Transdisciplinarity as subversion: in space and place

References

• Baptista B.V. & Klein, J.T., (Eds.), 2022, Institutionalizing Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., 2022, 'Transdisciplinarity: a suitably ambiguous idea for higher education response to ‘the struggling towards a transdisciplinary metaphysics’ (Gibbs 2021)’, Postdigital Science and Education, 4, pp. 659–66.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R., Bengtsen, S. & Nørgård, R., 2022a, Culture and the University (London, Bloomington Academic).
   Google Scholar
• Bedau, M., 2008, ‘Downward causation and autonomy in weak emergence’, Principia: an International Journal of Epistemology, 6(1), pp. 155–88.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D.J., 2006, ‘Strong and weak emergence’, in Davies, P. & Clayton, P. (Eds.), 2006, The Re-Emergence of Emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion (Oxford. Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, L., Morin, E. & Nicolescu, B., 1994, ‘Charter of transdisciplinarity’, Adopted at the first World Congress of Transdisciplinarity. Convento da Arrábida, Portugal, 2–6 November 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. & Gauttri, F., 1992, What is Philosophy? (London, Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Eikeland, O., Frimann, S., Hersted, L. & Jensen, J., 2022, ‘Are action researchers mixed up? Reviewing and revising basic assumptions, concepts, and terminology in and by means of action research’, International Journal of Action Research, 18(4), pp. 165–82.
   Google Scholar
• Fam, D. & O’ Rourke, M., 2021, Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Failures (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S.C., 2021, ‘Similarity structure and diachronic emergence’, Syntheses, 198, pp. 873–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1972, ‘The discourse on language’, in Foucault, M. (Ed.), 1972, The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, pp. 215–37 (New York, Pantheon).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, P., 2022, ‘The struggling towards a transdisciplinary metaphysics’, Postdigital Science and Education, 4, pp. 649–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gignoux, J., Chérel, G., Davie, I.D., Flint, S.H. & Lateltin, E., 2027, ‘Emergence and complex systems: the contribution of dynamic graph theory’, Ecological Complexity, 31, pp. 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P. & Beckett, D., 2022, ‘Refurbishing learning via complexity theory: introduction’; Educational Philosophy and Theory, published online 5 August 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, P., 2016, Emergence: A philosophical account (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J.T., Baptista B.V. & Streck, D., 2022, ‘Introduction: institutionalizing interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity: cultures and communities, timeframes and spaces’, in Baptista B.V. & Klein, J.T., (Eds.), 2022, Institutionalizing Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity pp. 1ff (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2016, ‘Is geo-logy the new umbrella for all the sciences? Hints for a neo-Humboldtian university’, Cornell University, 25th October 2016, English corrected by Michael Flower. Available at www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/150-CORNELL-2016-.pdf (accessed 27 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• List, C. & Pettit, P., 2011, Group Agency, the Possibility. Design and status of corporate agents (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., 2022, ‘Excellence with impact: why UK research policy discourages “transdisciplinarity”’ in Baptista B.V. & Klein, J.T., (Eds.), 2022, Institutionalizing Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity pp. 13–26 (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Mason M., 2008, ‘What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change?’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), pp. 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M.A., 2005, ‘Foundations of transdisciplinarity’, Ecological Economics, 53, pp. 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R., 1942, ‘The normative structure of science’, in Storer, N.W. (Ed.), 1973, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Midgelow, V.L., 2017, ‘A new kind of learning: somatics, dance improvisation and transdisciplinarity’, in Gibbs, P., (Ed.), 2017, Transdisciplinary Higher Education: A theoretical basis revealed in practice, pp. 121–35 (Cham, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K., 2005, ‘Structuration theory, habitus and complexity theory: elective affinities or old wine in new bottles?’, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), pp. 311–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B., 2002, Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, translated by Voss, K-C (New York, SUNY Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B., 2005, ‘Towards transdisciplinary education’ Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 1(1), pp. 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., 2005, ‘The changing nature of public science’, in Nowotny, H., Pestre, D., Schmidt-Aßmann, E., Schulze-Fielitz, H. & Trute, H-H., 2005, The Public Nature of Science under Assault, pp. 1–27 (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Ombler, J. & Sarah, D., 2018, ‘Rejuvenating radical potential through transdisciplinarity: art and public health’, Counterfutures, 5, pp 165–92.
   Google Scholar
• Osberg, D., Biesta, G. & Cilliers, P., 2008, ‘From representation to emergence: complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), pp. 213–27.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J., 1972, ‘The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships,’ in Apostel, L., (Ed.), 1972, Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities, pp. 127–39 (Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Rider, S., 2022, ‘The corrision of the academic character’ in Mohan, A. (Ed.), 2022, The Promise of the University, pp. 29–40 (Cham, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Riveros, P.S., Meriño, J., Crespo, F. & Vienni Baptista, B., 2022, ‘Situated transdisciplinarity in university policy: lessons for its institutionalization’, Higher Education, 84, pp. 1003–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. & Mitchell, C., 2018, ‘Transforming transdisciplinarity: an expansion of strong transdisciplinarity and its centrality in enabling effective collaboration’, in Fam, D., Neuhauser, L. & Gibbs, P. (Eds.), 2018, Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education: The art of collaborative research and collective learning (Cham, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Sartenaer, O., 2015, ‘Synchronic vs. diachronic emergence: a reappraisal’ European Journal of Philosophy of Science, 5, pp. 31–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman, T.A., Andrew, E., Baines, S., Bharadwaj, L., Bjornson, E.A., Bradford, L., Cardinal, K., Carriere, G., Fresque‑Baxter, J., Jardine, T.D., MacColl, I., Macmillan, S., Marten, J., Oros, C., Reed, M.G., Rose, I., Shmon, K., Shantz, S., Staples, S., Stricker, G. & Voyageur, M., 2019, ‘Identifying transformational space for transdisciplinarity: using art to access the hidden third’, Sustainability Science 14, pp. 771–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellodi, K., 2019, ‘Diagrammatic transdisciplinary. Thought outside discipline’, in Collett, G. (Ed.), 2019, Deleuze, Guattari, and the Problem of Transdisciplinarity, pp. 105–31 (London, Bloomsbury Academic).
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A.N., 1968, Modes of Thought (New York, Touchstone Press).
   Google Scholar
• Yeoman, P. & Wilson, S., 2019, ‘Association designing for situated learning: understanding the relations between material properties, designed form and emergent learning activity’, British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), pp. 2090–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar