Unravelling the expectation-performance gaps in teacher behaviour: a student engagement perspective

References

• Allen, J.M., Wright, S., Cranston, N., Watson, J., Beswick, K. & Hay, I., 2018, ‘Raising levels of school student engagement and retention in rural, regional and disadvantaged areas: is it a lost cause?’, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(4), pp. 409–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almarghani, E.M. & Mijatovic, I., 2017, ‘Factors affecting student engagement in HEIs: it is all about good teaching’, Teaching in Higher Education, 22(8), pp. 940–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L. & Furlong, M.J., 2008, ‘Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct’, Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), pp. 369–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borneo Post, 2018, ‘Minister concerned about low number of students qualified for Science Stream in S'wak’. Available at http://www.theborneopost.com/2018/02/25/minister-concerned-about-low-number-of-students-qualified-for-science-stream-in-swak/ (accessed 10 June 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, L., Baird, A. & Jones, S.E., 2017, ‘The student-as-consumer approach in higher education and its effects on academic performance’, Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), pp. 1958–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carini, R., Kuh, G. & Klein, S., 2006, Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages’, Research in Higher Education, 47(1), pp. 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J.S., Campbell, E.Q., Hobson, C.J., McPartland, J., Mood, A.M., Weinfeld, F.D. & York, R.L., 1966, Equality of Educational Opportunity (Washington, DC, US Department of Health, Education & Welfare/Office of Education).
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D.D. & Soo, M., 2005, ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems’, Higher Education, 49(4), pp. 495–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Whitehead, Y., 2018, ‘Non-academic support services and university student experiences: adopting an organizational theory perspective’, Studies in Higher Education, 43(9) pp. 1692–1706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., 2018, ‘Quality assurance for university teaching: issues and approaches’, in Handbook of Quality Assurance for University Teaching, pp. 21–36 (New York, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Farr-Wharton, B., Charles, M.B., Keast, R., Woolcott, G. & Chamberlain, D., 2018, ‘Why lecturers still matter: the impact of lecturer-student exchange on student engagement and intention to leave university prematurely’, Higher Education, 75(1), pp. 167–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer, L.K., 2015, ‘Predicting self-concept, interest and achievement for first-year students: the seeds of lifelong learning’, Learning and Individual Differences, 38, pp. 107–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, F.F., 1969, ‘Concerns of teachers: a developmental conceptualization’, American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), pp. 207–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E., 2010, Multivariate Data Analysis, seventh edition (New Jersey, Pearson Prentice-Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Harris, W.E., Langan, A.M., Barrett, N., Jack, L., Wibberley, C. & Hamshire, C., 2019, ‘A case for using both direct and indirect benchmarking to compare university performance metrics’, Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), pp. 2281–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, D.N. & Sass, T.R., 2014, ‘Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance’, Economics of Education Review, 40, pp. 183–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., 2003, ‘Teachers make a difference, what is the research evidence?’, Interpretations, 36(2), pp. 27–38.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, A.S., Horner, O.G. & Lee, G., 2019, ‘Measuring the effectiveness of two-year colleges: a comparison of raw and value-added performance indicators’, Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), pp. 151–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosen, M., Ogbeibu, S., Giridharan, B., Cham, T.-H., Lim, W.M. & Paul, J., 2021, ‘Individual motivation and social media influence on student knowledge sharing and learning performance: evidence from an emerging economy’, Computers & Education, 172, 104262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inda-Caro, M., Maulana, R., Fernández-García, C.-M., Peña-Calvo, J.-M., del Carmen Rodríguez-Menéndez, M. & Helms-Lorenz, M., 2019, ‘Validating a model of effective teaching behaviour and student engagement: perspectives from Spanish students’, Learning Environments Research, 22(2), pp. 229–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E.R., 2013, ‘Framing student engagement in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), pp. 758–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E.R. & Nelson, K., 2018, ‘Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success’, Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), pp. 58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiew, P., 2018, ‘Women on track to attain gender equality’, Borneo Post, 17 August 2018. Available at http://www.theborneopost.com/2018/08/17/women-on-track-to-attain-gender-equality/ (accessed 10 June 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Kimbark, K., Peters, M.L. & Richardson, T., 2017, ‘Effectiveness of the student success course on persistence, retention, academic achievement, and student engagement’, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 41(2), pp. 124–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, P, Lee, C. & Ho, C., 2019, ‘University student engagement in learning’, Education + Training, 61(3), pp. 342–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L. & Zepke, N., 2011, ‘Engaging students in learning: a review of a conceptual organiser’, Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), pp. 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.J., Hong, Y. & Choi, H., 2017, ‘Perceptions of tutoring roles and psychological distance among instructors, tutors and students at a Korean university’, Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), pp. 143–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, S.-O., 2011, ‘A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales’, Journal of Social Service Research, 37(4), pp. 412–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W.M. & Ting, D.H., 2012, Research Methodology: A toolkit of sampling and data analysis techniques for quantitative research (Munich, Germany, GRIN Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, K.E., Dwyer, A., Hine, L. & Turner, J., 2018, ‘Conceptions of students as partners’, Higher Education, 76(6), pp. 957–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M. & van de Grift, W., 2015, ‘Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: a Rasch modelling approach’, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(2), pp. 169–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, B. & Portelli, J.P., 2004, ‘Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement’, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(1), pp. 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J.J. & Cheney, G. 1996, ‘The student as consumer: the implications and limitations of a metaphor’, Communication Education, 45(1), pp. 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmark, D. 1929, ‘Students’ opinions of their best and poorest teachers’, The Elementary School Journal, 29(8), pp. 576–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. 1978, Psychometric Theory, second edition (New York, McGraw-Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J. & Leech, N.L., 2004, ‘Post hoc power: a concept whose time has come’, Understanding Statistics, 3(4), pp. 201–30.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency, 2018, UK Quality Code for Higher Education. Part B: Assuring and enhancing academic quality. Chapter B5: Student engagement (Southgate, Gloucester, Southgate House).
   Google Scholar
• Qualtrics, 2022, Sample size calculator. Available at https://www.qualtrics.com/blog/calculating-sample-size/ (accessed 10 June 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Roohr, K.C., Liu, H. & Liu, O.L., 2017, ‘Investigating student learning gains in college: a longitudinal study’, Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), pp. 2284–2300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., 2016, ‘Theories on educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness’, in Scheerens, J. (Eds.), 2016, Educational Effectiveness and Ineffectiveness, pp. 259–89 (New York, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Shah, M. & Richardson, J.T.E., 2016, ‘Is the enhancement of student experience a strategic priority in Australian universities?’, Higher Education Research & Development, 35(2), pp. 352–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, D.P., 2019, ‘Trying to teach dialogically: the good, the bad, and the misguided’, Language Teaching Research, 23(6), pp. 787–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, R.L., Aldemir, T., Hitchcock, J., Resig, J., Driver, J. & Kohler, M., 2020, ‘What students want: a vision of a future online learning experience grounded in distance education theory’, American Journal of Distance Education, 34(1), pp. 36–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, V., 2010, ‘Student engagement literature review’, The Higher Education Academy, 11(1), pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, J., 2016, ‘‘That ain't going to get you a professorship’: discourses of writing and the positioning of academics’ work with student writers in UK higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 41(9), pp. 1612–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W., 2007, ‘Quality of teaching in four European countries: a review of the literature and application of an assessment instrument’, Educational Research, 49(2), pp. 127–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W., Helms-Lorenz, M. & Maulana. R., 2014, ‘Teaching skills of student teachers: calibration of an evaluation instrument and its value in predicting student academic engagement’, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, pp. 150–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., Broughan, C. & Marselle, M., 2019, ‘A new framework for the design and evaluation of a learning institution’s student engagement activities’, Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), pp. 1931–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K.L., Murphy, K.A., Pearson, A.G., Wallace, B.M., Reher, V.G.S. & Buys, N., 2016, ‘Understanding the early transition needs of diverse commencing university students in a health faculty: informing effective intervention practices’, Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), pp. 1023–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., 2018, ‘Student engagement in neo-liberal times: what is missing?’, Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), pp. 433–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zepke, N., Leach, L. & Butler, P., 2014, ‘Student engagement: students’ and teachers’ perceptions’, Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), pp. 386–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar