Teachers’ conceptions of assessment literacy

References

• American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1990.tb00391.x
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. A. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293–309). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., Liebig, S., & Sauer, C. (2015). The factorial survey as a method for measuring sensitive issues. In U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, & P. Sturgis (Eds.), Improving survey methods: Lessons from recent research (pp. 137–149). Routledge/Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0054
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Bennett, S., Joughin, G., & Molloy, E. (2018). Reframing assessment research: Through a practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1107–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1202913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J., McCluskey, S., Turley, E., & King, N. (2015). The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caena, F. (2011). Literature review Teachers’ core competences: Requirements and development. European Commission Thematic Working Group “Professional Development of Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Charteris, J., & Dargusch, J. (2018). The tensions of preparing pre-service teachers to be assessment capable and profession-ready. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(4), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1469114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, E. (2012). Teaching in innovative vocational education in the Netherlands. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(6), 637–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.746499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C., & Johnson, S. (2017). Developing assessment capable teachers in this age of accountability. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 24(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneen, C. C., & Boud, D. (2014). Patterns of resistance in managing assessment change. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.859654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneen, C. C., Brown, G. T. L., & Ciuffetelli Parker, D. (2016). The impact of conceptions of assessment on assessment literacy in a teacher education program. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1225380. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1225380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, S., & Hess, A. C. (2021). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for transformative service research. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. T., Kreijns, K., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2016). The design and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ professional development at work. Studies in Continuing Education, 38(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1055465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (2005). Focus group research: Using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences and understandings. In I. Holloway (Ed.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 56–69). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, R., & Anderson, D. (2015). Reflections on academics’ assessment literacy. London Review of Education, 13(3), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.13.3.06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney, A., Cumming, J., van der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(5), 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(1), 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education, 33(1), 49–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41064623
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of professional competence. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 107–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_5
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C., & Leicht, A. (2019). ‘Struggles as engagement’ in teacher change: A longitudinal case study of a reading teacher’s changing practices. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 25(4), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1625764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., Mukherjee, N., & Geneletti, D. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. Qualitative Report, 12(2), 218–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638
   Google Scholar
• Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap, H., Louws, M., Meirink, J., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., Van Der Want, A., Zuiker, I., Zwart, R., & Meijer, P. (2019). Tensions experienced by teachers when participating in a professional learning community. Professional Development in Education, 45(5), 814–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1547781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuwirth, L. W. T., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2019). How ‘testing’ has become ‘programmatic assessment for learning. Health Professions Education, 5(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2018.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Stravakou, P. A., & Lozgka, E. C. (2018). Vignettes in qualitative educational research: Investigating Greek school principals’ values. Qualitative Report, 23(5), 1188–1207. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturing, L., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & de Bruijn, E. (2011). The nature of study programmes in vocational education: Evaluation of the model for comprehensive competence-based vocational education in the netherlands. Vocations and Learning, 4(3), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-011-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Spoel, I., Noroozi, O., Schuurink, E., & Van Ginkel, S. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1821185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, N. L. (2002). Assessment literacy in a standards-based education setting [Conference presentation]. American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April 1-5 United States.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodyatt, C. R., Finneran, C. A., & Stephenson, R. (2016). In-person versus online focus group discussions: A comparative analysis of data quality. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316631510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., & Tartwijk Van, J. (2019). Dutch teacher and teacher education policies. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), The teacher’s role in the changing globalizing world (pp. 63–77). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_005
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). University English teacher assessment literacy: A survey-test report from China. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 133–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar