1,024
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Teacher learning as a polyphonic endeavor: A context sensitive model of teacher professional development

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 908-923 | Received 14 Sep 2022, Accepted 11 May 2023, Published online: 19 May 2023

References

  • Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge University Press.
  • Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618932
  • Archer, M. (Ed.). (2010). Can reflexivity and habitus work in tandem?. Can reflexivity and habitus work in tandem?. Conversations about reflexivity. Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. University of Texas.
  • Baldwin, J. M. (1898). Story of the mind. D. Appleton & Co.
  • Baraldi, C., Farini, F., & Ślusarczyk, M. (2023). Facilitative practices to promote migrant children’s agency and hybrid integration in schools: Discussing data from Italy, Poland and England. Language and Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2022.2096054
  • Beijaard, D., Meijer, P., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching & Teacher Education, 20(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
  • Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
  • Dutton, J., D’warte, J., Rossbridge, J., & Rushton, K. (2018). Tell me your story : Confirming identity and engaging writers in the middle years. Primary English Teaching Association Australia PETAA.
  • Farini, F., Baraldi, C., & Scollan, A. (2023). This is my truth, tell me yours. Positioning children as authors of knowledge through facilitation of narratives in dialogic interactions. Practice: Contemporary Issues in Practitioner Education, 5(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/25783858.2023.2177185
  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. Pantheon.
  • Gore, J. M., Miller, A., Fray, L., Harris, J., & Prieto, E. (2021). Improving student achievement through professional development: Results from a randomised controlled trial of quality teaching rounds. Teaching & Teacher Education, 101, 103297–103309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103297
  • Hamilton, M. (2018). Pedagogical transitions among science teachers: How does context intersect with teacher beliefs? Teachers & Teaching, 24(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1367658
  • Harrell Levy, M. K., & Kerpelman, J. L. (2010). Identity process and transformative pedagogy: Teachers as agents of identity formation. Identity, 10(2), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283481003711684
  • Holland, D., & Leander, K. (2004). Ethnographic studies of positioning and subjectivity: An introduction. Ethos, 32(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2004.32.2.127
  • Jordhus-Lier, A. (2021). Using discourse analysis to understand professional music teacher identity. Nordic Research in Music Education, 2(1), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.23865/nrme.v2.3025
  • Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Salonen, V., Salmela-Aro, K., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). A teacher-researcher partnership for professional learning: Co-designing project-based learning units to increase student engagement in science classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1872207
  • Kennedy, A. (2014). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 336–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.929293
  • Khosronejad, R., Kervin, G., Barton, L., & Kervin, L. (2021). “I get all my ideas from the tree”: Investigating elementary students’ views as reflexive writers. Research Papers in Education, 38(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1961299
  • Khosronejad, R. M., Weber, L., & Weber, L. (2023). In quest for a dialogic space: A microethnographic approach to classroom interaction about writing. Learning, Culture & Social Interaction, 40, 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100714
  • Klamann, C. (2014). Whose holy of holies? Bakhtin’s polyphony and Tolstoy the author-god. Tolstoy Studies Journal, 26, 39.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521- 42374–0. first published in 1990 as Institute for Research on Learning report 90-0013.
  • Mannheim, B., & Tedlock, D. (1995). Introduction. In D. Tedlock & B. Mannheim (Eds.), The dialogic emergence of culture (pp. 1–32). University of Illinois Press.
  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. (C. Morris, Ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Naot-Ofarim, Y., & Solomonic, S. (2015). Educational Polyphony. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 35(4), 385–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-015-9491-2
  • Nawab, A., Bissaker, K., & Datoo, A. K. (2021). Contemporary trends in professional development of teachers: Importance of recognising the context. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2020-0476
  • Ramsey, C. (2008). Managing to learn: The social poetics of a polyphonic “classroom. Organization Studies, 29(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088700
  • Rex, & Schiller, L. (2009). Using discourse analysis to improve classroom interaction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876985
  • Ryan, M., & Barton, G. (2020). Literacy teachers as reflexive agents? Enablers and constraints. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(2), 219–238. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13384-019-00349-9
  • Ryan, M., Khosronejad, M., Barton, G., Kervin, L., & Myhill, D. (2021). A reflexive approach to teaching writing: enablements and constraints in primary school classrooms. Written Communication, 38(3), 417–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211005558
  • Ryan, M., Khosronejad, M., Barton, G., Myhill, D., & Kervin, L. (2022). Reflexive writing dialogues: Elementary students’ perceptions and performances as writers during classroom experiences. Assessing Writing, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100592
  • Saunders, R. (2014). Effectiveness of research-based teacher professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 166–184. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n4.10
  • Schwarz-Franco, O. (2018). Polyphonic teaching: The ability to facilitate multiple voices as a crucial teaching skill. Educational Studies, 54(4), 429–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2018.1474112
  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse : The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.
  • Skidmore, D., & Murakami, K. (2012). Claiming our own space: Polyphony in teacher–student dialogue. Linguistics & Education, 23(2), 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.02.003
  • van Oers, & van Oers, B. (2002). Fruits of polyphony: A commentary on a multiperspective analysis of mathematical discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(2), 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS11,2-3n_9
  • Zellermeyer, M., & Tabak, E. (2006). Knowledge construction in a teachers’ community of enquiry: A possible road map. Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500364562