How the association of time pressure with work engagement and affect depends on workers’ sensation seeking: a daily diary study

References

• Arnett, J. (1994). Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(2), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(94)90165-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge, A., Deci, N., Dettmers, J., & Rigotti, T. (2019). “Some days won’t end ever”: Working faster and longer as a boundary condition for challenge versus hindrance effects of time pressure. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(3), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baethge, A., Vahle-Hinz, T., Schulte-Braucks, J., & van Dick, R. (2018). A matter of time? Challenging and hindering effects of time pressure on work engagement. Work & Stress, 32(3), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1415998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370802393649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Bojesen-Christensen, R. H., Singmann, H., Dai, B., Scheipl, F., Grothendieck, G., Green, P., Fox, J., Bauer, A., & Krivitsky, P. N. (2022). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. R package version 1.1-30. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J. (2012). Industrial/Organizational psychology. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 601–619). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J. (2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335
   Google Scholar
• Binnewies, C., & Wörnlein, S. C. (2011). What makes a creative day? A diary study on the interplay between affect, job stressors, and job control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breyer, B., & Bluemke, M. (2016). Deutsche Version der Positive and negative affect schedule PANAS [German version oft he Positive and negative affect schedule PANAS]. GESIS—Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.6102/zis242
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (1998). “Challenge” and “hindrance” related stress among U.S. managers. (Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies Working Paper). Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. Managers. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, E. R., Lepine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dornbach-Bender, A., Ruggero, C. J., Smith, P., Schuler, K., Bennett, C. B., Neumann, C. S., & Callahan, J. L. (2020). Association of behavioral activation system sensitivity to lower level facets of positive affect in daily life. Personality and Individual Differences, 152(2), 109570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109570
   Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, cronbach, or spearman-brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). One in three EU workers experience time pressure. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20201006-2
   Google Scholar
• Frenkel, M. O., Heck, R.-B., & Plessner, H. (2018). Cortisol and behavioral reaction of low and high sensation seekers differ in responding to a sport-specific stressor. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 31(5), 580–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2018.1498277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43(5), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.5.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at job stressors and positive affect during the workday. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. G. (1986). Activation theory and task design: An empirical test of several new predictions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 411–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. G. (1990). Task complexity effects on non-task-related movements: A test of activation theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(90)90012-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, D. G., & Cummings, L. L. (1988). Activation theory and task design: Review and reconceptualization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 81–122). JAI Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Giardini, A., & Frese, M. (2006). Reducing the negative effects of emotion work in service occupations: Emotional competence as a psychological resource. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., & Phetvaroon, K. (2022). Beyond the bend: The curvilinear effect of challenge stressors on work attitudes and behaviors. Tourism Management, 90(2), 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104482
   Google Scholar
• Hammelstein, P. (2008). Das Stimulationsbedürfnis (sensation seeking) im klinischen und differentialpsychologischen kontext [The need for stimulation (sensation seeking) in the clinical and differential psychological context]. Pabst Science Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984). Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., & Nock, M. K. (2013). Improving acute stress responses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412461500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronenwett, M., & Rigotti, T. (2022). All’s well that ends well!? Moderating effects of goal progress on the relation between challenge and hindrance appraisal and well-being. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(5), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2019-0618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnel, J., Sonnentag, S., & Bledow, R. (2012). Resources and time pressure as day-level antecedents of work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2011.02022.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzelmann, A., & Rigotti, T. (2021). How time pressure is associated with both work engagement and emotional exhaustion: The moderating effects of resilient capabilities at work. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 35(3), 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002220952741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B., & Jensen, S. (2020). LmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-3. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
   Google Scholar
• LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lepine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lischetzke, T., & Könen, T. (2021). Daily diary methodology. In F. Maggino (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (Vol. 74, pp. 1–8). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_657-2
   Google Scholar
• Mazzola, J. J., & Disselhorst, R. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees? A critical review and meta‐analysis of the challenge‐hindrance model of stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, S., Skues, J. L., & Williams, B. J. (2018). With risk may come reward: Sensation seeking supports resilience through effective coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. W., Stromeyer, W. R., & Schwieterman, M. A. (2013). Extensions of the Johnson-Neyman technique to linear models with curvilinear effects: Derivations and analytical tools. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48(2), 267–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2013.763567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani, F., Vandenberghe, C., Khedhaouria, A., & Courcy, F. (2020). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Human Relations, 73(1), 59–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718819055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezlek, J. B. (2017). A practical guide to understanding reliability in studies of within-person variability. Journal of Research in Personality, 69(4), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.020
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. E., & Beehr, T. A. (2019). So far, so good: Up to now, the challenge–hindrance framework describes a practical and accurate distinction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(8), 962–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(4), 543–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., & LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prem, R., Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2018). Exploring the ambivalence of time pressure in daily working life. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafique, M., Jaafar, M., Zafar, A., & Ahmed, S. (2023). Time pressure, emotional exhaustion and project manager abusive supervision in the construction industry: The role of psychological resilience. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 26(1/2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-02-2022-0034
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.1.2). Computer software. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reis, D., Arndt, C., Lischetzke, T., & Hoppe, A. (2016). State work engagement and state affect: Similar yet distinct concepts. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 93, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, D., Hoppe, A., Arndt, C., & Lischetzke, T. (2017). Time pressure with state vigour and state absorption: Are they non-linearly related? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1224232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, M., & Hammelstein, P. (2012). The need inventory of sensation seeking (NIsensation seeking). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, M., Liebe, N., & Altmann, T. (2019). Testing the stress-buffering hypothesis of sensation seeking in a controlled experimental setting. Personality and Individual Differences, 151(5), 109508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109508
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney, G., & Michel, J. S. (2022). Challenge and hindrance stressors and work outcomes: The moderating role of day-level affect. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(2), 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09752-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, J., & Staufenbiel, T. (2023). Workers’ sensation seeking matters: Development and validation of the need for sensations at work scale (NSWS). Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(5), 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2130340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. (2021). Engaging leadership: How to promote work engagement? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 754556. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A., Ohly, S., & Kleespies, N. (2015). Time pressure promotes work engagement. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. C., Prestele, E., & Reis, D. (2021). Perfectionistic cognitions as antecedents of work engagement: Personal resources, personal demands, or both? Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.25912
   Google Scholar
• Schoellbauer, J., Sonnentag, S., Prem, R., & Korunka, C. (2022). I’d rather know what to expect … work unpredictability as contemporary work stressor with detrimental implications for employees’ daily wellbeing. Work & Stress, 36(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2021.1976881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmer, N. K., Zapf, D., & Dunckel, H. (1999). Instrument zur stressbezogenen Tätigkeitsanalyse ISTA [Instrument for Stress-Related Job Analysis ISTA. In H. Dunckel (Ed.), Handbuch psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren (pp. 179–204). vdf Hochschulverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, X., Wang, Y., Hong, W., Zhu, Z., & Zhang, X. (2019). The curvilinear relationship between daily time pressure and work engagement: The role of psychological capital and sleep. International Journal of Stress Management, 26(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. E., Ptacek, J. T., & Smoll, F. L. (1992). Sensation seeking, stress, and adolescent injuries: A test of stress-buffering, risk-taking, and coping skills hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Z., Ginzburg, K., Neria, Y., & Ohry, A. (1995). Coping with war captivity: The role of sensation seeking. European Journal of Personality, 9(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., & Binnewies, C. (2013). Daily affect spillover from work to home: Detachment from work and sleep as moderators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., & Lischetzke, T. (2018). Illegitimate tasks reach into afterwork hours: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(2), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, S., Reinecke, L., Mata, J., & Vorderer, P. (2018). Feeling interrupted—being responsive: How online messages relate to affect at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, P. J., Schutte, N. S., & Phillips, W. J. (2021). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between basic psychological need satisfaction and affect. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47602/jpsp.v5i1.210
   Google Scholar
• Stiglbauer, B. (2018). Differential challenge and hindrance stressor relations with job-related core affect. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000076
   Google Scholar
• Tadić, M., Bakker, A. B., & Oerlemans, W. G. M. (2015). Challenge versus hindrance job demands and well-being: A diary study on the moderating role of job resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 702–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadić Vujčić, M., Oerlemans, W. G. M., & Bakker, A. B. (2017). How challenging was your work today? The role of autonomous work motivation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teuchmann, K., Totterdell, P., & Parker, S. K. (1999). Rushed, unhappy, and drained: An experience sampling study of relations between time pressure, perceived control, mood, and emotional exhaustion in a group of accountants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.4.1.37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turgut, S., Michel, A., & Sonntag, K. (2017). Coping with daily hindrance and challenge stressors in the workplace. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O, 61(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121
   Google Scholar
• Yu, W., & Wang, Z. (2022). Dual influencing paths of time pressure on employee creativity. International Journal of Stress Management, 29(4), 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M. (1994). Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., & Aluja, A. (2015). Measures of sensation seeking. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs (Vol. 14, pp. 352–380). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00013-9
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, M., Lubin, B., & Rinck, C. M. (1983). Construction of new scales for the multiple affect adjective check list. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 5(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01321444
   Google Scholar