How to measure the human value awareness of design students?

References

• Barlex, David. 1993. “The Nuffield Approach to Values.” Design & Technology Teaching 26 (1): 42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, M. W. 2011. “What Works in Values Education.” International Journal of Educational Research 50 (3): 153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Breckon, Andrew. 1998. “National Curriculum Review in Design and Technology for the Year 2000.” Journal of Design & Technology Education 3 (2): 101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Brey, P. 2018. “The Strategic Role of Technology in a Good Society.” Technology in Society 52: 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. 2006. “Regulation or Responsibility? Autonomy, Moral Imagination, and Engineering.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (3): 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, Rhoda, and Eddie Norman. 2005. “An Exploration of the Role Values Plays in Design Decision-Making.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (2): 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8274-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, R. 1994. “Values in Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education4 (1): 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197586.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, Ruth, and Anne Riggs. 1994. “Valuing in Technology.” In Teaching Technology, edited by Frank Banks, 227–237. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dakers, John R. 2005. “The Hegemonic Behaviorist Cycle.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8275-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. 2005. “The Nature of Technological Knowledge: Philosophical Reflections and Educational Consequences.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (2): 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8276-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov, D. M., and J. Rumrill. 2003. “Pretest-Posttest Designs and Measurement of Change.” Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 20 (2): 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Elshof, L. 2005. “Teacher’s Interpretation of Sustainable Development.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (2): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8277-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., E. Nilsson, A. Hansen, and T. Bekker. 2022. “Teaching for Values in Human–Computer Interaction.” Frontiers in Computer Science 4 (article 830736): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2022.830736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröhlich, A. 2019. “Value Creation and Value awareness - Toward a Psychological Perspective (Doctoral Thesis). Leipzig: HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, T. 2001. “The Value Orientations Method: A Tool to Help Understand Cultural Differences.” Journal of Extension 39 (6): 165–117.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, W. 1968. “Value Systems and Vocational Choice of the Priesthood (Doctoral Thesis). Edmonton: The University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Hintz, F., C. Geiser, and S. Shiffman. 2019. “A Latent State-Trait Model for Analyzing States, Traits, Situations, Method Effects, and Their Interactions.” Journal of Personality 87 (3): 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., G. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). London - New York: MacGraw-Hill Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, Ian, and Brian Conway. 2009. “Investigating Values in Secondary Design and Technology Education.” Journal of Design & Technology Education 4 (3): 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. A. 1968. “The Interpretation of the Religious Scale of the Allport-Vernon-Lindzey Study of Values.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 7 (1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald, Miguel Basanez, Jaime Diez-Medrano, Loek Halman, and Ruud Luijkx. 2000. “World Values Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1981–1984, 1990–1993, 1995–1997.” Ann Arbor-Michigan, Institute for Social Research, ICPSR version.
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, Esa-Matti, and Aki Rasinen. 2015. “Implementing Technology Education in Finnish General Education Schools: Studying the Cross-Curricular Theme 'Human Being and Technology.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 25 (1): 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9270-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JafariNaimi, N. 2018. “Our Bodies in the Trolley’s Path, or Why Self-Driving Cars Must *Not* Be Programmed to Kill.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (2): 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917718942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S. 2018. “HuValue- a Tool to Enrich Design Concepts with Human Values (Doctoral Thesis). Eindhoven, The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S., and M. Rauterberg. 2018. “Human Value Based Game Design.” Proceedings of 2nd National and 1st International Digital Games Research Conference: Trends, Technologies, and Applications (DGRC) (pp. 6–16). Tehran, Iran: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S., and M. Rauterberg. 2020. “How to Utilize the HuValue Tool for Daily Life Product Design.” International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 338–357). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S., M. Funk, S. Wensveen, M. Verkerk, and M. Rauterberg. 2020a. “A Comprehensive Value Framework for Design.” Technology in Society 62 (article 101302): 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101302.
   Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S., M. Funk, S. Wensveen, M. Verkerk, and M. Rauterberg. 2020b. “HuValue: A Tool to Support Design Students in considering Human Values in Their Design.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 30 (5): 1015–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09527-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirandish, S., M. Funk, S. Wenswen, M. Verkerk, and M. Rauterberg. 2019. “HuValue: A Toolkit to Facilitate considering Various Human Values in a Design Process.” In Design and Semantics of Form and Movement: Beyond Intelligence, DeSForM 2019, 246–249. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Northumbria University.
   Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B. 1964. “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis.” Psychometrika 29 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudina, O., and P.-P. Verbeek. 2018. “Ethics from within: Google Glass, the Collingridge Dilemma, and the Mediated Value of Privacy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (2): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918793711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layton, D. 1991. Aspects of National Curriculum: Design and Technology. New York: NCC.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. 2002. “Values and Attitudes in Design and Technology.” In Issues in Design and Technology Teaching, edited by S. Sayers, J. Morley, & B. Barnes, 208–223. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• McCoach, D., R. Gable, and J. Madura. 2013. Instrument Development in the Affective Domain (3rd ed.). New York: Springer Science Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, S. 1997. “Value Judgements: Evaluating Design—a Scottish Perspective on a Global Issue.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7 (3): 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008825219627.
   Google Scholar
• Mehalik, M. M., and M. E. Gorman. 2006. “A Framework for Strategic Network Design Assessment, Decision Making, and Moral Imagination.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (3): 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynhardt, Timo, and Andreas Fröhlich. 2019. “More Value Awareness for More (Public) Value: Recognizing How and for Whom Value is Truly Created.” In Public Value, edited by Adam Lindgreen, Nicole Koenig-Lewis, Martin Kitchener, John Brewer, Mark Moore and Timo Meynhardt, 23–39. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, H. 2005. “Creative Thinking, Values and Design and Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (1): 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-6199-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J., and T. Gorichanaz. 2019. “Trust as an Ethical Value in Emerging Technology Governance: The Case of Drone Regulation.” Technology in Society 59: 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H., and D. Walker. 1998. “Will Computers Dehumanize Education? A Grounded Approach to Values at Risk.” Technology in Society 20 (3): 237–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00011-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlova, M. 2009. “Conceptualisation of Technology Education within the Paradigm of Sustainable Development.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education19 (2): 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-008-9073-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., and M. Seligman. 2004. Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, C. C., and A. Colman. 2000. “Optimal Number of Response Categories in Rating Scales: Reliability, Validity, Discriminating Power, and Respondent Preferences.” Acta Psychologica 104 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00050-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime, G. M. 1993. “Values in Technology: Approaches to Learning.” Design and Technology Teaching 26 (1): 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rauterberg, M. 2017. “Reality Determination through Action.” In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Culture and Computing - C&C (pp. 24–29). Piscataway: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/Culture.and.Computing.2017.16.
   Google Scholar
• Rekus, Juergen. 1991. “Teaching Technology with a Focus on Moral Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 2 (2): 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00527957.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. 1973. The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. 2012. “An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values.” Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 2 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
   Google Scholar
• Shilton, K. 2012. “Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (3): 374–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912436985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M. 2015. “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Full: Exploring the Ethics in Design Practices.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (3): 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914547645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swierstra, T., and J. Jelsma. 2006. “Responsibility without Moralism in Technoscientific Design Practice.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (3): 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2017. “The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education.” Research in Science Education48 (6): 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tungaraza, Frida, and Margaret Sutherland. 2005. “Capturing the Minds of a Lost and Lonely Generation.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 15 (2): 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8279-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voinea, C. 2018. “Designing for Conviviality.” Technology in Society 52: 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Values Survey. 2018. Retrieved March 30, 2018, from World Values Survey: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp
   Google Scholar