Counter Conduct and Autonomy Politics in the Era of Neoliberal Governmentality

References

• Akdoğan, Y. 2004. AK Parti ve Muhafazakar Demokrasi [AK Party and Conservative Democracy]. İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Asl, M. P. 2022. “Gender, Space and Counter-Conduct: Iranian Women’s Heterotopic Imaginations in Ramita Navai’s City of Lies: Love, Sex, Death, and the Search for Truth in Tehran.” Gender, Place & Culture 29 (9): 1296–1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2021.1975100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafra, Ç. 2022. “A. Aslı Demir’in Çalışmaları ve Ankara Queer Art Programı.” https://feeds.transistor.fm/haricten-sanat.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat, A. 2017. Revolution Without Revolutionaries. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. 2016. “Governmentality After Neoliberalism.” In Governmentality After Neoliberalism, edited by Mark Bevir, 13–20. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2018. “Neoliberalism’s Frankestein: Authoritarian Freedom in Twenty-First Century Democracies.” Critical Times 1 (1): 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/26410478-1.1.60.
   Google Scholar
• Burf, I., and C. B. Tansel. 2019. “Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Trajectories of Knowledge Production and Praxis.” Globalizations 16 (3): 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1502497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassani, A., and L. Tomini. 2019. Autocratization in Post-Cold War Political Regimes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cervinkova, H., and P. Rudnicki. 2019. “Neoliberalism, Neoconservatism, Authoritarianism. The Politics of Public Education in Poland.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 17 (2): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacko, P. 2018. “The Right Turn in India: Authoritarianism, Populism and Neoliberalisation.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (4): 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1446546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. 2017. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Darıcıoğlu, L. S. 2014. “Golden Butterflies.” http://lemandaricioglu.com/golden-butterflies/.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. 2002. “Liberal Government and Authoritarianism.” Economy and Society 31 (1): 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120109240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1983. Nietzche and Philosophy. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1988. Bergsonism. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus, Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, O. 2016. “Counter-Conduct and the Everyday: Anthropological Engagements with Philosophy.” Global Society 30 (2): 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1133568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrien, G. 1993. The Neoconservative Mind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ertuğrul, K. 2012. “AKP’s Neo-Conservatism and Politics of Otherness in Europe-Turkey Relations.” New Perspectives on Turkey 46: 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600001540.
   Google Scholar
• Ertuğrul, K. 2022. “Gezi Insurgency as ‘Counter-Conduct’.” Middle East Critique 31 (3): 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2022.2098901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1997a. “What is Enlightenment.” In Ethics, Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984 v. I, edited by Paul Rabinow, 303–320. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1997b. “Ethics of the Concern of the Self as a Practice of Freedom.” In Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth vol. I, edited by Paul Rabinow, 281–301. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures At The College De France, 1975-1976. Translated by David Macey. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College De France, 1977–78. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics, Lectures At The College De France, 1978-1979. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmilan.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, A. 2022. “Internalized Class Governance and the AKP’s Populism: On Turkey’s Integration with the European Union.” In Regime Change in Turkey. Neoliberal Authoritarianism, Islamism and Hegemony, edited by Errol Babacan, Melehat Kutun, Ezgi Pınar, and Zafer Yılmaz, 103–119. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. 2010. Crack Capitalism. New York: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L. 2022. “Re-Embedding and Disembedding in Post-Socialist Hungary: An Analysis of Orbanism from a Polanyian Perspective.” Forum for Social Economics 52 (3): 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2022.2031248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzini, D. 2022. “Reason Versus Power: Genealogy, Critique, and Epistemic Injustice.” The Monist 105: 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onac016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan I Lindberg. 2019. “A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?.” Democratization 26 (7): 1095–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1582029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrati, P. 2001. “Against the Doxa: Politics of Immanence and Becoming Minoritarian.” In Micropolis of Media Culture, edited by Patricia Pisters, 205–220. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, J. 2011. “Toward a Foucaultian Epistemology of Resistance: Counter Memory, Epistemic Friction, and Guerilla Pluralism.” Foucault Studies 12: 9–35. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i12.3335.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, P. B. 2022. “Hindu Nationalism: From Ethnic Identity to Authoritarian Repression.” Studies in Indian Politics 10 (1): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210230221082828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. 2006. Neoliberalism as Exception. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özdüzen, Ö. 2022. “DIY Media and Urban Citizenship: Intersectional Post-Occupy Media Activism in Turkey.” In Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Resistance in Turkey. Construction, Consolidation and Contestation, edited by İmren Borsuk, Pınar Dinç, Sinem Kavak, and Pınar Sayan, 191–210. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Özgen, A. 2022. “Ruins, Ruination, and Counter-Memory in Kurdish Women’s Art.” Feminist Media Studies 8 (1): 16–45.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., and N. Theodore. 2019. “Still Neoliberalism?” South Atlantic Quarterly 118 (2): 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer, D., and E. Gönlügür. 2020. “Therapeutic Forgetting, Agonistic Remembrance: Conflicting Memories of Izmir’s Kültürpark and Contested Narratives in Contemporary Turkey.” Memory Studies 14 (2): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698020921432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofos, A. S. 2022. Turkish Politics and ‘The People’. Mass Mobilisation and Populism. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz, Z. 2018. “Revising the Culture of Political Protest After the Gezi Uprising in Turkey.” Mediterranean Quarterly 29 (3): 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1215/10474552-7003168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar