Public deliberation and policy crisis: the moderating effects of deliberation on policy support determinants

References

• Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” In Action Control, edited by Julius Kuhl and Jürgen Beckmann, 11–39. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. 1935. “Attitudes.” In A Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by C. Murchison, 798–844. Massachusetts: Clark University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., and R. E. Burnkrant. 1979. “Attitude Organization and the Attitude–Behavior Relationship.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (6): 913. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y. J., and J. H. Lee. 2012. “Cross-Cutting Exposure on the Internet Discussion Forums and Its Influence on Political Tolerance: A Mediation Analysis of Opinion Modification and Opinion Polarization.” Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 56 (2): 301–330.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, edited by Alan Hamlin and Phillip Petit, 17–34. New York: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., and B. Mullen. 1996. “Are Evaluations of Minorities More Extreme? A Meta-Analytic Integration.” Unpublished Manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eun, J. 2018. “Shin-Gori Nuclear Public Deliberation: Assessment and Prospects.” KAPS News, The Korean Association of Policy Studies 52:18–31.
   Google Scholar
• Eun, J. 2022. Public Deliberation in Theory and Practice: How to Detect or Shape Public Opinion. Seoul: Pakyoungsa.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1974. “Attitudes Towards Objects as Predictors of Single and Multiple Behavioral Criteria.” Psychological Review 81 (1): 59. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. S., R. C. Luskin, and R. Jowell. 2000. “Deliberative Polling and Public Consultation.” Parliamentary Affairs 53 (4): 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/53.4.657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., P. Visser, and P. E. Tetlock. 2000. “Coping with Accountability Cross-Pressures: Low-Effort Evasive Tactics and High-Effort Quests for Complex Compromises.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26:1380–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. F. Thompson. 2009. “Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process.” In Why Deliberative Democracy, edited by Amy Gutmann and Dennis F. Thompson, 95–124. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 2005. “Concluding Comments on Empirical Approaches to Deliberative Politics.” Acta Politica 40:384–392. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. K., J. Eun, and J. G. Park. 2020. “The Role and Impact of Public Deliberation in Public Decision-Making”, Korea Development Institute Report 2020-02
   Google Scholar
• Jang E. G., and J. M. Lee. 2020. “Types of Consumer Ambivalence for Intelligent Personal Assistant and Their Impact on Consumer Acceptance”. Journal of Consumer Studies 31 (2): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.35736/JCS.31.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, H. G., and J. D. Chung. 2019. “A Study on the Factors Affecting Renewable Energy Acceptance for Climate Change Response”. Korean Journal of Environmental Education 32 (4): 437–456. https://doi.org/10.17965/kjee.2019.32.4.437.
   Google Scholar
• Katz & Stotland. 1959 “A Preliminary Statement to a Theory of Attitude Structure and Change.” In Psychology: A Study of a Science, edited by S. Koch, Vol. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Keele, L., and J. Wolak. 2008. “Contextual Sources of Ambivalence.” Political Psychology 29 (5): 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00659.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. W., S. H. Ahn, and Y. M. Kim. 2018. ““Who Supports Basic Income and why?”: An Exploratory Study on the Discourse of 4th Industrial Revolution and Job Substitution.” Korean Social Security Studies 34 (4): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Kumlin, S. 2004. The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. A. 2007. “Can we Come to the Reasonable and Reciprocal Agreement Through Discourse?- A Critical Review of Habermas’ Theory of Deliberative Democracy.” Korean Political Science Review 41 (4): 1269–1290.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E., and D. Mutz. 2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and out-Group Anxiety.” International Organization 63:425–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. 2002. “The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 46:838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., M. S. Lewis-Beck, and É. Bélanger. 2013. “Economics and Elections Revisited.” Comparative Political Studies 46:551–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, M. K., Y. J. Cha, and H. J. Lee. 2020. “The Effect of Policy Attitudes and Perceived Cost on the Policy Acceptance.” Modern Society and Public Administration 30 (4): 29–55.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K. T., and M. J. Lee. 2020. “The Deliberation Effects of a Participatory Survey on Reform of the College Entrance System.” Survey Research 21 (2): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.20997/SR.21.2.3.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R. B. 1990. The Power of Public Ideas. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., and C. L. Funk. 1990. “The Limited Effect of Economic Self-Interest on the Political Attitudes of the Mass Public.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19 (3): 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-5720(90)90030-B.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., and C. L. Funk. 1991. “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24:1–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60327-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sniderman, P. M., and E. H. Stiglitz. 2012. The Reputational Premium: A Theory of Party Identification and Policy Reasoning. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wroe, A., N. Allen, and S. Birch. 2013. “The Role of Political Trust in Conditioning Perceptions of Corruption.” European Political Science Review 5 (2): 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. Y., and K. S. Ko. 2018. “A Study on the Structural Relationship Between Policy Situation Perception, Policy Support, and Policy Acceptance During Travel Week: Focusing on the Spring Travel Week in Gyeongsangnam Province.” Northeast Asia Tourism Research 14 (2): 73–89.
   Google Scholar