable crowdfunding. Internet Research (2018).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z.; Ben, S.; and Zhang, R. Factors Affecting crowdfunding success. Journal of Computer Information Systems (2022), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B.; Wilson, D.W.; and Haig, W.L. A picture is worth a thousand words: Source credibility theory applied to logo and website design for heightened credibility and consumer trust. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30, 1 (2014), 63–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukkarinen, A.; Teich, J.E.; Wallenius, H.; and Wallenius, J. Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems, 87, (2016), 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunt, M.; Solomon, D.; Rothman, K.; Glynn, R.; Hyrich, K.; Symmons, D.P.; Stürmer, T.; and British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register. Different methods of balancing covariates leading to different effect estimates in the presence of effect modification. American Journal of Epidemiology, 169, 7 (2009), 909–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysander Manohar, H. How a doer persuade a donor? Investigating the moderating effects of behavioral biases in donor acceptance of donation crowdfunding. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15, 2 (2021), 243–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, S.; and Bejarano, T.A. Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns. Strategic Organization, 15, 2 (2017), 194–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochkabadi, K.; and Volkmann, C.K. Equity crowdfunding: a systematic review of the literature. Small Business Economics, 54, 1 (2020), 75–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick, E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 1 (2014), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J.; and Shugan, S.M. Explaining bundle-framing effects with signaling theory. Marketing Science, 37, 4 (2018), 668–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudambi, S.M.; and Schuff, D. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer review on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34, 1 (2010), 185–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnenkamp, P.; and Öhler, H. Funding, competition and the efficiency of NGOs: An empirical analysis of non‐charitable expenditure of US NGOs engaged in foreign aid. Kyklos, 65, 1 (2012), 81–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, R.; and Kotze, J. Do not log-transform count data. Nature Precedings (2010), 1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C.; and Kim, Y. Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Perez, B.; Machado, S.R.; Andrews, J.T.; and Kourtellis, N. I call BS: Fraud detection in crowdfunding campaigns. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.16849 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Phau, I.; and Prendergast, G. Consuming luxury brands: The relevance of the ‘rarity principle.’ Journal of Brand Management, 8, 2 (2000), 122–138.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, L.A.; Allison, T.H.; and Connelly, B.L. Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 5 (2016), 1585–1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, T.G.; Chen, G.; Jackson, E.M.; and Hambrick, D.C. How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 1 (2010), 6–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. Charitable giving and “excessive” fundraising. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 2 (1982), 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P.R.; and Rubin, D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 1 (1983), 41–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S.; Park, J.; Kim, K.; and Kim, Y.-G. Reward versus altruistic motivations in reward-based crowdfunding. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 24, 2 (2020), 159–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saluzzo, F.M.; and Alegre, I. Supporting entrepreneurs: The role of third-party endorsement in crowdfunding platforms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, (2021), 120402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarin, S.; Sego, T.; and Chanvarasuth, N. Strategic use of bundling for reducing consumers’ perceived risk associated with the purchase of new high-tech products. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11, 3 (2003), 71–83.
   Google Scholar
• Septianto, F.; Seo, Y.; Sung, B.; and Zhao, F. Authenticity and exclusivity appeals in luxury advertising: the role of promotion and prevention pride. European Journal of Marketing, 54, 6 (2020), 1305–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serman, Z.E.; and Sims, J. Source credibility theory: SME hospitality sector blog posting during the covid-19 pandemic. Information Systems Frontiers (2022), 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, S.; and Pan, Y. Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: the role of brand image and bundle features. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 5 (2009), 367–376.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, M. Crowdfunding statistics (2021): Market size and growth. Fundera Ledger (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Simonin, B.L.; and Ruth, J.A. Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers’ reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in. Journal of Business Research, 33, 3 (1995), 219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stremersch, S.; and Tellis, G.J. Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 66, 1 (2002), 55–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The New Humanitarian. NGOs in Kenya protest threatened deregistration of 959 organizations. New Humanitarian (2016).
   Google Scholar
• TheCrowdDataCenter: Projects (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Toyasaki, F.; and Wakolbinger, T. Joint fundraising appeals: Allocation rules and conditions that encourage aid agencies’ collaboration. Decision Sciences, 50, 3 (2019), 612–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, S.; and Fogg, B. Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42, 5 (1999), 39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viravaidya, M.; and Hayssen, J. Strategies to Strengthen NGO Capacity in Resource Mobilization Through Business Activities. PDA and UNAIDS joint publication, UNAIDS Best Practice Collection, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, A.A.; and Olale, D.A. Analyzing the effectiveness of a Kenyan NGO with the HPO framework. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 38, 2 (2019), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, N.; Liang, H.; Xue, Y.; and Ge, S. Mitigating information asymmetry to achieve crowdfunding success: Signaling and online communication. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 3 (2021), 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X.; Sung, B.; and Phau, I. Examining the influences of perceived exclusivity and perceived rarity on consumers’ perception of luxury. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 26, 2 (2022), 365–382.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, D.; Zhang, L.; Tao, Q.; Wang, Y.; and Ma, S. Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: An empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47, 6 (2019), 1046–1063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y.; Song, W.; Bi, G.; and Zhou, Q. Threshold effect in crowdfunding: Evidence from investment-level data. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 25, 4 (2021), 416–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Calic, G.; and Shevchenko, A. How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information. Journal of Business Research, 117, (2020), 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T.-C.; and Lai, H. Comparison of product bundling strategies on different online shopping behaviors. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 5, 4 (2006), 295–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoman, I.; and McMahon-Beattie, U. Exclusivity: The future of luxury. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 13, 1 (2014), 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, C.; Liu, L.; and Mirkovski, K. Does more crowd participation bring more value to crowdfunding projects? The perspective of crowd capital. Internet Research, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenone, M.; and Snyder, J. Fraud in medical crowdfunding: A typology of publicized cases and policy recommendations. Policy & Internet, 11, 2 (2019), 215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y.; Tan, C.D.; Sun, J.; and Yang, Z. Why do people patronize donation-based crowdfunding platforms? An activity perspective of critical success factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, (2020), 106470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K.; Zhou, L.; and Zhao, X. Multi-modal emotion expression and online charity crowdfunding success. Decision Support Systems, 163, (2022), 113842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, H.; Xu, B.; Wang, T.; and Chen, D. Project implementation success in reward-based crowdfunding: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 21, 3 (2017), 424–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M.J.; Lu, B.; Fan, W.P.; and Wang, G.A. Project description and crowdfunding success: An exploratory study. Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 2 (2018), 259–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar