Dual-porosity approach: heat transfer and heat storage processes in porous media

References

• Barbe S, Kneer A. 2020. Virtual Material Design: A Powerful Tool for the Development of High-Efficiency Porous Media. In: Membrane Desalination. CRC Press; pp. 269–283.
   Google Scholar
• Bejan A. 2013. Convection heat transfer. Heboken, New Jersey: John wiley & sons.
   Google Scholar
• bulletphysics.org. 2022. Bullet real-time physics simulation. Weblink.
   Google Scholar
• CD-adapco (Ed.), User Guide StarCCM+, Vol. 7.04.006, CD-adapco, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dostál Z, Ladányi L. 2018. Demands on energy storage for renewable power sources. J Energy Storage URL. 18:250–255. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X17303857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlofsky L, Brady J. 1987. Analysis of the Brinkman equation as a model for flow in porous media. Phys Fluids. 30(11):3329–3341. doi: 10.1063/1.866465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferziger J, Peric M. 1997. Computational methods for fluid dynamics. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez A. 2005. Combined Flow and Heat Transfer Characterization of open cell Aluminium Foams, Master Thesis, University of Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Hötzer J, Reiter A, Hierl H, Steinmetz P, Selzer M, Nestler B. 2018. The parallel multi-physics phase-field framework PACE3D. J Comput Sci. 26:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2018.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarullah A, Noor A. 2019. Energy consumption and heat recovery of an industrial fluidized catalytic cracking process based on cost savings. Appl Petrochem Res. 9(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s13203-018-0217-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneer A, Ed. 2022. User guide TinFlow, vol. V2.402. TinniT Technologies GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Kopanadis AGE, Theodorakakos BD, Gavaises E, Bouris D. 2010. 3D numerical simulation of flow and conjugate heat transfer through a pore scale model of high porosity open cell metal foam. International Journal Of Heat And Mass Transfer. 53(11–12):2539–2550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulagin R, Reiser P, Truskovskyi K, Koeppe A, Beygelzimer Y, Estrin Y, Friederich P, Gumbsch P. 2023. Lattice metamaterials with mesoscale motifs: exploration of property charts by Bayesian optimization. Adv Eng Mater. 25(13):2300048. doi: 10.1002/adem.202300048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunii D, Suzuki M. 1967. Particle-to-fluid heat and mass transfer in packed beds of fine particles. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 10(1967):845–852. Pergamon Press Ltd. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(67)90064-6.
   Google Scholar
• Laurien JH, und Oertel E. 2003. Numerische Strömungsmechanik, Vol. 8. überarbeitete Auflage, Viehweg Verlag, Fried. Braunschweig/Wiesbaden: Vieweg und Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
   Google Scholar
• Nield D, Bejan A. 2013. Convection in porous media. 4th ed. New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Peszynska A, Trykozko M, Sobieski W. 2010. Forchheimer law in computational and experimental studies of flow through porous media at porescale and mesoscale. GAKUTO International Series, Mathematical Sciences And Applications. 32:463–482.
   Google Scholar
• Pierro L, Matturro B, Rossetti S, Sagliaschi M, Sucato S, Alesi E, Bartsch E, Arjmand F, Petrangeli PM. 2017. Polyhydroxyalkanoate as a slow-release carbon source for in situ bioremediation of contaminated aquifers: from laboratory investigation to pilot-scale testing in the field. New Biotechnol. 37:60–68. doi: 10.1016/jnbt.2016.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajapati N, Hermann C, Späth M, Schneider D, Selzer M, Nestler B. 2020. Brittle anisotropic fracture propagation in Quartz Sandstone: insights from phase-field simulations. Comput Geosci. 24(3):1361–1376. doi: 10.1007/s10596-020-09956-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prajapati N, Selzer M, Nestler B, Busch B, Hilgers C, Ankit K. 2018. Three-dimensional phase- field investigation of pore space cementation and permeability in Quartz Sandstone. JGR Solid Earth. 123(8):6378–6396. doi: 10.1029/2018JB015618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard M, Whitaker S. 1994a. Convection, Dispersion, and interfacial Transport of Contaminants: Homogeneous porous Media. Adv Water Resour. 17(4):221–239. doi: 10.1016/0309-1708(94)90002-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard M, Whitaker S. 1994b. Transport in ordered and disordered porous media IV: computer generated porous media for three-dimensional systems. Transp Porous Media. 15(1):51–70. doi: 10.1007/BF01046158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard M, Whitaker S. 1997a. Transport in chemically and mechanically heterogeneous porous media - IV, large-scale mass equilibrium for solute transport with adsorption. Adv Water Resour. 22(1):33–57. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00027-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintard M, Whitaker S. 1997b. Transport in chemically and mechanically heterogeneous porous media—III. Large-scale mechanical equilibrium and the regional form of Darcy’s law. Adv Water Resour. 21(7):617–629. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00015-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu Z, Xu H, Wang T, Tao W, Lu T. 2013. Thermal transport in metallic porous media, key laboratory of thermal fluid science and engineering, key laboratory of strength and vibration. China www.intechopen.com:UniversityinXi’an.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting H, Gersten K. 2003. Grenzschichttheorie. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Wang X, Comparison of Darcy’s law, the Brinkman equation, the modified N-S equation and the pure diffusion equation in PEM fuel cell modeling, in: Comsol conference, Boston, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Simons S, Schmitt J, Tom B, Bao H, Pettinato B, Pechulis M. 2021. Chapter 10 - advanced concepts. in Brun K, Allison T Dennis R. editors. Thermal, mechanical, and hybrid chemical energy storage systems. Academic Press. pp. 569–596. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819892-6.00010-1
   Google Scholar
• Sommer W, Drijver B, Verburg R, Slenders H, De Vries E, Dinkla I, Leusbrock I, Grotenhuis T. 2013. Combining shallow geothermal energy and groundwater remediation. European Geothermal Congress. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/264023.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan S, Nakshatrala K. 2010. A stabilizes mixed formulation for unsteady Brinkman equation based on the method of horizontal lines, cs.NA. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 68(5):642–670. doi: 10.1002/fld.2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summ G, Lösbarkeit und Dikretisierung der gemischten Formulierung für Darcy-Forchheimer- Fluss in porösen Medien, Ph.D. thesis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultäten (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor GI. 1954.“Conditions under which dispersion of a solute in a stream of solvent can be used to measure molecular diffusion.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 225.1163; pp. 473–477.
   Google Scholar
• Toride FVGM, Leij N, The CXTFIT code for estimating transport parameters from laboratory or field tracer experiments version 2.1, Tech. rep. (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Vafai K, Tien C. 1981. Boundary and inertia effects on flow and heat transfer in porous media. J Heat Transfer. 24(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/0017-9310(81)90027-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Genuchten M, Wagenet R. 1989. Two-site-two-region models for pesticide transport and degradation: theoretical development and analytical solutions. Vol. 53. Amsterdam: Soil Science Society; pp. 1303–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Vdi VGVUCG. 2006. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, VDI-Wärmeatlas. 10th ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New-York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker S. 1967. Diffusion and dispersion in porous media, A.I.Ch.E. AichE J. 13(3):420–427. doi: 10.1002/aic.690130308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker S. 1986a. Flow in porous media I: a theoretical derivation of Darcy’s law. Transp Porous Media. 1(1):3–25. doi: 10.1007/BF01036523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker S. 1986b. Flow in porous media II: the governing equations for immiscible, two-phase flow, transport in porous media. Transp Porous Media. 1(2):105–125. doi: 10.1007/BF00714688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker S. 1996. The Forchheimer equation: a theoretical development. Transp Porous Media. 25(1):27–61. doi: 10.1007/BF00141261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Li Y, Wang R, Liu W. 2014. Performance investigation of a solar heating system with underground seasonal energy storage for greenhouse application. Energy. 67:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Vafai K. 2011. Transient aspects of heat flux bifurcation in porous media: an exact solution. J Heat Transfer. 133(52602):1–12. doi: 10.1115/1.4003047.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Altschuh P, Santoki J, Griem L, Tosato G, Selzer M, Koeppe A, Nestler B. 2023. Characterization of porous membranes using artificial neural networks. Acta Mater. 253:118922. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu ZH, Wen Q, Zhan H, Yuan S. 2020. Optimization strategies for in situ groundwater remediation by a vertical circulation well based on particle-tracking and node dependent finite difference methods. Water Resour. 56(11): doi: 10.1029/2020WR027396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zierep J, Bühler K. 2010. Grundzüge der Strömungslehre. In: überarbeitete Auflage, Viehweg +. Teubner Verlag, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH; pVol. 8.
   Google Scholar