Mobilizing social transformation with technology. The shaping of social processes since the development of industrial society and beyond: innovation input and social processes

References

• Acemoglu, D. 2021. Harms of AI. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Augé, M. 1997. Non-places. Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Betancourt, M. 2016. The Critique of Digital Capitalism: An Analysis of the Political Economy of Digital Culture and Technology. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bravermann, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 1998. End of Millennium, The information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. III. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. 2021. AI Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. 2006. On the Move. Mobility in the Modern Western World. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. 2013. The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson-Decleve, S., O. Gaffney, J. Ghosh, J. Rockström, P. E. Stoknes, and J. Randers. 2022. Earth for All - A Survival Guide for Humanity. A Report to the Club of Rome. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F. (1884) 2010. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. Reprint. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2010. Between Reason and Experience. Essays in Technology and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., and F. Louçã. 2001. As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2021. Digital Capitalism: Media, Communication and Society Volume Three. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbreth, F., and L. E. Gilbreth. 1917. Applied Motion Study: A Collection of Papers on the Efficient Method to Industrial Preparedness. New York: Sturgis & Walton.
   Google Scholar
• Guigueno, V., and M. Flonneau (dir.). 2009. De l’histoire des transports à l’histoire de la mobilité? [From the History of Transports to the History of Mobility?] Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes. DOI: 10.4000/books.pur.102111.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1985. Die neue Unübersichtlichkeit. Kleine Politische Schriften [The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. 2023. Das Versprechen der Künstlichen Intelligenz [The Promise of Artificial Intelligence]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, S. 1983. The Culture of Time and Space, 1880-1918. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korinek, A., and J. E. Stiglitz. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment.” In The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, edited by A. Agrawal, J. Gans, and A. Goldfarb, 349–390. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krotz, F. 2022. Die Teilung Geistiger Arbeit per Computer [The Division of Intellectual Work via the Computer]. Weinheim: Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Lash, S., and J. Urry. 1993. Economies of Signs and Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992. “Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Technology/Building Society, edited by W. E. Bijker, and J. Law, 151–180. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2011. “Networks, Societies, Spheres: Reflections of an Actor-Network Theorist.” International Journal of Communication 5: 796–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín, A. and C. Pérez. 2015. “Cambio tecnológico y desarrollo sustentable” [Technological change and sustainable development]. Integración & Comercio 39: 30–43.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1867) 1982. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, Volume one. Reprint. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mau, S. 2021. Sortiermaschinen. Die Neuerfindung der Grenze im 21. Jahrhundert [Sorting Machines. Reinventing the Border in the 21st Century]. Munich: C. H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. 2018. “Media and Mobility: Two Fields, One Subject.” The Journal of Transport History 39 (3): 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022526618793396.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam Deutschland. 2023. Umsteuern für soziale Gerechtigkeit [Changing Direction for Social Justice]. Oxfam Deutschland e. V.: Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam International. 2022. “Ten Richest Men Double their Fortunes in Pandemic While Incomes of 99 percent of Humanity Fall.” Oxfam International. Accessed November 25, 2023. https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/ten-richest-men-double-their-fortunes-pandemic-while-incomes-99-percent-humanity.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, C. 2010. “Technological Revolutions and Techno-Economic Paradigms.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, C. 2019. “Transitioning to Smart Green Growth: Lessons from History.” In Handbook on Green Growth, edited by R. Fouquet, 447–463. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. 2021. Une brève histoire de l’égalité [A brief history of equality]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, P. O. 1997. “Telecommunication Vs. Transportation.” Access 10: 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Popitz, H. 1995. Der Aufbruch zur artifiziellen Gesellschaft: Zur Anthropologie der Technik [The Dawn of Artificial Society: On the Anthropology of Technology]. Tübingen: Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Popitz, H. 1997. Verso una società artificiale. Il lavoro dell'uomo e l'evoluzione tecnologica [Towards an Artificial Society. Human Work and Technological Evolution]. Rome: Editori Riuniti.
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. 1992. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. 2014. The Zero Marginal Cost Society. The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Risso, W. A., and E. J. Sánchez-Carrera. 2019. “On the Impact of Innovation and Inequality in Economic Growth.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 28 (1): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2018.1429534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G. 1996. “The McDonaldization Thesis. Is Expansion Inevitable?” International Sociology 11 (3): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858096011003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser, M. 2021. “Global Economic Inequality: What Matters Most for your Living Conditions is Not Who You Are, but Where You Are.” Accessed December 2, 2023. https://ourworldindata.org/global-economic-inequality-introduction.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, P. 2022. Kapitalistische Subjektivation. Das Subjekt des kybernetischen Kapitalismus zwischen Digitalisierung, Prekarisierung und Autoritarismus [Capitalist Subjectivation. The Subject of Cybernetic Capitalism between Digitalization, Precarization and Authoritarianism]. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2012. Together: The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. 2018. Mobility Justice. The Politics of Movement in an Age of Extremes. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, C., and X. Zhao. 2023. “How Does Income Inequality Affects Economic Growth at Different Income Levels?” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 36 (1): 864–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2080742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1968) 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. Reprint. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers our Future. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, C. 1994. Lernen in der Informationsgesellschaft. Informelle Bildung durch Computer und Medien [Learning in the Information Society. Informal Education through Computers and Media]. Opladen/Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, C. 2010. “Transitions from Function-oriented to Effect-oriented Technologies – Some Thoughts on the Nature of Modern Technology.” In History and philosophy of science and technology, Vol. 4, edited by P. Lorenzano, H.-J. Rheinberger, E. Ortiz, and C. Galles, 82–112. Oxford: EOLSS.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, C., and C. Alfaraz. 2017. “Youth and Mobility: The Lifestyle of the New Generation as an Indicator of a Multi-local Everyday Life.” Applied Mobilities 2 (2): 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1322778.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty First Century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World-System I. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, I. 1980. The Modern World-System II. Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1921) 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Reprint. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2023. “Poverty and Inequality Platform.” The World Bank. Accessed December 1, 2023. https://pip.worldbank.org/home.
   Google Scholar
• Yonkers, V. 2020. “Creating Theoretic Boundaries for the Study of Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies: A Framework for Choosing Theory.” Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2 (4): 401–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.210.
   Google Scholar