Governing global policy: what IPE can learn from public policy?

References

• Bauer, M., & Trondal, J. (Eds). (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J. (1991). Review article: What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S. (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22(3), 442–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. (2009). Managers of global change: The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (2001). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E., & Peterson, J. (2000). Policy transfer and europeanization: Passing the Heineken Test. Queen’s Papers on Europeanization, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government-Nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A. (2014). Issues and Actors in the Global Political Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2020). Recursive recognition in the international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 28(2), 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, B., & McNeill, D. (2007). Development issues in global governance: Public-private partnerships and market multilateralism. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation of the world economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2011). Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cerny, P. (2001). From” iron triangles” to” golden pentangles”? Globalizing the policy process. Global Governance, 7(4), 397–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Pegram, T. (2015). Wanted: A third generation of global governance research. Governance, 28(4), 417–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. J. (2007). The transatlantic divide: Why are American and British IPE so different? Review of International Political Economy, 14(2), 197–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. (2001). Financing international public goods. In C. D. Gerrar, M. Ferroni, & A. Mody (Eds.), Global public policies and programs: Implications for financing and evaluation. (pp. 81-117). Washington DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. S., & Patman, R. G. (2015). Science diplomacy: New day or false dawn? Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, P. (2006). The historical roots of the field. In Moran, M., Rein, M., & Goodin, R. E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy. (pp. 39-57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P. (2003). A policy-maker’s guide to policy transfer. The Political Quarterly, 74(1), 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies review,3(1), 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, T. R. (1972). Understanding Public Policy (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000). Citizens, experts, and the environment. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019). The politics of policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, 58, 1245–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfman, W., & Hoppe, R. (2004). Science/Policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in dutch expert policy advice. In S. Maasse & P. Weingart (Eds.), Scientific expertise and political decision making. Dordrecht: Kluwer
   Google Scholar
• Hanrieder, T. (2015). International organization in time: Fragmentation and reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., & Rosamond, B. (2002). Globalization, European integration and the discursive construction of economic imperatives. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 147–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of Evidence‐Based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1981). Essays in trespassing: Economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge: CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M., & Seabrooke, L. (Eds.). (2007). Everyday politics of the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2005). The challenge of public-private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Ni, A. Y., Poocharoen, O.-O., Yang, K., & Zhao, Z. (2011). The case for public administration with a global perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supp 1), i45–i51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inkeles, A. (1980). Modernization and family patterns: A test of convergence theory. Conspectus of History,1(6), 31–62.
   Google Scholar
• Inkeles, A., & Sirowy, L. (1983). Convergent and divergent trends in national educational systems. Social Forces, 62(2), 303–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasch, A., & Martens, K. (Eds.). (2015). Actors and agency in global social governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul, I. (2005). Exploring the policy space between markets and states: Global public-private partnerships. In I. Kaul & P. Conceição (Eds.), The new public finance: Responding to global challenges. New York: Oxford University Press and United Nations Development Programme219-268.
   Google Scholar
• Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. (2009). The old IPE and the new. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1), 34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, C. (1983). The future of industrial societies: Convergence or continuing diversity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Ashley, S., & Lambright, W. H. (Eds.). (2014). Public administration in the context of global governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). Private actors and the state: Internationalization and changing patterns of governance. Governance, 15(1), 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2012). Public policy: A new introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. D. (1950). National security and individual freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legrand, T. (2015). Transgovernmental policy networks in the Anglosphere. Public Administration, 93(4), 973–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand, T. (2021). The architecture of policy transfer: Ideas, institutions and networks in transnational policymaking. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Legrand, T., & Vas, C. (2014). Framing the policy analysis of OECD and Australian VET interaction: Two heuristics of policy transfer. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(3), 230–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D., & Jordana, J. (2005). The rise of regulatory capitalism: The global diffusion of a new order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,598(1), 200–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monet, A. (Ed.). (2017). The role of expertise in international bureaucracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Long, D., & Woolley, F. (2009). Global public goods: Critique of a UN discourse. Global Governance, 15(1), 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization,52(4), 943–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marer, Z. (2016). Interdisciplinary Social Research. The Edge. http://edge.org/response-detail/26755
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013). A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations. Policy Studies, 34(1), 2–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer, C. (2005). Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 67–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (2005). Private authority, technical authority, and the globalization of accounting standards. Business and Politics, 7(3), 1-30.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2000). Policy transfer in the European Union: Institutional isomorphism as a source of legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronit, K. (Ed.). (2006). Global public policy: Business and the countervailing powers of civil society. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Tsingou, E. (2016). Bodies of knowledge in reproduction: Epistemic boundaries in the political economy of fertility. New Political Economy, 21(1), 69–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., & Elkins, Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. D. (2011). Policy paradigms, transnationalism, and domestic politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2006). Metagovernance the changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. A. Stern (Eds.), Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. (pp. 308-325). New York: Oxford University Press and UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1999). Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics,19(1), 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the global agora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews, K., Busch, P. O., & Jörgens, H. (2003). The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments. European Journal of Political Research, 42(4), 569–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondal, J. (2016). Advances to the study of international public administration. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1097–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsingou, E. (2010). Global financial governance and the developing anti-money laundering regime: What lessons for International Political Economy. International Politics, 47(6), 617–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. The American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2011). Globalized public management: An interdisciplinary design science? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 1), i53–i59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1) 297–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and collaboration. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. C., & Weller, P. (2009). Inside the World Bank. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar