Bridging international political economy and public policy and administration research on central banking

References

• Abdelal, R. (2007). Capital rules: The construction of global finance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adolph, C. (2018). The missing politics of central banks. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 737–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S., & Zlate, A. (2014). Capital flows to emerging market economies: A brave new world? Journal of International Money and Finance, 48, 221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, C. E., & Öniş, Z. (2003). Emerging market crises and the IMF: Rethinking the role of the IMF in light of Turkey’s 2000-2001 financial crisis. Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement, 24(2), 267–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper, K., Kara, H., & Yorukoglu, M. (2013). Reserve options mechanism. Central Bank Review, 13(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. M. (1994). Capital mobility and state autonomy: Toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 193–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ant, O. (24 May 2018). How markets won: Erdogan concedes a hated rate hike to save lira. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-05-24/how-markets-won-erdogan-concedes-a-hated-rate-hike-to-save-lira
   Google Scholar
• Ant, O. Behind Erdogan’s strange ideas about interest rates. Bloomberg, August 2, 2019. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-02/behind-erdogan-s-strange-ideas-about-interest-rates-quicktake.
   Google Scholar
• Aysan, A. F., Fendoglu, S., & Kilinc, M. (2014). Managing short-term capital flows in new central banking: Unconventional monetary policy framework in Turkey. Eurasian Economic Review, 4(1), 45–69.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. (2013). The New Political Economy of the Macroprudential Ideational Shift. New Political Economy, 18(1), 112–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C. (2007). Merkezdeki Banka ve Uluslararası Bir Karşılaştırma. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Bakır, C. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and institutional change: Multi-level governance of central banking reform. Governance, 22(4), 571–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C. (2013). Bank behavior and resilience: The effects of structures, institutions and agents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bakır, C. (2017). How can interactions among interdependent structures, institutions, and agents inform financial stability? What we have still to learn from global financial crisi. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 217–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C. (2020). The Turkish state’s responses to existential COVID-19 crisis. Policy and Society, 39(3), 424–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C., Akgünay, S., & Çoban, K. (forthcoming). Why does the combination of policy entrepreneur and institutional entrepreneur roles matter for the institutionalization of policy ideas? Policy Sciences.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C., & Darryl, S. L. J. (2017). Contextualising the context in policy entrepreneurship and institutional change. Policy and Society, 36(4), 465–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C., & Kerem Çoban, M. (2019). How can a seemingly weak state in the financial services industry act strong? the role of organizational policy capacity in monetary and macroprudential policy. New Perspectives on Turkey, 61, 71–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakır, C., & Öniş, Z. (2010). The regulatory state and turkish banking reforms in the age of Post‐Washington consensus. Development and Change, 41(1), 77–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, C. (2016). Ruling ideas: How global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauerle Danzman, S. W., Winecoff, K., & Oatley, T. (2017). All crises are global: Capital cycles in an imbalanced international political economy. International Studies Quarterly, 61(4), 907–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2019). How ideas and institutions shape the politics of public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M., Hassan, M., Honig, D., Rogger, D., & Williams, M. J. (2020). An agenda for the study of public administration in developing countries. Governance, 33(4), 735–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. (2012). The political economy of public sector governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, S., & Spindel, M. (2017). The myth of independence: How congress governs the federal reserve. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, S., & Spindel, M. (2018). Why Study Monetary Politics? PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 732–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2002). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borio, C., & Disyatat, P. (2010). Unconventional monetary policies: An appraisal. The Manchester School, 78(1), 53–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2020). Recursive recognition in the international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 369-381 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (1998). Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy. Theory and Society, 27(3), 377–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., & Kaj Pedersen, O. (ed). (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CBRT 2018. Press release on the operational framework of the monetary policy. May 28, https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Announcements/Press+Releases/2018/ANO2018–21.
   Google Scholar
• CBRT 2020. Press release on interest rates. November 19, https://www.tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/EN/TCMB+EN/Main+Menu/Announcements/Press+Releases/2020/ANO2020–68.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudoin, S., & Milner, H. V. (2017). Science and the system: IPE and international monetary politics. Review of International Political Economy, 24(4), 681–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corder, K. (2014). Central bank autonomy: The federal reserve system in American politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coşkun, O. Turkey’s central bank governor was sacked after resisting 300 point rate cut: Sources. Reuters, July 22, 2019. https://www.reuters.com/article/usturkey-cenbank-governor/turkeys-central-bank-governor-was-sacked-after-resisting-300-point-rate-cut-sources-idUSKCN1UH142.
   Google Scholar
• Derthick, M., & Quirk, P. J. (1985). The politics of deregulation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derviş, K. (2005). Returning from the brink: Turkey’s efforts at systemic change and structural reform. In T. Besley & R. Zagha (Eds.), Development Challenges in the 1990s: Leading policymakers speak from experience (pp. 81–102). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dombey, D., & Güler, F. Turkey’s lira slides as erdogan attacks central banker. Financial Times, March 4, 2015. https://www.ft.com/content/c0eaf6a0-c287-11e4-ad89-00144feab7de.
   Google Scholar
• Dönmez, P. E., & Zemandl, E. J. (2019). Crisis of capitalism and (de-)politicisation of monetary policymaking: reflections from Hungary and Turkey. New Political Economy, 24(1), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. 2018. Turkey’s lira Crisis may be down to erdogan’s fundamental misunderstanding of how ‘evil’ interest rates work. Business Insider August 10, https://www.businessinsider.com/turkish-lira-crisis-erdogan-interest-rates–2018–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ersel, H. (1996). The timing of capital account liberalization: The Turkish experience. New Perspectives on Turkey, 15, 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2016). The new interdependence approach: Theoretical development and empirical demonstration. Review of International Political Economy, 23(5), 713–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galati, G., & Moessner, R. (2013). Macroprudential policy–a literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(5), 846–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. P. (2014). Ruling capital: Emerging markets and the reregulation of cross-border finance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gemici, K. (2012). Rushing toward currency convertibility. New Perspectives on Turkey, 47, 33–55.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, S. R., & Law, D. (1989). Global hegemony and the structural power of capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhart, C. A. (2013). The potential instruments of monetary policy. Central Bank Review, 13(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Guidi, M., Guardiancich, I., & Levi‐Faur, D. (2020). Modes of Regulatory Governance: A Political Economy Perspective. Governance, 33(1), 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (ed). (1989). The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton-Hart, N. (2002). Asian states, Asian Bankers: Central banking in Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, T. H., & Knott, J. H. (1999). Political institutions, public management and policy choice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 33–86.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., Xiong, M., & Frank, H. A. (2020). Public administration and macroeconomic issues: Is this the time for a marriage proposal? Administration & Society, 52(9), 1439-1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2006). Globalization and public policy. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 587–605). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Giest, S. (2012). The policy-making process. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. R. Michael Howlett, & W. Xun (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 35–46). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., & King, D. S. (2016). Fed power: How finance wins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (2018). Theories of policy change and variation reconsidered: A prospectus for the political economy of public policy. Policy Sciences, 51(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2016). Priests of prosperity: How Central bankers transformed the postcommunist world. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahler, M. (2016). Complex governance and the New Interdependence Approach (NIA). Review of International Political Economy, 23(5), 825–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, H. (2016). A brief assessment of turkey’s macroprudential policy approach: 2011–2015. Central Bank Review, 16(3), 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J., & Nelson, S. C. (2013). Reading the right signals and reading the signals right: IPE and the financial crisis of 2008. Review of International Political Economy, 20(5), 1101–1131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H., & Miller, G. J. (2006). Social Welfare, corruption and credibility: Public management’s role in economic developmen. Public Management Review, 8(2), 227–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H., & Miller, G. J. (2008). When ambition checks ambition: Bureaucratic trustees and the separation of powers. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 387–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M. (2019). The political economies of Turkey and Greece: Crisis and change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Levingston, O. (2020). Minsky’s moment? The rise of depoliticised keynesianism and ideational change at the federal reserve after the financial crisis of 2007/08. Review of International Political Economy, 1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1772848
   Google Scholar
• Maxfield, S. (1994). Financial incentives and central bank authority in industrializing nations. World Politics, 46(4), 556–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (1992). Managerial dilemmas: The political economy of hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (2005). The political evolution of principal-agent models. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 203–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J., & Whitford, A. B. (2016). Above politics: Bureaucratic discretion and credible commitment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Williams, C. (2012). Public policy debate and the rise of policy analysis. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. R. Michael Howlett, & W. Xun (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 3–16). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. C. (2017). The currency of confidence: How economic beliefs shape the IMF’s relationship with its borrowers. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. C. (2020). Constructivist IPE. In E. Vivares (Ed.), The routledge handbook to global political economy: Conversations and Inquiries (pp. 211–228). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S. C., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2014). Uncertainty, risk, and the financial crisis of 2008. International Organization, 68(2), 361–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 49(4), 803–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, T. (2011). The reductionist gamble: Open economy politics in the global economy. International Organization, 65(2), 311–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, T. (2019). Toward a political economy of complex interdependence. European Journal of International Relations, 25(4), 957–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perl, A. (2012). International dimensions and dynamics of policy-making. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. R. Michael Howlett, & W. Xun (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 44–56). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pitel, L. Turkey’s erdogan calls interest rates ‘tool of exploitation Financial Times, September 13, 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/e15f8e00-b734-11e8-bbc3-ccd7de085ffe
   Google Scholar
• Pitel, L. Turkey’s president calls for further interest rate cuts Financial Times, July 26, 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/974c1b5a-af9d-11e9-8030-530adfa879c2.
   Google Scholar
• Polillo, S., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). Globalization pressures and the state: The worldwide spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110(6), 1764–1802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, P. J. (1988). In defense of the politics of ideas. The Journal of Politics, 50(1), 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. (2020). Bridging levels of public administration: How macro shapes meso and micro. Administration & Society, 52(4), 631–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahasrabuddhe, A. (2019). Drawing the line: The politics of federal currency swaps in the global financial crisis. Review of International Political Economy, 26(3), 461–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samman, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2016). International political economy. In X. Guillame & P. Bilgin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international political sociology (pp. 46–59). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, H. M. (2016). Banking on the FED: QE1-2-3 and the rebalancing of the global economy. New Political Economy, 21(1), 26–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sil, R., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2010). Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 411–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, D. A. (2007). Regulating capital: Setting standards for the international financial system. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1991). An eclectic approach. In N. M. Craig & T. Roger (Eds.), The new international political economy (pp. 33–49). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Takagi, Y. (2016). Central banking as state building: Policymakers and their nationalism in the Philippines, 1933–1964. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yackley, A. J. (November 7, 2020). Erdogan ousts head of Turkish central bank after lira plunge, Financial Times, https://www.ft.com/content/4e65286e-a33b-49b2-a5c4-b21b5cfa01fb.
   Google Scholar
• Yağcı, M. (2017). Institutional entrepreneurship and organizational learning: financial stability policy design in Turkey. Policy and Society, 36(4), 539–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yağcı, M. (2018). The political economy of central banking in Turkey: The macroprudential policy regime and self-undermining feedback. South European Society and Politics, 23(4), 525–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yağcı, M. (ed). (2020). The political economy of central banking in emerging economies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zayim, A. (2020). Inside the black box: Credibility and the situational power of central banks. Socio-Economic Review, mwaa011, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwaa011, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. (2005). The changing politics of central banking in Taiwan and Thailand. Pacific Affairs, 78(3), 377–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar